Elsevier

World Development

Volume 25, Issue 8, August 1997, Pages 1271-1281
World Development

The maturation and growth of infant industries: The case of Korea

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(97)00035-1Get rights and content

Abstract

This paper first shows that, contrary to evidence from most developing countries, Korean infant industries under protection have tended to mature. It also shows that output grows faster in infant industries than in mature ones. The paper then discusses probable factors that have made the maturation and growth of infant industries possible in Korea. Overall, the empirical evidence and its interpretation support the “revisionist” rather than neoclassical or “market friendly” view in the recent debate on East Asian industrialization.

References (29)

  • M.W. Corden

    Trade Policy and Economic Welfare

    (1974)
  • C.F. Diaz Alejandro

    Trade policies and economic development

  • J.L. Enos et al.

    The Adoption and Diffusion of Imported Technology: The Case of Korea

    (1988)
  • A. Harrison

    An empirical test of the infant industry argument: Comment

    American Economic Review

    (1994)
  • Cited by (19)

    • Revisiting the infant industry argument

      2007, Journal of Development Economics
    • A framework of indicators to measure project circularity in construction circular economy

      2021, Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Management, Procurement and Law
    • Estimating the welfare loss due to vehicle tariffs in Malaysia

      2021, International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    The research for the paper was financed by Korea Research Foundation. I am grateful to Professor Walter Park and an anonymous referee for helpful comments. Mr. Sung-duk Hong kindly provided data. The remaining errors, however, are of course mine.

    View full text