A model of crystal plasticity containing a natural length scale
Introduction
There has been a resurgence of interest in regularizing or adding a mathematical length scale to continuum models of deformation [1]. The motivation for this comes from several sources. From the point of view of numerical solutions, it is well-established that in the post-bifurcation regime of a solution (initiation of either strain localization or damage associated with material softening), the system of differential equations changes and the problem is ill posed [2], [3], [4], [5]. In codes modeling hyperbolic systems, the differential equations become elliptic in the post-bifurcation regime, but the boundary conditions are still prescribed for hyperbolic systems. Similarly, in static codes, elliptic systems transform into hyperbolic systems but the associated boundary conditions are still prescribed for the original elliptic system. This problem can be resolved by regularizing or adding a mathematical length scale to the continuum, either in the form of spatial gradients in the constitutive model or by some numerical construction. Another motivation results from the attempt to solve boundary value problems at extremely small length scales. Recent experimental studies have revealed that material properties change as a function of size [6], [7], [8]. For example, in mechanical tests on small specimens, when the specimen dimensions reaches a critically small size, the yield strength begins to increase sharply with further decrease in specimen dimension. This dimension is generally smaller than the reasonable applicability of local continuum theory, but still much larger than that required for tractable solutions of the problem with atomistic methods. This problem can also be resolved by the aforementioned introduction of a length scale using spatial gradients. And finally, as the demands of design require the incorporation of more of the underlying physics, it is becoming important to develop a means to bridge the length scales from the macroscopic continuum to the atomistic levels. One approach to achieve this is generalization or the addition of more kinematic degrees of freedom to the continuum. This approach results in the development of a crystal plasticity model with a physical length scale. Briefly, as a crystalline material is deformed, the crystals begin to rotate to align themselves with the imposed loading. At large enough strain, geometrical necessary dislocations (GNDs) or geometrically necessary boundaries (GNBs) are introduced as an energetically favorable alternative to the formation of gaps, overlaps and holes [9]. In the description of the material as a continuum field, these GNDs lead to incompatibilities resulting in internal stresses that are described by higher order spatial gradients of the deformation. Hence, the resulting model of the crystal includes a natural, physical length scale.
Section snippets
Kinematics
In an attempt to solve the elasticity problem of the internal stress field in an unloaded (but previously loaded) body, Bilby et al. [10] and Kroner [11] independently proposed that the deformation gradient be multiplicatively decomposed into elastic and plastic parts.where Fp, represents the plastic deformation from the prior loading while Fe the elastic strain in the unloaded body resulting from the presence of dislocations. The natural configuration is defined by unloading through
Crystal plasticity model
It is convenient to couple the concepts of the previously derived internal stresses to a model for crystal plasticity. Since the stress is proportional to a gradient term, a natural length scale is introduced into the model. Several crystal plasticity models have recently been proposed that incorporate length scales motivated from crystal plasticity. Acharya and Bassani [19] have introduced the curl of the elastic stretch in the hardening, Shu and Fleck [20] introduced gradients of slip in
References (24)
- et al.
Mech. Eng.
(1998) Acta Metall.
(1953)- et al.
J. Mech. Phys. Solids
(1999) - D.J. Bammann, J. Eng. Mater. Technol., in...
Ing. Arch.
(1986)- et al.
Int. J. Solids Struct.
(1996) Eng. Comput.
(1991)- N.A. Fleck, et al., Acta Metall. Mater. 42 (1994)...
- et al.
J. Mater. Res.
(1995) - et al.
J. Mater. Res.
(1998)
Phys. Rev. Lett.
Proc. R. Soc. (London)
Cited by (69)
Response of 2D and 3D crystal plasticity models subjected to plane strain condition
2023, Mechanics Research CommunicationsStrain Gradient Plasticity Length Scales
2023, Comprehensive Structural IntegrityA non-equilibrium thermodynamic framework for viscoplasticity incorporating dynamic recrystallization at large strains
2021, International Journal of PlasticityCitation Excerpt :Our model is only limited to isotropic elasticity and therefore cannot consider misorientation effects between grains and elastic incompatibilities due to anisotropic elasticity. To this end, the scalar misorientation variable could be replaced with a tensorial variable, see e.g. Bammann (2001). Similarly, the influence of the texture on dynamic recrystallization, see e.g. Zhou et al. (2017, 2018) and Tang et al. (2019), and anisotropy of the matrix as well as the orientation and elongation of grains, Zhou et al. (2018) and Chen et al. (2020)), should be investigated.
On the formulation of the kinematics and thermodynamics for polycrystalline materials undergoing phase transformation
2019, International Journal of PlasticityStrain gradient continuum plasticity theories: Theoretical, numerical and experimental investigations
2019, International Journal of PlasticityMaterial length scale of strain gradient plasticity: A physical interpretation
2017, International Journal of PlasticityCitation Excerpt :In particular, by analyzing the size effect by the deformation approximation of Gurtin's theory, Bardella (2010) found that the size effect due to the defect energy leads to strain hardening 1 with diminishing size, while the gradient-enhanced plastic potential gives rise to strengthening, i.e. the increase in initial yielding. Besides, various theories of strain gradient crystal plasticity (e.g. Bammann, 2001; Ma et al., 2006; Clayton et al., 2006; Gurtin and Needleman, 2005; Gurtin, 2008; Gurtin and Reddy, 2014) and continuum dislocation theory (Berdichevsky, 2006, 2016; Le, 2016; Le and Günther, 2014; Zaiser, 2015) have also been developed for modeling the size-dependent plastic behavior. To date, strain gradient plasticity has attracted much attention due to its feasibility in applications.