Elsevier

The Leadership Quarterly

Volume 14, Issues 4–5, August–October 2003, Pages 411-432
The Leadership Quarterly

How creative leaders think: Experimental findings and cases

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(03)00045-6Get rights and content

Abstract

To direct innovative efforts, leaders must possess creative thinking skills. The available evidence, however, suggests that leaders may express their creative thinking skills in a unique way. In the present effort, we argue that leader creativity is based on experiential cases, a form of situated cognition, where idea generation occurs through evaluative operations. Evidence supporting this argument is provided using a series of experimental studies as well as incidents of “real-world” creative leadership in manufacturing, finance, and service industries. The implications of these observations for understanding leader performance, leader development, and leader–follower interactions are discussed.

Introduction

Because turbulence, technological change, and competition emphasize the need for creativity, the generation of new ideas, and innovation, the translation of these ideas into usable products, organizations have become more concerned with the effective direction of creative work Dess & Pickens, 2000, Mumford et al., 2002. In fact, a number of approaches have been used to understand how leaders shape the production of new ideas and the subsequent development of new products based on these ideas. For example, Sosik et al., 1998, Sosik et al., 1999 emphasized the role of leaders in motivating followers' creative efforts. Cardinal (2001) and Damanpour (1991) have argued that the role of leaders is to formulate structures that will allow creative activities to flower. Still other scholars Anderson & West, 1998, Bain et al., 2001, Oldham & Cummings, 1996 have emphasized the need for leaders to support creative efforts.

These approaches, like others aimed at understanding the leadership of creative ventures, are based on an implicit assumption. They all hold that the leader is not a part of the creative process—the generation and implementation of new ideas. Instead, the leader is viewed as a supporting player whose job, ultimately, is to stimulate and facilitate the work of others. In contrast to this passive, supportive view of leader influences on creativity and innovation, one might argue that leaders play a more direct role in shaping creative ventures, being actively engaged in the production and refinement of new ideas Dunham & Freeman, 2000, Sharma, 1999.

Accordingly, our intent here is to examine how leaders think when involved in creative activities, with a specific emphasis on the unique contributions of leader cognition to the generation and implementation of new ideas. We first examine the role leaders play in creative problem solving efforts by a group. Subsequently, we present a model describing the nature of the creative thought required by leaders in the context of follower's creative ideas. In later sections of the paper, we examine this model with respect to available experimental evidence as well as case study evidence bearing on the activities of three historically notable individuals—Henry Ford (automotive manufacturing), J. Pierpont Morgan (investment banking), and Henry Chauncey (educational testing)—who led creative efforts in the manufacturing, finance, and service sectors.

Section snippets

Leader performance

The notion that leadership of creative enterprises requires creative thought on the part of the leader is not a common one. Creative cognition, the production and refinement of new ideas, is held to be the provenance of followers, not the leader. Moreover, given the hectic, fragmented nature of managerial work (Mintzberg, 1975), it is difficult at first glance to see how leaders could engage in the sustained cognitive effort needed to develop and refine new ideas (Mumford & Gustafson, in press)

Experimental findings

In an initial study, Lonergan, Scott, and Mumford (in press) sought to test two key propositions flowing from the model of leader creative thought outlined above. First, they hoped to show that the availability of more original ideas, ideas provided by followers, would stimulate leader creativity. Second, they hoped to show that the use of certain standards in idea evaluation and revision influenced creative thinking on the part of leaders.

To test these hypotheses, 148 undergraduates were asked

Conclusions

Before turning to our broader conclusions, certain limitations of the present effort warrant some discussion. To begin, the series of studies used to test our model of creative thinking on the part of leaders was based on the classic experimental paradigm. Although the tasks that provided a basis for these experiments were reasonably realistic, it is also true that the samples consisted of undergraduate college students. Accordingly, the question arises as to the generalizability of our

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Ginamarie Scott, Devin Lonergan, Jill Strange, Suzie Marta, and Brian Licuanan for their contributions to the present effort.

References (86)

  • M.A. Runco et al.

    Interpersonal and intrapersonal evaluations of creative ideas

    Personality and Individual Differences

    (1992)
  • S.J. Zaccaro et al.

    Assessment of leader problem-solving capabilities

    Leadership Quarterly

    (2000)
  • J. Abra

    Collaboration in creative work: An initiative for investigation

    Creativity Research Journal

    (1994)
  • N.R. Anderson et al.

    Measuring climate for workgroup innovation: Development and validation of a team climate inventory

    Journal of Organizational Behavior

    (1998)
  • F.M. Andrews et al.

    Supervisory practices and innovation in scientific teams

    Personnel Psychology

    (1967)
  • F.M. Andrews et al.

    Social and organizational factors affecting innovative research

    Proceedings of the American Psychological Association

    (1970)
  • J. Baer

    Evaluative thinking, creativity, and task specificity: Separating the wheat from the chaff is not the same as finding needles in haystacks

  • P.G. Bain et al.

    The innovation imperative: The relationships between team climate, innovation, and performance in research and development teams

    Small Group Research

    (2001)
  • M. Basadur et al.

    Understanding how creative thinking skills, attitudes, and behavior work together: A causal process model

    Journal of Creative Behavior

    (2000)
  • M. Basadur et al.

    Improving the measurement of divergent thinking attitudes in organizations

    Journal of Creative Behavior

    (1999)
  • W.A. Baughman et al.

    Process analytic models of creative capabilities: Operations involved in the combination and reorganization process

    Creativity Research Journal

    (1995)
  • L.B. Cardinal

    Technological innovation in the pharmaceutical industry: The use of organizational control in managing research and development

    Organizational Science

    (2001)
  • M.S. Connelly et al.

    Reactions to negative feedback: The influences of leader feedback on subordinate perceptions and group performances

    (2003)
  • F. Damanpour

    Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators

    Academy of Management Journal

    (1991)
  • D. Dougherty

    Organizational capacities for sustained product innovation

  • R. Drazin et al.

    Multi-level theorizing about creativity in organizations: A sense making perspective

    Academy of Management Review

    (1999)
  • K. Dunbar

    How scientists really reason: Scientific reasoning in real-world laboratories

  • K.D. Ericsson et al.

    Expert performance: Its structure and acquisition

    American Psychologist

    (1994)
  • G.F. Farris

    The effect of individual role on performance in creative groups

    R & D Management

    (1972)
  • R.A. Finke et al.

    Creative cognition: theory, research, and applications

    (1992)
  • J.R. Gailbraith

    Designing the innovative organization

    Organizational Dynamics

    (1982)
  • N.T. Galluchi et al.

    Perfectionism and creative striving

    Journal of Creative Behavior

    (2000)
  • A. Goor et al.

    A comparison of problem-solving processes of creative students and noncreative students

    Journal of Educational Psychology

    (1975)
  • M.E. Gorman et al.

    Teaching invention as critical creative processes: A course on technoscientific creativity

  • D. Halberstam

    The reckoning

    (1986)
  • D.F. Halpern

    Thinking critically about creative thinking

  • M.A. Hitt et al.

    The market for corporate control and firm innovation

    Academy of Management Journal

    (1996)
  • E.A. Houndshell

    Invention in the industrial research laboratory: Individual or collective process?

  • S.G. Isaksen et al.

    Curriculum planning for creative thinking and problem-solving

    Journal of Creative Behavior

    (1985)
  • S. Kitchell

    Corporate culture, environmental adaptation, and innovation adoption: A qualitative/quantitative approach

    Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science

    (1995)
  • J. Kolodner

    Case-based reasoning

    (1993)
  • N. Lehmann

    The big test: The secret history of the American meritocracy

    (2000)
  • Lonergan, D. C., Scott, G. M., & Mumford, M. D. (in press). Evaluative aspects of creative thought: Effects of idea...
  • Cited by (129)

    • CIP leadership theory and creativity: The benefits of aligning leader cognition with context

      2023, Handbook of Organizational Creativity: Leadership, Interventions, and Macro Level Issues, Second Edition
    • EXPLORING HOW EXPERT BEHAVIOURAL DESIGNERS IDEATE in the BEHAVIOURAL DESIGN SPACE

      2020, Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference
    • Collective genius: Leadership lessons from pina bausch and tanztheater wuppertal

      2023, Innovation Leadership in Practice: How Leaders Turn Ideas into Value in a Changing World
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text