Elsevier

Academic Radiology

Volume 15, Issue 12, December 2008, Pages 1513-1525
Academic Radiology

Original investigation
Quantitative Analysis of Lesion Morphology and Texture Features for Diagnostic Prediction in Breast MRI1,

This work was presented at the 2007 Joint ISMRM-ESMRMB meeting held in Berlin, Germany.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2008.06.005Get rights and content

Rationale and Objectives

To investigate the feasibility using quantitative morphology/texture features of breast lesions for diagnostic prediction, and to explore the association of computerized features with lesion phenotype appearance on magnetic resonance imaging.

Materials and Methods

Forty-three malignant/28 benign lesions were used in this study. A systematic approach from automated lesion segmentation, quantitative feature extraction, diagnostic feature selection using an artificial neural network (ANN), and lesion classification was carried out. Eight morphologic parameters and 10 gray level co-occurrence matrix texture features were obtained from each lesion. The diagnostic performance of selected features to differentiate between malignant and benign lesions was analyzed using receiver-operating characteristic analysis.

Results

Six features were selected by an ANN using leave-one-out cross validation, including compactness, normalized radial length entropy, volume, gray level entropy, gray level sum average, and homogeneity. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve was 0.86. When dividing the database into half training and half validation set, a classifier of five features selected in the half training set achieved an area under the curve of 0.82 in the other half validation set. The selected morphology feature “compactness” was associated with shape and margin in the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System lexicon, round shape and smooth margin for the benign lesions, and more irregular shape for the malignant lesions. The selected texture features were associated with homogeneous/heterogeneous patterns and the enhancement intensity. The malignant lesions had higher intensity and broader distribution on the enhancement histogram (more heterogeneous) compared to the benign lesions.

Conclusion

Quantitative analysis of morphology/texture features of breast lesions was feasible, and these features could be selected by an ANN to form a classifier for differential diagnosis. Establishing the link between computer-based features and visual descriptors defined in the BI-RADS lexicon will provide the foundation for the acceptance of quantitative diagnostic features in the development of computer-aided diagnosis.

Section snippets

Subjects and MRI Protocol

The study included 28 histologically proven benign and 43 malignant lesions selected from our breast MRI database collected from 1999–2005. The age of the patients was from 29–76 years old (48 ± 9, median 48) in the malignant group, and 21 to 74 (45 ± 7, median 45) in the benign group. Only lesions that showed strong contrast enhancements with a clearly defined boundary were selected for this study. Those cases presenting diffuse infiltrating enhancements or ill-defined tumor margins were

Evaluation of Computerized vs. Manual Lesion Segmentation

First, the consistency between two manual segmentations performed by a radiologist was evaluated, as shown in Figure 2a, which is separately labeled for benign and malignant lesions. The Pearson's correlation coefficient was r = 0.97 for both benign and malignant lesions. Taking the average of the two radiologist's segmentation as the “ground truth,” it was compared to the segmentation obtained by computerized algorithms, as shown in Figure 2b. The correlation coefficient for all lesions was r =

Discussion

Compared to the well-established CAD for mammography, development of automated CAD for breast MRI is in its early stage. Only a few investigations have pursued automated lesion segmentation and/or feature extraction for lesions detected by breast MRI, as summarized in Table 3. In this study, we applied quantitative analysis to characterize the morphology and texture features of breast lesions and used the ANN to select a classifier for differential diagnosis. This comprehensive approach was

References (30)

  • L. Esserman et al.

    Utility of magnetic resonance imaging in the management of breast cancer: evidence for improved preoperative staging

    J Clin Oncol

    (1999)
  • Y. Zhang et al.

    The role of contrast-enhanced MR mammography for determining candidates for breast conservation surgery

    Breast Cancer

    (2002)
  • A. Rieber et al.

    Pre-operative staging of invasive breast cancer with MR mammography and/or PET: boon or bunk?

    Br J Radiol

    (2002)
  • H. Li et al.

    Computerized radiographic mass detection—part ILesion site selection by morphological enhancement and contextual segmentation

    IEEE Trans Med Imaging

    (2001)
  • W.E. Polakowski et al.

    Computer-aided breast cancer detection and diagnosis of masses using difference of Gaussians and derivative-based feature saliency

    IEEE Trans Med Imaging

    (1997)
  • Cited by (203)

    • Automatic Detection and Segmentation of Breast Cancer on MRI Using Mask R-CNN Trained on Non–Fat-Sat Images and Tested on Fat-Sat Images

      2022, Academic Radiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      DCE-MRI was acquired using a fat-suppressed three-dimensional fast low angle shot (3D-FLASH) sequence with one precontrast and four postcontrast frames, with TR/TE = 4.50/1.82 msec, flip angle = 12°, matrix size = 512 × 512, field of view = 32 cm, and slice thickness = 1.5 mm. The tumor was segmented on the subtraction image generated by subtracting the pre-contrast image from the 2nd DCE postcontrast image, using the fuzzy c-means clustering algorithm (33). This DCE frame was selected based on the high tissue contrast between the boundary of the mass lesion (often showing strong peripheral enhancement) and the adjacent normal tissue.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    This work was conducted at Tu and Yuen Center for Functional Onco-Imaging at University of California, Irvine, CA.

    This work was supported in part by NIH/NCI Grants R01 CA90437, CA121568 and the California Breast Cancer Research Program # 9WB-0020.

    View full text