Catalytic ozonation for the degradation of nitrobenzene in aqueous solution by ceramic honeycomb-supported manganese

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2008.02.009Get rights and content

Abstract

Catalytic ozonation of nitrobenzene in aqueous solution has been carried out in a semi-continuous laboratory reactor where ceramic honeycomb and Mn–ceramic honeycomb have been used as the catalysts. The presences of the two catalysts significantly improve the degradation efficiency of nitrobenzene, the utilization efficiency of ozone and the production of oxidative intermediate species compared to the results from non-catalytic ozonation, and the improvement of them is even more pronounced in the presence of Mn–ceramic honeycomb. Adsorptions of nitrobenzene on the two catalytic surfaces have no remarkable influence on the degradation efficiency. Addition of tert-butanol causes the obvious decrease of degradation efficiency, suggesting that degradation of nitrobenzene follows the mechanism of hydroxyl radical (radical dotOH) oxidation. Some of the main operating variables like amount of catalyst and reaction temperature exert a positive influence on the degradation efficiency of nitrobenzene. Initial pH also presents a positive effect in the ozonation alone system while the optimum working initial pH is found to be around 8.83 and 10.67 to the processes of ozonation/ceramic honeycomb and ozonation/Mn–ceramic honeycomb, respectively. The surface characteristics measurement of the two catalysts indicates that the loading of Mn increases the specific surface area, the pH at the point of zero charge (pHPZC) and the density of surface hydroxyl groups, and results in the appearance of new crystalline phase of MnO2. The results of mechanism research confirm that the loading of Mn promotes the initiation of radical dotOH.

Introduction

Nitrobenzene is a major environmental pollutant due to its carcinogenesis and mutagenesis [1], [2]. The commercial uses of nitrobenzene are reduction to aniline, solvent, synthetic products of benzene [3], metal polishes, shoe-black, perfume, dye intermediates [4], [5], plastics, explosives, pharmaceuticals [6], pesticides [7] and a combustible propellant [1]. The production of nitrobenzene in the USA was close to 0.75 billion kg for the year 1995 [1]. Therefore, the remediation of nitrobenzene in aqueous solution is of environmental concern because of its toxicity and the quantity of its production. However, nitrobenzene resists to oxidation by conventional chemical oxidation due to the strong electron-withdrawing property of the nitro-group. Mineralization of nitrobenzene by microorganisms is prevented owing to the effects of toxic and mutagenic on biological systems, which derive from nitrobenzene and its transformation metabolites, such as nitrosobenzene, hydroxylaminobenzene and aniline [2], [4], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16]. In order to afford the inexpensive and effective processes for the water treatment, various chemical reduction treatment and advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) have been studied for the degradation of nitrobenzene in aqueous solution, such as Fe0 reduction [1], [2], photocatalysis [17], [18], photoassisted Fenton oxidation [19], supercritical oxidation [20] and so on.

AOPs are characterized by the generation of hydroxyl radical (radical dotOH), species of high oxidizing power, that reacts on the matter present in water in an unselective way [21]. In recent years, heterogeneous catalytic ozonation, as a promising AOP, has received much attention in water treatment due to its high oxidation potential. Several researches have been reported on the degradation of nitrobenzene in aqueous solution by the heterogeneous catalytic ozonation processes. The experimental results indicate that removal efficiency of nitrobenzene is significantly promoted in the presence of heterogeneous catalysts compared with that of ozone alone, including nano-TiO2 [22], Mn-loaded granular activated carbon (MnOx/GAC) [23], [24], ceramic honeycomb [25], [26] and synthetic goethite [27]. Moreover, except for MnOx/GAC catalytic ozonation, it is found that the degradation of nitrobenzene follows the radical dotOH oxidation mechanism in the other systems mentioned above.

In order to increase the catalytic activity of ceramic honeycomb [25], [26] and develop the convenient operation of manganese catalyst [23], [28], [29], [30] used in the previous study, ceramic honeycomb was modified by loading Mn in the experiments, and the degradation efficiency of organic micropollutant was investigated by ceramic honeycomb-supported Mn catalytic ozonation. Nitrobenzene slowly reacts with molecular ozone (0.09 ± 0.02 M−1 s−1), reacts quickly with radical dotOH (2.2 × 108 M−1 s−1) and it does not adsorb on the ceramic honeycomb catalyst surface. Therefore, nitrobenzene, listed as a priority pollutant, is chosen as a model pollutant due to its toxicity of the central nervous system and its refractory nature to conventional chemical oxidation, and the special indication of radical dotOH. Furthermore, the objective of the present investigation was to compare the degradation efficiency of nitrobenzene in the different processes (ozonation alone, catalytic ozonation and adsorption of catalysts), and to elucidate several control options for the degradation efficiency of nitrobenzene (addition of radical dotOH scavenger, amount of catalyst, reaction temperature, initial pH) and to confirm preliminarily the reaction mechanism.

Section snippets

Materials and reagents

Monoliths of ceramic honeycomb (Shanghai Pengyinaihuo Material Factory, China) were used as the catalyst and the framework of catalyst. These blocks have the following characteristics: the shape of a cylinder with a diameter of 50 mm and a length of 50 mm, wall thickness 0.4 mm, the cell density 400 square cells per square inch and the weight of a single block of ceramic honeycomb was 34.6–35.4 g. All the monolithic blocks were cleaned before the catalytic ozonation process and the modified

Degradation efficiency of nitrobenzene in the different processes

The experiments were performed in the different processes to investigate the degradation efficiency of nitrobenzene, including ozonation alone, ozonation/ceramic honeycomb, ozonation/Mn–ceramic honeycomb, adsorption of ceramic honeycomb and adsorption of Mn–ceramic honeycomb, under the condition of the applied specific ozone dose of 20 mg ozone/mg nitrobenzene. The results are represented in Fig. 1.

As shown in Fig. 1, the concentrations of nitrobenzene all decrease with the increasing reaction

Conclusions

It has been demonstrated that the degradation efficiency of nitrobenzene in aqueous solution by ozonation alone is accelerated in the presence of ceramic honeycomb and Mn–ceramic honeycomb as the catalysts, and the more pronounced degradation efficiency is achieved in the process of ozonation/Mn–ceramic honeycomb. The results suggest that the adsorption of the organic model substances on the surface of catalysts is not compulsory for effective catalytic ozonation, in fact it may scarcely be

Acknowledgement

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 50578051).

References (68)

  • Y. Mu et al.

    Chemosphere

    (2004)
  • S. Contreras et al.

    J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem.

    (2001)
  • J. Sarasa et al.

    Water Res.

    (1998)
  • L.S. Bell et al.

    J. Contam. Hydrol.

    (2003)
  • M. Rodriguez et al.

    Catal. Today

    (2002)
  • R. Dillert et al.

    Chemsphere

    (1995)
  • M. Rodríguez et al.

    J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem.

    (2000)
  • D.S. Bhatkhande et al.

    Water Res.

    (2003)
  • M. Rodriguez et al.

    J. Photochem. Photobiol. A

    (2000)
  • I. Arslan-Alaton et al.

    Appl. Catal. B: Environ.

    (2002)
  • Y.X. Yang et al.

    J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem.

    (2007)
  • J. Ma et al.

    Water Res.

    (2005)
  • L. Zhao et al.

    Appl. Catal. B: Environ.

    (2008)
  • J. Ma et al.

    Water Res.

    (1999)
  • J. Ma et al.

    Water Res.

    (2000)
  • H. Bader et al.

    Water Res.

    (1981)
  • H. Bader et al.

    Water Res.

    (1988)
  • E. Laiti et al.

    J. Colloid Interface Sci.

    (1995)
  • H. Tamura et al.

    J. Colloid Interface Sci.

    (1999)
  • J.S. Noh et al.

    J. Colloid Interface Sci.

    (1989)
  • J.S. Noh et al.

    Carbon

    (1990)
  • B. Legube et al.

    Catal. Today

    (1999)
  • B. Kasprzyk-Hordern et al.

    Appl. Catal. B: Environ.

    (2003)
  • C.P. Huang et al.

    Waste Manage.

    (1993)
  • R. Andreozzi et al.

    Catal. Today

    (1999)
  • J. Hoigné et al.

    Water Res.

    (1976)
  • J. Hoigné et al.

    Water Res.

    (1983)
  • F.J. Beltrán et al.

    Appl. Catal. B: Environ.

    (2002)
  • U. von Gunten

    Water Res.

    (2003)
  • M. Carbajo et al.

    Appl. Catal. B: Environ.

    (2006)
  • C. Cooper et al.

    Water Res.

    (1999)
  • E. Neyens et al.

    J. Hazard. Mater. B

    (2003)
  • M. Ernst et al.

    Appl. Catal. B Environ.

    (2004)
  • F.J. Beltrán et al.

    J. Hazard. Mater. B

    (2000)
  • Cited by (155)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text