Elsevier

Applied Energy

Volume 195, 1 June 2017, Pages 234-246
Applied Energy

Blockchain technology in the chemical industry: Machine-to-machine electricity market

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.03.039Get rights and content

Highlights

  • An implementation of blockchain technology facilitating a M2M electricity market.

  • Industrial plants are trading electricity with each other over a blockchain.

  • Data produced by process flow sheet models of industrial equipment are utilized.

  • Technical details and background of blockchain technology are presented.

  • This paper explores blockchain technology in relation to Industry 4.0.

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to explore applications of blockchain technology related to the 4th Industrial Revolution (Industry 4.0) and to present an example where blockchain is employed to facilitate machine-to-machine (M2M) interactions and establish a M2M electricity market in the context of the chemical industry. The presented scenario includes two electricity producers and one electricity consumer trading with each other over a blockchain. All participants are supplied with realistic data produced by process flow sheet models. This work contributes a proof-of-concept implementation of the scenario. Additionally, this paper describes and discusses the research and application landscape of blockchain technology in relation to the Industry 4.0. It concludes that this technology has significant under-researched potential to support and enhance the efficiency gains of the revolution and identifies areas for future research.

Introduction

Industry 4.0 (or the 4th Industrial Revolution) introduces into industry the concepts of machine-to-machine (M2M) communication, cyber-physical systems (CPSs) and the Internet of Things (IoT) [1], [2]. M2M communication refers to the ability of industrial components to communicate with each other. CPSs can monitor physical processes, create virtual copies of the physical world and make decentralised decisions. IoT is a dynamic network where physical and virtual entities have identities and attributes and use intelligent interfaces. An eco-industrial plant (EIP) refers to an industrial park where businesses cooperate with each other and, at times, with the local community to reduce waste and pollution, efficiently share resources (such as information, materials, water, energy, infrastructure, and natural resources) and minimise environmental impact while simultaneously increasing business success [3], [4], [5]. Implementation of the principles of Industry 4.0 and EIPs in the industry could be aided by blockchain technology. For example, blockchain could be used to facilitate M2M commodity (e.g. electricity) trading. For electricity traded on a wholesale market (as in USA, Australia, New Zealand, many European countries and Singapore [6]) such a system could reduce the overhead costs of the traditional trading practice and increase speed of transaction settlements. Those costs include administration associated with billing, reconciliation, hedging contracts and purchase agreements, which may constitute a significant part of electricity price (e.g. in the UK it is 16% [7] and in Australia approximately an eighth [8] depending on the place e.g. in Tasmania 12.2% [9]). Additionally, two extensive reports on the application of blockchain technology in the energy sector by Burger et al. [10], Hasse et al. [11] describe potential use cases and obstacles, including legislative, that need to be overcome before the technology can be widely introduced. A large number of studies has been published on electricity policies, prices, energy management and the impact of those on industrial competitiveness [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18].

The purpose of this paper is to explore applications of blockchain technology related to Industry 4.0 and to present an example where blockchain is employed to facilitate M2M interactions and establish a M2M electricity market in the context of the chemical industry. This paper is structured as follows: Section 2 introduces the readers to blockchain technology using the biggest digital currency (Bitcoin) as case study; Section 2.2 describes and discusses the research and application landscape in relation to the engineering industry; Section 3 provides implementation details of the example, including the interactions occurring on the blockchain; Section 4 summarizes the main findings.

Section snippets

Background

Blockchain technology is a relatively new research area. Whilst the topic is currently ubiquitous on the news, many readers may not be familiar with the technical terms. For readers’ benefit this publication provides a background section with a description of the inner workings and key concepts of blockchain technology and a brief literature review.

Blockchain-enabled M2M electricity market

This section presents an example in which blockchain technology is employed to facilitate M2M interactions and establish a M2M electricity market in the context of the chemical industry and the IoT. Electricity is a convenient example as its transfer is near-instantaneous (as are the corresponding blockchain transactions), but in principle any other commodity (e.g. steam, natural gas, coal) could be used here. However, the likelihood of a discrepancy between the blockchain record and reality is

Conclusions and future work

This paper demonstrates that it is possible to successfully employ the blockchain technology to facilitate M2M interactions and establish a M2M electricity market in the context of the chemical industry via the IoT. The presented scenario includes two electricity producers and one elecricity consumer trading with each other over a blockchain. The producers publish exchange offers of energy (in kWh) for currency (in USD) in a data stream. The consumer reads the offers, analyses them and attempts

Acknowledgements

This project is funded by the National Research Foundation (NRF), Prime Minister’s Office, Singapore under its Campus for Research Excellence and Technological Enterprise (CREATE) programme.

References (85)

  • Kleinelanghorst MJ, Zhou L, Sikorski J, Shyh EFY, Aditya K, Mosbach S, et al. J-park simulator: roadmap to smart...
  • M. Kraft et al.

    The future of computational modelling in reaction engineering

    Philos Trans Roy Soc Lond A: Math Phys Eng Sci

    (2010)
  • M. Pan et al.

    Applying industry 4.0 to the Jurong Island eco-industrial park

    Energy Proc

    (2015)
  • R.J. Green

    Electricity wholesale markets: designs now and in a low-carbon future

    Energy J

    (2008)
  • Energy bill breakdown; 2015....
  • Understand energy prices & rates; 2016....
  • Electricity cost breakdown; 2017....
  • Burger C, Kuhlmann A, Richard P, Weinmann J. Blockchain in the energy transition: a survey among decision-makers in the...
  • Hasse F, von Perfall A, Hillebrand T, Smole E, Lay L, Charlet M. Blockchain – an opportunity for energy producers and...
  • Condos J, Sorrell WH, Donegan SL. Blockchain technology: opportunities and risks. Technical report, State of Vermont,...
  • P. Rogaway et al.

    Cryptographic hash-function basics: definitions, implications, and separations for preimage resistance, second-preimage resistance, and collision resistance

    (2004)
  • Lewis A. A gentle introduction to blockchain technology; 2015....
  • Buterin V. Consensus mechanisms used in blockchain; 2014....
  • Bitcoin developer guide; 2009. <https://bitcoin.org/en/developer-guide> [accessed:...
  • P. Koshy et al.

    An analysis of anonymity in bitcoin using P2P network traffic

    (2014)
  • J. Yli-Huumo et al.

    Where is current research on blockchain technology? - a systematic review

    PLoS ONE

    (2016)
  • N. Koblitz et al.

    Cryptocash, cryptocurrencies, and cryptocontracts

    Des Codes Cryptogr

    (2016)
  • Brands S. An efficient off-line electronic cash system based on the representation problem. Technical report; 1993....
  • J.H. Ziegeldorf et al.

    CoinParty: secure multi-party mixing of bitcoins

  • C. Decker et al.

    Bitcoin transaction malleability and MtGox

  • Sasson EB, Chiesa A, Garman C, Green M, Miers I, Tromer E, et al. Zerocash: decentralized anonymous payments from...
  • O’Dwyer KJ, Malone D. Bitcoin mining and its energy footprint. In: 25th IET irish signals systems conference 2014 and...
  • Kishigami J, Fujimura S, Watanabe H, Nakadaira A, Akutsu A. The blockchain-based digital content distribution system....
  • M. Spagnuolo et al.

    Bitiodine: extracting intelligence from the bitcoin network

  • English M, Auer S, Domingue J. Block chain technologies & the semantic web: a framework for symbiotic development....
  • M. Vukolić

    The quest for scalable blockchain fabric: proof-of-work vs. BFT replication

  • O’Dair M, Beaven Z, Neilson D, Osborne R, Pacifico P. Music on the blockchain. Technical report 1, Blockchain For...
  • Goodman LM. Tezos – a self-amending crypto-ledger. Technical report, Tezos; 2014....
  • Zamfir V. Introducing casper the friendly ghost; 2015....
  • Sompolinsky Y, Zohar A. Accelerating Bitcoin’s transaction processing: fast money grows on trees, not chains. Technical...
  • Higgins S. Jed McCaleb talks Stellar’s new protocol for consensus; 2015....
  • M. Castro et al.

    Practical Byzantine fault tolerance

  • Cited by (602)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text