Archeology and the Anthropocene

Abstract

A proposal to officially name a new geological epoch, the Anthropocene, based on the pervasive human domination of earth's ecosystems, is being seriously considered, with a proposed beginning date of AD 1800. An arbitrary date for the defining the Anthropocene may be inevitable, but human domination of our planet is the result of a long process of cultural and ecological changes that spans millennia. The archeological study of human impacts to earth's ecosystems provides multiple lines of evidence to understand this process. Considering broad “hard rock” and stratigraphically recognizable evidence for major floral and faunal changes worldwide, we argue that the Anthropocene began roughly 10,000 years ago, after anatomically modern humans spread beyond Africa and Eurasia to Australia and the Americas, then domesticated a variety of plant and animal species. These developments set in motion a cumulative process of human population growth, landscape modification, and environmental changes visible in Holocene soil, pollen, faunal, and other records around the world.

Introduction

In a landmark paper published in the journal Science near the turn of the 21st century, “Human Domination of Earth's Ecosystems,” Vitousek et al. (1997) conducted a meta-analysis and found that humans had reached a historical watershed in transforming our planet—atmospherically, hydrologically, pedologically, geochemically, biologically, ecologically, and more (Fig. 1). A few 4 years later, Jackson et al. (2001) argued that the recent collapse of marine fisheries and ecosystems had deeper roots in a gradual intensification of coastal fisheries and the development of sophisticated maritime technologies by Homo sapiens sapiens (anatomically modern humans, a.k.a. AMH). Ecological and cultural changes intensified with the development of European colonialism and a globalized economy, beginning in the late 15th century AD with Christopher Columbus’ ‘discovery’ of the Americas and the mapping of remote continents and islands that ensued in the decades or centuries that followed. These and other studies proposed that humans have had significant impacts on earth's ecosystems for centuries or even millennia (e.g., Alroy, 2001, Erlandson and Rick, 2010, Foley et al., 2013, Goudie, 2000, Kirch, 2005, Kirch and Hunt, 1997, Martin, 1973, Martin and Steadman, 1999, Redman, 1999; Redman et al., 2004; Rick and Erlandson, 2008, Steadman, 2006).

At the turn of the millennium, not coincidentally, another idea proposed earlier gained significant traction. This was the idea that humans had reached a level of domination of the Earth that was both measurable and of comparable scale to those of previous transitions between geological epochs. This proposed new epoch, known as the Anthropocene (human era), recognizes the widespread effects humans have had on Earth's climate, atmosphere, oceans, rivers, estuaries, terrestrial landscapes, and the biodiversity of floral and faunal communities. The concept of an Anthropocene epoch has generated considerable debate, some about the value of the idea itself, and some about where the temporal boundary between the Holocene and the Anthropocene should be drawn. As this debate has unfolded, the use of the term Anthropocene has grown in the popular media (e.g., Kolbert, 2011) and among scientists from a variety of disciplines. Curiously, there has been little discussion of the topic within the discipline of archeology, an historical science that is well positioned to address the long term processes involved in how humans have come to dominate our planet (see Redman, 1999, Redman et al., 2004).

In organizing this volume, which grew out of a 2013 symposium at the Society of American Archaeology meetings held in Honolulu (Balter, 2013), we sought to rectify this situation by inviting a distinguished group of archeologists to examine the issue of humanity's expanding footprint on Earth's ecosystems. The papers in this issue utilize archeological records to consider the Anthropocene from a variety of topical or regional perspectives. The first two papers address general and global issues, including Smith and Zeder's discussion of human niche construction and the development of agricultural and pastoral societies, as well as Braje and Erlandson's summary of late Pleistocene and Holocene extinctions as a continuum mediated by climate change, human activities, and other factors. Several papers then look at the archeology of human landscape transformation within specific regions of the world: C. Melvin Aikens and Gyoung-Ah Lee for East Asia, Sarah McClure for Europe, Anna Roosevelt for Amazonia, and Douglas Kennett and Timothy Beach for Mesoamerica. Later chapters again address global issues: from Torben Rick, Patrick Kirch, Erlandson, and Scott Fitzpatrick's summary of ancient human impacts on three well-studied island archipelagos (Polynesia, California's Channel Islands, and the Caribbean) around the world; to Erlandson's discussion of the widespread post-glacial appearance of coastal, riverine, and lake-side shell middens as a potential stratigraphic marker of the Anthropocene; and Kent Lightfoot, Lee Panich, Tsim Schneider, and Sara Gonzalez’ exploration of the effects of colonialism and globalization along the Pacific Coast of North America and around the world. Finally, we complete the volume with concluding remarks that examine the breadth of archeological approaches to the Anthropocene, and the significance and implications of understanding the deep historical processes that led to human domination of Earth's ecosystems.

In this introduction we provide a broad context for the articles that follow by: (1) briefly discussing the history of the Anthropocene concept (see also Smith and Zeder, 2014); (2) summarizing the nature of archeological approaches to understanding human impacts on ancient environments; (3) setting the stage with a brief overview of human evolution, demographic expansion and migrations, and the acceleration of technological change; (4) and identifying some tipping points and key issues involved in an archeological examination of the Anthropocene.