Global estimation of crop productivity and the impacts of global warming by GIS and EPIC integration
Introduction
A large number of research groups have focused on estimation of all damages of global warming (Adams et al., 1993, Easterling et al., 1992, Dixon et al., 1994). From their exhaustive literature analysis, globally about one-fifth of all damages will occur in agriculture (Pearce et al., 1996). Together with damages from sea level rise, increasing mortality and increasing energy demand, food production is ranking at the top of the vulnerable sectors. However, all these researches are often very rough, because highly aggregated studies suffer from the fact that sub-national or sub-regional differences are not sufficiently taken into account. For example, international productivity differences, socioeconomic environments, or the climate microstructures within a country are neglected. Consequently, as the Intergovernment Panel on Climate Change (IPCC1) states in its report, future work regarding the impacts of climate change on agriculture should be focused on regional models, which carefully paying attention to local features (Reilly, 1996). That means that a useful model to estimate different crop productivities at global level is the key to predict the impact of climate on farming.
In the past two decades, a wide variety of approaches have been developed to estimate land productivity at global level. We can classify these approaches into three categories. One is used to assess land productivity potentials, such as FAO method (FAO, 1978–1980), which determines the ecological potential of land resources for crop production using the agroecological zone approach, and estimates land suitability with soil moisture conditions and other climate characteristics. However, current FAO global models have many problems. For example, the key measures of productivity have not yet blended soils and climate together; the effect of each is computed independently. Nor is it clear how rightly climate zones can predict which crops should be grown or what their yields will be potentially. The second approach to estimate global land productivity is the regression analysis method, which explicitly links climatic conditions to land and water resources and to production, trade, and consumption throughout the world (Kjaiswal and Saha, 1993, Moen et al., 1994, Franke et al., 1990, Trouslard-Kerdiles and Grondona, 1997). The key disadvantage of this method is the poor accuracy. The third approach is based on a field-based crop model which runs at individual fields to obtain regional or national results on crop yields (Saarikko, 2000, Priya and Shibasaki, 2001). Field-based models often have a good accuracy to estimate crop yields at field level. But due to the uncertainties associated with the yield estimates in a global assessment, such as uncertainties in climate change, model errors, cropping systems, and management practices, there is no published approach regarding the application of field-based model at global level.
There have been lots of field-based crop modeling studies around agroecosystems, such as DSSAT (Tsuji et al., 1994), YIELD (Burt et al., 1981), CENTURY (Parton et al., 1988) and DNDC (Li et al., 1992). DSSAT simulates crop growth with impacts of climate and soil conditions. The limitation with DSSAT is that it does not provide one model to simulate crops instead it has models for all specific crops. YIELD is able to simulate seasonal crop yield, crop water use, and length of growing season for 11 crops with relatively simple functions (Mahmood, 1998). CENTURY and DNDC are focused on element and material cycles. They pay more attention to soil processes, such as decomposition, nitrification, and denitrification instead of crop growth (Zhang et al., 2002). Erosion Productivity Impact Calculator (EPIC) is another very popularly used model to simulate crop yields at field level. It was developed by USDA to analyze the relationship between soil erosion and agricultural productivity. The model integrates the major processes that occur in the soil–crop–atmosphere–management system, including: hydrology, weather, erosion, nutrients, plant growth, soil temperature, tillage, plant environmental control, and economics (Williams et al., 1990, Williams, 1995). There are many test investigations about EPIC, performed using different data and parameters (Roloff et al., 1998, Bryant et al., 1992, Edwards et al., 1994). It seems that EPIC is well suited for relative comparisons of soils, crops, and management scenarios and has a good accuracy to estimate field yields (Bouzaher et al., 1993).
In this paper, a new global food production estimation methodology is proposed to estimate the impact of global warming on crop productivity. This methodology integrates Geographic Information System (GIS) with the EPIC and Inference Engine (IE). GIS have emerged as powerful tools in the management and analysis of large amount of basic data and information. They are being applied increasingly to a variety of situations, including the simulation of crop productivity and the evaluation of land resources (FAO/IIASA, 1991). This paper is organized into five sections. After a brief background introduction in Section 1, the methodology of integrating GIS with EPIC is discussed in Section 2; then the material and data required in our research are introduced in Section 3; a test of global land productivity for main crops and result analysis will be given in Section 4, followed by the conclusions in Section 5.
Section snippets
Methodology of crop productivity estimation
The methodology for the integration of IE, EPIC, and GIS technique is briefly illustrated in Fig. 1. Firstly, we create GIS database and prepare the data for EPIC running, so data can flow from GIS-created database into EPIC and modeling results can be transferred to GIS for further processing and presentation. After operation variables such as planting and harvesting date are determined, crop yields can be simulated with EPIC in each grid cell. There are three main components in this
Materials and data requirements
EPIC is a sophistical model. It requires a very large amount of input data. Only important input data used in our examination, such as weather, soil, and management data, are introduced here.
Results and discussions
The test area covers all of the globe from longitude 180.0°W to 180.0°E and from latitude 84.0°N to 56.5°S. A raster format, grid, is used for the operation. The cell size, 6 min by 6 min, is the maximum resolution of all coverages so as to retain the spatial information at a maximum level.
Conclusions
Agricultural recommendations for the sustainable management of land resources need accurate crop yield data on a global or regional scale. This paper has presented a methodology for the integration of GIS and IE technique with field-based EPIC models. GIS and IE are used to prepare the grided data and parameters for the running of EPIC. A case of main crops simulations is tested in 2000. The comparison of the simulated results and FAO statistic data shows that with the aid of GIS, EPIC can be
References (33)
- et al.
Simulations of crop response to climate change: effects with present technology and currently available adjustments
Agric. Forest Meteorol.
(1992) Air temperature variations and rice productivity in Bangladesh: a comparative study of the performance of the YIELD and the CERES-rice models
Ecol. Modelling
(1998)- et al.
Regional yield estimation using a crop simulation model: concepts, mothods, and validation
Agric. Syst.
(1994) - et al.
National spatial crop yield simulation using GIS-based crop production model
Ecol. Modelling
(2001) Applying a site based crop model to estimate regional yields under current and changed climates
Ecol. Modelling
(2000)- et al.
A case of combined use of crop simulation models and general linear models
Ecol. Modelling
(1997) - et al.
A model analysis of the terrestrial vegetation model of IMAGE 2.0 for Costa Rica
Ecol. Modelling
(1996) - et al.
A simulation model linking crop growth and soil biogeochemistry for sustainable agriculture
Ecol. Modelling
(2002) - Adams, R.M., Fleming, R.A., Chang, C.C., McCarl, B.A., Rosenzweig, C., 1993. A Reassessment of the Economic Effects of...
- Bouzaher, A., Shogren, J.F., et al., 1993. Agricultural Policies and Soil Degradation in Western Canada: An...
Simulating corn yield response to irrigation timings: validation of the EPIC
J. Prod. Agric.
A parametric crop water use model
Water Resour. Res.
Estimating corn yield response models to predict impacts of climate change
J. Agric. Resou. Econ.
Use of the EPIC to predict runoff transport of surface-applied inorganic fertilizer and poultry manure constituents
Trans. ASAE
Cited by (195)
Melatonin in business with abiotic stresses in vegetable crops
2024, Scientia HorticulturaeExpansion of the olive crop based on modeling climatic variables using geographic information system (GIS) in Aljouf region KSA
2022, Computers and Electronics in AgricultureCitation Excerpt :GIS programs (also known as GIS software) are computer-based tools that allow users to create interactive queries, store and change spatial and non-spatial data, analyze spatial data output, and visually display the results of these operations by presenting them as maps. It has evolved into one of the most powerful tools for managing and analyzing massive amounts of basic data and information (Tan and Shibasaki, 2003). In this work, GIS techniques were used to evaluate data from various soil measurements and map the soil suitability for sustainable agriculture in jouf region.
Assessing the response of orchard productivity to soil water depletion using field sampling and modeling methods
2022, Agricultural Water ManagementCitation Excerpt :Crop yield was calculated as a proportion of the economic yield over the total actual aboveground biomass at maturity, defined by a harvest index (Xiong et al., 2014). The model was used to optimize crop management practices (Ko et al., 2009; Therond et al., 2011; Xiong et al., 2014; Yang et al., 2019) and to evaluate the effects of environmental factors on agricultural production worldwide (Tan and Shibasaki, 2003; Chavas et al., 2009; Reidsma et al., 2009; Angulo et al., 2013). Our team calibrated and validated the EPIC model on the Loess Plateau and used it to investigate the soil water dynamics and water productivity among different management practices in this region (Wang and Li, 2010; Wang et al., 2012; Peng et al., 2017).