Elsevier

Water Policy

Volume 2, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 423-432
Water Policy

Institutional framework for managing groundwater: A case study of community organisations in Gujarat, India

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1366-7017(00)00020-9Get rights and content

Abstract

Groundwater resources are showing increasing signs of over-development in many arid and semi-arid sections of India. The author suggests a general framework for design of local groundwater management institutions based on participatory institutional format and determines the ‘externalities’ in local groundwater management. The author presents a case study of community based groundwater management initiative in Western India and discusses the real life externalities. The author suggests establishment of tradable private property rights in groundwater as a major institutional reform for communities to establish rights over the water they manage and to address the issues of efficiency, equity and sustainability.

Introduction

Groundwater in India is characterized by physical heterogeneity in geology, topography and climate. In hard rocks, which underlie two-third of the country, groundwater availability varies widely depending upon the depth and degree of weathering and fracturing. In alluvial areas, aquifers are regionally extensive and are capable of giving sustained yields through high-capacity tube wells. Rainfall, the primary source of groundwater recharge, and topography vary significantly across the country resulting in significant changes in the magnitude of recharge. The average replenishable groundwater in India has been estimated to be 43.18 Mha m (Kittu, 1995).

Groundwater has been viewed as a sustainable source of irrigation over the past few decades. During 1951–1990, there was a steady increase in the groundwater irrigation potential from a mere 6.5 million hectare (m ha) to 34.8 m ha (Kittu, 1995). Groundwater irrigation now accounts for more than 50% of the net irrigated area in India (GOI, 1992). According to some reports: ‘groundwater irrigation already accounts for 75–80% of the irrigated production’ (Daines & Pawar, 1987). Today, groundwater also supplies 80% of domestic water supply in rural areas and perhaps 50% of urban and industrial uses (World Bank/GOI, 1997).

Over-development of groundwater is causing threats to groundwater supplies in terms of depletion and groundwater quality deterioration (Moench, 1993; Kumar, 1995). Alarming drops in water table and increasing levels of fluoride and TDS are reported from the deep alluvial areas of North Gujarat (Bhatia, 1991; Kumar, 1995). Dropping groundwater levels are observed in many parts of Rajasthan, Punjab, Tamil Nadu and Karnataka. Saline intrusion is occurring in the coastal aquifers of Gujarat and in Chennai coast of Tamil Nadu (Kumar, 1995). Widespread incidences of high arsenic content in deep aquifers have affected 34 districts and 50 million people in West Bengal and neighbouring Bangladesh. However, major institutional innovations to manage groundwater are absent.

The focus of this paper is on the institutional framework for community-based groundwater management. The paper discusses the institutional structure for local groundwater management consisting of village institutions, watershed committees and aquifer management committees and identifies and determines the externalities. It also provides a case study of community-based local groundwater management initiative in Gujarat State of India. It recognizes and demonstrates the role of these institutions in the overall institutional arrangements for groundwater management at the basin level.

Section snippets

Legal and regulatory approaches to manage groundwater

De Jure rights to groundwater are not clearly defined. But de facto, groundwater belongs to all those who have land overlaying it (Singh, 1995). Any one who has a piece of land has access to the resource underlying. A landowner can legally abstract any amount of water unless the geo-hydrology limits. The lack of well-defined property rights, the invisibility, indivisibility and the complex flow characteristics of groundwater makes it difficult to monitor the use (Singh, 1995). On the other

General framework for design of groundwater management institutions

The institutional structure for community-based local groundwater management suggested here have three levels in the hierarchy that are vertically integrated.

Local management of groundwater by user groups

The nature of groundwater problems varies from region to region and location to location and as a result the management solutions for one locality cannot be adopted for another. Also, there is a range of physical, social, economic, and institutional factors, which affect the effectiveness of any groundwater management solution for a locality. These factors also vary from locality to locality. As a result, groundwater management solutions are to be ‘locale specific’ and should incorporate the

A case study of community-based groundwater management

The Mehsana district in Gujarat is underlain by a rich multi-layered alluvial aquifer which underlies most parts of the district. But, with the average annual extraction (900 MCM) far exceeding annual recharge (510 MCM) (GOG, 1992), overdraft of groundwater for irrigation has resulted in many depletion problems in the district. Water levels are falling at alarming rates resulting in drying up of many thousands of shallow open wells, large reduction in deep tube well yields, and increasing

Alternative institutional and legal framework for groundwater management

In the absence of well-defined property rights structure, the increase in groundwater supplies due to management interventions will lead to increased use by a few, undermining local management efforts. Therefore, unless the communities establish rights over the resource and regulate the demand, groundwater cannot be sustainably managed.

Many researchers suggest the establishment of tradable private rights as a solution to the growing issues of access equity and efficiency in water (Frederick,

Conclusion

The legal and regulatory measures to be used by the Central Groundwater Authority are likely to be ineffective, as they deny ownership rights to individual users and do not involve them in management. The Central Groundwater Authority being set up in India should evolve strategies and guidelines for Joint Management of groundwater for ‘problem areas’ and provide legal, financial and technical support for speeding up the process of institutional development from aquifer to watershed to village

References (19)

  • Bhatia, B. (1991). Lush fields and parched throats: Political economy of groundwater in Gujarat. Working Paper, World...
  • Chaudhari, S. (1996). To sell a resource. Down to Earth, New Delhi, February...
  • Daines, S. R. & Pawar, J. R. (1987). Economic returns to irrigation in India. SDR Research Groups Inc. and Development...
  • Frederick, K. D. (1993). Balancing water demands with supplies: The role of management in a world of increasing...
  • Frederiksen, H. D. (1998). Institutional principles for sound management of water and related environmental resources....
  • Government of Gujarat. (1992). Report of the Committee on Estimation of Groundwater Resources and Irrigation Potential...
  • Government of India. (1992). Indian agriculture in brief (24th ed.). Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Ministry...
  • Kittu, N. (1995). Status of groundwater development and its impact on groundwater quality. In M. Moench, Groundwater...
  • Kumar, M. D. (1995). Approaches to groundwater management: An overview of groundwater situation in Gujarat, Western...
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (32)

  • Water resources of rural India: Challenges and management strategies for sustainable development

    2023, Water Resources Management for Rural Development: Challenges and Mitigation
  • Groundwater Economics and Policy in South Asia

    2023, Groundwater Economics and Policy in South Asia
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text