Recent advances in molecular, multimodal and theranostic ultrasound imaging☆
Graphical abstract
Introduction
Due to its non-invasive nature, low cost, broad diagnostic applicability and easy handling, ultrasound (US) imaging is the second-most used imaging modality in clinical practice after conventional x-ray radiography [1]. It is used by medical doctors from various different disciplines, including radiologists, gynecologists, cardiologists, gastroenterologists, surgeons and many more as an initial screening tool, as well as for fast-look follow-up examinations. Its ability to visualize blood flow, blood velocity and blood vessels by Power and Color Doppler further recommends US imaging for vascular diagnosis, e.g. for measuring the degree of stenosis in carotid arteries [2], and for looking at the perfusion of tumors [3] and organs after transplantation [4].
Besides these diagnostic applications, High-Intensity Focused US (HIFU) has been attracting ever more attention as a valuable therapeutic option to destroy ureteric stones [5], and to ablate benign uterus myomas and other benign and malignant tumors [6]. In this context, the acoustic energy focused to one defined spot is moved over the pathological tissue. Due to absorption of the acoustic energy and the resulting local temperature increase, the pathological tissue is destroyed. Recently, the first commercial HIFU-systems that can be used inside clinical MR scanners have been introduced which enable highly personalized and well-controlled tissue ablation by getting anatomical information about the pathology and the local temperature rise from MR imaging.
However, the diagnostic and therapeutic potential of US imaging has not yet been fully explored and translated to clinic. In this regard, US contrast agents, which are gas-filled microbubbles (MBs) stabilized by a shell made of lipids, proteins or polymers can enormously improve US imaging. In particular, the use of MB significantly expands the diagnostic potential of US for characterizing pathologies based on functional and molecular vascular characteristics. Furthermore, the use of MB-based contrast agents in US imaging offers possibilities for image-guided (theranostic) interventions. In the present manuscript, recent developments in this emerging and interdisciplinary field are summarized and discussed.
US contrast agents in combination with contrast agent-specific US imaging techniques are increasingly accepted in routine clinical practice for diagnostic imaging of several organs and pathologies. Particular interest is given to examinations of the liver, because of the significant improvement over conventional US in both, the detection and characterization of focal liver lesions. Recent studies even show that the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) can reach that of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (Fig. 1) [7], [8], [9]. The high diagnostic accuracy of CEUS in liver imaging is based on two characteristics:
- 1.
the detection and early enhancement of a malignant liver lesion during the arterial phase
- 2.
the rapid wash-out of the contrast agent in malignant liver lesions.
A further benefit of US contrast agents in the clinical routine is their good safety profile, which enables the administration of contrast agents to patients who have contra-indications for contrast-enhanced CT or MRI (e.g. patients with severe renal dysfunction). As a consequence, focal liver diseases have evolved into the single most important application of CEUS. The recommendations for CEUS for liver imaging are summarized in the guidelines for good clinical practice of the EFSUMB [10].
A second major clinical application is contrast echocardiography, where MBs are used for left ventricular opacification and endocardial border delineation. The superior anatomical delineation of the cardiac boarders leads to specific clinical scenarios in which US contrast agents could/should be used, including the assessment of left ventricular systolic function, elevation of the left ventricular apex, mechanical complications of myocardial infarction and the characterization of intracardiac masses. The consensus statement on the use of ultrasound contrast agents was published in 2008 by the American Society of Echocardiography [11] and a summary of the clinical impact of the guidelines was provided two years afterwards [12].
In neurology and intensive care medicine, contrast-enhanced transcranial Doppler ultrasound has been established as a reliable tool to evaluate the cerebral circulation, e.g. to outline vessel stenosis and occlusion as well as ultimately, to diagnose brain death [13], [14].
Besides liver, cardiac and brain imaging, indications for CEUS have expanded to applications in the kidney [15], [16], in vesico-ureteric reflux [17], [18], in the pancreas [18], [19], [20], [21], in trauma patients [22] and in cerebral circulation, as well as in oncological studies [23], [24]. In this context, an emerging clinical field might represent the assessment of novel targeted drugs such as anti-angiogenic therapies. Here, contrast enhanced ultrasound enables the early identification of responders to an antiangiogenic treatment for gastrointestinal stromal tumors, renal cell carcinoma, and hepatocellular carcinoma [25], [26]. Despite this promising data derived in clinical trials, however, a broad application into the daily clinical routine has not yet been established.
In this context, the continuous revision of the existing “Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice” in consensus meetings of the US societies and the continuous medical training of “CEUS-examiners” in specialized CEUS courses are – besides advancements in US machines and contrast agents – the most important preconditions for maintaining and increasing the clinical success of CEUS.
Section snippets
Molecular US imaging
An important precondition for in vivo molecular imaging is the use of contrast agents which can be detected with high sensitivity and specificity. MB applied for US imaging fulfill these demands. In principle, even a single MB can be detected and there are imaging techniques that detect MB selectively (see Section 2.2). Due to their size, which typically ranges from 1 to 5 μm, MBs do not extravasate from the vasculature. This is both an advantage and a disadvantage. On the one hand, no
Multimodal US contrast agents
Multimodal US contrast agents are particularly useful in (whole-body) biodistribution and histological validation studies. In this context, they enable the non-invasive and quantitative imaging of the fate of MB and of their shell fragments after systemic application. The ability to image drugs released from MB in vivo and ex vivo, to investigate the coverage of MB surfaces with targeting ligands, to characterize the binding of targeted MB to cells, and to image the opening of biological
Therapeutic US
Besides for diagnostic purposes, US can also be used for therapeutic and theranostic purposes. Therapeutic US interventions generally refer to the use of the thermal effects of HIFU. MR-guided HIFU ablation, for instance, is currently used in the clinic for the treatment of deep-seated tumors [5], [6], [109]. In this procedure, the unwanted tissue is destroyed by heating it to around 60 °C using HIFU. This is nowadays performed under the guidance of MRI which provides high-resolution anatomical
Conclusion
In summary, with the introduction of MB as US contrast agents, important diagnostic and therapeutic options have emerged for this extensively used, real-time and low-cost imaging modality. Besides a detailed characterization of tissue (and tumor) microvascularisation, US imaging also allows the assessment of specific molecular alterations, in particular at the vascular level. This is expected to improve the accuracy in pathology characterization and likely also enables more efficient treatment
Acknowledgments
This work was financially supported by the DFG (KI 1072/5-1), the ERS Boost Fund (RWTH Aachen), the HighTech.NRW/EU Ziel 2 program (EFRE) ForSaTum, and the ERC (Starting Grant 309495 —NeoNaNo).
References (139)
- et al.
The evolving role of sonography in evaluating solid breast masses
Semin. Ultrasound CT MR
(2000) - et al.
A review of the physical properties and biological effects of the high amplitude acoustic field used in extracorporeal lithotripsy
Ultrasonics
(1993) - et al.
Clinical and future applications of high intensity focused ultrasound in cancer
Cancer Treat. Rev.
(2012) - et al.
American Society of Echocardiography consensus statement on the clinical applications of ultrasonic contrast agents in echocardiography
J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr.
(2008) - et al.
New potential and applications of contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the breast: own investigations and review of the literature
Eur. J. Radiol.
(2009) - et al.
Targeting vascular endothelium with avidin microbubbles
Ultrasound Med. Biol.
(2005) - et al.
Advanced characterization and refinement of poly N-butyl cyanoacrylate microbubbles for ultrasound imaging
Ultrasound Med. Biol.
(2011) - et al.
Ultrasonic bubbles in medicine: influence of the shell
Ultrason. Sonochem.
(2007) New sonographic techniques for harmonic imaging—underlying physical principles
Eur. J. Radiol.
(2007)- et al.
Optimising phase and amplitude modulation schemes for imaging microbubble contrast agents at low acoustic power
Ultrasound Med. Biol.
(2005)
Stimulated acoustic emission: pseudo-Doppler shifts seen during the destruction of nonmoving microbubbles
Ultrasound Med. Biol.
Ultrasound derived imaging and quantification of cell adhesion molecules in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) by Sensitive Particle Acoustic Quantification (SPAQ)
Neuroimage
Molecular ultrasound imaging of early vascular response in prostate tumors irradiated with carbon ions
Neoplasia
Enhanced targeting of ultrasound contrast agents using acoustic radiation force
Ultrasound Med. Biol.
Effects of acoustic radiation force on the binding efficiency of BR55, a VEGFR2-specific ultrasound contrast agent
Ultrasound Med. Biol.
Iron oxide nanoparticle-containing microbubble composites as contrast agents for MR and ultrasound dual-modality imaging
Biomaterials
Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticle-embedded encapsulated microbubbles as dual contrast agents of magnetic resonance and ultrasound imaging
Biomaterials
SPIO-conjugated, doxorubicin-loaded microbubbles for concurrent MRI and focused-ultrasound enhanced brain-tumor drug delivery
Biomaterials
Theranostic Gd(III)-lipid microbubbles for MRI-guided focused ultrasound surgery
Biomaterials
Diagnostic ultrasound: past, present, and future
J. Med. Biol. Eng.
Grading carotid stenosis using ultrasonic methods
Stroke
Renal transplants: what ultrasound can and cannot do
Ultrasound Q.
Tumor-specific vascularization pattern of liver metastasis, hepatocellular carcinoma, hemangioma and focal nodular hyperplasia in the differential diagnosis of 1,349 liver lesions in contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)
Ultraschall Med.
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for the characterization of focal liver lesions —prospective comparison in clinical practice: CEUS vs. CT (DEGUM multicenter trial). Parts of this manuscript were presented at the Ultrasound Dreilandertreffen 2008, Davos
Ultraschall Med.
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for the characterization of focal liver lesions in clinical practice (DEGUM Multicenter Trial): CEUS vs. MRI—a prospective comparison in 269 patients
Ultraschall Med.
Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) —update 2008
Ultraschall Med.
Contrast echocardiography: what have we learned from the new guidelines?
Curr. Cardiol. Rep.
Diagnostic and prognostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in acute stroke
Ultraschall Med.
Contrast-enhanced transcranial Doppler ultrasonography in the diagnosis of brain death
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry
Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in the diagnosis of solid renal tumors
J. Ultrasound Med.
The kidney: imaging with microbubble contrast agents
Ultrasound Q.
Voiding urosonography with ultrasound contrast agents for the diagnosis of vesicoureteric reflux in children. I. Procedure
Pediatr. Radiol.
Urban ecological land in Changsha City: its quantitative analysis and optimization
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao
Improved characterisation of solitary solid pancreatic tumours using contrast enhanced transabdominal ultrasound
J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol.
Comparison of contrast-enhanced sonography and MRI in displaying anatomic features of cystic pancreatic masses
AJR Am. J. Roentgenol.
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the staging of acute pancreatitis
Eur. Radiol.
CEUS in abdominal trauma: multi-center study
Abdom. Imaging
Can contrast-enhanced sonography distinguish benign from malignant breast masses?
J. Clin. Ultrasound
Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (DCE-US) and anti-angiogenic treatments
Discov. Med.
Early response to anti-tumoral treatment in hepatocellular carcinoma—can quantitative contrast-enhanced ultrasound predict outcome?
Ultraschall Med.
Angiogenesis in cancer, vascular, rheumatoid and other disease
Nat. Med.
Tumorigenesis and the angiogenic switch
Nat. Rev. Cancer
VEGF and the quest for tumour angiogenesis factors
Nat. Rev. Cancer
Vascular endothelial growth factor: basic science and clinical progress
Endocr. Rev.
Requirement of vascular integrin alpha v beta 3 for angiogenesis
Science
Role of integrins in cell invasion and migration
Nat. Rev. Cancer
Cooperation between integrin alphavbeta3 and VEGFR2 in angiogenesis
Angiogenesis
The physiological role of endoglin in the cardiovascular system
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.
Detection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in mice by ultrasound imaging of thymocyte differentiation antigen 1
Gastroenterology
Construction and in vitro/in vivo targeting of PSMA-targeted nanoscale microbubbles in prostate cancer
Prostate
Cited by (170)
Polymer mechanochemistry in drug delivery: From controlled release to precise activation
2024, Journal of Controlled ReleaseTargeted therapy of breast tumor by PLGA-based nanostructures: The versatile function in doxorubicin delivery
2023, Environmental ResearchA review on the latest developments of mesoporous silica nanoparticles as a promising platform for diagnosis and treatment of cancer
2022, International Journal of PharmaceuticsMultimodal molecular imaging in drug discovery and development
2022, Drug Discovery TodayCancer nanomedicine based on polyethylenimine-mediated multifunctional nanosystems
2022, Progress in Materials Science
- ☆
This review is part of the Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews theme issue on “Ultrasound triggered drug delivery”.