Review
Kinetics of liquid-phase hydrogenation reactions over supported metal catalysts — a review

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-860X(00)00885-1Get rights and content

Abstract

The kinetics of liquid-phase hydrogenation reactions have been reviewed with a special emphasis on α, β-unsaturated aldehydes as reactants. These reactions can be complex and can be influenced by factors such as metal specificity, side reactions, and metal-support interactions as well as reaction parameters. The importance of results in the absence of heat and mass transfer limitations has been emphasized. Hydrogenation reactions are typically assumed to be structure-sensitive, but dependencies on metal crystallite size have been reported; however, this behavior has been attributed to side reactions which can inhibit activity. Finally, solvent effects can exist, but the effect of H2 concentration in the liquid phase has infrequently been isolated. Thermodynamic arguments indicate that a solvent effect can enhance the surface coverage of hydrogen on the catalyst surface at a constant H2 partial pressure, but in the absence of any solvent effects, surface coverage is independent of the liquid-phase H2 concentration.

Introduction

The application of catalytic techniques for the production of fine chemicals and pharmaceuticals is important, especially with increased environmental awareness. Table 1 displays order of magnitude estimates for the quantity of by-products formed per kg of product, termed the E-factor [1]. An E-factor of 1–5 is common in the bulk and commodity chemicals industry, and some petrochemical processes can exhibit values as low as 0.1. In contrast, significantly higher E-factors are encountered in the specialty chemical and pharmaceutical sectors where values as high as 50–100 can be obtained. Such a large E-factor has been attributed, at least in part, to multi-step syntheses using stoichiometric reagents that result in accumulation of inorganic salts that need to removed from the final product. Admittedly, the use of the E-factor alone is a gross oversimplification, nevertheless, these values highlight the need for development of selective catalytic routes for transformations relevant in fine chemicals and pharmaceuticals. Significant efforts are focused on development of homogeneous catalytic techniques that offer significant potential because they can be molecularly tuned through ligand modification. Molecular tuning of heterogeneous catalysts is more difficult; however, such catalysts have enormous advantages compared to their homogeneous counterparts in terms of ease of handling, separation, catalyst recovery, and regeneration that make them industrially attractive.

Hydrogenation reactions are a class of reactions that are valuable in the pharmaceutical and specialty chemical industry [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. A review of heterogeneously catalyzed liquid-phase hydrogenation reactions appears to be a daunting task; however, the focus of this review will be restricted to the kinetics of such reactions with a primary emphasis on hydrogenation of α,β-unsaturated aldehydes over supported metal catalysts. A survey of the literature regarding liquid-phase hydrogenation reactions reveals that much of the work performed in this area has been aimed at studying selectivity issues and only scant quantitative kinetic data are reported. This is very apparent for liquid-phase hydrogenation of α,β-unsaturated aldehydes, a field of chemistry which has been extensively studied for over a decade, but only recently has had quantitative kinetics determined. These results with Pt/SiO2 showed an unusual effect of temperature on reaction rate and product distribution [7], [8]. Augustine reviewed heterogeneously catalyzed hydrogenation reactions from a selectivity standpoint and outlined a number of different hydrogenation reactions; however, reaction kinetics were not addressed [9]. A kinetic approach to a better mechanistic understanding of liquid-phase hydrogenation reactions has already proven to be valuable [7], [8], [10], [11], [12], and the discussion that follows will highlight some of the important aspects describing the kinetic behavior of liquid-phase hydrogenation reactions.

Section snippets

Mass (and heat) transfer effects

A critical step in obtaining reliable quantitative kinetics is to ensure the absence of all transport limitations including external and internal heat and mass transfer effects as well as the rate of hydrogen transfer from the gas phase to the liquid phase. In general, temperature gradients arising from heat transfer limitations are not as prevalent under liquid-phase reaction conditions compared to the vapor phase because heat capacities and thermal conductivities of the liquid phase are an

Solvent effects

Solvent effects are well documented in the organic synthesis literature [35]. Similar effects have also been reported in the heterogeneous catalysis literature; however, the mechanistic basis of the observed effects is not clear. Solvent effects in heterogeneous catalysis have been rationalized by correlating reaction rates and product distributions with solvent polarity or dielectric constant [36], [37], [38], [39]. While there is no doubt that such solvent properties can influence reaction

Kinetics of CC and CO bond hydrogenation

As mentioned, this review will focus on the kinetics of liquid-phase hydrogenation of unsaturated organics, with a particular emphasis on α,β-unsaturated aldehydes. The issues related to chemoselective hydrogenation of the CO bond for these systems have been studied extensively; however, detailed kinetics have been obtained only recently [1], [7], [8], [12]. The kinetics of liquid-phase hydrogenation of olefinic and aromatic hydrocarbons have been studied in some detail [24], [25], [26], [44],

Crystallite size effects

The term structure sensitivity was coined by Boudart to explain large variations in TOFs due to changes in catalyst structure brought about by varying the exposed crystal plane or by changing the average metal crystallite size over the range of 1–10 nm [99], [100]. The structure sensitivity of a number of different reactions has been probed and reviewed [101], [102], [103], [104]. In general CC, CO, and CN bond scission reactions are structure sensitive while CH bond formation and scission

Summary

The kinetics of liquid-phase hydrogenation reactions were reviewed with a particular emphasis on hydrogenation of α,β-unsaturated aldehydes. The following aspects were emphasized.

  • 1.

    Prior to obtaining accurate kinetics with supported metal catalysts, it is essential to ensure the absence of all transfer limitations by application of an appropriate test, such as the Madon–Boudart method which checks for external and internal heat and mass transfer resistances, and/or the Weisz criterion, or an

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the DOE, Division of Basic Energy Sciences under Grant no. DE-FE02-84ER13276.

References (131)

  • R.A. Sheldon

    J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem.

    (1996)
  • R.N. Landau et al.

    J. Catal.

    (1995)
  • H.-U. Blaser et al.

    J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem.

    (1996)
  • U.K. Singh et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2000)
  • U.K. Singh et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2000)
  • R.L. Augustine

    Catal. Today

    (1997)
  • R. Koros et al.

    Chem. Eng. Sci.

    (1967)
  • F. Notheisz et al.

    Appl. Catal. A: Gen.

    (1994)
  • R. Chambers et al.

    J. Catal.

    (1966)
  • G.W. Roberts et al.

    J. Catal.

    (1995)
  • I. Bergault et al.

    J. Catal.

    (1998)
  • U.K. Singh et al.

    J. Catal.

    (1995)
  • Y. Sun et al.

    J. Catal.

    (1996)
  • Y. Sun et al.

    J. Organomet. Chem.

    (1997)
  • H.-U. Blaser et al.

    J. Catal.

    (1998)
  • J. Wang et al.

    Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal.

    (1996)
  • A. Deimling et al.

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (1984)
  • L. Gilbert et al.

    Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal.

    (1993)
  • J.T. Wehrli et al.

    Mol. Catal.

    (1989)
  • H.-U. Blaser et al.

    J. Mol. Catal.

    (1991)
  • R.L. Augustine

    Adv. Catal.

    (1976)
  • R.L. Augustine et al.

    J. Mol. Catal.

    (1994)
  • R.A. Rajadhyaksha et al.

    Chem. Eng. Sci.

    (1986)
  • T. Mallat et al.

    J. Catal.

    (1997)
  • J. Struijk et al.

    Appl. Catal. A: Gen.

    (1992)
  • P.J. van der Steen et al.

    Appl. Catal.

    (1990)
  • P.J. van der Steen et al.

    Appl. Catal.

    (1990)
  • J. Struyk et al.

    Appl. Catal.

    (1990)
  • E.E. Gonzo et al.

    J. Catal.

    (1978)
  • J.P. Boitiaux et al.

    Appl. Catal.

    (1987)
  • J.P. Boitiaux et al.

    Appl. Catal.

    (1987)
  • J.P. Boitiaux et al.

    Appl. Catal.

    (1987)
  • D.E. Gardin et al.

    J. Catal.

    (1996)
  • S. Lin et al.

    J. Catal.

    (1993)
  • S. Tsuchiya et al.

    J. Catal.

    (1970)
  • R.W. McCabe et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (1977)
  • G. Ertl et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (1977)
  • M. Englisch et al.

    Appl. Catal. A: Gen.

    (1997)
  • C.J. Houtman et al.

    J. Catal.

    (1991)
  • M.A. Vannice et al.

    J. Catal.

    (1979)
  • D. Godbey et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (1986)
  • N.M. Abbas et al.

    Appl. Surf. Sci.

    (1981)
  • G.L. Haller et al.

    Adv. Catal.

    (1989)
  • B. Sen et al.

    J. Catal.

    (1988)
  • F. Delbecq et al.

    J. Catal.

    (1995)
  • M. Boudart

    Adv. Catal.

    (1969)
  • M. Ash, I. Ash, Specialty Chemicals Handbook, 1st Edition, Vol. 1, Synapse Information Resources, New York,...
  • M. Besson et al.

    Top. Catal.

    (1998)
  • P. Gallezot et al.

    Catal. Rev. Sci. Eng.

    (1998)
  • C.R. Landis et al.

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (1987)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text