Skip to main content
Log in

The Merits of Passive Compliant Joints in Legged Locomotion: Fast Learning, Superior Energy Efficiency and Versatile Sensing in a Quadruped Robot

  • Published:
Journal of Bionic Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A quadruped robot with four actuated hip joints and four passive highly compliant knee joints is used to demonstrate the potential of underactuation from two standpoints: learning locomotion and perception. First, we show that: (i) forward locomotion on flat ground can be learned rapidly (minutes of optimization time); (ii) a simulation study reveals that a passive knee configuration leads to faster, more stable, and more efficient locomotion than a variant of the robot with active knees; (iii) the robot is capable of learning turning gaits as well. The merits of underactuation (reduced controller complexity, weight, and energy consumption) are thus preserved without compromising the versatility of behavior. Direct optimization on the reduced space of active joints leads to effective learning of model-free controllers. Second, we find passive compliant joints with potentiometers to effectively complement inertial sensors in a velocity estimation task and to outperform inertial and pressure sensors in a terrain detection task. Encoders on passive compliant joints thus constitute a cheap and compact but powerful sensing device that gauges joint position and force/torque, and — if mounted more distally than the last actuated joints in a legged robot — it delivers valuable information about the interaction of the robot with the ground.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. More H L, Hutchinson J R, Collins D F, Weber D J, Aung S K, Donelan J M. Scaling of sensorimotor control in terrestrial mammals. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2010, 277, 3563–3568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Blickhan R, Seyfarth A, Geyer H, Grimmer S, Wagner H, Guenther M. Intelligence by mechanics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A, 2007, 365, 199–220.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Ernst M, Geyer H, Blickhan R. Extension and customization of self-stability control in compliant legged systems. Bio-inspiration & Biomimetics, 2012, 7, 046002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Koditschek D E, Full R J, Buehler M. Mechanical aspects of legged locomotion control. Arthropod Structure and Development, 2004, 33, 251–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. McGeer T. Passive dynamic walking. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 1990, 9, 62–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Saranli U, Buehler M, Koditschek D. Rhex: A simple and highly mobile hexapod robot. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 2001, 20, 616–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Collins S, Ruina A, Tedrake R, Wisse M. Efficient bipedal robots based on passive dynamic walkers. Science, 2005, 307, 1082–1085.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Iida F. Biologically inspired motor control for underactuated robots — Trends and challenges. In: Kozlowski K R ed., Robot Motion and Control, 2009, Springer, London, UK, 2009, 145–154.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Berkemeier M D. Modeling the dynamics of quadrupedal running. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 1998, 17, 971–985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Schmiedeler J P, Waldron K J. The mechanics of quadrupedal galloping and the future of legged vehicles. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 1999, 18, 1224–1234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Meek S, Kim J, Anderson M. Stability of a trotting quadruped robot with passive, underactuated legs. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA 2008), Pasadena, California, US, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nie H, Sun R, Hu L, Su Z, Hu W. Control of a cheetah robot in passive bounding gait. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2016, 13, 283–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Poulakakis I, Smith J A, Buehler M. Modeling and experiments of untethered quadrupedal running with a bounding gait: The Scout II robot. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 2005, 24, 239–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Spröwitz A, Tuleu A, Vespignani M, Ajallooeian M, Badri E, Ijspeert A J. Towards dynamic trot gait locomotion: Design, control, and experiments with cheetahcub, a compliant quadruped robot. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 2013, 32, 932–950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Iida F, Gomez G, Pfeifer R. Exploiting body dynamics for controlling a running quadruped robot. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Advanced Robotics (ICAR 05), Seattle, USA, 2005, 229–235.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hoffmann M, Schmidt N, Nakajima K, Iida F, Pfeifer R. Perception, motor learning, and speed adaptation exploiting body dynamics: Case studies in a quadruped robot. Proceedings of International Symposium on Adaptive Motion in Animals and Machines (AMAM), Awaji, Japan, 2011, 39–40.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pfeifer R, Lungarella M, Iida F. The challenges ahead for bio-inspired ‘soft’ robotics. Communications of the ACM, 2012, 55, 76–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kurowski S, von Stryk O. A systematic approach to the design of embodiment with application to bio-inspired compliant legged robots. 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Hamburg, Germany, 2015, 3771–3778.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Matsushita K, Yokoi H, Arai T. Pseudo-passive dynamic walkers designed by coupled evolution of the controller and morphology. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 2006, 54, 674–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Chernova S, Veloso M. An evolutionary approach to gait learning for four-legged robots. Proceedings of 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2004), Sendai, Japan, 2004, 3, 2562–2567.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Christensen D, Larsen J, Stoy K. Fault-tolerant gait learning and morphology optimization of a polymorphic walking robot. Evolving Systems, 2014, 5, 21–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hornby G S, Takamura S, Yamamoto T, Fujita M. Autonomous evolution of dynamic gaits with two quadruped robots. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2005, 21, 402–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ikemoto S, Nishigori Y, Hosoda K. Advantages of flexible musculoskeletal robot structure in sensory acquisition. Artificial Life and Robotics, 2012, 17, 63–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sornkarn N, Howard M, Nanayakkara T. Internal impedance control helps information gain in embodied perception. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Hong Kong, China, 2014, 6685–6690.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Reinstein M, Hoffmann M. Dead reckoning in a dynamic quadruped robot based on multimodal proprioceptive information. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2013, 29, 563–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Degrave J, Cauwenbergh R, Wyffels F, Waegeman T, Schrauwen B. Terrain classification for a quadruped robot. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA), Miami, Florida, USA, 2013, 1, 185–190.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hoffmann M, Stepanova K, Reinstein M. The effect of motor action and different sensory modalities on terrain classification in a quadruped robot running with multiple gaits. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 2014, 62, 1790–1798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Schmidt N, Hoffmann M, Nakajima K, Pfeifer R. Bootstrapping perception using information theory: Case studies in a quadruped robot running on different grounds. Advances in Complex Systems, 2013, 16, 1250078.

  29. Pfeifer R, Iida F. Morphological computation: Connecting body, brain and environment. Japanese Scientific Monthly, 2005, 58, 48–54.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hauser H, Ijspeert A, Fuchslin R, Pfeifer R, Maass W. Towards a theoretical foundation for morphological computation with compliant bodies. Biological Cybernetics, 2011, 105, 355–370.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Hauser H, Nakajima K, Füchslin R M. Morphological computation — The body as a computational resource. In: Hauser H, Füchslin R M, Pfeifer R, eds., Opinions and Outlooks on Morphological Computation, Self-published e-book, Zurich, Switzerland, 2014, 226–244.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Müller V C, Hoffmann M. What is morphological computation? On how the body contributes to cognition and control. Artificial Life, 2017, 23, (in press).

  33. Caluwaerts K, D’Haene M, Verstraeten D, Schrauwen B. Locomotion without a brain: Physical reservoir computing in tensegrity structures. Artificial Life, 2013, 19, 35–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Nakajima K, Hauser H, Li T, Pfeifer R. Information processing via physical soft body. Scientific Reports, 2015, 5, 10487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Hoffmann M, Schmidt N, Pfeifer R, Engel A, Maye A. Using sensorimotor contingencies for terrain discrimination and adaptive walking behavior in the quadruped robot Puppy. In: Ziemke T, Balkenius C, Hallam J, eds., From Animals to Animats 12, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2012, 7426, 54–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Iida F, Pfeifer R. “Cheap” rapid locomotion of a quadruped robot: Self-stabilization of bounding gait. In: Groen F E A ed., Intelligent Autonomous Systems 8, IOS Press, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2004, 642–649.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Webots, [2013], http://www.cyberbotics.com.

  38. De Luca A, Book W. Robots with flexible elements. In: Siciliano B, Khatib O, eds., Springer Handbook of Robotics, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2008, 287–319.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  39. Abourachid A. A new way of analysing symmetrical and asymmetrical gaits in quadrupeds. Comptes Rendus Biologies, 2003, 326, 625–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kirkpatrick S, Gelatt C D, Vecchi M P. Optimization by simulated annealing. Science, 1983, 220, 671–680.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Ziegler M, Hoffmann M, Carbajal J P, Pfeifer R. Varying body stiffness for aquatic locomotion. 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2011, 2705–2712.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  42. Rechenberg I. Evolution Strategy: Optimization of Technical Systems by Means of Biological Evolution, 1st ed, Fromman - Holzboog, Stuttgart, German, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Hutter S. Co-evolution of Morphology and Controller of a Simulated Underactuated Quadruped Robot Using Evolutionary Algorithms, Bachelor thesis, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Ren L, Qian Z, Ren L Q. Biomechanics of musculoskeletal system and its biomimetic implications: A review. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2014, 11, 159–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. He J, Gao F. Type synthesis for bionic quadruped walking robots. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2015, 12, 527–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Seyfarth A, Geyer H, Blickhan R, Lipfert S, Rummel J, Minekawa Y, Iida F. Running and walking with compliant legs. In: Diehl M, Mombaur K, eds., Fast Motions in Biomechanics and Robotics, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2006, 383–401.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  47. Smith J A, Jivraj J. Effect of hind leg morphology on performance of a canine-inspired quadrupedal robot. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2015, 12, 339–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matej Hoffmann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hoffmann, M., Simanek, J. The Merits of Passive Compliant Joints in Legged Locomotion: Fast Learning, Superior Energy Efficiency and Versatile Sensing in a Quadruped Robot. J Bionic Eng 14, 1–14 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6529(16)60374-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6529(16)60374-8

Keywords

Navigation