Elsevier

Catalysis Today

Volume 43, Issues 1–2, 13 August 1998, Pages 123-133
Catalysis Today

Relationship between hydrodesulfurization activity and morphological and structural changes in NiW hydrotreating catalysts supported on Al2O3–TiO2 mixed oxides

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-5861(98)00141-2Get rights and content

Abstract

Characterization and catalytic activity of the NiW-based catalysts supported on Al–Ti(x) mixed oxides has been obtained. The results from the characterization techniques (Surface area, XRD, DRS, TPR, XPS, FTIR of adsorbed NO and HREM) were used to establish a relationship between the morphological and structural changes of the tungsten phases and catalytic activity. The results indicate that the incorporation of titania to the support enhances the reducibility and sulfidability of the tungsten phases due to mainly a reduced interaction of the tungsten phases with the support. Correlation of the catalytic activity in the thiophene HDS reaction and the number of tungsten atoms in edge and corner positions in the WS2 crystallites indicates that only the number of tungsten atoms equivalent to those present in one layer of the WS2 crystallites are active at a given time.

Introduction

In the search for better hydrotreating catalysts, it has been found that the nature of the support plays an important role to improve the HDS activity. For example, it has been found that the titania supported CoMo catalysts have 1.9 times the HDS activity of their alumina supported counterparts [1]. However, since the titania polymorph, anatase, shows low-thermal stability and -surface area, some other alternatives must be used. Among these, the use of titania–alumina mixed oxides has been proposed as an interesting alternative [2]. Also, in the case of W-based catalysts, the use of alumina as support leads to a strong interaction between the tungsten oxidic phases and the alumina support, which diminishes the degree of sulfidation of the former ones 3, 4. To overcome this problem, in a previous work, we studied the effects that the change in the nature of the support produced in the state of the W oxidic supported phases as the nature of the support changed from alumina to titania [5]. The results from this study showed that W catalysts supported on titania-rich Al2O3–TiO2 mixed oxide supports have a greater HDS activity than those supported on alumina and that it is possible to obtain catalysts with higher surface areas than TiO2 even for Al2O3–TiO2 mixed oxides with 95% mol content of TiO2. Also, good dispersion and reducibility of the W oxidic phases was obtained by the incorporation of titania to the alumina support.

It is well known that the presence of the Ni promoter also improves the reducibility and dispersion of the W phases. Therefore, it seems interesting to study the behavior of Ni-promoted W based catalysts supported on Al–Ti(x) mixed oxides to benefit from both, the Ni promotion and the presence of TiO2 in the support, which leads to higher HDS activities. To this end, a series of W and NiW/Al2O3–TiO2 catalysts with different support compositions were prepared and characterized in their oxided and sulfided forms. The results from these characterizations will be used to estimate the changes in the degree of reducibility (TPR), dispersion (XPS, FTIR of adsorbed NO) and catalyst sulfidation (HREM) with the titanium content and to build a geometrical model of the sulfided catalysts to explain the catalytic activity changes for the thiophene hydrodesulfurization reaction, in terms of the architectural changes of the WS2 crystallites.

Section snippets

Supports and catalysts preparation

A series of nickel–tungsten catalysts supported on alumina–titania mixed oxides with a molar ratio x=TiO2/(Al2O3+TiO2)=0, 0.1, 0.5, 0.7, 0.95 and 1.0 have been prepared. The supports were prepared by the co-precipitation of the required amounts of aluminum (AIP) and titanium (TIP) isopropoxides following the same method described previously [5]. In short, after the dissolution of AIP in n-propanol, under vigorous stirring the required amount of TIP was added. The hydrolysis of the alkoxides was

Catalytic activity

The results from the catalytic activity of the NiW/Al–Ti(x) catalysts are presented in Fig. 1. To allow a good comparison of the catalysts, since they have widely different surface areas, the rates of hydrodesulfurization have been normalized by the total amount of W atoms and are therefore expressed as molecules of thiophene converted per second and per atom of W impregnated on the catalyst. It is clear from the results in Fig. 1 that high titania contents in the catalyst (x≥0.7) lead to a

Discussion

According to our TPR results, the increase of titanium in the catalyst support leads to tungsten species with less interaction with the support which therefore reduce more easily than those supported on alumina. This improvement in reducibility may be due to the decrease of the interaction between the tungsten oxidic species and the support as the titanium loading is increased. In addition, effects due to the reducible behavior of TiO2 and its semiconductor character may play a role considering

Conclusions

From the above results the following conclusions can be drawn:

  • 1.

    The incorporation of titania to the support in W and NiW/Al–Ti (x) catalysts increases the reducibility and sulfidability of the W species. The incorporation of the Ni promoter also enhances the reducibility of the tungsten species.

  • 2.

    During the sulfidation process, a thin layer of the TiO2 present in the support is also sulfided.

  • 3.

    The XPS results indicate that for the titania-rich catalysts (x≥0.7), which show tungsten concentrations

Acknowledgements

We kindly acknowledge financial support from PEMEX-Refinación, IMP (FIES program), and DGAPA-UNAM.

References (18)

  • J Ramı́rez et al.

    Appl. Catal.

    (1989)
  • W Zhaobin et al.

    Appl. Catal.

    (1990)
  • J Ramı́rez et al.

    J. Catal.

    (1997)
  • B Scheffer et al.

    Appl. Catal.

    (1989)
  • D Vermaire et al.

    J. Catal.

    (1989)
  • M.C Paganini et al.

    J. Catal.

    (1997)
  • S Kasztelan et al.

    Appl. Catal.

    (1984)
  • M. Breysse et al., Catal. Today 4 (1988)...
  • J Grimblot et al.

    J. Elec. Spec. Rel. Phen.

    (1990)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (45)

  • Synthesis of highly ordered TiO<inf>2</inf>-Al<inf>2</inf>O<inf>3</inf> and catalytic performance of its supported NiMo for HDS of 4, 6-dimethyldibenzothiophene

    2023, Catalysis Today
    Citation Excerpt :

    In order to overcome this disadvantage, binary composite supports, such as TiO2-Al2O3 [12–17], MgO-Al2O3 [18–20], ZrO2-Al2O3 [21] and SiO2-Al2O3 [22] have been considered and developed as the support of HDS catalysts. Among them, TiO2-Al2O3 composite oxides [12–17] had caused a significant amount of attention. Because TiO2-Al2O3 composite oxides could not only accurately regulate the support-metal interactions, but also overcome the defect of the low surface area and the poor stability of titania.

  • Role of the Si/Al molar ratio and pH in NIW/MCM41-Al<inf>2</inf>O<inf>3</inf> catalysts for HDS of DBT

    2016, Catalysis Today
    Citation Excerpt :

    In addition, it was reported [7–9] that sulfidation for WO3 and MoO3 to WS2 and MoS2, proceeded through oxysulfides as intermediates [10–14]. Ramírez reported that W–Al2O3 interaction increased with the calcination temperature and thus leading to a more difficult sulfidation [15]. Topsøe [16] described the catalytic activity based on sulfurs of Co (Ni)-Mo-S support on two structures named as Co (Ni)-Mo-S type I and Co (Ni)-Mo-S type II.

  • Preparation of un-promoted molybdenum HDS catalysts supported on titania by equilibrium deposition filtration: Optimization of the preparative parameters and investigation of the promoting action of titania

    2016, Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical
    Citation Excerpt :

    This is related to low loading of the supported phase and thus to relatively low activity per gram of the catalysts (specific catalytic activity). In order to confront this problem many studies have tried to combine the excellent intrinsic catalytic behavior of titanium dioxide with the excellent textural and mechanical properties of γ-alumina [47–70]. Two main approaches have been followed.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text