27 River restoration in the Alps and their surroundings: past experience and future challenges

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0928-2025(07)11161-5Get rights and content

Abstract

Alpine rivers have undergone significant changes over the two last centuries. Human activities have modified their geometry through engineering measures to gain land for agricultural purposes and settlements, as well as through active mining to exploit gravel resources. Their sediment and water transfers have also been altered by hydropower-plant construction, control works on high-gradient streams, and catchment land-use changes. The resulting river morphological changes have led to abiotic (e.g., river-bed degradation and narrowing) and biotic (e.g., longitudinal and lateral disconnection) disruption. The current critical management situation (channel instability problems, flood effects, biodiversity decrease) has made river restoration a major issue in the Alps and their surroundings. Such an approach is reinforced by the European Water Framework Directive, which aims to ensure that rivers attain a good ecological status by 2015.

In the Alps, space is not always easily available and boundary conditions have changed over the long term. A major challenge in river restoration in the Alpine environment is therefore to identify the processes and key parameters for improving both geomorphological and ecological conditions under often-restricted boundary conditions. Early attempts at river restoration mainly focused on small-scale measures. Today, successful restoration projects in high-energy and bedload-transport-dominated conditions must include the full spectrum of scales, striving to initiate self-forming morphodynamics.

In this context, we appraise restoration experiences from the Alps, focusing on channel widening and dike enlargement, former channel reconstruction and reconnection, promotion of bedload supply input from floodplains, tributaries, and hillslopes, as well as on bank erosion measures and restoration activities. We discuss the basic arguments behind such actions, their limitations, and research challenges.

Introduction

In Europe, all large rivers have been significantly modified by human activities for centuries (Petts, 1989). A study of the International Commission for the Protection of the Alps (CIPRA) showed that only around 10% of the most important rivers of the entire Alpine region are still “pristine” or in a “near-natural” condition (Martinet and Dubost, 1992). The earlier activities concentrated on local works for flood and bank erosion protection but also for navigation purposes. The basic river morphological features underwent serious disruptions in the 19th century, when systematic hydraulic engineering measures were conducted along reaches of 1 to more than 100 km length. These major and widespread regulation efforts totally modified the morphodynamics and sediment transport behaviour, initiating channel changes such as river-bed degradation (Habersack and Nachtnebel, 1995; Bravard et al., 1997). These morphological changes led to abiotic and biotic consequences, and are associated with ecological and economic impacts (Roux et al., 1989; Bravard et al., 1999a; Jungwirth et al., 2003). Today's critical situation in terms of management (channel instability problems, limitations of flood regulation works, biodiversity decrease) has made river restoration a major issue in the Alps and their surrounding areas (Bravard et al., 1999a; Gilvear, 1999). These efforts are reinforced by the European Water Framework Directive (WFD), which aims to ensure that rivers will reach good ecological status by 2015 (European Parliament and Council of Europe, 2000). The first step in addressing these concerns is to describe the existing situation. This incorporates a deficit analysis, which highlights the risk that a certain water body will not reach a good ecological status by 2015. This is followed by a planning phase. In the final phase, measures are implemented to reach the goal. To date, no formal guidelines for restoration are available to achieve these goals. This calls for a summary of current measures in order to evaluate the most appropriate applications.

In the Alpine environment, high gradients generate significant energy and channel features are sensitive to changes in control parameters (peak flow regime and bedload input). A key challenge in river restoration is to identify the processes and primary parameters with which to improve both geomorphological and ecological conditions, under often-restricted boundary conditions (Jäggi, 1989; Bravard et al., 1999b; Piégay and Schumm, 2003). Early attempts at river restoration mainly applied small-scale measures. However, successful restoration projects in high-energy and bedload-transport-dominated conditions have to emphasise the full spectrum of scales, striving to initiate self-forming morphodynamics (Amoros et al., 1982; Frissell et al., 1986; Amoros and Petts, 1993; Habersack and Nachtnebel, 1995; Habersack et al., 2000).

In this context, we present the historical evolution of rivers in the Alpine area and their surroundings, and discuss how this evolution has led to the necessity of river restoration. A summary of restoration experiences is then drawn. Feedback elements are provided to explain such actions and their limitations, highlighting research challenges.

Section snippets

Short history of river regulation: from natural to cultural landscapes

Within the Modern period the first significant measures were taken on the large rivers to prevent floods (with dikes) and to improve navigation (Table 27.1). Industrial development in the 19th century, along with increased technical capabilities and public investment, brought about major channelisation works on the Rhine, the Rhône, and the Danube. The goal was to develop navigation and protect major cities from floods (Vischer, 1986, Vischer, 2003). Moreover, the main tributaries of these

Short historical review

The first restoration measures aimed mainly at restructuring short river reaches, especially by increasing variability in channel width and depth or designing certain habitats such as spawning places and gravel bars. Examples of initial attempts to restore rivers include reintroduction of gravel along Danish streams (Brookes, 1990), remeandering channels – but with stabilised curves – in different areas of Europe (Binder et al., 1983; Brookes, 1987), and reconnecting former channels to the main

Feedback on restoration measures

From the previous experience and debates in the scientific community, but also amongst managers, it is possible to open several discussions and identify challenges for the scientific community. An overview of impacts and possible restoration options is given in Table 27.5.

Conclusions

This paper first analyses the historical development of Alpine rivers with respect to hydromorphological and ecological deficits. Based on a review of existing restoration projects in the Alps and their surrounding areas, currently solved and remaining challenges are discussed. The following conclusions are drawn: (i) in the Alps, every larger river system is anthropogenically influenced, (ii) many rivers have already reached or will soon reach a critical state of morphodynamic development

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the Austrian Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water Management, along with Regional Governments and local authorities, the European Community (Life Nature “Restoration of the wetland and riparian area at the Upper Drau River” 1999–2003), the Water Agency RMC, the region Rhône-Alpes and the local managers for financial support of various research projects related to river restoration (mainly Life Environment “Forests for Water” 2003–2007 and Life

References (92)

  • Bourdin, L., 2004. Les rivières en tresses sur le basin Rhône Méditerranée Corse. Bilan et perspectives de gestion....
  • M. Boyer et al.

    Réhabilitation, restauration et entretien des ripisylves

  • Boyer, M., Piégay, H., Ruffinoni, C., et al., 1998. Guide technique SDAGE no. 1 – Vol. 1: La gestion des boisements de...
  • G. Braga et al.

    Evolution of the Po river: an example of the application of historic maps

  • J.P. Bravard et al.

    Impact of civil engineering works on the successions of communities in a fluvial system. A methodological and predictive approach applied to a section of the Upper Rhone river, France

    Oikos

    (1986)
  • J.P. Bravard et al.

    River incision in South-east France: morphological phenomena and ecological effects

    Regul. Rivers Res. Manage.

    (1997)
  • J.P. Bravard et al.

    Environmental and societal effects of river incision and remedial strategies

  • Bravard, J.P., Peiry, J.L., 1993. La disparition du tressage fluvial dans les Alpes françaises sous l’effet de...
  • G.J. Brierley et al.

    Geomorphology and River Management: Applications of the River Styles Framework

    (2005)
  • A. Brookes

    Restoring the sinuosity of artificially straightened stream channels

    Environ. Geol. Water Sci.

    (1987)
  • A. Brookes

    Restoration and enhancement of engineered river channels: some European experiences

    Regul. Rivers Res. Manage.

    (1990)
  • BUWAL, 2002. Umwelt-Bericht Bd 1. Politik und Perspektiven des BUWAL. Bundesamt für Umwelt, Wald und...
  • Citterio, A., Rollet, A.J., Piégay, H., 2002. Synthèse des connaissances géomorphologiques pour évaluer la diversité...
  • E. Dister

    La maîtrise des crues par la renaturation des plaines alluviales du Rhin supérieur

    Espaces naturels rhénans Bull. Soc. Ind. de Mulh.

    (1992)
  • DonauConsult, Zottl & Erber und A. Oberhofer, 1998. Donauausbau östlich von Wien. Flussbauliches Gesamtprojekt;...
  • Downs, P.W., Gregory, K.J., 2004. River channel management: towards sustainable catchment hydrosystems, ISBN:...
  • J.L. Edouard et al.

    Une hydrologie naturelle dans les Alpes du Nord ? Les nouveaux paramètres de l’hydrologie alpine: les aménagements hydroélectriques

    Rev. Géogr. Alpine

    (1984)
  • European Parliament and Council of Europe, 2000. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of...
  • Formann, E., Habersack, H. M., Schober, St. (2007). Morphodynamic river processes and techniques for assessment of...
  • Formann, E., Schober, St., Habersack, H.M., 2004. Monitoring and modelling of river widening processes in an alpine...
  • C.A. Frissell et al.

    A hierarchical framework for stream habitat classification: viewing streams in a watershed context

    Environ. Manage.

    (1986)
  • G. Garbrecht

    Wasser

    (1985)
  • J. Girel et al.

    Landscape structure and historical processes along diked European valleys: a case study of the Arc/Isère confluence (Savoie, France)

    Environ. Manage.

    (1997)
  • D. Glitz

    Artificial channels – the “ox-bow” lakes at tomorrow: the restoration of the course of the Wandse in Hambourg-Rahlstedt

    Garten Landschaft (Landsc. Archit. Plann.)

    (1983)
  • Habersack, H., Liedermann, M., Tritthart, M., 2007. Restoring large rivers – the integrated Danube river project....
  • H.-M. Habersack

    The river scaling concept (RSC): a basis for ecological assessments

    J. Hydrobiol.

    (2000)
  • Habersack, H.-M., Hauer, Ch., Edin, S., et al., 2004. Ecologically oriented hydraulic engineering at an Austrian...
  • H.-M. Habersack et al.

    Flussaufweitungen in Österreich – Entwicklung, Stand und Ausblick

    Österreichische Wasser und Abfallwirtschaft, ÖWAV

    (2000)
  • H.-M. Habersack et al.

    Bedload texture in an Alpine gravel bed river

    Water Resour. Res.

    (2001)
  • H.-M. Habersack et al.

    Short-term effects of local river restoration on morphology, flow field, substrate and biota

    Regul. Rivers Res. Manage.

    (1995)
  • Habersack, H.-M., Nachtnebel, H.-P., 1998. Planung und Konzeption flussbaulicher Maßnahmen zur Sohlsicherung und...
  • Habersack, H.-M., Schneider, J., 2000. Ableitung und Analyse flussmorphologisch relevanter Parameter von historischen...
  • Habersack, H.-M., Schober, S.T., Formann, E., et al., 2003. Flussmorphologisches Monitoring im Rahmen des...
  • D.D. Hart et al.

    A special section on dam removal and river restoration

    Bioscience

    (2002)
  • Hengl, M., 2001. Numerical simulation of bedload transport at the Mur river between Spielfeld and Radkersburg, final...
  • Hengl, M., 2004. Processes in river morphology and extreme floods, presentation at the conference FloodRisk of the...
  • Cited by (109)

    • Nature-based solutions in freshwater pearl mussel rivers – A novel approach for self-dynamic desanding developed in a physical model test

      2023, Limnologica
      Citation Excerpt :

      Juvenile mussels exhibit particularly high requirements for the substrate in which they are completely buried for the first few years of their lives (Bauer, 1988; Buddensiek et al., 1993; Hastie et al., 2000). A loose, non-clogged sediment structure with a low percentage of fine sediments is especially important for juvenile freshwater pearl mussels, while adult mussels prefer stable sections with relatively coarse substrate (Hastie et al., 2000). Fine sediments (grain size fractions < 2 mm) can lead to ecologically adverse riverbed siltation conditions (Davies-Colley et al., 1992; Evans and Wilcox, 2014; Österling et al., 2010), with fractions < 0.63 mm of particular importance due to their biogeochemical properties, as these sediment fractions can store and transport nutrients and trace elements (Owens, 2005; Wood and Armitage, 1997).

    • Towards quantitative evidence of Eco-DRR in mountains: A concise review

      2022, Ecological Engineering
      Citation Excerpt :

      Channel widening refers to removing or relocating flood embankments further from the channel, thereby establishing a part of a valley floor where the river can develop its channel freely (Piégay et al., 2005). This is increasingly applied in mountain areas (Jäggi and Zarn, 1999; Habersack and Piégay, 2008) but because of limiting space, it is not a common as in lowlands. In addition, secondary channels are reconstructed along channelized rivers or reconnected with them (Hornich and Baumann, 2008), resulting in increased channel storage of floodwater and reduced bedshear stress of floodflows.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text