Coalescence limits for higher order Painlevé equations
Introduction
The search for new functions defined as solutions of differential equations led, at the turn of the last century, to the discovery of the six Painlevé equations [1], [2], [3], [4]. One question of particular importance, and indeed of some controversy, was that of whether the solutions of these equations could be expressed in terms of known functions. Since it could be shown that the first Painlevé equation arises as a coalescence limit of the other five (see [4]), this question was reduced to that of showing that the solution of the first Painlevé equation defines a new transcendent. This last problem has in fact only been solved remarkably recently [5], [6], [7].
As an example of a coalescence limit, let us consider that between the second Painlevé equation PII, in v(y) with arbitrary parameter a, and the first Painlevé equation PI, in u(x), Making the change of variables (a rescaled version of that in [4]) in (1) leads to the equation which in the limit ε→0 gives (2). Thus we see that PII contains PI as a coalescence limit. Coalescence limits of the six Painlevé equations may be summarized as [4], [8] and thus we see that PI can be obtained from each of the other Painlevé equations.
It is this limiting process that we seek to explore here for higher order analogues of the Painlevé equations. In particular, we will seek linear transformations of dependent and independent variables, and also of parameters ai (into new parameters A1,A2,…,AN), with coefficients dependent on a parameter ε, We note that all the transformations used in the coalescence processes in (5) are of this form [4] (see, e.g., (3)). It turns out that consideration of such linear transformations is sufficient for the purposes of the present Letter. Our requirement is that the expression obtained by solving the transformed equation for the highest derivative of u be analytic in ε at ε=0; the limit ε→0 then gives our coalescence limit.
There are two reasons why our results are important. First, we extend the analogy between certain Painlevé equations and their higher order analogues. Second, as with Painlevé's results [4], we reduce the number of equations for which it must be shown that their solution cannot be expressed in terms of known functions. This last is of great practical importance in the study of higher order Painlevé equations.
Higher order Painlevé equations may be obtained in a variety of ways. One is by taking similarity reductions of the higher order members of a hierarchy of completely integrable partial differential equations; thus, for example, the modified Korteweg–de Vries hierarchy yields the PII hierarchy [9]. Another is by extending the classification programme of Painlevé to higher order differential equations [10]. A third approach is that developed in [11], [12], [13], [14]. Here we consider coalescence limits for certain higher order analogues of the second Painlevé equation.
Section snippets
Examples from the generalized second Painlevé hierarchy
Here we consider two examples from a generalized version of the PII hierarchy, Here a and all bj are arbitrary constants, ∂y=d/dy and is the recursion operator of the modified Korteweg–de Vries hierarchy. The hierarchy of equations (7) consists of linear combinations of the members of the PII hierarchy given in [9]; setting n=1 gives PII (1). We note that here we have assumed that the coefficient of the non-autonomous term is non-zero,
A new higher order second Painlevé equation
In this section we consider the second member of an alternative PII hierarchy presented in [14]. This equation was originally derived as a system of equations, where g3, c, γ2 and δ2 are all constants. The system (22), (23) has the underlying linear problem where Solving (22) for w and
Conclusions
In this Letter we have considered coalescence limits for certain members of two distinct PII hierarchies. We have shown that these equations have as coalescence limits corresponding members of the first Painlevé hierarchy. Thus we at once both extend the analogy between the higher order analogues of the second and first Painlevé equations with those equations themselves, and at the same time reduce the number of equations for which it must be shown that their solutions cannot be expressed in
References (16)
On the irreducibility of the first differential equation of Painlevé
Phys. Lett. A
(1997)Bull. Soc. Math. France
(1900)Acta Math.
(1902)Acta Math.
(1910)Ordinary Differential Equations
(1956)Nagoya Math. J.
(1988)Nagoya Math. J.
(1990)
Cited by (23)
Solution classes of the matrix second Painlevé hierarchy
2022, Physica D: Nonlinear PhenomenaLax pairs for one of hierarchies similar to the first Painlevé hierarchy
2021, Applied Mathematics LettersCitation Excerpt :And although one of the important properties for the classical Painlevé equations namely the property of irreducibility for the higher analogues of the Painlevé equations has not been proved to date yet, and it is not yet clear how to approach its proof, it is intuitively clear that most of the higher analogues of the Painlevé equations can be real candidates for determining new special functions. Currently, higher analogues of the Painlevé equations are intensively studied by several scientific groups (see for example papers [8–21]). In this Letter we consider the new hierarchy of nonlinear differential equations that is similar to the first Painlevé hierarchy, but with the different Lax pairs.
On matrix fourth Painlevé hierarchies
2021, Journal of Differential EquationsBäcklund transformations for a new extended Painlevé hierarchy
2019, Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical SimulationCitation Excerpt :The discovery of the connection between completely integrable partial differential equations (PDEs) and ODEs having the Painlevé property [11] led, through consideration of the Korteweg-de Vries (KdV) and modified KdV (mKdV) hierarchies, to the introduction of a hierarchy of ODEs having as first member the second Painlevé (PII) equation, i.e., to a PII hierarchy [11,12]. This hierarchy, which we refer to as the standard PII hierarchy in contrast to the generalized PII hierarchy where terms derived from lower order mKdV flows are also included [13,14], was shown in [12] to admit auto-Bäcklund transformations (auto-BTs) analogous to those known for the second Painlevé equation itself. This then meant that the way was open, at least in principle, to the derivation of higher order analogues of the Painlevé equations along with their properties.
On an extended second Painlevé hierarchy
2017, Journal of Differential EquationsOn matrix Painlevé hierarchies
2016, Journal of Differential Equations