Accidents in the New Zealand adventure tourism industry
Introduction
Accidents are acknowledged to be a leading cause of mortality and morbidity among tourists travelling to foreign destinations (Page & Meyer, 1996, Page & Meyer, 1997, Wilks & Atherton, 1994), being the second largest cause of death among Scottish (Paixao et al., 1991) and United States overseas visitors (Hargarten et al., 1991). They are also the main reason for overseas tourist hospital admissions in Queensland, Australia (Nichol et al., 1996). The potential for events such as accidents to negatively impact on the tourism industry is also well understood (Cliff and Page, 1996; Greenaway, 1996, Wilks et al., 1996), and safety is recognised as a key factor in the selection of tourist destinations (Bovet, 1994, World Tourism Organisation, 1996). This issue was exemplified in a recent survey, reported in the New Zealand press (Bentley and Page, 2001), in which safety concerns were found to be the major hinderance to Japanese overseas travel to New Zealand. New Zealand was ranked behind Hawaii, Australia, Switzerland, Canada, Singapore, Britain and Guam as a safe destination. These perceptions are believed to have been strongly affected by media reports in Japan concerning New Zealand scenic flight crashes in which Japanese tourists were killed (also see Greenaway, 1996, Page, 1997, Page & Meyer, 1997).
Accidents involving tourists have been the subject of relatively few academic publications in either the safety management or tourism literature, despite the obvious scale of the tourism safety problem, and the potential for injuries and fatalities to seriously damage the tourism industry and the economies of countries who rely on tourism (Clift and Page, 1996). Research that has been undertaken on tourist safety has identified unfamiliarity with foreign marine and road environments as important risk factors for accidents and injuries involving overseas visitors (e.g. Hartung et al., 1990, Nichol et al., 1996, Wilks & Watson, 1998). Little published work has focused on the risk of injury among domestic and international tourists participating in specific recreational activities, particularly those activities which have become collectively known as ‘adventure tourism’.
Section snippets
Understanding adventure tourism: perception and reality
Adventure tourism is a burgeoning sector of the tourism industry internationally. The adventure tourism sector encompasses a wide range of diverse activities, and may be defined as commercially operated activities involving a combination of adventure and excitement pursued in an outdoor environment. Adventure tourism is also often taken to include more passive activities associated with eco tourism (e.g. safaris and trekking in difficult terrain). As a result adventure tourism incorporates a
The scale and extent of adventure tourism accidents
While an important attraction of many of these activities is excitement and a high level of ‘perceived’ risk (Brannan & Condello, 1992, Berno & Moore, 1996), there is evidence that certain adventure tourism activities present a serious actual risk to the health and safety of participants. Hall and McArthur (1991), reported that 70% of all adventure tourism injuries and 50% of all adventure tourism fatalities in Australia were directly associated with white water rafting. New Zealand Maritime
The sample
An accident experience questionnaire was posted to 300 adventure tourism businesses operating throughout the North and South Islands of New Zealand. A stratified sample, ensuring representation of operators from a wide range of adventure tourism businesses, was drawn from a sampling frame of approximately 400 known businesses. The sampling frame was constructed from various sources, including the Adventure Tourism Council’s database of adventure tourism operators, tourist guides and brochures,
Sample characteristics
The great majority of the 142 adventure tourism businesses surveyed were either individually or jointly owned (95%). Most businesses surveyed were in the small/medium-sized category, with 89% of businesses employing 10 or less full-time equivalent (FTE) staff (including the owner/manager), and 35% employing just one or two FTE staff. This is consistent with the survey conducted by Page et al. (1999) and earlier findings of small tourism businesses conducted by Deloitte Touche Tomatsu (1995).
Discussion and conclusion
The survey has provided an initial assessment of the actual extent of the New Zealand adventure tourism accident/injury problem, and baseline data upon which further primary and secondary accident research will build. Adventure tourism operators’ reported accident experience suggested very few serious client injuries were incurred during the 12 month period, January to December, 1998. Serious injuries occurred most often during water-based activities (diving, white water rafting and marine
Acknowledgements
This research was funded by a Massey University research grant during 1999–2000.
References (25)
- et al.
Tourist accidentsan exploratory analysis
Annals of Tourism Research
(1996) Bicycle tourism in the South Island of New Zealandplanning and management issues
Tourism Management
(1998)- Bentley, T.A., Page, S.J., 2001. Scoping the extent of tourist accidents. Annals of Tourism Research....
- Berno, T., Moore, K., 1996. The nature of the adventure tourism experience in Queenstown. Paper presented at the...
- Bovet, S., 1994. Safety concerns world travel market: B-M Survey shows. Public Relations Review 50, p....
- et al.
Public perceptions of risk in recreational activities
Journal of Applied Recreation Research
(1992) - Cliff, S., Page, S.J., 1996. Health and the International Tourism, Routledge,...
Small Business Survey 1994. New Zealand Tourism Industry
(1994)- Greenaway, R., 1996. Thrilling not killing: managing the risk tourism business. Management. May 1996:...
- Haddock, C., Wisheart, P., 1993. Managing Risks in Outdoor Activities. New Zealand Mountain Safety...