Elsevier

Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews

Volume 72, 15 June 2014, Pages 15-27
Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews

Recent advances in molecular, multimodal and theranostic ultrasound imaging

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2013.11.013Get rights and content

Abstract

Ultrasound (US) imaging is an exquisite tool for the non-invasive and real-time diagnosis of many different diseases. In this context, US contrast agents can improve lesion delineation, characterization and therapy response evaluation. US contrast agents are usually micrometer-sized gas bubbles, stabilized with soft or hard shells. By conjugating antibodies to the microbubble (MB) surface, and by incorporating diagnostic agents, drugs or nucleic acids into or onto the MB shell, molecular, multimodal and theranostic MBs can be generated. We here summarize recent advances in molecular, multimodal and theranostic US imaging, and introduce concepts how such advanced MB can be generated, applied and imaged. Examples are given for their use to image and treat oncological, cardiovascular and neurological diseases. Furthermore, we discuss for which therapeutic entities incorporation into (or conjugation to) MB is meaningful, and how US-mediated MB destruction can increase their extravasation, penetration, internalization and efficacy.

Introduction

Due to its non-invasive nature, low cost, broad diagnostic applicability and easy handling, ultrasound (US) imaging is the second-most used imaging modality in clinical practice after conventional x-ray radiography [1]. It is used by medical doctors from various different disciplines, including radiologists, gynecologists, cardiologists, gastroenterologists, surgeons and many more as an initial screening tool, as well as for fast-look follow-up examinations. Its ability to visualize blood flow, blood velocity and blood vessels by Power and Color Doppler further recommends US imaging for vascular diagnosis, e.g. for measuring the degree of stenosis in carotid arteries [2], and for looking at the perfusion of tumors [3] and organs after transplantation [4].

Besides these diagnostic applications, High-Intensity Focused US (HIFU) has been attracting ever more attention as a valuable therapeutic option to destroy ureteric stones [5], and to ablate benign uterus myomas and other benign and malignant tumors [6]. In this context, the acoustic energy focused to one defined spot is moved over the pathological tissue. Due to absorption of the acoustic energy and the resulting local temperature increase, the pathological tissue is destroyed. Recently, the first commercial HIFU-systems that can be used inside clinical MR scanners have been introduced which enable highly personalized and well-controlled tissue ablation by getting anatomical information about the pathology and the local temperature rise from MR imaging.

However, the diagnostic and therapeutic potential of US imaging has not yet been fully explored and translated to clinic. In this regard, US contrast agents, which are gas-filled microbubbles (MBs) stabilized by a shell made of lipids, proteins or polymers can enormously improve US imaging. In particular, the use of MB significantly expands the diagnostic potential of US for characterizing pathologies based on functional and molecular vascular characteristics. Furthermore, the use of MB-based contrast agents in US imaging offers possibilities for image-guided (theranostic) interventions. In the present manuscript, recent developments in this emerging and interdisciplinary field are summarized and discussed.

US contrast agents in combination with contrast agent-specific US imaging techniques are increasingly accepted in routine clinical practice for diagnostic imaging of several organs and pathologies. Particular interest is given to examinations of the liver, because of the significant improvement over conventional US in both, the detection and characterization of focal liver lesions. Recent studies even show that the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) can reach that of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (Fig. 1) [7], [8], [9]. The high diagnostic accuracy of CEUS in liver imaging is based on two characteristics:

  • 1.

    the detection and early enhancement of a malignant liver lesion during the arterial phase

  • 2.

    the rapid wash-out of the contrast agent in malignant liver lesions.

A further benefit of US contrast agents in the clinical routine is their good safety profile, which enables the administration of contrast agents to patients who have contra-indications for contrast-enhanced CT or MRI (e.g. patients with severe renal dysfunction). As a consequence, focal liver diseases have evolved into the single most important application of CEUS. The recommendations for CEUS for liver imaging are summarized in the guidelines for good clinical practice of the EFSUMB [10].

A second major clinical application is contrast echocardiography, where MBs are used for left ventricular opacification and endocardial border delineation. The superior anatomical delineation of the cardiac boarders leads to specific clinical scenarios in which US contrast agents could/should be used, including the assessment of left ventricular systolic function, elevation of the left ventricular apex, mechanical complications of myocardial infarction and the characterization of intracardiac masses. The consensus statement on the use of ultrasound contrast agents was published in 2008 by the American Society of Echocardiography [11] and a summary of the clinical impact of the guidelines was provided two years afterwards [12].

In neurology and intensive care medicine, contrast-enhanced transcranial Doppler ultrasound has been established as a reliable tool to evaluate the cerebral circulation, e.g. to outline vessel stenosis and occlusion as well as ultimately, to diagnose brain death [13], [14].

Besides liver, cardiac and brain imaging, indications for CEUS have expanded to applications in the kidney [15], [16], in vesico-ureteric reflux [17], [18], in the pancreas [18], [19], [20], [21], in trauma patients [22] and in cerebral circulation, as well as in oncological studies [23], [24]. In this context, an emerging clinical field might represent the assessment of novel targeted drugs such as anti-angiogenic therapies. Here, contrast enhanced ultrasound enables the early identification of responders to an antiangiogenic treatment for gastrointestinal stromal tumors, renal cell carcinoma, and hepatocellular carcinoma [25], [26]. Despite this promising data derived in clinical trials, however, a broad application into the daily clinical routine has not yet been established.

In this context, the continuous revision of the existing “Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice” in consensus meetings of the US societies and the continuous medical training of “CEUS-examiners” in specialized CEUS courses are – besides advancements in US machines and contrast agents – the most important preconditions for maintaining and increasing the clinical success of CEUS.

Section snippets

Molecular US imaging

An important precondition for in vivo molecular imaging is the use of contrast agents which can be detected with high sensitivity and specificity. MB applied for US imaging fulfill these demands. In principle, even a single MB can be detected and there are imaging techniques that detect MB selectively (see Section 2.2). Due to their size, which typically ranges from 1 to 5 μm, MBs do not extravasate from the vasculature. This is both an advantage and a disadvantage. On the one hand, no

Multimodal US contrast agents

Multimodal US contrast agents are particularly useful in (whole-body) biodistribution and histological validation studies. In this context, they enable the non-invasive and quantitative imaging of the fate of MB and of their shell fragments after systemic application. The ability to image drugs released from MB in vivo and ex vivo, to investigate the coverage of MB surfaces with targeting ligands, to characterize the binding of targeted MB to cells, and to image the opening of biological

Therapeutic US

Besides for diagnostic purposes, US can also be used for therapeutic and theranostic purposes. Therapeutic US interventions generally refer to the use of the thermal effects of HIFU. MR-guided HIFU ablation, for instance, is currently used in the clinic for the treatment of deep-seated tumors [5], [6], [109]. In this procedure, the unwanted tissue is destroyed by heating it to around 60 °C using HIFU. This is nowadays performed under the guidance of MRI which provides high-resolution anatomical

Conclusion

In summary, with the introduction of MB as US contrast agents, important diagnostic and therapeutic options have emerged for this extensively used, real-time and low-cost imaging modality. Besides a detailed characterization of tissue (and tumor) microvascularisation, US imaging also allows the assessment of specific molecular alterations, in particular at the vascular level. This is expected to improve the accuracy in pathology characterization and likely also enables more efficient treatment

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the DFG (KI 1072/5-1), the ERS Boost Fund (RWTH Aachen), the HighTech.NRW/EU Ziel 2 program (EFRE) ForSaTum, and the ERC (Starting Grant 309495 —NeoNaNo).

References (139)

  • K. Tiemann et al.

    Stimulated acoustic emission: pseudo-Doppler shifts seen during the destruction of nonmoving microbubbles

    Ultrasound Med. Biol.

    (2000)
  • M. Reinhardt et al.

    Ultrasound derived imaging and quantification of cell adhesion molecules in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) by Sensitive Particle Acoustic Quantification (SPAQ)

    Neuroimage

    (2005)
  • M. Palmowski et al.

    Molecular ultrasound imaging of early vascular response in prostate tumors irradiated with carbon ions

    Neoplasia

    (2009)
  • J.J. Rychak et al.

    Enhanced targeting of ultrasound contrast agents using acoustic radiation force

    Ultrasound Med. Biol.

    (2007)
  • P.J. Frinking et al.

    Effects of acoustic radiation force on the binding efficiency of BR55, a VEGFR2-specific ultrasound contrast agent

    Ultrasound Med. Biol.

    (2012)
  • Z. Liu et al.

    Iron oxide nanoparticle-containing microbubble composites as contrast agents for MR and ultrasound dual-modality imaging

    Biomaterials

    (2011)
  • F. Yang et al.

    Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticle-embedded encapsulated microbubbles as dual contrast agents of magnetic resonance and ultrasound imaging

    Biomaterials

    (2009)
  • C.H. Fan et al.

    SPIO-conjugated, doxorubicin-loaded microbubbles for concurrent MRI and focused-ultrasound enhanced brain-tumor drug delivery

    Biomaterials

    (2013)
  • J.A. Feshitan et al.

    Theranostic Gd(III)-lipid microbubbles for MRI-guided focused ultrasound surgery

    Biomaterials

    (2012)
  • K.K. Shung

    Diagnostic ultrasound: past, present, and future

    J. Med. Biol. Eng.

    (2011)
  • G.M. von Reutern et al.

    Grading carotid stenosis using ultrasonic methods

    Stroke

    (2012)
  • D.O. Cosgrove et al.

    Renal transplants: what ultrasound can and cannot do

    Ultrasound Q.

    (2008)
  • D. Strobel et al.

    Tumor-specific vascularization pattern of liver metastasis, hepatocellular carcinoma, hemangioma and focal nodular hyperplasia in the differential diagnosis of 1,349 liver lesions in contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)

    Ultraschall Med.

    (2009)
  • K. Seitz et al.

    Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for the characterization of focal liver lesions —prospective comparison in clinical practice: CEUS vs. CT (DEGUM multicenter trial). Parts of this manuscript were presented at the Ultrasound Dreilandertreffen 2008, Davos

    Ultraschall Med.

    (2009)
  • K. Seitz et al.

    Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for the characterization of focal liver lesions in clinical practice (DEGUM Multicenter Trial): CEUS vs. MRI—a prospective comparison in 269 patients

    Ultraschall Med.

    (2010)
  • M. Claudon et al.

    Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) —update 2008

    Ultraschall Med.

    (2008)
  • K. Wei

    Contrast echocardiography: what have we learned from the new guidelines?

    Curr. Cardiol. Rep.

    (2010)
  • J. Allendoerfer et al.

    Diagnostic and prognostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in acute stroke

    Ultraschall Med.

    (2008)
  • S. Welschehold et al.

    Contrast-enhanced transcranial Doppler ultrasonography in the diagnosis of brain death

    J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry

    (2013)
  • H. Tamai et al.

    Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in the diagnosis of solid renal tumors

    J. Ultrasound Med.

    (2005)
  • J.M. Correas et al.

    The kidney: imaging with microbubble contrast agents

    Ultrasound Q.

    (2006)
  • K. Darge

    Voiding urosonography with ultrasound contrast agents for the diagnosis of vesicoureteric reflux in children. I. Procedure

    Pediatr. Radiol.

    (2008)
  • X.L. Li et al.

    Urban ecological land in Changsha City: its quantitative analysis and optimization

    Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao

    (2010)
  • C.F. Dietrich et al.

    Improved characterisation of solitary solid pancreatic tumours using contrast enhanced transabdominal ultrasound

    J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol.

    (2008)
  • M. D'Onofrio et al.

    Comparison of contrast-enhanced sonography and MRI in displaying anatomic features of cystic pancreatic masses

    AJR Am. J. Roentgenol.

    (2007)
  • T. Ripolles et al.

    Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the staging of acute pancreatitis

    Eur. Radiol.

    (2010)
  • O. Catalano et al.

    CEUS in abdominal trauma: multi-center study

    Abdom. Imaging

    (2009)
  • P.G. Sorelli et al.

    Can contrast-enhanced sonography distinguish benign from malignant breast masses?

    J. Clin. Ultrasound

    (2010)
  • N. Lassau et al.

    Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (DCE-US) and anti-angiogenic treatments

    Discov. Med.

    (2011)
  • F. Knieling et al.

    Early response to anti-tumoral treatment in hepatocellular carcinoma—can quantitative contrast-enhanced ultrasound predict outcome?

    Ultraschall Med.

    (2013)
  • J. Folkman

    Angiogenesis in cancer, vascular, rheumatoid and other disease

    Nat. Med.

    (1995)
  • G. Bergers et al.

    Tumorigenesis and the angiogenic switch

    Nat. Rev. Cancer

    (2003)
  • N. Ferrara

    VEGF and the quest for tumour angiogenesis factors

    Nat. Rev. Cancer

    (2002)
  • N. Ferrara

    Vascular endothelial growth factor: basic science and clinical progress

    Endocr. Rev.

    (2004)
  • P.C. Brooks et al.

    Requirement of vascular integrin alpha v beta 3 for angiogenesis

    Science

    (1994)
  • J.D. Hood et al.

    Role of integrins in cell invasion and migration

    Nat. Rev. Cancer

    (2002)
  • P.R. Somanath et al.

    Cooperation between integrin alphavbeta3 and VEGFR2 in angiogenesis

    Angiogenesis

    (2009)
  • J.M. Lopez-Novoa et al.

    The physiological role of endoglin in the cardiovascular system

    Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.

    (2010)
  • K. Foygel et al.

    Detection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in mice by ultrasound imaging of thymocyte differentiation antigen 1

    Gastroenterology

    (2013)
  • L. Wang et al.

    Construction and in vitro/in vivo targeting of PSMA-targeted nanoscale microbubbles in prostate cancer

    Prostate

    (2013)
  • Cited by (170)

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This review is part of the Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews theme issue on “Ultrasound triggered drug delivery”.

    View full text