Comparison of the biological H2S removal characteristics among four inorganic packing materials
References (24)
- et al.
Degradation characteristics of hydrogen sulfide, methanetiol, dimethyl sulfide and dimethyl disulfide by Thiobacillus thioparus DW44 isolated from peat biofilter
J. Ferment. Bioeng.
(1991) - et al.
Removal characteristics of dimethyl sulfide, methanethiol and hydrogen sulfide by Hyphomicrobium sp., I55 isolated from peat biofilter
J. Ferment. Bioeng.
(1991) - et al.
Enhanced removal efficiency of malodorous gases in a pilot-scale peat biofilter inoculated with Thiobacillus thioparus DW44
J. Ferment. Bioeng.
(1992) - et al.
Elimination of hydrogen sulphide from odorous air by a wood bark biofilter
Water Res.
(1986) - et al.
Effects of periods of starvation and fluctuating hydrogen sulfide concentration on biofilter dynamics and performance
J. Hazard. Mater.
(1998) - et al.
Characteristics of hydrogen sulfide removal by Thiobacillus thiooxidans KS1 isolated from a carrier-packed biological deodorization system
J. Ferment. Bioeng.
(1995) - et al.
Biological deodorization using activated carbon fabric as a carrier of microorganisms
J. Ferment. Bioeng.
(1989) - et al.
Treatment of exhaust gases from a night soil treatment plant by a combined deodorization system of activated carbon fabric reactor and peat biofilter inoculated with Thiobacillus thioparus DW44
J. Ferment. Bioeng.
(1993) - et al.
Biological deodorization of hydrogen sulfide using porous lava as a carrier of Thiobacillus thioparus
J. Biosci. Bioeng.
(2000) - et al.
Characteristics of H2S oxidizing bacteria inhabiting a peat biofilter
J. Ferment. Technol.
(1986)
Removal characteristics of hydrogen sulphide and methanethiol by Thiobacillus sp. isolated from peat biofilter in biological deodorization
J. Ferment. Bioeng.
Methods for the biological treatment of exhaust gases
Cited by (63)
Behavior of nitrogen and sulfur compounds in the rice husk pellet bioscrubber and its circulation water
2022, Journal of Environmental ManagementCitation Excerpt :Bioscrubbers are considered as an alternative to other biological deodorization methods, combining the physical methods of absorbing odorous substances into body fluids with the biological methods of oxidizing the odorous substances by microorganisms (Wysocka et al., 2019; Bravo et al., 2017). Conventional media used for biological deodorization include foamed polymer materials, bark, and ceramics (Hirai et al., 2001). However, the flow of odor gases causes drying in the medium, which prevents the continuous supply of nutrients needed by microorganisms, making the system unsustainable.
Removal of H<inf>2</inf>S in biogas using biotrickling filter: Recent development
2020, Process Safety and Environmental ProtectionCitation Excerpt :Inorganic material includes porous ceramic, lava rock, glass beads, and rubber particles, while organic materials include wood chips, soil, and compost (Hirai et al., 2001). The organic materials are utilized by traditional biofilters which have characteristics such as good surface properties, low cost, and high porosity (Hirai et al., 2001; Wu et al., 2018). Moreover, the organic materials may not require additional nutrients in the start-up period, while inorganic or synthetic materials must acquire nutrients from external sources (Moe and Irvine, 2000) to ensure the growth of SOB.
Review of odour abatement in sewer networks
2016, Journal of Environmental Chemical EngineeringSynthesis and evaluation of some amine compounds having surface active properties as H<inf>2</inf>S scavenger
2014, Egyptian Journal of PetroleumRemoval of odorous compounds from poultry manure by microorganisms on perlite - bentonite carrier
2014, Journal of Environmental ManagementSteady-and transient-state H<inf>2</inf>S biofiltration using expanded schist as packing material
2013, New BiotechnologyCitation Excerpt :Concerning long-term operation systems, organic beds lack some of the requirements for good biofilter performance such as low pressure drop, high nutrient composition, high microbial density, air permeability, buffering capacity and high porosity [7]. Hence, several studies have focused on the use of different synthetic materials to offset organic bed deficiencies [8–10]. Inorganic and synthetic materials can provide a good and stable physical support for biofilm formation, yet they should also ensure enough water and nutrient content, as a good buffering effect.