Integrating maintenance and production decisions in a hierarchical production planning environment

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0548(99)00022-2Get rights and content

Abstract

This article presents a three-part model to evaluate an organization’s maintenance policy. In stage one, an aggregate production plan is generated using a linear programming formulation suggested by Chung and Krajewski (Operations Management 1984;4:389–406). In stage two, a master production schedule is developed to minimize the weighted deviations from the goals specified by the aggregate production plan. In stage three, work center loading requirements, determined through rough cut capacity planning using resource profiles, are used to simulate equipment failures during the aggregate production planning horizon. Several experiments are used to test the significance of various factors for maintenance policy selection. These factors include the category of maintenance activity, maintenance activity frequency, failure significance, maintenance activity cost, and aggregate production policy.


Scope and purpose

In order to resolve often conflicting objectives of system reliability and profit maximization, an organization should establish appropriate maintenance guidelines that take into consideration (1) costs associated with performing production activities, (2) costs associated with performing maintenance activities, and (3) the various costs associated with equipment failure and the resulting interruptions to the production plan. In currently prevailing practices, maintenance policy often is determined at the operational level in a political test between production and maintenance management. The resulting policy often is not optimal for the organization’s overall objectives.

References (0)

Cited by (121)

  • A robust integrated production and preventive maintenance planning model for multi-state systems with uncertain demand and common cause failures

    2019, Journal of Manufacturing Systems
    Citation Excerpt :

    They proposed a model concerning condition-based maintenance for a production system with parallel lines that had bottleneck feature [4]. Weinstein & Chung (1999) proposed a three-stage hierarchical approach for a production system with interchangeable components [6]. In the first stage, the aggregate production plan and cyclical or run-based maintenance activities are determined while in the second stage, the master schedule plan is defined concerning the first-stage model, and finally, master schedule and maintenance plans are integrated through a simulation process [6].

  • Integrated Planning for a Hybrid Manufacturing-Remanufacturing System: a Multi-Objective/Fuzzy-Satisfying Combined Approach

    2023, 2023 International Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and Applications, DASA 2023
View all citing articles on Scopus

This research was made possible through a grant from the Wright State University Strategic Initiatives Support Fund.

View full text