Tunnel research and development
Use of the punch test for estimating TBM performance

This paper is dedicated to the memory of Arne Reinert, colleague, geologist, musician, and good friend, without whose dedicated labor this paper would not have been possible.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-7798(98)00083-2Get rights and content

Abstract

This paper discusses the history of the punch test as a laboratory tool for estimating Raise Boring Machine and Tunnel Boring Machine penetration rates. Included are discussions of some of the methods that have been used to evaluate the test results for this purpose and how the test has been used to evaluate certain rock characteristics such as brittleness, bedding or cleavage, and porosity, which have been observed to affect machine performance. Also presented are some examples as to how the test has been used in an expanded form to evaluate the effect of certain machine parameters such as cutter spacing and geometry on excavation rates. Based on this, it is concluded that the punch test has proven itself to be a powerful laboratory tool for evaluating rock boreability and that it has the potential of becoming a stand alone test for this purpose.

References (3)

  • H.J. Handewith

    Predicting the economic success of continuous tunnelling and hard rock

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (72)

  • Development and application of an in-situ indentation testing system for the prediction of tunnel boring machine performance

    2021, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences
    Citation Excerpt :

    The statistical analysis between the TBM performance and the acquired parameters was also presented. Indentation test, also known as indentation hardness test, punch test and punch penetration test,32,51–57 was originally intended to provide a direct method for estimating the normal load on disc cutters in rock engineering. It is one of the most powerful method to understand the rock fragmentation mechanism.58,59

View all citing articles on Scopus

This paper was originally published in Canadian Tunnelling 1998. It is reprinted herein with the permission of the Tunnelling Association of Canada and the authors.

1

Present address: G.L. Dollinger, Ph.D., Geologic Consultant, Underground Construction, 22 - 16th Ave. S.E., Bellevue, WA, U.S.A.

2

Present address: H.J Handewith, Tunnel Consultant, Seattle, WA, U.S.A.

3

Present address: C. D. Breeds, Ph.D., President, SubTerra, Inc., Kirkland, WA U.S.A.

View full text