Tectonothermal events in Central Indian Tectonic Zone (CITZ) and its implications in Rodinian crustal assembly

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1367-9120(02)00180-3Get rights and content

Abstract

The Precambrian crust of Central India comprising Bundelkhand Craton (BKC) in the north and Bastar Craton (BC) in the south were accreted along a ENE–WSW trending Proterozoic Central Indian Tectonic Zone (CITZ). The CITZ is an ensemble of several low- to medium-grade supracrustal belts, gneisses, granitoids and a few linear tracts of granulite belts. A number of crustal scale shear zones define the boundaries of the supracrustal belts and discrete terrains. Available data suggest polyphase tectonothermal events in CITZ, spanning from Palaeoproterozoic to early Neoproterozoic. Each event is characterized by contractional tectonic regime and attendant metamorphism and magmatism. A new plate tectonic model, in contrast to the earlier one of Yedekar et al. [Geol. Surv. India Spec. Publ. 28 (1990) ], is proposed. According to the present model a northward dipping subduction system leading to continent–continent collision explains the growth and assembly of the CITZ. The continent–continent collision is tentatively placed at ca. 1.5 Ga, which is comparable to similar tectonothermal event in Chotanagpur Gneissic Complex further east. While the suturing event predates the global Grenvillian Orogeny (∼ca. 1.3–1.0 Ga), the Sausar tectonothermal event (ca. 1.1–0.9 Ga) of CITZ is correlatable with the latter.

Introduction

It is well known that a supercontinent called Rodinia, which apparently contained all continental blocks, existed at ∼1 Ga (Dalziel, 1991, Hoffman, 1991, Moores, 1991). It is presumed that Rodinia was formed largely by accretion of various continental blocks during Grenvillian/Circum East Antarctica (CEA) Orogeny (ca. 1.3–1.0 Ga) (Rogers, 1996, Yoshida et al., 2000, Condie, 2003). In general, these orogenic/mobile belts are characterized by amalgamation of various components, which record several episodes of Pre-Grenvillian tectonothermal events. Thus, it is essential to study different components and imprints of complex tectonothermal histories of a mobile belt in order to build coherent regional scale tectonic models. Although the applicability of the plate tectonic models to the Precambrian terranes is questioned by few workers (e.g. Hamilton, 1998, Perchuk et al., 2001 and references therein), such models are widely used and excellently demonstrated in many of the Archaean–Proterozoic mobile belts (e.g. Windley, 1995, Condie and Solan, 1998, de Wit, 1998, Chadwick et al., 2000).

The Peninsular shield of India is composed of several Archaean cratons bordered/separated by Proterozoic mobile belts (Fig. 1, inset). Eastern Ghat Mobile Belt (EGMB), Delhi–Aravalli Mobile Belt, Singbhum Mobile Belt and Central Indian Tectonic Zone (CITZ) are some of the prominent mobile belts. Among them, a considerable amount of work has been carried on EGMB, which revealed the polycyclic tectonothermal evolution of the belt (Dasgupta, 1998, Dasgupta and Sengupta, 2000, Yoshida et al., 2000). Further, continuation of EGMB in to the adjoining east Gondwanaland has been demonstrated. In comparison, the CITZ has received little attention in 1980s, barring a few publications on the geological aspects of different lithotectonic units (Roy and Bandyopadhyay, 1990, Jain et al., 1991, Bandyopadhyay et al., 1995). Yedekar et al. (1990) provided the plate tectonic model for the evolution of the CITZ, which was refuted by later workers (Bhowmik et al., 1999, Acharyya and Roy, 2000, Roy et al., 2000). Recognition of ca. 1.0 Ga event from Sausar supracrustal belt (Lippolt and Hautmann, 1994) and collision-related high-pressure granulite belt (Bhowmik et al., 1999, Bhowmik et al., 2000), provided major impetus for detailed studies on CITZ in the perspective of the Rodinian Assembly (Acharyya, 2001, Acharyya and Roy, 2000, Bhowmik et al., 2000, Roy et al., 2000, Roy et al., 2001, Roy and Hanuma Prasad, 2001a). Here we present a brief review of the studies carried out so far and enumerate a plate tectonic model for the evolution of CITZ.

Section snippets

Regional tectonic assembly

The Precambrian crust of Central India consists of two Archaean cratonic domains, viz. Bundelkhand Craton (BKC) in the north and Bastar Craton (BC) in the south, which were accreted along the ENE–WSW trending CITZ (Fig. 1). Both BKC and BC are made up of gneisses–supracrustals–granite association and record independent evolutionary histories spanning over ∼1000 Ma ranging from ca. 3.5 to ca. 2.5 Ga (Basu, 1986, Sarkar et al., 1993, Sarkar et al., 1995, Sharma, 1998, Roy et al., 2000). The

Mahakoshal supracrustal belt

The ENE–WSW trending Mahakoshal supracrustal belt is a prominent, fault-controlled asymmetrical rift basin (Roy and Bandyopadhyay, 1990) which occurs in the northern part of CITZ. It is bounded by SNNF in the north and SNSF in the south and extends for more than 600 km along strike. It is bordered in the north by Archaean gneiss–granite–supracrustal complex (Sidhi gneissic complex, part of the BKC) and in the south by vast expanse of Proterozoic granitic intrusives. The lithoassemblage of the

Makrohar Granulite Belt

The granitic rocks south of Mahakoshal supracrustal belt contain enclaves of amphibolite to granulite facies rocks (Pichai Muthu, 1990). They occur as small rafts to WNW–ESE trending mappable units. Calc silicates, marble, BIF, metapelites and basic rocks represent the lithoassemblage in them. They are intruded by gabbro-anorthsite and granitic suite of rocks. No geochronological data is available from this belt. However, similar granitic rocks from the adjoining area yield Rb–Sr ages in the

Shear zones and granite magmatism

CITZ, as described earlier, is characterized by a few regional scale ductile shear zones. Recent studies have indicated that these shear zones owe their origin to different deformational events in CITZ and in turn, provided avenues for the emplacement of granitic magma (Roy et al., 2002a, Roy and Hanuma Prasad, 2001b). Some of the prominent shear zones, viz. SNSF, Tan Shear and CIS, are discussed below.

Discussion

The CITZ evolved through polyphase Proterozoic tectonothermal events involving several cycles of volcano-sedimentary deposition, deformation, metamorphism and magmatism. Limited radiometric data indicate a protracted evolutionary history, spanning over 1.0 Ga. Proper understanding of this history is essential to build any tectonic model, which in turn will throw light on the tectonic assembly of the Peninsular Indian Shield.

Yedekar et al. (1990) proposed a plate tectonic model for the evolution

Conclusions

The CITZ, as shown above, is an assembly of several lithotectonic components, which evolved through polyphase tectonothermal events. Geochronological data confirm protracted period of evolution from ca. 2.2–0.9 Ga. Based on the geological and limited geochronological data the prominent tectonothermal events in the CITZ can be tentatively placed at ca. 1.8, ca. 1.5 and ca. 1.1–0.9 Ga. The first event is correlatable with the orogeny and deformation of Mahakoshal belt in a convergent arc setting,

Acknowledgements

The paper is published with the kind permission of the Director General, Geological Survey of India. We are thankful to Dr A. Gupta, Dy. Director General (Retd.) and Shri Seva Dass, Dy. Director General, GSI, Central Region for constant support and encouragement. We profusely thank Prof. S. Dasgupta and Prof. M. Yoshida for kindly inviting us to present the paper for publication. Comments by one of the anonymous reviewers and constructive discussions with Dr S.K. Bhowmik of IIT, Kharagpur and

References (66)

  • B.K. Bandyopadhyay et al.

    Structure and tectonics of a part of Central Indian shield

    Memoir Geological Society of India

    (1995)
  • A.K. Basu

    Geology of parts of Bundelkhand Granite massif, Central India

    Records Geological Survey of India

    (1986)
  • S.K. Bhowmik

    Granulite–granite connection: a case study from the northern part of the Sausar mobile belt in Central India

    Unpublished Report of Geological Survey of India

    (2000)
  • S.K. Bhowmik et al.

    Petrotectonic implications of the granulite suite north of the Sausar mobile belt in the overall tectonothermal evolution of the Central Indian Mobile Belt

    Unpublished Report of Geological Survey of India

    (2000)
  • S.K. Bhowmik et al.

    Evidence for Pre-Grenvillian high-pressure granulite metamorphism from the northern margin of the Sausar mobile belt in central India

    Journal of Geological Society of India

    (1999)
  • S.K. Bhowmik et al.

    Implication of Ramakona cordierite gneiss in the crustal evolution of Sausar mobile belt in central India

    Precambrian Crust in Eastern and Central India. Geological Survey of India, Special Publication

    (2000)
  • A. Chaudhuri et al.

    Nature of volcanism and related gold mineralization at Suda, Sidhi district, Madhya Pradesh

    Precambrian of Central India. Geological Survey of India, Special Publication

    (1990)
  • A. Chhattopadhyay et al.

    Geology and structure of the Sausar fold belt: a retrospection and some new thoughts

    Geological Survey of India, Special Publication

    (2001)
  • K.C. Condie

    Supercontinents, superplumes and continental growth: the record in the Neoproterozoic supercontinent Rodinia

    Geological Society of London, Special Publication

    (2003)
  • K.C. Condie et al.

    Origin and Evolution of Earth

    (1998)
  • I.W.D. Dalziel

    Pacific margins of Laurentia and East Antarctica–Australia as a conjugate rift pair: evidence and implications for an Eocambrian supercontinent

    Geology

    (1991)
  • S. Dasgupta

    Pressure–temperature evolutionary history of the Eastern Ghats granulite province: recent advances and some thoughts

  • S. Dasgupta et al.

    Tectonothermal evolution of Eastern Ghats Granulite Belt, India: a metamorphic perspective

    Geological Survey of India, Special Publication

    (2000)
  • M.K. Devarajan et al.

    A report on the second generation mapping of the area between Bharweli and Ukwa, Balaghat district, Madhya Pradesh

    Unpublished Report of Geological Survey of India

    (1992)
  • P.R. Golani et al.

    Gavilgarh–Tan Shear: a prominent ductile shear zone in central India with multiple reactivation history

    Geological Survey of India, Special Publication

    (2001)
  • P.F. Hoffman

    Did the break out of Laurentia turn Gondwana inside-out?

    Science

    (1991)
  • S.C. Jain et al.

    Central Indian Shear Zone: a major Precambrian crustal boundary

    Journal of Geological Society of India

    (1991)
  • A.S. Khan et al.

    Specialized thematic mapping in Sausar fold Belt in Manegaon-Karwahi, Totaladoh Kirangi, Sarra and Susurdoh-Sotekasa area, Nagpur and Bhandara Districts, Maharashtra for elucidation of stratigraphy, structure, metamorphic history and tectonic

    Records of Geological Survey of India

    (1999)
  • V. Kumar

    Petrography and geochemistry of Jungel metavolcanics, Bijawar greenstone belt, Central India: a picritic basalt low K-andesite association

    Journal of Geological Society of India

    (1993)
  • H.J. Lippolt et al.

    Ar40/Ar39 ages of Precambrian manganese ore minerals from Sweden, India and Morocco

    Mineralium Deposita

    (1994)
  • B.K. Mishra et al.

    Stratigraphy and structure of the Precambrian basement rocks and Gondwana sequences in Sarguja, Raigarh and Bilaspur districts of Madhya Pradesh

    Records of Geological Survey of India

    (1994)
  • E.M. Moores

    Southwest US–East Antarctica (SWEAT) connections: a hypothesis

    Geology

    (1991)
  • K.K.K. Nair et al.

    Stratigraphy, structure and geochemistry of the Mahakoshal greenstone

    Memoir Geological Society of India

    (1995)
  • Cited by (166)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text