Spatial analysis of land suitability, hot-tub cabins and forest tourism in Appalachian Ohio
Introduction
After decades of falling real commodity prices in agriculture, forestry and mining, natural amenities have become central components of regional growth strategies as the countryside itself has become an object of consumption (Bowe and Marcouiller, 2007, Urquhart et al., 2012). Amenities can be defined as location-specific characteristics that increase willingness to move to or visit a particular area (Marcouiller and Clendenning, 2005, Waltert and Schläpfer, 2010). Location-specific amenities are increasingly attracting urban visitors to spend time in and money on rural areas (Gartner, 2004). Rural actors including foresters and farmers have developed new livelihood strategies in response to this demand that have had varying success (Van Berkel, Carvalho-Ribeiro, Verburg, & Lovett, 2011; Saxena, Clark, Oliver, & Ilbery, 2007). While the prospects for amenity-led growth are perceptible, there are still many open questions regarding how physical features become valuable amenity assets, and how local and regional communities can foster long-term amenity transitions.
Recent work in geography has enhanced understanding of amenity-led growth through analyses of postproductivism and multifunctionality (Duesberg et al., 2013, Lovell et al., 2010, Urquhart et al., 2012, Wilson, 2010). This research has emphasized the spatiality of such transitions, recognizing the diverse social, political, economic and environmental contexts within which they occur (Wilson, 2009). Specifically, this literature has stressed the importance of local institutional support (Holmes, 2006, Wilson, 2010), the provision of recreational opportunities most demanded by visitors (Jongeneel et al., 2008, Urquhart et al., 2012, Van Huylenbroeck et al., 2007) and the role of the surrounding landscape in complementing tourist and recreational activities (Willemen, Verburg, Hein, & van Mensvoort, 2008). At local scales, landscape configuration has been especially emphasized as an important component of amenity growth (Marsden, 1999, Wilson, 2009). Spatial quantitative analysis can add insight into how and where amenity development occurs by investigating attributes including proximity to environmental features, cultural amenities, or incompatible land uses that shape where natural amenity tourism is possible (Mather, Hill, & Nijnik, 2006).
Opportunities for amenity-led growth may rise from environmental features like topography, climate, proximity to lakes and rivers, and attractive biomes (e.g. autumn colors of temperate deciduous forests) due to their inherent aesthetic value (Van Berkel & Verburg, 2012). Critically, physical attributes can become tourist amenities through the establishment of protected areas, the agency of local institutions, and the construction of tourist facilities, among other features that increase local demand for recreation and leisure activities (Brown, 2006, Claver-Cortés et al., 2007). Transportation networks that increase accessibility to these amenities are also important.
In addition to these key factors, current tourism opportunities may be affected by competing uses that conflict with aesthetic values. Such conflicts may be a result of land-use history, for example the contamination of soil and water or aesthetic damage resulting from mining (Hunt, Boxall, Englin, & Haider, 2005). Rural growth that includes substantial exurbanization may also impede tourism. This paper examines how such processes are associated with the locations of tourist lodging.
We analyze patterns of tourist lodging in the Appalachian foothills of Hocking County, Ohio (39.50°N 82.48°W), a landscape experiencing an amenity transition (Fig. 1a). The county was at one time the site of heavy resource extraction and has transitioned toward increasing recreation and leisure. The decline of mining and lumber industries and subsequent reforestation has given rise to a tourist lodging industry with an estimated $14 million in rental returns annually. So-called hot-tub cabins (HTCs) vary from rustic to extremely luxurious and almost universally offer a hot tub as an accommodation amenity. They are advertised as romantic retreats, locations for group getaways, and secluded escapes.
Previous studies of amenity landscapes have provided insight into how location-specific characteristics increase tourist demand. One of the earliest spatial evaluations of the role of environmental features in tourism dates to Christaller (1964). Subsequent studies have utilized advances in GIS to develop multicriteria suitability maps of landscape characteristics using expert input (Kliskey, 2000). Recent participatory empirical methods have linked stated preferences to actual landscape structure (Alessa et al., 2008, Kienast et al., 2012, Plieninger et al., 2013, Sherrouse et al., 2014) allowing for more sophisticated representations of trade-offs among different landscape configurations. Hedonic techniques can shed light on how environmental amenities are associated with variations in market value (e.g. lodging returns) (Kaidou et al., 2012, Parmeter and Pope, 2009, Santana-Jiménez et al., 2011, White and Mulligan, 2002).
A major challenge of understanding suitability for natural amenity tourism is finding the most appropriate spatial scale for analysis, as tourists seek locations that offer proximate amenities, which satisfy their leisure and recreational demands (Alessa et al., 2008, Howley, 2011). Most studies focus on a relatively large region because amenity activities, e.g., tourist lodging, are often a comparatively small part of a local landscape, which confounds adequate spatial representativeness (Hunt et al., 2005, White and Mulligan, 2002). Analysis at larger aggregate scales, however, may obscure the diversity of land uses and covers and therefore may not account for spatial conflicts that can exist at sub-regional scales. In this paper, we take steps to capture these sub-regional interactions by using a rare events logistic regression model (King & Zeng, 2001), which ameliorates the challenge of rarity at this fine scale. The statistical model enables stable results despite the low occurrence of indicators of amenity demand (i.e., HTCs) that has previously hindered sub-regional analysis.
Hocking County, Ohio, has experienced dramatic growth in tourism in recent decades, and hot-tub cabins are a key component of that growth. The county's proximity to the Columbus metropolitan area as well as the region's natural beauty, characterized by the dramatic topography of the Hocking Valley, and lush temperate forests, is a draw for visitors. The county is also home to several state parks and federal forests with well-known caves and waterfalls, hiking, All Terrain Vehicle (ATV) trails, and hunting opportunities. All these amenities attract tourists, and an estimated 3 million people visit Hocking Hills State Park annually (Hocking Hills Tourism Association, 2012). This high amenity demand has occurred despite seemingly incompatible land uses. The mining industry, for example, left lasting scars, including acid mine drainage and the outflow of acidic water from coal mines (Wan, Liu, Munroe, & Cai, 2013), damaging the attractiveness and viability of surface water bodies. A more complicated issue is the relationship between exurbanization and hot tub cabins. At the same time that tourism has been increasing in the region, there has been growth in residential development, possibly decreasing the perceived naturalness of the region and leading to potential conflicts between tourists and residents (Smith & Krannich, 2000).
A spatial analysis of HTCs can shed light on which features enhance or attenuate transitions to amenity landscapes. In this study we investigate which spatial factors are most strongly associated with the observed patterns of hot-tub cabins in the county. In so doing, we can evaluate spatial conflicts or complementarities in the observed pattern of hot tub cabins, and assess the influence of other land uses on current HTC locations. Specifically, we seek to understand what role the land use, physical environment, transportation infrastructure and services, and more recent trends in exurbanization play in shaping the development of amenity demand at a local scale.
Section snippets
Overview
In this research, we investigate the association between various spatial factors and the locations of HTCs using a Rare Events Logistic Regression (RELR) (King & Zeng, 2001), which helps correct for the relatively low occurrences of HTCs in the county. In the following section we discuss data collection, variables that were included in the investigation as factors that might influence the locations of HTCs, and the methodology used to investigate why they are located where they are.
Overview
The results of the different model runs revealed several spatial conflicts and complementarities in the analysis of the observed pattern of hot tub cabins that are described below. We omitted erosion rates and soil moisture content as these were highly correlated with agricultural suitability, as well as parcel size as this was correlated with urban density. Proximity to lakes and creeks was likewise left out as model results indicated that they were not reliable predictors of HTCs (exhibiting
Discussion and conclusions
In this paper we investigated the spatial variation in the suitability for HTC businesses. By using a spatial quantitative analysis we have added insight into how and where amenity development occurs. This was achieved by evaluating those factors that significantly contribute to the locations of hot tub cabins and possible conflicts among other land uses and covers. We also investigate how legacies of past land use can influence future suitability for HTCs given instrumental variables that
Acknowledgement
This research received support from the U.S. National Science Foundation, Award # 1010314, ‘CNH: Collaborative Research: Explaining Socioecological Resilience Following Collapse: Forest Recovery in Appalachian Ohio.’ The authors would like to thank two anonymous reviewers for their helpful suggestions that greatly improved the manuscript. We are also grateful to the Hocking Hills Tourist Association for their kind advice, insight, and assistance in understanding the tourism industry in Hocking
References (70)
- et al.
The persistence of the sun and sand tourism model
Tourism Management
(2005) - et al.
Social–ecological hotspots mapping: a spatial approach for identifying coupled social–ecological space
Landscape and Urban Planning
(2008) - et al.
Alternative tourism–timber dependencies and the development of forested rural regions
Forest Policy and Economics
(2007) Some considerations of tourism location in Europe: the peripheral regions-under-developed countries-recreation areas
Papers in Regional Science
(1964)- et al.
Competitiveness in mass tourism
Annals of Tourism Research
(2007) - et al.
To plant or not to plant—Irish farmers' goals and values with regard to afforestation
Land Use Policy
(2013) - et al.
Increasing development in the surroundings of US National Park Service holdings jeopardizes park effectiveness
Journal of Environmental Management
(2011) Impulses towards a multifunctional transition in rural Australia: gaps in the research agenda
Journal of Rural Studies
(2006)Landscape aesthetics: assessing the general publics' preferences towards rural landscapes
Ecological Economics
(2011)- et al.
Remote tourism and forest management: a spatial hedonic analysis
Ecological Economics
(2005)