Ship track-keeping: experiments with a physical tanker model

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0661(98)00082-3Get rights and content

Abstract

Two autopilots for ship track-keeping along a given trajectory are presented, namely a linear quadratic output feedback controller and a robust cascade controller. In both of them, the rudder is used as the only control actuator. The paper presents the mathematical foundation of the problem, the filtering techniques applied in its solution, and selected results of the simulations carried out on a physical ship model on the Silm Lake.

References (0)

Cited by (39)

  • Experimental and numerical study of autopilot using Extended Kalman Filter trained neural networks for surface vessels

    2020, International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering
    Citation Excerpt :

    The physical model is a 1:100 scaled replica of the ‘M/V Nedlloyd: Hoorn’ (the main characteristics are outlined in Table 1), whose hydrodynamic design and loading condition follow the properties of the full scale ship. The geometric, kinetic and dynamic similarity principles were preserved to guarantee that experiments results can be further referred to real objects (Morawski and Pomirski, 1998). In this section, the configurations of the ship and the four Degree of Freedom (DOF) motion equations are presented.

  • Unscented Kalman Filter trained neural network control design for ship autopilot with experimental and numerical approaches

    2019, Applied Ocean Research
    Citation Excerpt :

    The hull was constructed of fabric glass with the geometric, kinetic and hydrodynamic similarity principles fully preserved. Thus, the results of hydrodynamic and control investigations can be recalculated to refer to real objects using the known relations [33]. The main particulars of the scaled model are outlined in Table 1.

  • Iterative lead compensation control of nonlinear marine vessels manoeuvring models

    2014, Applied Ocean Research
    Citation Excerpt :

    However, for high speed applications, tight turns, large sideslip angles or in the presence of currents, nonlinear effects become pronounced and thus neglecting them may degrade the controller's performance and robustness. On the other hand, different nonlinear methods [10] have been presented for course-keeping autopilot's design such as state feedback linearization [12], nonlinear backstepping [2,38], sliding mode control [20], output feedback [21], H∞-control [16], particle swarm optimization [31], genetic algorithms [20], fuzzy logic methods [5], etc. For most of these type of applications, nonlinear manoeuvring models in 1 degree of freedom (DOF) are considered, see [25] or [3] as example, still in these contributions, the coupling existing between the various variables is obviously not taken into account.

  • Experiment on track-keeping performance using free running model ship

    2013, IFAC Proceedings Volumes (IFAC-PapersOnline)
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text