Elsevier

NeuroImage

Volume 18, Issue 3, March 2003, Pages 670-674
NeuroImage

Regular article
Dual representation of the hand in the cerebellum: activation with voluntary and passive finger movement

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-8119(02)00055-1Get rights and content

Abstract

Early electrophysiological studies during sensory stimulation in the anesthetized cat and more recent functional imaging studies during voluntary movement in humans have provided evidence for two separate representations of the body in the anterior and posterior lobes of the cerebellum; however, the functional role of these body maps in motor and sensory processing is not known. The aims of the present study were to determine whether this dual representation is also present during passive movement, and to compare the pattern of activation with that obtained during voluntary movement. Functional MRI measurements were undertaken in 14 subjects who performed right index finger flexion and extension movements at ∼1 Hz, or had their finger moved passively at the same rate and through the same angle using a pneumatic device. During passive movement, dual activation was detected in the ipsilateral cerebellum, in the anterior lobe, and in the posterior lobe. A similar pattern of activation was observed during voluntary movement; however, the overall magnitude was about doubled. These data provide evidence for a dual ipsilateral representation of the hand in the rostral and caudal cerebellar cortex during passive as well as voluntary movements, with the rostral representation being the dominant one, and indicate that both of these areas are involved in kinesthetic sensory and motor processing.

Introduction

Early electrophysiological studies in the anesthetized cat and monkey provided evidence that sensory stimulation can activate cells in the cerebellar cortex in the absence of voluntary movement, and showed that there were two separate representations of the body in the anterior and the posterior lobes Combs 1954, Snider and Eldred 1952. However, this dual body map was lost in the awake cat, in which a more diffuse projection pattern was found. More recent functional imaging studies in the awake human have also identified a dual hand representation in the anterior and posterior lobes of the cerebellum during voluntary movement Grodd et al 2001, Rijntjes et al 1999. These studies have not investigated the patterns of activation during passive limb movement, and it is not known whether there is a similar dual representation for afferent inputs to the cerebellum, as in the cat and monkey. If this is the case, the question that arises is whether the two areas have comparable roles in motor and sensory processing, or whether there are differences in the patterns of activity in these areas during voluntary movement and passive kinesthetic sensory stimulation.

The aims of the present study were, therefore, to determine whether a dual representation can also be demonstrated with passive movement, and to compare the patterns and degree of cerebellar activation with kinematically comparable active and passive limb movement.

Section snippets

Subjects

The study had the approval of the Ethics Committee of the University of Western Australia. Fourteen healthy right-handed subjects (22–53 years of age, 6F) gave informed consent to participate in the study.

Image acquisition

Functional imaging was carried out on a 1.5 T Siemens Magnetom Vision Plus scanner equipped with gradient overdrive and echo-planar imaging (EPI) capabilities. Imaging was performed using a standard head coil with 256×256-mm field of view and a 64×64 image matrix (4×4-mm in-plane voxel size).

Cerebellar activation

During voluntary movement, activation was observed in two separate regions of the ipsilateral cerebellar hemisphere, one located rostrally in the anterior lobe, and the other caudally in the posterior lobe (Figs. 1A–1C). These regions correspond to Schmahmann hemispheric lobules V/VI (anterior region) and XIIIB/IX (posterior region) (Schmahmann et al., 1999), and are consistent with previous reports of the pattern of cerebellar activation during voluntary movement Grodd et al 2001, Rijntjes et

Discussion

There has been conflicting evidence for the presence of cerebellar activation with sensory stimulation in previous human functional imaging studies. Cerebellar activation was not found during vibro-tactile stimulation, noxious stimulation, or passive movement in some studies Casey et al 1996, Mima et al 1999, Seitz and Roland 1992, Tempel and Perlmutter 1992, whereas in other studies activation at times equal to that recorded during voluntary movements has been described with passive movement

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Dr. S. Ghosh for comments and helpful discussion. Dr. M. Fallon, Dr. S. Davis, and Mr. I. Morris, Department of Radiology, MRI Unit, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, and radiographers from the MRI Unit are thanked for support and assistance with the imaging studies. Prof. L.A. Cala and members of the Australian Research Centre for Medical Engineering are thanked for assistance with the passive movement device.

References (18)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (54)

  • BOLD signal in sensorimotor regions reveals differential encoding of passive forefinger velocity and displacement amplitude

    2018, NeuroImage
    Citation Excerpt :

    Later, the use of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) assessed activation with greater spatial precision than PET. Several fMRI studies identified activation in the aforementioned brain areas and some additional regions such as the cingulate motor area (CMA), CB and putamen during passive movement of fingers, wrist, hand, leg or ankle induced by an investigator (Thickbroom et al. 2003; Guzzetta et al. 2007; Jaeger et al. 2014). Taken together, these studies suggest that S1, S2, as well as M1, SMA, CMA, CB and occasionally putamen are part of the central network associated with the representation of passive movements.

  • Triple representation of language, working memory, social and emotion processing in the cerebellum: convergent evidence from task and seed-based resting-state fMRI analyses in a single large cohort

    2018, NeuroImage
    Citation Excerpt :

    Woolsey, 1952 regarded these as primary and secondary motor representations, along the lines of the dual representation of motor systems in the cerebral hemispheres. This finding has been replicated multiple times: through viral tract tracer studies in monkey in which M1 cerebral cortex injections label cerebellar lobules IV/V/VI and also lobules VIIB/VIII (Kelly and Strick, 2003, Fig. 1B), in structure-function correlation studies in patients with stroke (Schmahmann et al., 2009; Stoodley et al., 2016), in PET and task based MRI studies in healthy subjects (Rijntjes et al., 1999; Bushara et al., 2001; Grodd et al., 2001; Takanashi et al., 2003; Thickbroom et al., 2003; Stoodley and Schmahmann, 2009; Buckner et al., 2011; Stoodley et al., 2012; Keren-Happuch et al., 2014), and with resting state functional connectivity MRI (Habas et al., 2009; Krienen and Buckner, 2009; O'Reilly et al., 2010; Buckner et al., 2011). Review of earlier physiological studies in cat (Oscarsson, 1965; see Schmahmann, 2007) demonstrating spinal cord input only to these anterior lobe and lobule VIII regions are consistent with these areas being regarded as the motor cerebellum (Schmahmann, 2004, 2010; Schmahmann et al., 2009; Stoodley et al., 2016).

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text