Bureaucracy and innovation revisited: Effects of contingency factors, industrial sectors, and innovation characteristics

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1047-8310(96)90002-4Get rights and content

Abstract

While the negative effect of bureaucracy on innovation is taken as a given by organization researchers, the existing models used to depict the relationship between bureaucracy and innovation are usually very simple. This study intends to develop and test theories that explain the variation in the bureaucracy-innovation relationship in greater detail. The study considers two major indicators of bureaucratic control—centralization and formalization. Propositions are advanced on the effects of 14 contingency variables on the relationship between centralization and innovation and formalization and innovation. The propositions are then tested against the data from published studies in organizational innovation during the last three decades using a multivariate meta-analytic procedure. Results suggest avenues for further theory development and research, which we discuss.

References (68)

  • J.R. Blau et al.

    Idea, complexity, and innovation

    Administrative Science Quarterly

    (1979)
  • J. Child

    Predicting and understanding organizational structure

    Administrative Science Quarterly

    (1973)
  • J. Child

    Organization: A guide to problems and practices

    (1984)
  • S.P. Cohn et al.

    The structure of the firm and the adoption of process innovations

    IEEE Transactions or Engineering Management

    (1980)
  • R.G. Corwin

    Innovation in organizations: The case of schools

    Sociology of Education

    (1975)
  • R.L. Daft

    A dual-core model of organizational innovation

    Academy of Management Journal

    (1978)
  • R.L. Daft

    Organization theory and design

    (1992)
  • R.L. Daft et al.

    The innovative organization

    (1978)
  • F. Damanpour

    Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators

    Academy of Management Journal

    (1991)
  • F. Damanpour et al.

    Organizational innovation and performance: The problem of organizational lag

    Administrative Science Quarterly

    (1984)
  • R.D. Dewar et al.

    The adoption of radical and incremental innovations: An empirical analysis

    Management Science

    (1986)
  • P.F. Drucker

    The discipline of innovation

    Harvard Business Review

    (1985)
  • R.B. Duncan

    Characteristics of organizational environments and perceived environmental uncertainty

    Administrative Science Quarterly

    (1972)
  • R.B. Duncan

    The ambidextrous organization: Designing dual structures for innovation

  • J.E. Ettlie et al.

    Organization strategy and structural differences for radical versus incremental innovation

    Management Science

    (1984)
  • J.E. Ettlie et al.

    Organizational integration and process innovation

    Academy of Management Journal

    (1992)
  • P.J. Frost et al.

    The political process of innovation

  • J.R. Galbraith

    Designing complex organizations

    (1973)
  • J. Hage et al.

    Program change and organizational properties: A comparative analysis

    American Journal of Sociology

    (1967)
  • L.V. Hedges et al.

    Statistical methods for meta-analysis

    (1985)
  • M.A. Hitt et al.

    Mergers and acquisitions and managerial commitment to innovation in M-form firms

    Strategic Management Journal

    (1990)
  • G.P. Huber et al.

    Developing more encompassing theories about organizations: The centralization-effectiveness relationship as an example

    Organization Science

    (1990)
  • G.P. Huber et al.

    Understanding and predicting organizational change

  • F. Hull et al.

    Organizing for innovation: Beyond Burns and Stalker's organic type

    Sociology

    (1982)

    • Cited by (0)

    View full text
    Copyright © 1996 Published by Elsevier Inc.