Selecting the most efficient maintenance approach using fuzzy multiple criteria decision making

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(02)00380-8Get rights and content

Abstract

We assess the most popular maintenance approaches, i.e. strategies, policies, or philosophies, using a fuzzy multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) evaluation methodology. We illustrate with two examples how the suggested evaluation methodology identifies the most informative approach. Using the fuzzy MCDM, it would be possible to select in advance, the most informative (efficient) maintenance approach. Consequently, this leads to less planned replacements, and failures would be reduced to approximately zero and higher utilization of component life can be achieved. Thus, the maintenance department could contribute more to the business objectives throughout participating effectively in adding value to the production activities.

Introduction

The importance of maintenance function has increased due to its role in keeping and improving the availability, product quality, safety requirements, and plant cost-effectiveness levels. Maintenance costs constitute an important part of the operating budget of manufacturing firms. Mckone and Wiess (1998) reported that the amount of money Du Pont spent, in 1991, company-wide on maintenance was roughly equal to its net income. Al-Najjar (1997) showed that maintenance expenses vary depending on the type of industry, typically, figures such as 15–40% of production costs may be encountered. The consequences of an inefficient maintenance policy go far beyond the direct costs of maintenance.

The maintenance concept has passed through several major developments. In this paper, we assess the most popular maintenance approaches, i.e. strategies, policies, methodology or philosophy, using a methodology based on fuzzy logic theory, i.e. fuzzy multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM). Section 2 reviews some of the most popular maintenance approaches. Section 3 demonstrates the bases of comparison of maintenance approaches. Section 4 goes through basic concepts of fuzzy logic and MCDM. Section 5 illustrates the evaluation methodology suggested for assessing and selecting the most efficient (informative) maintenance approach by applying it on typical data from two different cases, and finally conclusions.

Section snippets

Maintenance approaches

In the following we present the most popular maintenance approaches, i.e. strategies, policies, methodology or philosophy. Maintenance strategy involves the identification, researching and execution of many repairs, replace and/or inspect decisions, see Al-Najjar (1997) and Kelly (1997).

Failure based maintenance (FBM) is only performed when a failure or breakdown occurs, no action is taken to detect the onset of-, or to prevent-, failure. The maintenance related costs are usually high, but it

Criteria to compare maintenance approaches

The accuracy of the timing of maintenance action highly affects the useful life length of the maintained equipment/component, number of failures, number of planned replacements, mean time to repair, maintenance direct costs and consequently production costs. The more accurate the maintenance action timing, the higher the utilization of the component life. To assess the efficiency of a maintenance policy two measures (effectiveness and accuracy) are suggested in Al-Najjar (1997).

Achieving more

Fuzzy logic and multiple criteria decision making (MCDM)

In the following we discuss the concept of fuzzy logic and MCDM.

Evaluation methodology

In this study, we assessed and identified set of maintenance approaches using a fuzzy MCDM. The objective is to rank the maintenance approaches by evaluating their ability to provide information about the changes in the behavior of failure causes, which are used as criteria, as illustrated in Table 1.

The decision problem is composed of a matrix of m maintenance approaches rated on a set of n failure causes (criteria) that are applicable to the case in question. w̃={wj,forj=1,2,…,n} is a set of

Conclusions

The most cost-effective maintenance approach is the one that is able to provide and utilize the required information about the changes in the failure causes behavior related to machine condition, product quality, and the surroundings. Knowing more information about the changes in the failure causes enables the user to control and maximize the utilization of the component life. This results in minimizing the number of failure (towards zero) and planned replacements.

The main conclusion is that by

References (39)

  • M. Setnes et al.

    Fuzzy arithmetic-based interpolative reasoning for nonlinear dynamic fuzzy systems

    Engineering Application of Artificial Intelligence

    (1998)
  • E. Triantaphyllou et al.

    Development and evaluation of five multiattribute DM methods

    International Journal of Approximate Reasoning

    (1996)
  • Y. Wang et al.

    Rolling contact fatigue failure modes of lubricated silicon nitride in relation to ring crack defects

    Wear

    (1999)
  • Y. Yang et al.

    Application of a specialized capacitance probe in bearing diagnosis

    Wear

    (1999)
  • S. Zanakis et al.

    Multi-attribute decision-makinga simulation comparison of select methods

    European Journal of Operational Research

    (1998)
  • B. Al-Najjar

    Total quality maintenance an approach for continuous reduction in costs of quality products

    Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering

    (1996)
  • Al-Najjar, B., 1997. Condition-based maintenance: selection and improvement of a cost-effective vibration-based policy...
  • Al-Najjar, B., 1999. An approach for continuous reduction in LCC when using integrated vibration-based maintenance: a...
  • Al-Najjar, B., 2000a. Product quality problems can be detected earlier by vibration spectral analysis than by...
  • Cited by (368)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text