The impact of grassy field margins on macro-invertebrate abundance in adjacent arable fields

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2010.08.014Get rights and content

Abstract

Grassy field margins are thought to be an important feature for a variety of species in arable landscapes. However, not many studies address the impact of such margins in arable landscapes on the abundance of macro-invertebrates in arable fields. We estimated the abundance of earthworms, gastropods and carabids in fields with and without a grassy margin. Additionally, fields were sampled along the edge and further in the field.

From our findings we can conclude that the presence of grassy field margins in arable landscapes increases the abundance of carabids and earthworms but decreases the abundance of gastropods. These effects were mainly noticeable on the edge of the field, but appear to be occurring further in the field as well.

Research highlights

▶ Presence of grassy margins in arable fields increases macro-invertebrate abundance. ▶ Abundance of carabids and earthworms increases, abundance of gastropods decreases. ▶ Effects were mainly noticeable on the edge, but may also occur further in the field.

Introduction

About 38% of the total land area of the world was used for agricultural purposes in 2004 (Clay, 2004), an area potentially valuable for an array of species (e.g. Chamberlain et al., 2000, Robinson and Sutherland, 2002). However, especially after the Second World War, farm management rapidly changed and intensified resulting in a reduction in diversity of landscapes (Robinson and Sutherland, 2002, Foley et al., 2005). Consequently, changes in agricultural management have frequently been mentioned as one of the major causes for the loss of species diversity and abundance (e.g. Krebs et al., 1999, Donald et al., 2001, Robinson and Sutherland, 2002, Foley et al., 2005).

Agri-environment schemes were introduced into the agricultural policy of the USA, Australia and in the European Union, during the last few decades, partly with the aim of protecting biodiversity and also in an attempt to reverse some of the negative impacts of agricultural intensification on wildlife and the environment (Australian Government, 2009, European Commission, 2009, USDA, 2009). Many existing agri-environment schemes have provision for grassy, or uncultivated, field margins (e.g. Benton, 2007, Butler et al., 2007). Many studies focus on the effect of different arable field margin management strategies on invertebrates (e.g. Morris and Webb, 1987, Kromp and Steinberger, 1992, Baines et al., 1998, Asteraki et al., 2004, Woodcock et al., 2005, Woodcock et al., 2007). However few studies investigated the impact of the presence of a grassy field margin in itself in comparison with its absence (Yu et al., 2006). More studies investigate whether a possible positive effect of grassy field margins on invertebrate abundance extends to surrounding arable fields (Kromp and Steinberger, 1992, Kádár et al., 2004, Saska et al., 2007, Smith et al., 2008, Werling and Gratton, 2008, Twardowski and Pastuszko, 2008), but many of these studies focus on a specific group of invertebrates.

Marshall et al. (2006) investigated the impact of agri-environment field margins and found positive impacts on diversity or abundance for flora, bees and orthoptera, but not for birds, spiders and carabids. However, it has also been found that undisturbed boundaries such as hedges and beetle banks, may act as winter reservoirs for some species of carabids in arable landscapes (Sotherton, 1984, Sotherton, 1985, Morris and Webb, 1987). Dennis and Fry (1992) found that the predatory arthropod species diversity is higher near grassy field boundaries. Whether the abundance of earthworms and gastropods may be enhanced in arable fields by the presence of an unmanaged boundary is currently not well studied and might be important with respect to the conservation of invertebrates and their predators, and to pest management. Complementary to the available literature, this paper investigates if the presence of grassy field margins affects the abundance of macro-invertebrates (earthworms, gastropods and carabids) in the field margin, and in adjacent arable fields.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

A total of 32 arable fields were sampled for invertebrate abundance in May–July 2009. All fields were surrounded by an established hedgerow of at least 2 m wide. Half of these fields were surrounded by a grassy field margin of 4–6 m wide and managed through an agri-environment scheme (Entry Level Stewardship [Natural England, 2008]). The remaining 16 fields did not have a grassy field margin; they were either harvested up to the hedgerow or a fringe (<1 m) of scrub and or nettles was still

Earthworms

The mean number of earthworms in the soil was significantly higher on fields with than on fields without a grassy margin (Wilcoxon signed-rank test: Z = −5.874, p < 0.001) at 0 and 20 m from the edge (Wilcoxon signed-rank test 0 m: Z = −5.855, p < 0.001, 20 m: F = −2.458, p = 0.014), but not at 10 m from the edge (Wilcoxon signed-rank test: Z = −0.235, p = 0.814). The mean biomass of earthworms was also significantly higher on fields with than on fields without a grassy margin (Wilcoxon signed-rank test: Z = −3.701,

Discussion

In our study carabids were more abundant on arable fields that had grassy margins along the edges. Although this appeared to be especially so away from the edge of the field; we did not find any significant differences at both 10 and 20 m from the edge, likely due to the high standard error of the mean. However, it must be noted that pitfall trap catches not only depend on the density of populations, but on other factors such as activity and body size of the species as well (Lang, 2000). Indeed,

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank the farmers who were so kind in permitting fieldwork on their land. We were also grateful for the help of fieldwork assistants Michael Bennett and Pieter Berends. The entire project was funded jointly by the People's Trust of Endangered Species, the British Hedgehog Preservation Society and by a legacy of Dilys Breece, to whom we are greatly indebted. We would also like to thank two anonymous referees for their useful comments.

References (40)

  • M. Baines et al.

    The effects of arable field margin management on the abundance and species richness of Araneae (Spiders)

    Ecography

    (1998)
  • T.G. Benton

    Managing farming's footprint on biodiversity

    Science

    (2007)
  • S.J. Butler et al.

    Farmland biodiversity and the footprint of agriculture

    Science

    (2007)
  • D.E. Chamberlain et al.

    Changes in the abundance of farmland birds in relation to the timing of agricultural intensification in England and Wales

    J. Appl. Ecol.

    (2000)
  • J. Clay

    World Agriculture and The Environment: A Commodity-by-Commodity Guide to Impacts and Practices

    (2004)
  • J.P. Curry

    Factors affecting earthworm abundance in soils

  • P.F. Donald et al.

    Agricultural intensification and the collapse of Europe's farmland bird populations

    Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B: Biol. Sci.

    (2001)
  • European Commission, 2009. Agriculture and The Environment. Available at:...
  • J.A. Foley et al.

    Global consequences of land use

    Science

    (2005)
  • E. Fournier et al.

    Activity and satiation state in Pterostichus melanarius: an experiment in different agricultural habitats

    Ecol. Entomol.

    (2001)
  • Cited by (64)

    • Supporting non-target arthropods in agroecosystems: Modelling effects of insecticides and landscape structure on carabids in agricultural landscapes

      2021, Science of the Total Environment
      Citation Excerpt :

      In intensively managed agricultural landscapes, the ongoing loss and fragmentation of semi-natural habitats (Cousins et al., 2015; Ridding et al., 2020) has led to their reduction to remnants mainly in a form of linear features, such as field margins, hedges, and ditches or grassy strips along waterlines or roads. Nevertheless, these narrow, extensively managed, linear semi-natural habitats can play a key role in enhancing NTA species by locally reducing negative impacts of pesticides (De Snoo and De Wit, 1998; Reichenberger et al., 2007), serving as connecting corridors and source habitats for recolonization of fields (Cole et al., 2012; Hof and Bright, 2010), and providing structural attributes and vegetation that offer shelter, food resources and overwintering refugia (Geiger et al., 2009; MacLeod et al., 2004; Pfiffner and Luka, 2000). However, with progressive land consolidation, increasing field sizes and decreasing field boundaries density, the abundance of linear semi-natural habitats in agroecosystems is declining together with multiple ecosystem services provided by NTA (Mkenda et al., 2019).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text