ReviewKinetics of liquid-phase hydrogenation reactions over supported metal catalysts — a review
Introduction
The application of catalytic techniques for the production of fine chemicals and pharmaceuticals is important, especially with increased environmental awareness. Table 1 displays order of magnitude estimates for the quantity of by-products formed per kg of product, termed the E-factor [1]. An E-factor of 1–5 is common in the bulk and commodity chemicals industry, and some petrochemical processes can exhibit values as low as 0.1. In contrast, significantly higher E-factors are encountered in the specialty chemical and pharmaceutical sectors where values as high as 50–100 can be obtained. Such a large E-factor has been attributed, at least in part, to multi-step syntheses using stoichiometric reagents that result in accumulation of inorganic salts that need to removed from the final product. Admittedly, the use of the E-factor alone is a gross oversimplification, nevertheless, these values highlight the need for development of selective catalytic routes for transformations relevant in fine chemicals and pharmaceuticals. Significant efforts are focused on development of homogeneous catalytic techniques that offer significant potential because they can be molecularly tuned through ligand modification. Molecular tuning of heterogeneous catalysts is more difficult; however, such catalysts have enormous advantages compared to their homogeneous counterparts in terms of ease of handling, separation, catalyst recovery, and regeneration that make them industrially attractive.
Hydrogenation reactions are a class of reactions that are valuable in the pharmaceutical and specialty chemical industry [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. A review of heterogeneously catalyzed liquid-phase hydrogenation reactions appears to be a daunting task; however, the focus of this review will be restricted to the kinetics of such reactions with a primary emphasis on hydrogenation of α,β-unsaturated aldehydes over supported metal catalysts. A survey of the literature regarding liquid-phase hydrogenation reactions reveals that much of the work performed in this area has been aimed at studying selectivity issues and only scant quantitative kinetic data are reported. This is very apparent for liquid-phase hydrogenation of α,β-unsaturated aldehydes, a field of chemistry which has been extensively studied for over a decade, but only recently has had quantitative kinetics determined. These results with Pt/SiO2 showed an unusual effect of temperature on reaction rate and product distribution [7], [8]. Augustine reviewed heterogeneously catalyzed hydrogenation reactions from a selectivity standpoint and outlined a number of different hydrogenation reactions; however, reaction kinetics were not addressed [9]. A kinetic approach to a better mechanistic understanding of liquid-phase hydrogenation reactions has already proven to be valuable [7], [8], [10], [11], [12], and the discussion that follows will highlight some of the important aspects describing the kinetic behavior of liquid-phase hydrogenation reactions.
Section snippets
Mass (and heat) transfer effects
A critical step in obtaining reliable quantitative kinetics is to ensure the absence of all transport limitations including external and internal heat and mass transfer effects as well as the rate of hydrogen transfer from the gas phase to the liquid phase. In general, temperature gradients arising from heat transfer limitations are not as prevalent under liquid-phase reaction conditions compared to the vapor phase because heat capacities and thermal conductivities of the liquid phase are an
Solvent effects
Solvent effects are well documented in the organic synthesis literature [35]. Similar effects have also been reported in the heterogeneous catalysis literature; however, the mechanistic basis of the observed effects is not clear. Solvent effects in heterogeneous catalysis have been rationalized by correlating reaction rates and product distributions with solvent polarity or dielectric constant [36], [37], [38], [39]. While there is no doubt that such solvent properties can influence reaction
Kinetics of CC and CO bond hydrogenation
As mentioned, this review will focus on the kinetics of liquid-phase hydrogenation of unsaturated organics, with a particular emphasis on α,β-unsaturated aldehydes. The issues related to chemoselective hydrogenation of the CO bond for these systems have been studied extensively; however, detailed kinetics have been obtained only recently [1], [7], [8], [12]. The kinetics of liquid-phase hydrogenation of olefinic and aromatic hydrocarbons have been studied in some detail [24], [25], [26], [44],
Crystallite size effects
The term structure sensitivity was coined by Boudart to explain large variations in TOFs due to changes in catalyst structure brought about by varying the exposed crystal plane or by changing the average metal crystallite size over the range of 1–10 nm [99], [100]. The structure sensitivity of a number of different reactions has been probed and reviewed [101], [102], [103], [104]. In general CC, CO, and CN bond scission reactions are structure sensitive while CH bond formation and scission
Summary
The kinetics of liquid-phase hydrogenation reactions were reviewed with a particular emphasis on hydrogenation of α,β-unsaturated aldehydes. The following aspects were emphasized.
- 1.
Prior to obtaining accurate kinetics with supported metal catalysts, it is essential to ensure the absence of all transfer limitations by application of an appropriate test, such as the Madon–Boudart method which checks for external and internal heat and mass transfer resistances, and/or the Weisz criterion, or an
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the DOE, Division of Basic Energy Sciences under Grant no. DE-FE02-84ER13276.
References (131)
J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem.
(1996)- et al.
J. Catal.
(1995) - et al.
J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem.
(1996) - et al.
J. Catal.
(2000) - et al.
J. Catal.
(2000) Catal. Today
(1997)- et al.
Chem. Eng. Sci.
(1967) - et al.
Appl. Catal. A: Gen.
(1994) - et al.
J. Catal.
(1966) - et al.
J. Catal.
(1995)