Photocatalytic oxidation of gas-phase Hg0 on the exposed reactive facets of BiOI/BiOIO3 heterostructures

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.11.013Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The removal efficiency of the as-prepared BiOI/BiOIO3 photocatalyst reached up to 98.53% and 100% under visible light and UV irradiation respectively.

  • The exposure mechanism of the dominant reactive facets of BiOI/BiOIO3 was analyzed in detail.

  • The mechanism of Hg0 oxidation by BiOI/BiOIO3 was proposed.

Abstract

Hetero layered BiOI/BiOIO3 composites were fabricated by a simple hydrothermal method. The prepared BiOI/BiOIO3 heterostructures were characterized and evaluated for gas-phase Hg0 oxidation. The photocatalytic activity of the BiOI/BiOIO3 heterostructures was detected under LED light and UV irradiation. Meanwhile, the cycle experiments were carried out to certify the stability of BiOI/BiOIO3 composites. The results showed that BiOI/BiOIO3 photocatalysts were of excellent photocatalyic ability with great efficient in oxidizing Hg0. The Hg0 removal efficiency reached up to 98.53% and 100% under LED light and UV irradiation respectively when the mole ratio of BiOI/BiOIO3 was 3:1. The photocatalytic reaction mechanism was elaborated in detail.

Introduction

Mercury emitted from coal combustion seriously damages to the environment, and as a toxic pollutants, it can harm to human health through the food chain biological accumulation. United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) survey has concluded that coal fired power plant is the largest source of mercury emissions, accounting for 1/3 of anthropogenic mercury emissions [1]. And the control of mercury emissions has caused enough attention [2]. China’s ministry of environmental protection issued a new national regulation for coal-fired power station in 2011, in which mercury emission controlling standard was mentioned for the first time, and the limiting value of mercury emission is less than 0.03 mg/m3 [3]. Hg exists in three chemical forms in coal combustion flue gas: elemental mercury (Hg0), oxidized mercury (Hg2+), and particle-bound mercury (Hgp) [4]. Mercury removal from flue gas largely depends on the form of mercury in the flue gas. Hg2+ is water-soluble, so it can be removed by wet scrubbers and the removal efficiency can reach up to 90% [5], [6]. Hgp can be easily removed by electrostatic precipitator (ESP) or fabric filter (FF) [7]. But it is difficult for the existing air pollution control devices(APCDs) to remove Hg0 because of its volatility, insolubility and chemical stability [5], so it is a great challenge to remove Hg0 from flue gas at the coal combustion power stations. The key is to oxidize Hg0 into Hg2+ in the flue gas. Recently, the research progress of photocatalytic oxidation removing Hg0 gives us a new perspective [8]. Compared with other methods, photocatalytic oxidation method is of the highest efficiency without secondary pollution and it has recyclable characteristics. Therefore, Hg0 removal from coal combustion flue gas has great potential development [9].

Photocatalytic in the direct use of solar energy to solve the two major issues of environmental pollution and energy shortage shows potential application prospects. In all of this, semiconductor photocatalysts have been applied to energy conversion, photocatalysis remediation and organic synthesis [10], [11], [12], [13], [14]. The traditional TiO2 photocatalyst is widely recognized semiconductor for photocatalytic oxidation because of its high chemical stability, high specific surface area, low cost, strong oxidation ability and photocatalytic activity [15]. However, TiO2 can only be excited by ultraviolet (UV) irradiation, which accounts for merely about 4% of the total solar radiation, what’s more, the rapid recombination of photogenerated electron-hole pairs (e–h+) causes poor quantum yield [16]. Hence many researchers have tried to improve the photocatalytic oxidation under visible light, and to improve the efficiency of photocatalytic oxidation, which included metal or nonmetal ion doping [17], [18], [19], [20], surface modification [17], [18], combining with other semiconductors or metal oxides [19], [20], etc. However, to some extent, these methods have not achieved the desired photocatalytic efficiency of mercury removal.

Bi-based layered semiconductors were found to possess a high photocatalytic activity[21]. The heterolayered BiOIO3 possesses an excellent photocatalytic activity among all of these Bi-based layered semiconductors, which is mainly due to the internal polar field and the heterolayered structure. Both features can effectively separate the e–h+ at the BiO6 and IO3 pyramids [22]. In our previous work [23], the pristine BiOIO3 photocatalyst was fabricated and studied the effect of pH value on its morphology and crystal structure, and we discussed its photocatalytic performance. However, the relatively wide band gap(3.13 eV) of BiOIO3 reduces its photoactivity under visible light. So we used BiOI with a narrow band gap (1.75 eV) to dope with BiOIO3 to narrow the band gap of BiOI/BiOIO3 compounds which can also fabricate the heterostructures, increasing the response to visible light region and separating the photogenerated e-h+. The photoactivity experiments of BiOI/BiOIO3 compounds were verified under ultraviolet (UV) light and visible light to remove mercury. Related research has been conducted in previous work [24], in which we used Bi(NO3)3·5H2O and KIO3 as the raw materials and added carbon spheres (CSs) into the solution to reduce I5+ to I directly, resulting in the formation of BiOI and carbon-doped simultaneously. In the previous work, we mainly emphasized the importance of carbon. The doped carbon element and produced BiOI can bring dramatic changes in their structural, optical, electronic and chemical properties, and the CSs acted as a photosensitizer. However the fabrication process was relatively cumbersome. In this study, we improved the fabrication process, which was very simple and was of low cost. We studied the effects of exposed reactive facets on photocatalytic activity and discussed the mechanism of mercury removal from two aspects of band gap and internal structure of the sample. The physical and chemical properties of the as-prepared BiOI/BiOIO3 compounds were characterized with a series of techniques, such as UV–vis DRS, PL, XRD, XPS, SEM and TEM. The as-prepared BiOI/BiOIO3 compounds were applied to photocatlytic oxidation of gaseous elemental mercury under ultraviolet (UV) light and visible light.

Section snippets

Chemicals and materials

Bismuth nitrate pentahydrate, Potassium iodate, Potassium iodide, acetic acid were all obtained from Guoyao Chemical Reagent Co. Ltd. All solutions were prepared with deionized water and all chemicals used in this study were analytical grade and were used without further purification.

Preparation of BiOI/BiOIO3 photocatalyst

BiOIO3 was prepared by a simple hydrothermal method. In a typical procedure, 0.485 g of Bi(NO3)3·5H2O was dissolved into 80 mL H2O, and stirred vigorously for 30 min. Then, 0.214 g of KIO3 was added into the above

XRD analysis

The XRD patterns of the as-prepared BiOI/BiOIO3 catalysts were depicted in Fig. 1. The XRD diffraction peaks of BiOIO3 were in good agreement with the orthorhombic BiOIO3 (ICSD # 262019). The obtained BiOI sample was well crystallized and can be indexed to tetragonal structure for BiOI (JCPDS file no.73-2062). The (010) and (040) peaks of BiOI/BiOIO3 heterostructures offset to a large angle to a certain extent compared to that of the pure BiOIO3, which is because the samples shifted towards the

Conclusions

  • 1)

    The BiOI/BiOIO3 heterostructures were fabricated by a simple hydrothermal synthesis method, and their photocatalytic activities were verified by removing Hg0 in flue gas. The BiOI/BiOIO3 heterostructures possess more superior photocatalytic activity compared to the conventional photocatalysts.

  • 2)

    The dominant active facets of the as-prepared BiOI/BiOIO3 nano-composite photo-catalyst are the {010} facets of BiOIO3 and the {001} facets of BiOI. The {010} facets and the {001} facets shared interfacial

Acknowledgments

This work was partially sponsored by NSF (Natural Science Foundation, 21237003, 50806041, 51106133, 51606115), Shanghai Science and Technology Development (15dz1200703, 11dz1203402, 15110501000).

References (39)

Cited by (111)

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text