Skip to main content
Log in

sEMG Pattern Recognition of Muscle Force of Upper Arm for Intelligent Bionic Limb Control

  • Published:
Journal of Bionic Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two new feature extraction methods, window sample entropy and window kurtosis, were proposed, which mainly aims to complete the surface Electromyography (sEMG)-muscle force pattern recognition for intelligent bionic limb. The inspiration is drawn from physiological process of muscle force generation. Five hand movement tasks were implemented for sEMG-muscle force data record. With two classical features: Integrated Electromyography (IEMG) and Root Mean Square (RMS), two new features were fed into the wavelet neural network to predict the muscle force. To solve the issues that amputates’ residual limb couldn’t provide full train data for pattern recognition, it is proposed that force was predicted by neural network which is trained by contralateral data in this paper. The feasibility of the proposed features extraction methods was demonstrated by both ipsilateral and contralateral experimental results. The ipsilateral experimental results give very promising pattern classification accuracy with normalized mean square 0.58 ± 0.05. In addition, unilateral transradial amputees will benefit from the proposed method in the contralateral experiment, which probably helps them to train the intelligent bionic limb by their own sEMG.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Otto Bock System Electric Hand. Patent 647H326, Otto Bock, Germany, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dhillon G S, Horch K W. Direct neural sensory feedback and control of a prosthetic arm. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 2005, 13, 468–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Biddiss E A, Chau T T. Upper limb prosthesis use and abandonment: A survey of the last 25 years. Prosthetics and Orthotics International, 2007, 31, 236–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yang D, Zhao J, Gu Y, Wang X, Li N, Jiang L, Liu H, Huang H, Zhao D. An anthropomorphic robot hand developed based on underactuated mechanism and controlled by EMG signals. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2009, 6, 255–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kent B A, Lavery J, Engeberg E D. Anthropomorphic control of a dexterous artificial hand via task dependent temporally synchronized synergies. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2014, 11, 236–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Scheme E, Englehart K. Electromyogram pattern recognition for control of powered upper-limb prostheses: State of the art and challenges for clinical use. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development, 2011, 48, 643–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Parker P, Englehart K, Hudgins B. Myoelectric signal processing for control of powered limb prostheses. Congress of the International-Society-of-Electrophysiology-and-Kinesiology, Torino, Italy, 2006, 541–548.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Li G, Schultz A E, Kuiken T A. Quantifying pattern recognition-based myoelectric control of multifunctional transradial prostheses. Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 2010, 18, 185–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Li Y, Tian Y T, Chen W Z. Modeling and classifying of sEMG based on FFT blind identification. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2012, 38, 128–134. (in Chinese)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Khezri M, Jahed M. Real-time intelligent pattern recognition algorithm for surface EMG signals. Biomedical Engineering online, 2007, 6, 45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Khezri M, Jahed M. A neuron-fuzzy inference system for sEMG-based identification of hand motion commands. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2011, 58, 1952–1960.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Li N, Yang D, Jiang L, Liu H, Cai H G. Combined use of FSR sensor array and SVM classifier for finger motion recognition based on pressure distribution map. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2012, 9, 39–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lloyd D G, Besier T F. An EMG-driven musculoskeletal model to estimate muscle forces and knee joint moments in vivo. Journal of Biomechanics, 2003, 36, 765–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wei G F, Tian F, Tang G, Wang C T. A wavelet-based method to predict muscle forces from surface electromyography signals in weightlifting. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2012, 9, 48–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Menegaldo L L, Oliveira L F. The influence of modeling hypothesis and experimental methodologies in the accuracy of muscle force estimation using EMG-driven models. Multibody System Dynamics, 2012, 28, 21–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kamavuakoa E N, Farina D, Yoshida K, Jensen W. Relationship between grasping force and features of single-channel intramuscular EMG signals. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 2009, 185, 143–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gurram R, Rakheja S, Gouw G J. A study of hand grip pressure distribution and EMG of finger flexor muscles under dynamic loads. Ergonomics, 1995, 38, 684–699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zajac F E. Muscle and tendon: properties, models, scaling, and application to biomechanics and motor control. Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering, 1988, 17, 359–411.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Scheme E J, Englehart K B, Hudgins B S. Selective classification for improved robustness of myoelectric control under nonideal conditions. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 2011, 58, 1698–1705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Abdelmaseeh M, Smith B, Stashuk D. Feature selection for motor unit potential train characterization. Muscle & Nerve, 2014, 49, 680–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hariharan M, Fook C Y, Sindhu R, Adom A H, Yaacob S. Objective evaluation of speech dysfluencies using wavelet packet transform with sample entropy. Digital Signal Processing, 2013, 23, 952–959.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. De Luca C J. The use of surface electromyography in biomechanics. Journal of Applied Biomechanics, 1997, 13, 135–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Jin F, Sattar F, Goh D Y T. New approaches for spectro-temporal feature extraction with applications to respiratory sound classification. Neurocomputing, 2014, 123, 362–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Arjunan S P, Kumar D K. Decoding subtle forearm flexions using fractal features of surface electromyogram from single and multiple sensors. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 2010, 7, 53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tian Yantao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhuojun, X., Yantao, T. & Yang, L. sEMG Pattern Recognition of Muscle Force of Upper Arm for Intelligent Bionic Limb Control. J Bionic Eng 12, 316–323 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6529(14)60124-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6529(14)60124-4

Keywords

Navigation