Research PaperExplicit expression for temperature distribution of receiver of parabolic trough concentrator considering bimetallic absorber tube
Introduction
The electricity generation using solar parabolic trough concentrators is one of the economically feasible renewable technologies. The parabolic trough concentrates the sun-rays at its focal line, when tracked appropriately. A selectively coated tube with a concentric glass cover (used for reducing heat losses) is generally used as receiver which is placed such that its central axis is aligned with the focal line of the trough. The absorber tube receives the concentrated solar flux only on the portion facing the reflector. Consequently, the temperature of the absorber tube is non-uniform. Almanza et al. [1] have measured the circumferential difference in the temperature of the absorber tubes made up of steel and copper. Almanza et al. [2] have extended the previous work [1] to analyze the stratified fluid flow. Flores and Almanza [3] have analyzed the bimetallic receiver made up of steel and copper. Flores and Almanza [4] have analyzed the case when the concentrated solar radiation falling on one side of the absorber tube instead of the lower periphery. Apart from the experimental measurements, numerical studies are also available in which the distribution of solar flux is computed using Monte Carlo Ray Tracing (MCRT) software and the distribution of absorber’s temperature is computed using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) software. In these studies, different types of receivers have been analyzed which are as follows.
Reddy and Satyanarayana [5] have considered the porous fins (square, triangular, trapezoidal and circular) inside the absorber tube. Cheng et al. [6] have considered a flow restriction device (a concentric tube) inside the absorber tube. Wang et al. [7] have analyzed an eccentric absorber tube. Munoz and Abanades [8], [9] have carried out the calculations considering the helical fins inside the absorber tube. Cheng et al. [10] have considered the residual gases in the space between the absorber tube and the glass cover. Cheng et al. [11] have studied the effect of the longitudinal vortex generators inside the absorber tube. Wang et al. [12] have studied the selection of the material of the absorber tube. Wang et al. [13] have considered the metal foams inside the absorber tube. Roldan et al. [14] have compared the numerical calculations of the absorber’s temperature with the experimental measurements. Yaghoubi et al. [15] have analyzed the receiver by considering vacuum in the space between the absorber tube and the glass cover and compared it with the case in which vacuum is not considered. Cheng et al. [16] have analyzed the effects of various parameters on the distribution of absorber’s temperature. Wang et al. [17] have investigated the receiver with a secondary reflector. Song et al. [18] have considered a helical screw-tape inside the absorber tube. Wu et al. [19] have presented the distributions of the temperature of absorber tube and glass cover. Natarajan et al. [20] have carried out the calculations considering the inserts (triangular, inverted triangular and semi circular) inside the absorber tube. Patil et al. [21] have computed the distribution of absorber’s temperature considering the sun to be a point source. Wang et al. [22] have analyzed the effect of the fluid’s inlet temperature, the fluid’s velocity and the solar radiation on the distribution of absorber’s temperature.
Guiqiang et al. [23] have analyzed the distribution of the solar flux on the flat receiver of compound parabolic concentrator and found that the distribution for concentrator having lens-walls is more uniform in comparison to the one having mirror-walls. Guiqiang et al. [24] have extended the previous work [23] and found that the optical efficiency of the concentrator can be increased by using air gap between the lens-walls and the reflector. Guiqiang et al. [25] have extended the previous work [24] to analyze the concentrated photovoltaic/thermal system.
Thus, to summarize, the distribution of the temperature of absorber tube of parabolic trough has been reported using CFD software. However, using explicit expressions, the design calculations consume significantly lesser time and lesser computational effort due to the absence of iterations and the problems related to the convergence of solution. Thus, in the previous work [26], an explicit analytical expression was derived for finding the distribution of absorber’s temperature and it was found that the temperature gradient across the circumference of the absorber tube can lead to significant bending [26], [27], [28], [29], [30]. Thus, in the current work, a bimetallic tube has been studied that can reduce the temperature gradient and an explicit analytical expression is derived for finding the temperature distribution of a bimetallic absorber tube. The appropriate pair of thicknesses and materials of inner and outer layers can also be found out from the current work. The issue of whether to use high conducting material on outside or inside has also been addressed in the current work. The best rim angle for a given aperture-width of the trough is also found out corresponding to the minimum non-uniformity in the absorber’s temperature across its circumference.
Section snippets
Methodology
The system under consideration consists of a parabolic trough. The aperture width, rim angle and length of the trough are denoted by w, θrim and L respectively. A bimetallic absorber tube with a concentric glass cover is aligned to the focal line of trough. The absorber tube is made up of two concentric layers of different materials (Fig. 1). The geometries of both absorber tube and glass cover are defined by cylindrical coordinates (r, θ, z). The angle θ is named as circumferential angle of
Verification
Sukhatme [36] has presented a method to solve the conduction equation numerically by following an iterative process. Thus, in order to compare the results obtained from the proposed explicit expression (Eqs. (29), (30)), Eqs. (5), (6), (7), (8), (9), (10) are solved numerically in this section. For this, all the parameters are assumed to be uniform within the span of Δr and Δθ in radial and circumferential directions respectively. Thus, in order to solve Eqs. (5), (6), (7), (8), (9), (10)
Results and discussion
Burkholder and Kutscher [37] have carried out an analysis of the heat losses from the Schott 2008 PTR70 receiver using the LS-3 parabolic trough collector and the Therminol VP1 heat transfer fluid. In their study [37], the circumference of the absorber tube is considered to be heated uniformly. Using the same trough-receiver system and the values of other parameters [37], tabulated in Table 1, the calculations have been carried out in the current work to evaluate the distributions of tube
Conclusions
In the present work, an explicit expression is derived (using the method of separation of variables) for finding the distribution of temperature of bimetallic absorber tube in significantly lesser time than the available software. It also incorporates the effect of optical errors of the trough-receiver system and the Gaussian sun-shape. It is verified with the already existing methodology. The results found out using the proposed explicit expression differ from those of existing methodology
References (39)
- et al.
Receiver behavior in direct steam generation with parabolic troughs
Sol. Energy
(1997) - et al.
Direct steam generation in parabolic trough concentrators with bimetallic receivers
Energy
(2004) - et al.
Behavior of the compound wall copper–steel receiver with stratified two-phase flow regimen in transient states when solar irradiance is arriving on one side of receiver
Sol. Energy
(2004) - et al.
Three-dimensional numerical study of heat transfer characteristics in the receiver tube of parabolic trough solar collector
Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transfer
(2010) - et al.
Thermal stress analysis of eccentric tube receiver using concentrated solar radiation
Sol. Energy
(2010) - et al.
Analysis of internal helically finned tubes for parabolic trough design by CFD tools
Appl. Energy
(2011) - et al.
A technical note on application of internally finned tubes in solar parabolic trough absorber pipes
Sol. Energy
(2011) - et al.
Numerical simulation of a parabolic trough solar collector with nonuniform solar flux conditions by coupling FVM and MCRT method
Sol. Energy
(2012) - et al.
Numerical study of heat transfer enhancement by unilateral longitudinal vortex generators inside parabolic trough solar receivers
Int. J. Heat Mass Transf.
(2012) - et al.
Effects of material selection on the thermal stresses of tube receiver under concentrated solar irradiation
Mater. Des.
(2012)
Numerical study of heat transfer enhancement in the receiver tube of direct steam generation with parabolic trough by inserting metal foams
Appl. Energy
Thermal analysis of solar receiver pipes with superheated steam
Appl. Energy
A detailed parameter study on the comprehensive characteristics and performance of a parabolic trough solar collector system
Appl. Therm. Eng.
A numerical study of parabolic trough receiver with nonuniform heat flux and helical screw-tape inserts
Energy
Three-dimensional numerical study of heat transfer characteristics of parabolic trough receiver
Appl. Energy
Optimization of non-evacuated receiver of solar collector having non-uniform temperature distribution for minimum heat loss
Energy Convers. Manage.
Performance analysis of a parabolic trough solar collector with non-uniform solar flux conditions
Int. J. Heat Mass Transf.
Experiment and simulation study on the flux distribution of lens-walled compound parabolic concentrator compared with mirror compound parabolic concentrator
Energy
Design and investigation of a novel lens-walled compound parabolic concentrator with air gap
Appl. Energy
Cited by (0)
- 1
Both are first author.