Long-term in vivo degradation behaviour and biocompatibility of the magnesium alloy ZEK100 for use as a biodegradable bone implant☆
Introduction
In recent years magnesium alloys have become a special focus of biomedical research [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8] as they are considered to be suitable for fracture repair of weight-bearing bone [1], [9], [10]. Magnesium alloys are biodegradable and would therefore make surgery for the removal of implants unnecessary [11]. Furthermore, in contrast to conventional metals such as titanium, steel or cobalt–chromium alloys [12], [13], their mechanical properties, which are similar to those of cortical bone [3], [14], prevent stress shielding effects. The advantages of magnesium alloys over commercially available resorbable polymers are the higher mechanical stability [1], [15], [16] and the fact that their corrosion products do not induce as much inflammatory reaction [17].
As the degradation rate of pure magnesium is too high and often results in gas accumulation [18], [19], [20], [21] and, additionally, pure magnesium lacks strength, the influence of alloying with various elements and of different surface treatments have been tested in vitro during recent years [6], [14], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27]. However, as it has been shown that results obtained in vitro do not necessarily predict the in vivo behaviour [28], a substantiated conclusion can only be drawn after in vivo evaluation.
A number of different promising magnesium alloys have been tested in vivo [16], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], but most of them still lack stability [29], [30], [36] or show a disadvantageous degradation behaviour [29], [36]. Furthermore, most in vivo studies did not observe the complete degradation period, only the beginning of corrosion [16], [32], [33], [37], [38], so biocompatibility during the later stages of degradation have not been well researched. For these reasons the new degradable magnesium alloy ZEK100 was developed to improve the stability and corrosion resistance by alloying with zinc, rare earth metals and zirconium [3], [39] and tested over 6 months in an in vivo study using an orthotopic implantation model [40]. As the implants were degraded to only a limited extent during the examination period and showed favourable degradation characteristics and suitable mechanical properties [40] the present study was conducted to evaluate the long-term degradation behaviour and biocompatibility in the same animal model over 9 and 12 months.
Section snippets
Implants
The magnesium alloy used in this study was designed and made as part of the research performed in the collaborative research center SFB599. It is not yet commercially available. The overall composition of ZEK100 was determined by means of inductively coupled plasma –optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES) (Spectro Ciros Vision EOP, SPECTRO Analytical Instruments GmbH, Kleve, Germany) resulting in 0.96 wt.% zinc, 0.21 wt.% zirconium, 0.3 wt.% rare earth elements (RE) and the remainder being
Clinical examination
Post-operative wound monitoring revealed swellings, which occurred in seven of the ten animals after a few days and lasted 2 weeks at the most. At the same time haematoma appeared in nine animals, but faded 10 days post-operatively. Hard swellings at the drill hole sites were palpated in all animals beginning 5 days post-operatively at the earliest and consolidating more or less over time. Starting 18–28 weeks after surgery eight rabbits developed palpable enlargements of the tibial diaphysis,
Discussion
The present study was conducted to evaluate the long-term degradation behaviour and biocompatibility of the promising magnesium alloy ZEK100 in an orthotopic animal model in vivo. Generally, as in vitro and in vivo results on magnesium degradation do not necessarily correlate [28], degradation as well as the biocompatibility of promising magnesium alloys should be tested in vivo to allow substantiated conclusions. However, knowledge of the final stages of in vivo degradation and the resulting
Conclusion
It could be shown that favourable in vivo degradation behaviour, as was shown by the magnesium alloy ZEK100 in this study, is not necessarily associated with good biocompatibility. Furthermore, the absence of general pathological disorders does not definitely indicate acceptable local biocompatibility of magnesium implants. Quite the opposite is true, as ZEK100 showed various local pathological effects in the form of severe bone alterations while not having general negative effects on the
Acknowledgements
This work was carried out within the framework of the Collaborative Research Centre 599, “Sustainable bioresorbable and permanent implants of metal and ceramic materials”, and was supported by the German Research Foundation.
References (65)
- et al.
In vivo corrosion of four magnesium alloys and the associated bone response
Biomaterials
(2005) - et al.
In vivo corrosion and corrosion protection of magnesium alloy LAE442
Acta Biomater
(2010) - et al.
Magnesium and its alloys as orthopedic biomaterials: a review
Biomaterials
(2006) Control of biodegradation of biocompatable magnesium alloys
Corros Sci
(2007)- et al.
In vitro corrosion and biocompatibility of binary magnesium alloys
Biomaterials
(2009) - et al.
Processing of biocompatible porous Ti and Mg
Scr Mater
(2001) - et al.
Stress shielding and bone resorption in shoulder arthroplasty
J Shoulder Elbow Surg
(2003) - et al.
In vitro degradation and mechanical integrity of calcium-containing magnesium alloys in modified-simulated body fluid
Biomaterials
(2008) - et al.
Bioresorbable devices made of forged composites of hydroxyapatite (HA) particles and poly-l-lactide (PLLA). Part I: basic characteristics.
Biomaterials
(1999) - et al.
Preparation and characterization of a new biomedical magnesium–calcium alloy
Mater Des
(2008)
On the biodegradation performance of an Mg–Y–RE alloy with various surface conditions in simulated body fluid
Acta Biomater
In vitro and in vivo corrosion measurements of magnesium alloys
Biomaterials
Bone–implant interface strength and osseointegration: biodegradable magnesium alloy versus standard titanium control
Acta Biomater
A biodegradable polymer-based coating to control the performance of magnesium alloy orthopaedic implants
Biomaterials
The development of binary Mg–Ca alloys for use as biodegradable materials within bone
Biomaterials
Biomechanical testing and degradation analysis of MgCa0.8 alloy screws: a comparative in vivo study in rabbits
Acta Biomater
Research on an Mg–Zn alloy as a degradable biomaterial
Acta Biomater
Effect of mechanical stability on fracture healing – an update
Injury
Degradable biomaterials based on magnesium corrosion
Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci
Magnesium hydroxide temporarily enhancing osteoblast activity and decreasing the osteoclast number in peri-implant bone remodelling
Acta Biomater
Are resorbable implants about to become a reality?
Cardiol Young
Influence of different surface machining treatments of magnesium-based resorbable implants on the degradation behavior in rabbits
Adv Eng Mater
Comparison of the cross sectional area, the loss in volume and the mechanical properties of LAE442 and MgCa0.8 as resorbable magnesium alloy implants after 12 months implantation duration
Mater Sci Forum
Recent metallic materials for biomedical applications
Metall Mater Trans A Phys Metall Mater Sci
Processing of implants made of magnesium alloys
Wt Werkstattstechnik Online
Biodegradable implants in traumatology: a review on the state-of-the-art
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg
MgZnCa glasses without clinically observable hydrogen evolution for biodegradable implants
Nat Mater
The road to bioabsorbable stents: reaching clinical reality?
Cardiovasc Interv Radiol
L’utilisation du magnesium comme materiel perdu dans l’osteosynthèse
Bull Mém Soc Nat Chir
Matériel métallique résorbable en chirurgie osseuse
La Press Med
Absorbable metal in bone surgery
J Am Med Assoc
The resorbing metallic alloy “Osteosintezit” as material for fastening broken bones
Khirurgiya
Cited by (0)
- ☆
Part of the Biodegradable Metals Conference 2012 Special Issue, edited by Professor Frank Witte and Professor Diego Mantovani.
- 1
Present address: Clinic for Small Animal Surgery and Reproduction, Centre of Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet Muenchen, Veterinaerstraße 13, 80539 Muenchen, Germany.