Elsevier

Agricultural Water Management

Volume 96, Issue 11, November 2009, Pages 1560-1566
Agricultural Water Management

Estimating the impacts of water pricing on smallholder irrigators in North West Province, South Africa

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2009.06.014Get rights and content

Abstract

Worldwide growing water scarcity has increased the call for economic instruments to stimulate rational water use in agriculture. Furthermore, cost-recovery is now widely accepted as a cornerstone of sustainable water management. In many developing countries, where agricultural water use is often still subsidised, water pricing policies are developed for allocating water efficiently and achieving sustainability of water systems. However, the impacts of water pricing policies on irrigation water use and on farm production systems is mostly unknown. We introduce an innovative two-stage methodology that allows estimating these effects at farm level. Applying the method to small-scale irrigators in South Africa, we show that water demand is quite responsive even to small changes in water price. In addition, the introduction of a water price significantly decreases farm profit. This appears to be a problem primarily for the poorer farmers.

Introduction

Irrigation is one of the main consumptive uses of water at world level. Due to the growing water scarcity, irrigators experience increasing pressure to release water for other uses and to find ways to improve water productivity (Perry, 2007, Malano et al., 2004). Efficient use of water resources is therefore considered as a fundamental target for farmers and water management (Ortega et al., 2004, Tsur, 2004). In this respect, the apparent misuse and waste of irrigation water, in the context of low and subsidised water prices, induces many authors (Liao et al., 2007, Russell et al., 2007, Bar-Shira et al., 2006, Becker and Lavee, 2002, Perry, 2001) to advocate a more prominent role of economic incentives in encouraging efficient water use. Irrigation water pricing is often regarded as a good tool to achieve efficient use (Singh, 2007). Moreover, this strategy also fits into the picture of cost-recovery, which is now generally considered as a basic requirement for sustainability (Molle et al., 2008, Massarutto, 2007).

In terms of efficiency, increasing the price of irrigation water or simply introducing a price is believed to have two important positive effects. Firstly, it will make consumers aware of the resource scarcity, creating a new respect for water, which should improve management efficiency and secondly it provides incentives to farmers to rethink crop choices, stimulating the shift to more profitable crops (Easter and Liu, 2007, He et al., 2006, Becker and Lavee, 2002). However, according to Tardieu and Préfol (2002) and Liao et al. (2007) rises in water prices are not without risk: they could lead to an overall reduction in a country's agricultural production, endangering the goal of securing food self-sufficiency; they could lead to higher prices for urban consumers resulting in increased import and loss of market share for local irrigating farmers; finally they could lower agricultural income with negative effects on rural development. Abu-Zeid (2001) adds that in many parts of the world increasing or introducing water charges is a sensitive issue, involving historical, social and even religious dimensions. Furthermore, the effect of irrigation charges on agricultural water use efficiency might be insignificant if irrigation water costs represent too small a proportion of the total production costs. Finally the low elasticity of demand for irrigation water reported by Albiac et al. (2007), Gómez-Limón and Riesgo (2004) and Berbel and Gómez-Limón (2000) is still another reason to expect limited water saving effects. Taking into consideration the possible disadvantages and the limited effect water pricing policies might have on water saving, it is clear that methodologies allowing to estimate as accurately as possible, the effects of water prices both on water demand and the agricultural production process are very important (Ortega et al., 2004).

South Africa is one of the countries currently in the process of introducing water charges, imposing a new challenge on the small-scale irrigation sector. Apart from increasing the cost-recovery rate for water supply, an expected benefit of this policy change is that water use efficiency will rise. However, the exact impact on the irrigation water use or on the farmers’ production system remains unclear. Assessment of these effects is important in South Africa, since small-scale irrigation is identified as a key sector for rural development. This study proposes a novel two-step method, which is applied to a sample of 60 small-scale irrigators in North West Province, South Africa. First technical and economic efficiency levels are calculated, then these are used as a representation of the production technology in a mathematical programming model to estimate the impact of changes in the water price. This method allows estimating the effect of water pricing at farm level and offers insight in the water saving effect of the introduction of water charges. In addition, the environmental effects (use of fertilizers and pesticides) and socio-economic effects (labour use, effect on farm profit and total agricultural output) can be assessed.

Section snippets

Methodology

Several authors (Albiac et al., 2007, Manos et al., 2006, Gómez-Limón and Riesgo, 2004, Doppler et al., 2002, Berbel and Gómez-Limón, 2000, Gómez-Limón and Berbel, 2000) have used linear programming models to estimate the effect of water pricing on water demand. A disadvantage of these models is that they use predetermined theoretical ratios between inputs and outputs that are not based on empirical data from actual farms. As a consequence, substitutions between different inputs are not

Water pricing in South Africa

Water pricing was introduced in South Africa by the National Water Act (1998). The Act foresees three types of water use charges (DWAF, 2004): The first type is introduced to fund water resource management. This involves activities such as information gathering, monitoring water resources and controlling their use, water resource protection and water conservation. Unit charges (cents per cubic metre) are determined for each user sector and water management area. However for billing purposes

Conclusions

Water pricing is often seen as an important tool to improve efficiency of water use. Several authors however have warned for the limited effect in terms of water saving and the even negative economic and social side effects of this policy. Given the increasing pressure to release water for other uses and to find ways in which to improve irrigation performance, there is an urgent need for methodologies that allow estimating the effects of different water pricing scenarios. This study proposes a

References (47)

  • S. Perret

    Water policies and smallholding irrigation schemes in South Africa: a history and new institutional challenges

    Water Policy

    (2002)
  • L. Riesgo et al.

    Multi-criteria policy scenario analysis for public regulation of irrigated agriculture

    Agricultural Systems

    (2006)
  • S. Speelman et al.

    A measure for the efficiency of water use and its determinants, a case study of 3 small-scale irrigation schemes in North-West Province, South Africa

    Agricultural Systems

    (2008)
  • H. Yang et al.

    Water scarcity, pricing mechanism and institutional reform in northern China irrigated agriculture

    Agricultural Water Management

    (2003)
  • D. Abler et al.

    The “Efficient but Poor” hypothesis

    Review of Agricultural Economics

    (2006)
  • S. Abrar et al.

    Supply response in Ethiopia: accounting for technical inefficiency

    Agricultural Economics

    (2006)
  • M. Abu-Zeid

    Water pricing in irrigated agriculture

    International Journal of Water Resource Development

    (2001)
  • J. Albiac et al.

    Instruments for water quantity and quality management in the agriculture in Aragon

    International Journal of Water Resource Development

    (2007)
  • C. Arnade et al.

    Estimating a profit function in the presence of inefficiency: an application to Russian agriculture

    Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics

    (2002)
  • G. Backeberg

    Reform of user charges, market pricing and management of water: problem or opportunity for irrigated agriculture?

    Irrigation and Drainage

    (2006)
  • Z. Bar-Shira et al.

    Block-rate versus uniform water pricing in agriculture: an empirical analysis

    American Journal of Agricultural Economics

    (2006)
  • N. Becker et al.

    The effect of reform of water pricing: the Israeli experience

    International Journal of Water Resource Development

    (2002)
  • Cai, X., Ringler, C., Rosegrant, M.W., 2006. Modeling Water Resources Management at the Basin Level: Methodology and...
  • Cited by (31)

    • Water pricing reform for sustainable water resources management in China's agricultural sector

      2023, Agricultural Water Management
      Citation Excerpt :

      In China, the water pricing reform is to recover O&M cost as much as possible to ensure daily operations, and to gradually recover full water supply cost to promote financial sustainability. A few countries have implemented full water supply cost pricing, such as South Africa (Speelman et al., 2009). However, almost all developing countries need subsidy policies to support pricing to be accepted and enforced.

    • Water pricing and the value-add of irrigation water in Vietnam: Insights from a crop choice model fitted to a national household survey

      2020, Agricultural Water Management
      Citation Excerpt :

      Setting a volumetric price for surface water diverted for irrigation does not have to result in a significant negative impact on net incomes if appropriately complemented by other policies. While empirical evidence shows crop profit may decline (Speelman et al., 2009), the revenue from water pricing could be used to provide income support to compensate farmers for higher water prices while retaining their incentive to conserve water. Flexible pricing schemes could also be developed to minimise the negative impacts on poor farmers, such as block pricing wherein water prices are low and fixed below a specific volume and rise rapidly for higher water diversions.

    • An analytical review of irrigation efficiency measured using deterministic and stochastic models

      2017, Agricultural Water Management
      Citation Excerpt :

      A total of nineteen studies (60%) aimed to determine farm efficiency by estimating TE, AE, EE, IWUE and/or WUE measures. Of the thirteen studies with other objectives, two (Díaz et al., 2004a; Ntantos and Karpouzos, 2010) aimed to identify inefficient systems or farms with respect to water use as well as how to improve them in future through potential investments in infrastructure and modern irrigation; two studies (Speelman et al., 2009; Frija et al., 2011) measured efficiency and estimated the impact of changes in the water price; and two studies proposed an alternative measure of efficiency. In Raju and Kumar (2006) the data envelopment analysis (DEA) technique was employed to select a suitable irrigation planning alternative to demonstrate its use as alternative methodology multi-criteria decision analysis.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text