Elsevier

Analytica Chimica Acta

Volume 578, Issue 1, 18 September 2006, Pages 59-74
Analytica Chimica Acta

Prospects of conducting polymers in biosensors

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2006.04.055Get rights and content

Abstract

Applications of conducting polymers to biosensors have recently aroused much interest. This is because these molecular electronic materials offer control of different parameters such as polymer layer thickness, electrical properties and bio-reagent loading, etc. Moreover, conducting polymer based biosensors are likely to cater to the pressing requirements such as biocompatibility, possibility of in vivo sensing, continuous monitoring of drugs or metabolites, multi-parametric assays, miniaturization and high information density. This paper deals with the emerging trends in conducting polymer based biosensors during the last about 5 years.

Introduction

Biosensors have recently attracted much interest. This is because these interesting bio-devices have been shown to have applications in clinical diagnostics, environmental monitoring, food freshness and bioprocess monitoring [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38], [39], [40], [41], [42], [43], [44], [45], [46], [47], [48], [49], [50], [51], [52], [53], [54], [55], [56], [57], [58], [59], [60], [61], [62], [63], [64], [65], [66], [67], [68], [69], [70], [71], [72], [73], [74], [75], [76], [77], [78], [79], [80], [81], [82], [83], [84], [85], [86], [87], [88], [89], [90], [91], [92], [93], [94], [95], [96], [97], [98], [99], [100], [101], [102], [103], [104], [105], [106], [107], [108], [109], [110], [111], [112], [113], [114], [115], [116], [117], [118], [119], [120], [121], [122], [123], [124], [125], [126], [127], [128], [129], [130], [131], [132], [133], [134], [135], [136], [137], [138], [139], [140], [141], [142], [143], [144], [145], [146], [147], [148], [149], [150], [151], [152], [153], [154], [155], [156], [157], [158], [159], [160], [161], [162], [163], [164], [165], [166], [167], [168], [169], [170], [171], [172], [173], [174], [175], [176], [177], [178], [179], [180], [181], [182], [183], [184], [185], [186], [187], [188], [189], [190], [191], [192], [193], [194], [195], [196], [197], [198], [199], [200], [201], [202], [203], [204], [205], [206], [207], [208], [209], [210], [211], [212], [213], [214], [215], [216], [217], [218], [219], [220], [221], [222], [223], [224], [225], [226], [227], [228], [229], [230], [231], [232], [233], [234], [235], [236], [237], [238], [239], [240], [241], [242], [243], [244], [245], [246], [247], [248], [249]. A number of materials such as polymers, sol–gels and conducting polymers have been used to improve the stability of the biomolecules used in the fabrication of the desired biosensors. In this context, polymers have become the materials of choice for recent technological advances in biotechnology. Initially polymers were thought to be insulators and were utilized in various electrical and electronic devices. The discovery of poly (sulphur nitride) [(SN)x] which becomes superconducting at low temperatures led to the renewed interest in polymers [10]. The electrical conductivity of [(SN)x] can be enhanced by several orders, i.e. 105 S cm−1 by simple doping with oxidizing agents, e.g. I2, AsF5, NOPF6 (p-doping) or reducing agents (n-doping), e.g. sodium napthalide. Subsequently, a new class of polymers such as poly-para-phenylene (PPP), polyphenylene sulphide (PPS), polythiophenes and polypyrroles (PPy) were reported [11], [12], [13]. Diaz et al. produced coherent films of PPy with conductivity of 100 S cm−1 and this conducting polymer exhibits excellent air stability [14]. Chen et al. have estimated the concentration of cytochrome C using electrochemically prepared conducting polymers based on ferrocene substituted thiophene and terthiophene [44]. Many other conducting polymers such as poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT), polyfuran, polyindole, polycarbazole, polyaniline, etc. have been synthesized and studied extensively [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [45].

Compared to saturated polymers, conducting polymers have different electronic structures. Chemical bonding in conducting polymers provides one unpaired electron, i.e. π electron per carbon atom in the backbone of the polymer. Carbon atoms are in sp2pz configuration in π bonding and orbitals of successive carbon atoms overlap providing delocalization of electrons along the backbone of polymer [12]. This delocalization provides the charge mobility along the backbone of the polymer chain and induces unusual properties such as electrical conductivity, low ionization potential, low energy optical transitions and high electron affinity. The π bonds in conjugated polymers are highly susceptible to chemical or electrochemical oxidation or reduction. The origin of electrical conduction in conducting polymers has been ascribed to the formation of non-linear defects such as solitons, polarons or bipolarons formed either during doping or polymerization of a monomer [19], [46], [47], [57]. The conductive and semiconducting properties of these polymers make them an important class of materials for a wide range of electronic, optoelectronic and biotechnological applications such as in rechargeable batteries, molecular electronics, electronic displays, solar cells, ion exchange membrane in fuel cells, diodes, capacitors, field-effect-transistors, printed circuit boards, chemical sensors, drug release systems and biosensors, etc. [14], [15], [16], [17]. It is being projected that conducting polymers can be used to transport small electronic signals in the body, i.e. act as artificial nerves. Perhaps modifications to the brain may eventually be contemplated. Scientists have used films in a neurotransmitter as a drug release system into the brain [18].

Conducting polymers have emerged as potential candidates for biosensors. Gerard et al. have reviewed the literature on applications of conducting polymers to biosensors [57]. Geetha et al. [77] have discussed the applications of conducting polypyrrole to drug delivery. Andreescu and Sadik have reviewed the challenges and trends in biosensors for environmental and clinical monitoring [78]. Cosnier [79], [80] has discussed the analytical applications of affinity biosensors based on electropolymerized films. Ramaniviciene and Ramanavicius have reported an interesting overview on the potential use of conducting polymers as electrochemical based affinity biosensors [81]. Malinauskas et al. have reviewed the electrochemical aspects of conducting polymer-based nano-structured materials for application to super-capacitors, energy conversion systems, batteries and sensors [82]. Wanekaya et al. have reviewed recent advances in biosensors based on one-dimensional (1-D) nanostructures [83]. Ming-Hung Lee et al. have highlighted the current developments of DNA-based bioanalytical microsystesm for point-of-care diagnostics [84]. Adhikari and Majumdar have discussed the role of non-conducting and intrinsically conducting polymers in sensor devices [56]. Terry et al. [86] have assessed the future and current trends of biosensors in food industry. Drummond et al. have discussed numerous approaches to electrochemical detection based on modified electrodes, electrochemical amplifications with nanoparticles and electrochemical devices using DNA-mediated charge transport chemistry and electrochemistry of DNA-specific redox reporters [87]. Habermuller et al. have reported on the various electron-transfer mechanisms operating in amperometric biosensors [88]. Kerman et al. have predicted that electrochemical DNA biosensors with suitable microfabrication techniques are likely to be increasingly popular in the near future [89]. The present paper focuses on the prospective applications of conducting polymers in biosensors.

Section snippets

Importance of conducting polymers to biosensors

Conducting polymers [48], [49], [50], [51], [52], [53], [54], [55], [56], [57], [58], [59], [60], [61], [62], [63], [64], [65], [66], [67], [68], [69], [70], [71], [72], [73], [74], [75], [76], [77], [78], [79], [80], [81], [82], [83], [84], [85], [86], [87], [88], [89], [90], [91], [92], [93], [94], [95], [96], [97], [98], [99], [100], [101], [102], [103], [104], [105], [106], [107], [108], [109], [110], [111], [112], [113], [114] have attracted much interest as suitable matrices of

Conducting polymer based enzyme biosensors

Enzymatic biosensors utilize the biospecificity of an enzymatic reaction, along with an electrode reaction that generates an electric current or potential difference for quantitative analysis [89], [90], [91], [92], [93], [94], [95], [96], [97], [98], [99], [100], [101], [102], [103], [104], [105], [106], [107], [108], [109], [110], [111], [112], [113], [114], [115], [116], [117], [118], [119], [120], [121], [122], [123], [124], [125], [126], [127], [128], [129], [130], [131], [132], [133],

Conclusions

An attempt has been made to present an overview on the prospects of conducting polymers in biosensors reported since 2000 till date. The extended π systems in conjugated polymers, highly susceptible to oxidation or reduction, provide precise control to the electrical and optical properties as biochemical reactions are often reversible in nature. The electro-active property of these polymers makes them good candidates for various biosensing applications including drug release systems. Conducting

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Dr. Vikram Kumar, Director, NPL, New Delhi, India for his interest in this work. We thank Mr. Sunil K. Arya and other members of the group for interesting discussions. B.D.M. thanks the Department of Biotechnology, Govt. of India, the Department of Science & Technology, Govt. of India and the Indian National Science Academy, New Delhi, for the financial assistance relating to the participation at the Pacifichem 2005.

References (249)

  • S. Dong et al.

    Rev. Mol. Biotechnol.

    (2002)
  • N. Adanyi et al.

    Curr. Appl. Phys.

    (2006)
  • S. Suman et al.

    Sens. Actuators B

    (2005)
  • H.H. Weetall et al.

    Bioelectrochemistry

    (2000)
  • P.N. Bartlett et al.

    Synth. Met.

    (1993)
  • G. Urban et al.

    Sens. Actuators A

    (1990)
  • W. Lu et al.

    Anal. Chim. Acta

    (1995)
  • P.N. Bartlett et al.

    Biosensors

    (1988)
  • P. De Taxis du Poet et al.

    Anal. Chim. Acta

    (1990)
  • J. Chen et al.

    Electrochim. Acta

    (2002)
  • V. Syritski et al.

    Synth. Met.

    (2005)
  • J. Tschmelak et al.

    Biosens. Bioelect.

    (2005)
  • M. Gerard et al.

    Biosens. Bioelectron.

    (2002)
  • M. Situmorang et al.

    Electroanalysis

    (2002)
  • M.S. Wrighton, H.S. White Jr., G.P. Kittlesen, Molecule-based micro-electronic devices, US Patent, 192 (1991)...
  • E. Cass et al.

    Anal. Chem.

    (1984)
  • W. Schuhmann

    Rev. Mol. Biotechnol.

    (2002)
  • T. Ramanathan et al.

    Chem. Matter.

    (2005)
  • Z. Sun et al.

    Anal. Chem.

    (1992)
  • S. Geetha et al.

    Anal. Chim. Acta

    (2006)
  • S. Andreescu et al.

    Pure Appl. Chem.

    (2004)
  • S. Singh et al.

    Anal. Chim. Acta

    (2006)
  • M. Gerard et al.

    Curr. Appl. Phys.

    (2005)
  • S.K. Sharma et al.

    Electrochim. Acta

    (2004)
  • A.L. Sharma et al.

    J. Appl. Polym. Sci.

    (2004)
  • B.D. Malhotra et al.

    Pramana

    (2003)
  • A.L. Sharma et al.

    Curr. Appl. Phys.

    (2003)
  • S. Cosnier et al.

    Analysis

    (1999)
  • S.K. Arya, P.R. Solanki, R.P. Singh, M.K. Pandey, M. Datta, B.D. Malhotra, Talanta (2006), in...
  • A.B. Sanghvi et al.

    Nat. Mater.

    (2005)
  • V. Saxena et al.
  • M. Komiyama et al.

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (2003)
  • S. Milardovic et al.

    Food Technol. Biotechnol.

    (2000)
  • J.D. Rasinger et al.

    Anal. Lett.

    (2005)
  • R.L. Green et al.

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (1975)
  • D.M. Ivory et al.

    J. Chem. Phys.

    (1979)
  • J.F. Rabolt et al.

    J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun.

    (1980)
  • A.F. Diaz et al.

    J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun.

    (1979)
  • R. Saraswathi et al.

    J. Appl. Polym. Sci.

    (1999)
  • T. Kawai et al.

    Jpn. J. Appl. Phys.

    (1990)
  • B. Zinger et al.

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (1984)
  • A.J. Heeger
  • S.B. Adeloju

    Analyst

    (1996)
  • W.J. Sung et al.

    Anal. Chem.

    (2000)
  • A. Heller

    Acc. Chem. Res.

    (1990)
  • P.R. Unwin et al.

    Anal. Chem.

    (1992)
  • J. Svorc et al.

    Anal. Chem.

    (1997)
  • D. Lewenstam et al.

    J. Electroanl. Chem.

    (1994)
  • K. Domansky et al.

    Anal. Chem.

    (1998)
  • A.K. Mulchandani et al.

    Electroanalysis

    (1996)
  • Cited by (340)

    • Polymer-based biosensors for medical applications

      2023, Handbook of Polymers in Medicine
    • Conducting polymers modulating the catalytic activity of urease in thin composite films

      2022, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects
    • Polymer nanocomposites for biomedical applications

      2022, Fundamentals of Bionanomaterials
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text