Linkages between best practice in business and good environmental performance by companies

doi:10.1016/S0959-6526(96)00039-X

Journal of Cleaner Production

Volume 4, Issues 3–4, 1996, Pages 189-202

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(96)00039-X Get rights and content

Abstract

Is the adoption of currently accepted best practice in business associated with improved environmental performance by companies? What methods can be used to assess and compare the environmental practices and performance of different companies? In this pilot study, the business and environmental practices and performances of five companies in the metal working sector were examined and scored. The business practices and performances were assessed using the best practice model adopted in the Australian Manufacturers Council study (AMC, November 1994, Melbourne, 112pp.). The environmental practices and performance of the companies were assessed based on a five stage framework of business response to environmental issues presented here. A strong correlation was observed between environmental performance and business practices (correlation coefficient, r = 0.85, p < 0.05). The company closest to best practice had a strong focus on quality, efficiency and elimination of waste, well-developed strategy, good teamwork and a high level of commitment and also had the highest score for environmental performance. The company with poorest score for its business practices had the poorest environmental performance, with the remaining companies lying between on both scores. There was no significant correlation between business performance outcomes and environmental performance.

References (16)

Environment Today
(1992)
Environment Today
(1992)
GEMI, GEMI at 3
J.T. Willig
Environmental TQM
R. Welford
Business Strategy and the Environment
(1992)
R. Welford
Disaster prevention and Management
(1993)
R. Welford et al.
Environmental Management and Business Strategy
G. Ledgerwood et al.
The Environmental Audit and Business Strategy: A Total Quality Approach
B. Dyer
How to integrate environmental and OSH programmes into your company TQM programme
(March 1994)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (10)

“A four-stage maturity model of green manufacturing orientation with an illustrative case study”
2021, Sustainable Production and Consumption
Citation Excerpt :
Depending upon the way maturity is perceived, the authors have proposed dimensions to further characterize different maturity stages in their own ways (see Table 1). Importantly, only a few of these authors (Hunt and Auster, 1990; Romme, 1992 and Roberts & Gehrke, 1996) provide detailed descriptions of maturity stages in their proposed dimensions. Notably, most maturity models use generic dimensions that are not customized to any specific industry sectors (Schaefer and Harvey, 1998; Machado et al., 2013; Potrich et al., 2019).
Maturity models describe a process or an activity's characteristics at different stages, which generally evolve from an initial stage to a more advanced stage. Notably, most maturity models in green manufacturing (GM) do not clearly define and characterize the maturity stages, and are also not empirically validated. Therefore, this study considers four discrete maturity stages of GM, viz., I. compliance driven; II. eco-opportunist; III. green innovator and IV. green manufacturing evangelist, based on drivers for proactiveness towards greenness. It defines a construct “green manufacturing orientation” and develops a maturity stage model for green manufacturing orientation following a two-stage methodology. In the first stage, a conceptual model is developed by analyzing extant literature which fills an important research gap in literature. In the second stage, a case study is used to illustrate the application of this proposed conceptual model through eight key green initiatives that have been carried out. It was observed that the case firm, over a period of time moved to a higher level of GM maturity. Moreover, there was also a progressive trend in the firm's GM orientation. However, a uniform enhancement of GM orientation was not witnessed in the case.
A systematic literature review on firm-level proactive environmental management
2019, Journal of Environmental Management
Citation Excerpt :
As described in the method, based on the analysis of the articles selected, the comparative study on environmental management was divided into three topics to improve the understanding: stage models (3.1); typology models (3.2); and proactive practices (3.3). We used the dimensions proposed in the seminal works of Hunt and Auster (1990) and Roberts and Gehrke (1996) to organize the analysis of the evolutionary stage models: Environmental Management (i), Resources (ii), Practices (iii), Integration (iv), Employees’ Involvement (v), and Monitoring (vi). Thus, the 14 models identified in the systematic literature review were organized according to Appendix A.
There is a broad spectrum of proactivity in environmental management practices in companies and industries, ranging from purely reactive efforts to adhere to minimum regulatory standards to innovative projects to develop new pollution preventing technologies and risk mitigation strategies. In fact, the importance of a proactive environmental management is increasingly recognized by academics, practitioners and policy makers alike. However, proactivity is still not clearly captured by current environmental management models, which often do not include it as a core element and lack practical guidelines on how to operationalize it at firm-level. In order to systematize the fragmented understanding on proactive environmental management practices applied in companies and industries, including their operationalization and determinants, we conducted a comprehensive review of 116 academic papers. Our results are presented and discussed along three main perspectives: (i) evolutionary stage models; (ii) typology models; and (iii) proactive practices. By comparing these three perspectives, we found that only the evolutionary stage models can fully capture proactive environmental management approaches in an integrative way, while the other two perspectives assume proactivity is highly specific of an organizational sector or function. The results also allow us to clarify and distinguish proactivity-related terms and concepts that are often used interchangeably, such as cleaner production, pollution prevention and eco-efficiency. Finally, we developed a synthetizing framework of the current literature on firm-level environmental proactivity that integrates proactive practices (divided into three dimensions: organizational, operational, and communicational), drivers of proactivity and evolutionary maturity stages towards increased proactivity. This framework not only consolidates the current state-of-the-art in terms of proactive environmental management practices but it can also be thought of as a starting point for further research on the topic.
Making the case for operating "green": Impact of environmental proactivity on multiple performance outcomes of Malaysian firms
2013, Journal of Cleaner Production
Citation Excerpt :
The reliability for this scale measured with Cronbach's Alpha was 0.62. This construct was measured with 10 items, which asked respondents the extent to which environmental proactivity has improved/worsened indicators such as “energy use”, “carbon footprint” and “overall reduction in pollution” (Judge and Douglas, 1998; Menguc and Ozanne, 2005; Roberts and Gehrke, 1996). The scale provided ranged from 1 = much worse to 7 = much improved.
In spite of the significant amount of work that has been conducted to investigate the impact of environmental proactivity on firm financial performance, limited research has focused on other firm performance outcomes such as operational performance and stakeholder satisfaction. The roles played by interacting and mediating constructs have not been addressed adequately in the environmental proactivity/firm performance literature. Drawing on stakeholder theory and the resource-based view of the firm, this study on 291 firms in Malaysia has hypothesized that environmental proactivity is positively related to (1) operational performance, (2) organizational learning, (3) environmental performance, (4) stakeholder satisfaction and (5) financial performance. The study has also hypothesized that the types of technologies deployed to address environmental issues moderates the relationship between environmental proactivity and operational performance, whilst environmental performance mediates the relationship between environmental proactivity and stakeholder satisfaction, which in turn mediates the relationship between environmental proactivity and financial performance. Using structural equation modeling (SEM) for the data analysis, findings indicate that environmental proactivity is positively related to operational performance, organizational learning, environmental performance, stakeholder satisfaction and financial performance. Significantly, the mediating role of stakeholder satisfaction is also supported by the data even though the mediating role of environmental performance and the moderating role of types of technologies are not supported by findings.
A maturity stage model to explore repercussions of green manufacturing for manufacturing strategy decision areas
2022, Management Research Review
“A conceptual four-stage maturity model of a firm's green manufacturing technology alternatives and performance measures”
2021, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management
Performance outcomes of supply chain practices for sustainable development: A meta-analysis of moderators
2021, Sustainable Development

View all citing articles on Scopus

View full text

PaperLinkages between best practice in business and good environmental performance by companies

Abstract

Environment Today

Environment Today

Environmental TQM

Business Strategy and the Environment

Disaster prevention and Management

Environmental Management and Business Strategy

The Environmental Audit and Business Strategy: A Total Quality Approach

How to integrate environmental and OSH programmes into your company TQM programme

Paper
Linkages between best practice in business and good environmental performance by companies