Reactions to children's faces: Resemblance affects males more than females
Introduction
Males invest less in children that they are not biologically related to and in many cases are more likely to abuse step or otherwise unrelated children Anderson et al., 1999, Daly & Wilson, 1988, Daly & Wilson, 1996, Marlowe, 1999. According to Daly and Wilson (1998) there are two ways in which a male can increase the probability that the children he is caring for are carrying his genetic material: he can monitor and/or sequester the female partner during the period that she is fertile to reduce the risk of being cuckolded, or he can attempt to assess paternity based on the degree to which the children resemble him.
There are two forms that a paternal resemblance mechanism might take: (1) the degree to which a male is told a child resembles him (i.e., a “social mirror”) and (2) the degree to which the child actually resembles him. Daly and Wilson (1982) recorded spontaneous remarks in maternity wards regarding the appearance of newborn children. Mothers and their friends and relatives were more likely to comment on how children resembled their fathers than they were to say the child resembled the mother or any other family member. When fathers displayed any doubt, the mothers were quick to reassure them of the child's resemblance. Regalski and Gaulin (1993) have replicated these findings using Mexican families.
In a population of males convicted of domestic violence, Burch and Gallup (2000) found the more males felt that their children looked like them, the better the children were treated. The childhood of the abusive males themselves were also associated with how much they thought they resembled their fathers. Perceptions of paternal resemblance were correlated with the incidence of physical and sexual abuse they experienced as children, as well as feelings of closeness to their fathers.
Christenfeld and Hill (1995) found that objective raters did no better than chance at matching pictures of 1-year-old infants to their mothers, but could more accurately match the pictures of infants to their fathers. Other studies have failed to replicate these findings Bredart & French, 1999, McLain et al., 2000, Nesse et al., 1990, but in these studies, actual paternity was never determined (e.g., by DNA testing). Since the incidence of cuckoldry may be appreciable (see Baker & Bellis, 1995, for a review), it is easy to see how instances of failed paternity could statistically mask/obscure paternal resemblance.
A more compelling test of the paternal resemblance hypothesis would be to experimentally manipulate resemblance to determine the effect it has on treatment and attitudes toward children. In this study, facial resemblance was manipulated using computerized facial morphing based on combinations of subjects and children and reactions to these images were measured with hypothetical investment scenarios.
Section snippets
Subjects
Forty (20 males, 20 females) undergraduates were recruited from the State University of New York at Albany as subjects and received course credit for their participation. Subjects were informed ahead of time that they would be participating in a study that required having their picture taken and that they were going to be asked questions about childcare. The study was approved by the local institutional review board and all subjects gave written informed consent.
Pictures
Pictures of subjects were taken
Results
There was no effect of the sex of the toddler's face. A binomial test revealed that males chose the face that they had been morphed with more often than chance in response to the questions: “Which one of these children would you be most likely to adopt?”, P<.001; “Which one of these children do you find to be the most attractive?”, P<.001; “Which one of these children would you be MOST comfortable spending time with?”, P<.001; “Which one of these children would you spend US$50 on if you could
Discussion
When subjects were shown their own faces morphed with a child's in an array of four other people's faces morphed with that child, males were more likely to choose the face that resembled their own as the one they would be most likely to adopt, the most attractive, the child they would spend the most time with, the child they would spend money on, and the child they would least resent having to pay child support for.
Unlike males, females were relatively indifferent to whether the children's
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Julian Paul Keenan, Sid O'Bryant, Carlos Finlay, and Anthony, Michelle, and Joseph Rubino for their assistance with computer software and design materials.
References (14)
- et al.
Paternal care of genetic fathers and stepfathers: II. Reports by Xhosa high school students
Evolution and Human Behavior
(1999) - et al.
Do babies resemble their fathers more than their mothers? A failure to replicate Christenfeld and Hill
Evolution and Human Behavior
(1999) - et al.
Perceptions of paternal resemblance predict family violence
Evolution and Human Behavior
(2000) - et al.
Educational attainment of siblings in stepfamilies
Evolution and Human Behavior
(2001) - et al.
Whom are newborn babies said to resemble?
Ethology and Sociobiology
(1982) Showoffs or providers? The parenting effort of Hadza men
Evolution and Human Behavior
(1999)- et al.
Ascription of resemblance of newborns by parents and nonrelatives
Evolution and Human Behavior
(2000)
Cited by (140)
Happy to help? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of performing acts of kindness on the well-being of the actor
2018, Journal of Experimental Social PsychologyCues to paternity: Do partner fidelity and offspring resemblance predict daughter-directed sexual aversions?
2018, Evolution and Human BehaviorCitation Excerpt :In non-human species, such cues include olfactory chemical signatures, physical resemblance, indications of female extra-pair copulations, and timing of birth relative to first copulation (Borries, 1997; Clutton-Brock, 1991; Hrdy, 1980; Kazem & Widdig, 2013; Mallory & Brooks, 1978; Møller & Birkhead, 1993; Neff, 2003; Sheldon, Räsänen, & Dias, 1997; Westneat & Sherman, 1993; Widdig, 2007). In humans, phenotypic resemblance and assessments of partner fidelity have been two putative cues to paternity previously examined in the literature, and are the focus here (e.g., Alvergne, Faurie, & Raymond, 2009, 2010; Apicella & Marlowe, 2004, 2007; DeBruine, 2004b; Gaulin & Schlegel, 1980; Platek et al., 2003; Platek, Burch, Panyavin, Wasserman, & Gallup Jr, 2002; Prokop, Obertová, & Fedor, 2010). Phenotypic resemblance of offspring has been proposed to operate as a kinship cue in humans (Alvergne, Faurie, & Raymond, 2007; Antfolk, Lindqvist, Albrecht, & Santtila, 2014; Bressan & Zucchi, 2009; DeBruine, 2002, 2005; DeBruine, Jones, Little, & Perrett, 2008; Kaminski, Dridi, Graff, & Gentaz, 2009).
Are newborns’ faces less appealing?
2018, Evolution and Human BehaviorCitation Excerpt :While they may possess other cues related to health and happiness such as crying lustily (Furlow, 1997; Lummaa, Vuorisalo, Barr, & Lehtonen, 1998), there is mixed evidence about whether these cues may be aversive to adults (Frodi et al., 1978). Another facial cue that might influence adults' investment in infants is facial resemblance to parents, particularly for men due to paternity uncertainty (Alvergne, Faurie, & Raymond, 2009, 2010; Anderson, Kaplan, & Lancaster, 1999, 2007; DeBruine, 2004; Platek et al., 2003; Platek, Burch, Panyavin, Wasserman, & Gallup, 2002; Volk & Quinsey, 2002, 2007). Generally older infants (around 1 year old) have higher facial resemblance to parents than newborns (Bressan & Grassi, 2004; Hiatt, Campos, & Emde, 1979; Komori & Nittono, 2013).
Sibling Conflict and Closeness: The Effects of Sex, Number of Siblings, Relatedness, Parental Resemblance and Investment
2023, Evolutionary Psychological ScienceResemblance Reporting on Children: Sisters Are More Proactive than Brothers
2023, Evolutionary Psychological Science