A derived probability distribution approach to stormwater quality modeling
Introduction
Different types of urban stormwater quality models are developed in the literature. These models with various degrees of complexity are based on different modeling approaches. Huber [21], [22] provided a review of these stormwater quality models and noted that there were six fully operational runoff quality models including the US EPA Stormwater Management Model (SWMM) [23], the most widely used continuous simulation model in North America. More generally, urban stormwater quality models fall into two broad categories, namely, deterministic models (including statistical and physically-based) and stochastic models.
Statistical models are normally developed with well-established multivariate pattern recognition techniques such as factor analysis, cluster analysis, correlation analysis, etc. Other frequently used techniques for developing stormwater quality models include linear, non-linear and stepwise regressions. Physically-based stormwater quality models usually involve a number of simplified and interconnected elements with some physical interpretation in attempting to describe the complex processes of pollutant generation and transport in urban catchments. Although considered as an alternative to physically-based approach, one apparent drawback of statistical modeling approach is its inability to take into account the antecedent dry period which can be considered as one of the most important parameters in conventional physically-based models [20]. In addition, the application of statistical models is somewhat restricted because of the onerous requirement of supporting data and the limited validation of results that cannot be extrapolated or transferred [30]. The determination of statistical relationships can be unduly influenced by high magnitude events with quite low frequencies of occurrence [38]. In contrast to deterministic models that describe independent variables and predict dependent variables with specific values of certainty, probabilistic models instead consider the possibility of occurrence of particular events and determine the likelihood of their occurrence. For the probabilistic models formulated with derived probability distribution theory, major inputs to an urban drainage system similar to many other physical phenomena, can be typically considered as independent random variables with specified known probability distributions. The probability distributions of these independent random variables are then mathematically transformed into the probability distributions of the dependent variables describing the system outputs.
The derived probability distribution approach has been widely employed in flood frequency analysis [18], [11], [44]. Gottschalk et al. [17] showed that the probability distribution function of low flows could be derived by combining a regional rainfall model developed from long rainfall record and a local model for runoff response. In addition to the modeling of stormwater quantity, the derived probability distribution approach has also been extended to include stormwater quality modeling as well [15], [27], [28], [37], [29]. Among which Segarra-Garcia and Loganathan [37] derived a mathematical expression for the expected pollutant washoff load by assuming that hydrologic variables such as runoff event depth, duration and interevent time, were exponentially distributed random variables. Loganathan and Delleur [27] applied the derived distribution approach in evaluating the effect of urbanization on the frequency of pollutant loads from storm sewer overflows. Akan [3] derived a mathematical frequency distribution for estimation of stormwater runoff suspended solids load washed off from the impervious surface of urban catchment. Li and Adams [26] developed analytical probabilistic models with derived probability distribution theory to analyze the runoff quantity/quality control performance of various combinations of storage/treatment systems. Xu et al. [45] proposed a probabilistic stormwater quality model in which stormwater runoff quantity was estimated by STORM, and statistical estimation methods such as regression and maximum likelihood methods were employed for estimating the mean of censored concentrations and pollutant loads.
This paper presents methodologies and major procedures for the development of urban stormwater quality model which consists of a number of functional components such as rainfall–runoff transformation, pollutant buildup and washoff, etc. By integrating rainfall–runoff transformations and pollutant buildup function with washoff model, stormwater quality measures such as the cumulative distribution functions (CDFs) of pollutant loads, the expected value of pollutant event mean concentrations (EMCs) and the average annual pollutant load to receiving waters are developed with derived probability distribution theory. In order to evaluate the impacts of rainfall–runoff transformation on pollutant loads, two different types of the rainfall–runoff transformations are proposed and integrated with the disaggregated form of the pollutant buildup function in this study.
Section snippets
Derived probability distribution approach
In contrast to other modeling approaches, the objective of urban stormwater quality modeling with derived probability distribution approach is essentially to transform the probability distributions of system inputs into the probability distributions of system outputs. This approach was first outlined by Benjamin and Cornell [9] in the Civil Engineering literature, where it was demonstrated that the probability distribution of a dependent random variable might be derived from those related
Pollutant buildup and washoff models
Pollutant buildup and washoff is a continuous process occurring over both dry and wet weather periods. Pollutants from various sources may enter stormwater runoff via different pathways including atmospheric fallout, automobile emissions and corrosion, land surface erosion, pavement degradation, vegetation and leaf litter, etc. During the wet weather period, rainfall not only washes off pollutants that have built up during dry weather period, but also deposits its own pollutants [24]. Although
Development of stormwater quality control measures
Stormwater quality measures include the CDF of pollutant event load, the expected value of pollutant load and pollutant EMC. In the literature, pollutant event mean concentration is usually a preferred measure of stormwater quality instead of instantaneous concentration since pollutant EMC is relatively less dependent on runoff volume. The event mean concentration (flow-weighted mean) should be a better measure of the pollution potential of urban stormwater runoff than an arithmetic mean, which
Study area and data condition
In this study, the test catchment with an area of 16.1 ha is located within the Upper East Don subwatershed, part of the Don River watershed in the city of Toronto. The study area selected from one of the two subcatchments within the tributary to the Upper East Don River is drained to the Heritage Estates pond. According to the previous study [31], the catchment is composed of primarily residential land use with the majority of the site made up of tablelands. The vegetation cover through almost
Summary and conclusions
This paper presents methodologies for the development of analytical stormwater quality models based on the derived probability distribution approach. By integrating rainfall–runoff transformation with pollutant buildup and washoff models, long-term stormwater quality measures; e.g., the average pollutant event mean concentration, and annual pollutant load to receiving waters are developed in terms of catchment meteorological characteristics. As demonstrated in this study, analytical models for
References (46)
- et al.
Derivation of low flow distribution functions using recession curves
J Hydrol
(1997) - et al.
Distribution of peak flow derived from a distribution of rainfall volume and runoff coefficient, and a unit hydrograph
J Hydrol
(1998) Runoff quality from a street with medium traffic loading
J Sci Total Environ
(1987)- et al.
Urban stormwater management planning with analytical probabilistic models
(2000) Pollutant washoff by overland flow
J Environ Engrg ASCE
(1987)Derived frequency distribution for storm runoff pollution
J Environ Engrg ASCE
(1988)Estimation of impervious-area washoff parameters
Water Resour Res
(1981)- et al.
Estimation of accumulation parameters for urban runoff quality modeling
Water Resour Res
(1981) - Ammon DC. Urban stormwater pollutant buildup and washoff relationships. Master of Engineering thesis. Gainesville (FL):...
- et al.
Modeling the buildup and washoff of pollutants on urban watersheds
Water Resour Bull AWRA
(1996)
Probability, statistics, and decision for civil engineers
Sewer sediment production and transport modeling: a literature review
J Hydrol Res
Flood frequency derivation from kinematic wave
J Hydrol Engrg ASCE
Evaluation of methods for estimating stormwater pollutant loadings
Water Environ Res
Modeling of storm washoff of suspended solids from impervious surfaces
J Hydrol Res
Probability model of stream quality due to runoff
J Environ Engrg ASCE
Pollutional aspects of urban runoff
Statistically based modeling of urban runoff quality: state of the art
Modeling urban runoff quality: state-of-the art
Deterministic modeling of urban runoff quality
Stormwater management model
Cited by (31)
Estimate of uncertain cohesive suspended sediment deposition rate from uncertain floc size in Meghna estuary, Bangladesh
2023, Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf ScienceCitation Excerpt :The derived distribution approach was applied to flood prediction in a basin in Italy comprising 16 poorly gauged watersheds (Brocchiola and Rosso, 2009). Chen and Adams (2007) used the derived distribution approach to develop an analytical stormwater quality model. Perona et al. (2013) obtained analytical expressions for probability distribution functions of optimally allocated river flows to human activity and the environment, using the derived distribution approach.
Uncertainty in the parameterization of sediment build-up and wash-off processes in the simulation of sediment transport in urban areas
2019, Environmental Modelling and SoftwareIncorporating process variability into stormwater quality modelling
2015, Science of the Total EnvironmentCitation Excerpt :For example, stormwater quality models such as SWMM and Hydrological Simulation Program-Fortran-HSPF (Bicknell et al., 1993) are embedded with linear, power, exponential and hyperbolic (saturation) forms of build-up and wash-off models. The derivatives of these mathematical models have been proposed, and their performance has been evaluated in several research studies (Chen and Adams, 2007; Wang et al., 2011). However, the simplest form of build-up and wash-off models frequently adopted in past research was selected (in Fig. 5) as it can guide the improvement of models for higher predictive performance.
Stormwater pollutant runoff: A stochastic approach
2014, Advances in Water Resources