Elsevier

Emerging Markets Review

Volume 2, Issue 4, 1 December 2001, Pages 387-417
Emerging Markets Review

Intra-day seasonalities on stock returns: evidence from the Turkish Stock Market

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1566-0141(01)00026-7Get rights and content

Abstract

One of the interesting findings among the seasonalities in stock markets is that the return, volume and volatility of the stock prices and bid-ask spreads all follow a U-shaped pattern over the trading day. This study examines the intra-daily seasonalities of the stock returns in the emerging Turkish Stock Market which is an order-driven market using electronic trading without market makers, in the period from 1996 to 1999, by using 15-min (and also 5- and 1-min) interval data. Results show that stock returns follow a U-shaped or more precisely a W-shaped pattern over the trading day at the Istanbul Stock Exchange (ISE) since there are two separate trading sessions in a day. Opening (Overnight) and closing returns are significantly large and positive. Volatility is higher at the openings and follows an L-shaped pattern during the both sessions. Interestingly, the daily average close-to-close returns are generated only during the opening and closing intervals and the average intra-day return is negative when the returns at the opening and/or closing intervals (even the first and the last minutes of the day) are excluded from the analyses. Relatively higher mean return and standard deviation at the openings of the trading sessions seem to be significantly generated by the accumulated overnight information and the closed-market effect (halt of trade). Large day-end returns are strongly affected by the activities of fund managers and speculators for the window-dressing around the close. Finally, intra-day seasonalities exist significantly also in the Turkish Stock Market as consistent with those of the international stock markets.

Introduction

Price behavior in financial markets has generated much research interest. The existence of seasonalities that contradicts the Efficient Markets Hypothesis in stock markets has increased the importance of intra-day data which offer further insight in understanding the price behavior of stocks. One of the interesting findings among the seasonalities in stock market prices is that the return, volume and volatility of the stock prices and the spread between the bid and ask quotes, all broadly follow a U-shaped pattern.2 All these variables are at the highest point at the opening, fall rapidly to lower levels during mid-day and then rise again towards the close.

Harris (1986) shows that there is a general increase in New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) stock prices on the last trade of the day for the period December 1, 1981 through January 31, 1983. Harris found that the weekend effect spills over into the first 45 min of trading on Monday, with prices falling during this period. On all other days, prices rise sharply during the first 45 min. Also, returns are high near the very end of the day, particularly on the last trade of the day. Furthermore, the day-end price changes are greatest when the final transaction is within the last 5 min of trading. He indicated that stocks traded in the last 5 min went up 0.1241% (1.75 cents), while the increase on the last trade for all stocks was only 0.0507% (0.595 cents). This is a large increase; assuming 250 trading days per year, a 0.1241% per day increase amounts to 31% without compounding.

Wood et al. (1985), Brooks and Chiou, 1995, McInish and Wood, 1990a with a 1980–84 NYSE dataset and Jain and Joh (1988) with hourly price changes using the S&P's index for the 1979–1983 period have also obtained similar results that report very high returns for the last minute of the day. Furthermore, some researchers3 indicate to the relationship between intra-day and day-of-the week effects.

It is widely documented that the return volatility varies systematically over the trading day and that this pattern is highly correlated with the intraday variation in trading volume and bid-ask spreads. Jain and Joh (1988) document a positive relation between volume and contemporaneous and lagged returns that is especially strong for positive returns. They study hourly aggregate NYSE volume and report that the volume is particularly high at the beginning and towards the close of trading. Foster and Viswanathan (1993) and Brock and Kleidon (1992) also identify U-shaped patterns in volume and volatility for NYSE stocks. The highest volume coincides with the highest variance, which is supportive of the concentrated trading model of Admati and Pfleiderer (1988). They find a significant positive relation between the volume and volatility of the stocks. Wood et al. (1985), Harris (1986), McInish and Wood (1990a), Foster and Viswanathan (1993), Ho and Cheung (1991), Chang et al. (1995), Madhavan et al. (1997) find similar results that the variance of returns is much higher at both the open and the close than for the rest of the day.

Moreover, bid-ask spread,4 risk premium,5 the number of shares traded,6 number of trades,7 quote revisions8 and trade size9 all have also been shown to have U-shaped patterns over the day.

Additional to the evidence from US markets, Cheung (1995), Lam and Tong (1999) for the Hong Kong Stock Market, Miller (1989), Yadav and Pope (1992) for the UK market and Choe and Shin (1993) for Korean, Copeland and Jones (2000) for Korean and Hong Kong Markets provide evidence for the intra-day effects. However, existence of intraday patterns and more specifically U-shaped patterns has been demonstrated for other markets such as: by Peterson (1990) and Aggarwal and Gruca (1993) for equity options market, Muller et al. (1990) and Baillie and Bollerslev (1990) for the foreign exchange market, Cornett et al. (1995) for the foreign exchange futures market, and Jordan et al. (1987) for the commodities market.

The main motivation here in this study is the search for evidence to support the microstructural hypotheses regarding intradaily trading patterns which are given in Section 2. In this context, the Turkish market is particularly interesting because of the shut down at lunchtime with two trading sessions in a day similar to the most of the Asian markets. For instance, if the Brock and Kleidon hypothesis is correct, this market should have four rather than two peak in activity during the day. Existing literature concentrates on markets where floor trading predominates. The ISE is a continuous order-driven market which uses computerized trading system but without a specialist or market maker.

However, finding an evidence for the existence of intra-day effect in an emerging market would imply that there may be significant opportunities for the international investors to make profit if they have discretion to time their trades. This study will also refer to this issue in order to find whether large profits can be obtained by using a simple trading rule such as buying and selling stocks at a particular time during the trading day based on the intra-day seasonality in stock returns observed.

Section snippets

Market structure and the trading mechanism

Amihud and Mendelson (1987) show that differences in the opening and closing trading mechanisms on the NYSE influence equity returns at these times and the higher variances at the opening may be related to strategic trading induced by the opening procedures used by the NYSE. Chan et al. (1995) indicated that the difference in intraday patterns between the NYSE and either the NASDAQ or the London market supports the contention that the institutional features of markets can have material effects

Institutional specifications of the ISE

Although the Istanbul Stock Exchange (ISE) was established just a decade ago in 1986, it has achieved rapid development. As a leading emerging market, ISE's progressive infrastructure and dynamism are attracting increasing international interest. In average, 50% of the free float of the shares at the ISE is owned by international institutional investors. Total market capitalization is approximately US$ 100 billion whereas it is a highly active market with an average daily trading value of US$

Summary and conclusion

One of the interesting findings among the seasonalities in stock markets is that the return, volume and volatility of the stock prices and bid-ask spreads all broadly follow a U-shaped pattern over the trading day. However, there is no consensus on the reasons of this phenomenon, previous findings indicate that market microstructure (specialist, opening/closing trading mechanisms), liquidity (halt of trade), information and psychological based factors have an important impact in generating and

Acknowledgements

Helpful comments contributed by the participants in the Annual Meeting of the European Financial Management Association in Athens in June 2000 are gratefully acknowledged.

References (64)

  • U.A. Muller et al.

    Statistical study of foreign exchange rates, empirical evidence of a price scaling law, and intraday analysis

    J. Banking Finance

    (1990)
  • P.K. Yadav et al.

    Intraweek and intraday seasonalities in stock market risk premia: cash and futures

    J. Banking Finance

    (1992)
  • A.R. Admati et al.

    A theory of intraday patterns: volume and price variability

    Rev. Financial Stud.

    (1988)
  • A.R. Admati et al.

    Divide and conquer: a theory of intraday and day-of-the-week effects

    Rev. Financial Stud.

    (1989)
  • R. Aggarwal et al.

    Intraday trading patterns in the equity options markets

    J. Financial Res

    (1993)
  • Y. Amihud et al.

    Trading mechanisms and stock returns: an empirical investigation

    J. Finance

    (1987)
  • Y. Amihud et al.

    Efficiency and trading: evidence from the Japanese Stock Market

    J. Finance

    (1991)
  • R.T. Baillie et al.

    Intra day and inter market volatility in foreign exchange rates

    Rev. Econ. Studies

    (1990)
  • M.J. Barclay et al.

    Private information, trading volume and stock-return variances

    Rev. Financial Stud.

    (1990)
  • H. Bessembinder et al.

    Return autocorrelations around nontrading volume and stock-return variances

    Rev. Financial Stud.

    (1993)
  • R. Bildik

    Day-of-the week effects in Turkish money and stock markets

    Annual Meeting of EFMA, Paris, June 25–28

    (1999)
  • T. Bollerslev et al.

    Trading patterns and prices in the interbank foreign exchange market

    J. Finance

    (1993)
  • R.M. Brooks et al.

    A bias in closing prices: the case of when-issued pricing anomaly

    J. Financial Quant. Anal.

    (1995)
  • K.C. Chan et al.

    Market structure and the intraday pattern of bid-ask spreads for NASDAQ securities

    J. Bus. Chicago

    (1995)
  • E.C. Chang et al.

    Standard & Poor's 500 Index Futures volatility and price changes around the New York Stock Exchange close

    J. Bus. Chicago

    (1995)
  • Y. Cheung

    Intraday returns and the day-end effect: evidence from the Hong Kong Equity Market

    J. Bus. Finance Acc.

    (1995)
  • J. Conrad et al.

    Long-term market overreaction or bias in computed returns

    J. Finance

    (1993)
  • L. Copeland et al.

    Intradaily Patterns in Two Asian Index Futures Markets: Korea and Hong Kong, Working Paper presented at EFMA-2000, Athens

    (2000)
  • B. Cornell

    The weekly pattern in stock returns: cash versus future: a note

    J. Finance

    (1985)
  • Fabozzi, F.J., Ma, C.K., Briley, J.E., 1994. Holiday trading in futures markets, J. Finance...
  • F.D. Foster et al.

    A theory of interday variations in volumes, variances, and trading costs in securities markets

    Rev. Financial Stud.

    (1990)
  • F.D. Foster et al.

    Variations in trading volume, return volatility, and trading costs: evidence on recent price formation models

    J. Finance

    (1993)
  • Cited by (30)

    • The day of the week effect and interest rates

      2020, Borsa Istanbul Review
      Citation Excerpt :

      Interest rates fall significantly on Wednesdays and increase on Mondays relative to the previous days, and stock market returns are significantly higher on Fridays (in the one-day settlement and full periods) and Thursdays (in the two-day settlements) than on other days of the week. Bildik (2001) studies the day of the week effect in ISE returns, and his findings are similar to Bildik (1998)'s results. In recent years, studies on the day of the week effect in the cryptocurrency market have become popular.

    • Intraday volatility and the implementation of a closing call auction at Borsa Istanbul

      2017, Emerging Markets Review
      Citation Excerpt :

      Some such studies include Choe and Shin (1993), Tian and Guo (2007) and Tissaoui (2012) who study the Korean Stock Exchange, the Shanghai Stock Exchange, and the Tunisian Stock Exchange respectively. Bildik (2001) and Inci (2012) both survey the intraday return and volatility behavior at the Borsa Istanbul (and its predecessor Istanbul Stock Exchange) using different sample periods. Our paper is different from previous work; we examine the evolution of intraday volatility at BIST using the longest to date high frequency data, and also analyze the impact of the closing call auction implementation on intraday volatility accentuation, especially near the market close.

    • Trading session effects on stock returns and their conditional volatility: Firm-level evidence from a European Union accession country

      2016, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications
      Citation Excerpt :

      In the case of weak form efficiency testing, calendar effects have attracted much more interest compared to the other tests. For example; Refs. [6–13] focus on the intraday and the day of the week effects, Balaban [14] on the month of the year effects and the term structure of volatility, and Balaban and Candemir [15] on the holiday effects. With special reference to the semi-strong form efficiency, we can cite Muradoglu and Onkal [16], to our best knowledge, being the first paper in this area; Muradoglu and Metin [17] with respect to monetary variables using cointegration analysis; Balaban, Candemir and Kunter [18] using a large set of monetary and financial variables in structural models; Yuce and Simga-Mugan [19] on the short and long run relationships between the financial markets; Balaban and Kunter [20] using Granger-causality tests for the interrelationships between the money, foreign exchange and stock markets; Muradoglu, Berument and Metin [21] with more emphasis on the risk–return relationship; Muradoglu, Metin and Argac [22], again, from a long-run perspective with respect to monetary variables; Among these, only Balaban, Candemir and Kunter [18] use the information variables decomposed into their anticipated and unanticipated components through autoregressive moving average models, as we discuss above.

    • Dynamic seasonality in time series

      2014, Computational Statistics and Data Analysis
      Citation Excerpt :

      This type of seasonality, which is associated with the variance process, is regarded as seasonality in variance. Bildik (2001) illustrated in detail the possible causes of seasonality in the variance observed in financial time series. Giot (2000, 2005) introduced a decomposition to extract seasonality in variance and used the average squared return of each season to model the corresponding seasonal component.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    The opinions expressed do not necessarily represent those of the Istanbul Stock Exchange.

    1

    Ph.D. Bildik is also Assistant Director of Stock Market Department of the Istanbul Stock Exchange.

    View full text