Elsevier

Acta Materialia

Volume 59, Issue 4, February 2011, Pages 1530-1541
Acta Materialia

Nucleation and variant selection during the α–γ–α phase transformation in microalloyed steel

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2010.11.017Get rights and content

Abstract

This study addresses variant selection during the α–γ–α phase transformation in recrystallized, low-carbon, microalloyed steel. Since variant selection was found to occur during incipient stages of transformation, the investigation focused mainly on γ-grain nucleation from the α phase. To obtain comprehensive microstructure information, the sample was characterized by high-temperature electron backscatter diffraction in a scanning electron microscope and additional three-dimensional serial sectioning. It is shown that preferred nucleation at a grain boundary near a triple junction requires an orientation relationship close to the Kurdjumov–Sachs (K–S) correspondence to both adjacent α grains (nucleation rule I). Furthermore, a low disorientation of a {1 1 0}bcc crystallographic plane to the grain boundary plane favors nucleation (nucleation rule II). The results suggest that the nucleation of γ grains is favored at triple junctions by a low surface energy of the nucleus. A corresponding model is proposed. On this basis, variant selection of different ferrite orientations and the product textures of the complete transformation cycle were successfully predicted for a random grain boundary plane distribution.

Introduction

The production of steel sheet involves many processing steps which are accompanied by a change in phase composition, texture and microstructure. These changes strongly influence the material properties. Low-carbon, microalloyed steel at high temperatures is usually hot-rolled in the austenite (γ) regime. This is commonly accompanied by the formation of a pronounced crystallographic texture. During subsequent cooling, the austenite–ferrite phase transformation takes place. This reversible phase transformation causes a change in crystal structure, but is also associated with a dramatic change in microstructure and texture. A review of transformation textures was given by Ray et al. [1]. The crystallography of the phase transformation reveals a specific orientation relationship between austenite (parent phase) and ferrite (product phase). For carbon steels, this crystallographic correspondence typically follows the Kurdjumov–Sachs (K–S) orientation relationship, or close to it [2], [3], [4], [5]. A specific orientation relationship can be used to predict the product texture. The same holds for the back transformation (α–γ). However, experiments show that not all crystallographic variants are generated equally frequently, so that the computed and measured transformation textures do not coincide. This is attributed to variant selection, but the rules and reasons for variant selection in recrystallized materials are not known. As the material properties are strongly influenced by microstructure and texture, a basic understanding of the underlying principles of variant selection is indispensable for texture control during processing.

Owing to experimental difficulties, variant selection has been investigated mostly at room temperature in the ferritic regime after previous deformation of the high-temperature austenite phase. Therefore, respective models had to assume a copper-type rolling or cube-type recrystallization texture of austenite prior to transformation to ferrite. To explain the variant selection of deformed steels, the activity of slip systems [6], [7], the Bain strain [2], [8] or the elastic interaction of transformation events [9] was considered. However, variant selection is also observed for recrystallized austenite (Fig. 1), which is less pronounced than in the deformed state, but distinct and reproducible.

Brückner and Gottstein proposed associating the variant selection in recrystallized steel with the Bain strain and residual stresses in recovered areas [3], but because of limitations in their experimental techniques, these assumptions could not be confirmed. The development of high-temperature orientation imaging, however, opened new avenues for observing phase transformations with spatial resolution and for obtaining information on local orientations. This allowed the mechanisms of phase transformations to be investigated and the underlying physics of variant selection to be revealed.

Most previous investigations of variant selection phenomena pertained to the γ–α phase transformation, whereas little attention was paid to forward transformation. However, since the transformation may occur in both directions during processing, the whole transformation cycle must be investigated [3], [10].

To acquire information on the location and orientation of the product phase with respect to the parent phase, local orientation measurements need to be conducted at the transformation temperature. Therefore, for this study a laser-powered heating stage for a scanning electron microscope was developed which would allow rapid heating and cooling as well as concurrent electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) measurements. With such a device the whole transformation cycle α → γ and γ → α can be investigated in situ. This study focuses on the α → γ transformation which has been addressed only infrequently so far.

Previous investigations on the same material revealed that the newly developed γ-phase texture did not significantly change with progressing transformation [11]. Accordingly, variant selection must already occur during the nucleation period. Furthermore, it was established that the K–S relationship which was originally developed for the martensitic transformation holds for the α–γ–α phase transformation as well. Typically, a small deviation from the ideal K–S relationship is observed [12].

The goal of this work was to reveal and to analyze all factors that cause a texture change and variant selection during the reversible α–γ–α phase transformation in recrystallized microalloyed steel. The required local information of the parent and product orientation was obtained by high-temperature in situ EBSD and three-dimensional (3D) serial sectioning. These results were analyzed with respect to the underlying mechanisms of variant selection. The relations derived were used to predict the transformation texture. A model is presented to rationalize the observed preference of nucleus orientations.

Section snippets

Material

The material investigated was a commercial hot band of a microalloyed low-carbon steel. The chemical composition is shown in Table 1. Initially, the samples of this material were cold rolled in a reversing manner to 50% thickness reduction. The cold-rolled samples were annealed at 700 °C for 5 h in a vacuum furnace, in order to obtain a stable microstructure for transformation annealing. Grain growth was suppressed during transformation annealing by the presence of stable micro carbo-nitrides.

Transformation texture development

The texture development in the course of the α–γ phase transformation was measured to determine the essential period where variant selection occurred.

To obtain good statistics for texture calculation, especially for the low transformed volume fractions, many samples were investigated by high-temperature in situ EBSD. The γ-phase orientations were binned with respect to their volume fraction (1–10% = 5%, 15–25% = 20%, 35–45% = 40%), and the texture was calculated (Fig. 4).

The results demonstrate that

Nucleation

From previous investigations, it is known [11] that variant selection takes place already during nucleation. The product texture is therefore essentially determined by the nucleation texture. As detailed in this study, the γ grains typically comprised a K–S relationship (with some scatter) to both α grains at a grain boundary next to a triple junction. The allowed deviation from the ideal K–S relationship was commonly in the range 10–15°. Furthermore, in one of the two α grains, a close-packed

Summary

Variant selection during αγα phase transformation was investigated in recrystallized low-carbon microalloyed steel. High-temperature orientation imaging by EBSD was applied to determine the location of transformation nuclei and their orientation relationship to the environment. The following results were obtained.

  • 1.

    The preferred selection of variants occurs during the nucleation stage of the phase transformation.

  • 2.

    Nucleation of the new phase occurs predominantly at triple junctions.

  • 3.

    The new phase

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Professors Lasar S. Shvindlerman and John J. Jonas for stimulating discussions. Financial support by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) through grant Go 335/33 is gratefully acknowledged.

References (35)

  • M. Humbert et al.

    Acta Mater

    (2002)
  • P. Bate et al.

    Acta Mater

    (2000)
  • S. Kundu et al.

    Scripta Mater

    (2006)
  • S. Kundu et al.

    Scripta Mater

    (2007)
  • T. Furuhara et al.

    Acta Metall Mater

    (1991)
  • J.F. Nie et al.

    Scripta Mater

    (1998)
  • T. Furuhara et al.

    Mater Sci Eng

    (2001)
  • M. Tong et al.

    Acta Mater

    (2004)
  • A.T.W. Kempen et al.

    Acta Mater

    (2002)
  • B. Zhao et al.

    Acta Mater

    (2010)
  • J.C. Bokros et al.

    Acta Metall

    (1963)
  • Y. Higo et al.

    Acta Metall

    (1974)
  • R.K. Ray et al.

    ISIJ Int

    (1994)
  • G. Kurdjumov et al.

    Z Phys

    (1930)
  • G. Brückner et al.

    ISIJ Int

    (2001)
  • G. Nolze

    Z Metallkunde

    (2004)
  • G. Nolze

    Cryst Res Technol

    (2006)
  • Cited by (74)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text