Elsevier

Omega

Volume 27, Issue 5, October 1999, Pages 537-553
Omega

The single-period (news-vendor) problem: literature review and suggestions for future research

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(99)00017-1Get rights and content

Abstract

The single-period problem (SPP), also known as the newsboy or news-vendor problem, is to find the order quantity which maximizes the expected profit in a single period probabilistic demand framework. Interest in the SPP remains unabated and many extensions to it have been proposed in the last decade. These extensions include dealing with different objectives and utility functions, different supplier pricing policies, different news-vendor pricing policies and discounting structures, different states of information about demand, constrained multi-products, multiple-products with substitution, random yields, and multi-location models. This paper builds a taxonomy of the SPP literature and delineates the contribution of the different SPP extensions. This paper also suggests some future directions for research.

Introduction

The classical single-period problem (SPP) is to find a product's order quantity that maximizes the expected profit under probabilistic demand. The SPP model assumes that if any inventory remains at the end of the period, a discount is used to sell it or it is disposed of [1]. If the order quantity is smaller than the realized demand, the news-vendor, hereafter NV, forgoes some profit. The SPP is reflective of many real life situations and is often used to aid decision making in the fashion and sporting industries, both at the manufacturing and retail levels [2]. The SPP can also be used in managing capacity and evaluating advanced booking of orders in service industries such as airlines and hotels [3].

Interest in the SPP has increased in the last decade with over 40 papers published since 1988. In this paper we review the literature on the SPP. The SPP literature is very large and complete coverage is beyond the scope of a single paper. A partial review of the SPP literature has been recently conducted in a textbook by Silver et al. [4]. Because of the depth of the SPP literature, many of the papers we review here were omitted in that review. To avoid redundancy we concentrate our efforts on papers that received little or no treatment in Silver et al.'s book. In Section 2 we introduce the SPP. In Section 3 we develop a taxonomy of SPP extensions and place the reviewed models into the classes of the taxonomy. In Section 4 we provide a discussion of the models. We close with some concluding remarks and suggestions for future research in Section 5.

Section snippets

The classical single-period problem

Researchers have followed two approaches to solving the SPP. In the first approach, the expected costs of overestimating and underestimating demand are minimized. In the second approach, the expected profit is maximized. Both approaches yield the same results. We use the second approach in stating the SPP. Define the following notation:

xquantity demanded, a random variable.
f(x)the probability density function of x.
F(x)the cumulative distribution function of x.
Pselling price per unit.
Ccost per

Extensions of the classical single-period model

The SPP has wide applicability especially in service industries which dominates the US economy. As product life cycles continue their downward trend, the importance of the SPP will grow. It is not surprising that many SPP extensions have been suggested with many of them appearing in the last five years. Extensions to the SPP can be classified into 11 categories:

  • 1.

    Extensions to different objectives and utility functions.

  • 2.

    Extensions to different supplier pricing policies.

  • 3.

    Extensions to different

Discussion

While many extensions of the SPP have been proposed, very little comparative work has been done. As described in Section 3.1, the SPP has been solved under many objectives. However, little work has been performed on comparing the results obtained under these differing objectives. For example, under what conditions in terms of demand distribution and problem parameters do the objectives of maximizing E(π) and PB lead to similar or different Q*. Additionally, while many objectives have been

Conclusion and suggestions for future research

Interest in the SPP has increased over the past 40 years. This interest can be attributed in part to the increased dominance of service industries for which the SPP is very applicable in both retailing and pure service organizations such as air transportation. Also, the reduction in product life cycles brought about by technological advances makes the SPP more relevant.

Further areas of SPP research include a joint determination of the optimal order quantity and the discounting policy which

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank the referees for their helpful suggestions.

References (92)

  • M. Khouja et al.

    A two-item newsboy problem with substitutability

    Int J Prod Econ

    (1996)
  • Y. Gerchak et al.

    An inventory model with component commonality

    Oper Res Lett

    (1986)
  • H. Jonsson et al.

    Application of the scenario aggregation approach to a two-stage, stochastic common component, inventory problem with a budget constraint

    Eur J Opl Res

    (1993)
  • H. Jonsson et al.

    Optimal and heuristic solutions for a simple common component inventory problem

    Int J Prod Econ

    (1989)
  • H. Jonsson et al.

    Common component inventory problem with a budget constraint: heuristics and upper bounds

    Int J Prod Econ

    (1989)
  • I. Moon et al.

    Distribution free procedures for make-to-order (MTO), make-in-advance (MIA), and composite policies

    Int J Prod Econ

    (1997)
  • M. Kodama

    Probabilistic single period inventory model with partial returns and additional orders

    Comput Ind Eng

    (1995)
  • S.C. Ward et al.

    Theoretical versus applied models: the newsboy problem

    Omega

    (1991)
  • S. Nahmias

    Production and operations management

    (1996)
  • G. Gallego et al.

    The distribution free newsboy problem: review and extensions

    J Opl Res Soc

    (1993)
  • E.A. Silver et al.

    Inventory management and production planning and scheduling

    (1998)
  • R.F. Lanzilotti

    Pricing objectives in large companies

    Am Econ Rev

    (1958)
  • B. Ismail et al.

    Optimizing and satisfying in stochastic cost–volume–profit Analysis

    Decis Sci

    (1979)
  • I. Kabak et al.

    Inventory models and management objectives

    Sloan Manage Rev

    (1978)
  • H. Lau

    Some extensions of Ismail–Louderback's stochastic CVP model under optimizing and satisfying criteria

    Decis Sci

    (1980)
  • H. Lau

    The newsboy problem under alternative optimization objectives

    J Opl Res Soc

    (1980)
  • A. Lau et al.

    Maximizing the probability of achieving a target profit level in a two-product newsboy problem

    Decis Sci

    (1988)
  • J. Li et al.

    A two-product newsboy problem with satisfying objective and independent exponential demands

    IIE Trans

    (1991)
  • R. Norland

    Refinements in the Ismail–Louderback's stochastic CVP model

    Decis Sci

    (1980)
  • E. Sankarasubramanian et al.

    Optimal order quantity for pre-determined level of profit

    Manage Sci

    (1983)
  • W. Shih

    A general decision model for cost–volume–profit analysis under uncertainty

    Account Rev

    (1979)
  • M. Anvari

    Optimality criteria and risk in inventory models: the case of the newsboy problem

    J Opl Res Soc

    (1987)
  • A.A. Atkinson

    Incentives, uncertainty, and risk in the newsboy problem

    Decis Sci

    (1979)
  • K. Chung

    Risk in inventory models: the case of the newsboy problem, optimality conditions

    J Opl Res Soc

    (1990)
  • L. Eeckhoudt et al.

    The risk averse (and prudent) newsboy

    Manage Sci

    (1995)
  • R.P. Magee

    Cost–volume–profit analysis, uncertainty and capital market equilibrium

    J Account Res

    (1975)
  • R.B. Thakkar et al.

    A stochastic demand CVP model with return on investment criterion

    Contemp Account Res

    (1983)
  • A. Thorstenson

    A comment on “Optimality criteria and risk in inventory models: the case of the newsboy problem”

    J Opl Res Soc

    (1989)
  • D.R. Finley et al.

    A general decision model for cost–volume–profit analysis under uncertainty: a comment

    Account Rev

    (1981)
  • A. Lau et al.

    A comment on Shih's general decision model for CVP analysis

    Account Rev

    (1981)
  • J.V. Jucker et al.

    Single-period inventory models with demand uncertainty and quantity discounts: behavioral implications and a new solution procedure

    Naval Res Logist Q

    (1985)
  • I. Kabak et al.

    The generalized newsboy problem, contract negotiations and secondary vendors

    IIE Trans

    (1972)
  • M. Khouja

    A Note on the newsboy problem with an emergency supply option

    J Opl Res Soc

    (1996)
  • P. Pantumsinchai et al.

    Standard container size discounts and the single-period Inventory problem

    Decis Sci

    (1991)
  • M. Khouja

    The newsboy problem with progressive retailer discounts and supplier quantity discounts

    Decis Sci

    (1996)
  • A. Lau et al.

    The newsboy problem with price-dependent demand distribution

    IIE Trans

    (1988)
  • Cited by (764)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text