Elsevier

Applied Surface Science

Volume 257, Issue 24, 1 October 2011, Pages 10390-10394
Applied Surface Science

Structural evolution of self-ordered alumina tapered nanopores with 100 nm interpore distance

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.06.097Get rights and content

Abstract

We in-detail investigated the profile evolution processes of highly ordered alumina under the cyclic treatment of mild anodizing of aluminum foils in oxalic acid followed by etching in phosphoric acid. With the cyclic times increasing, the profiles of nanopores were gradually evolved into the parabola-like, trumpet-like and conical shape. Although the inserted etching itself nearly had no impact on the growth rate of the nanopores due to the rapid recovering of thinned barrier layer at the initial stage of next anodizing, overmuch etching could bring apparent side effects such as wall-breaking, thinning and taper-removing from the top down. The anodizing and etching kinetics and their synergetic effects in modulating different aspect ratios and open sizes of conical pores were studied systematically. These findings are helpful to tailor high-quality anodic alumina taper-pores with tunable profiles.

Highlights

► Profiles of alumina taper-pores evolve with cyclic anodizing and etching. ► Matched cyclic times, anodizing and etching time is vital to high-quality taper-pore. ► Overmuch etching can cause side effects such as wall-breaking and thinning. ► Roles of anodizing and etching and their co-effects on taper-pore are revealed.

Introduction

Ordered porous anodic alumina (PAA) has attracted intensive interest due to their potential as initial templates for studying special physical and chemical effects of different materials of zero-dimensional (0D) nanodot, 1D nanofiber, nanotube, nanochannel, and nanorod arrays [1], [2], [3], [4]. So far, great breakthrough has been made in the fabrication of ordered PAA nanostructures with controllable interpore distances (dint) in the range of 50–600 nm by mild anodization [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], hard anodization [10], [11], [12], [13], and those combined with pre-patterning techniques [14], [15], [16]. However, these as-prepared nanopores are nearly cylindrical. Very recently, to develop advanced functional nanostructures, renewed interest was focused on the modulation of internal configurations of anodic alumina nanopores at 3D scale [17], [18], [19], [20].

Alumina taper-pore arrays (TPA) are just a type of emerging and valuable 3D nanostructures [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27]. They could be utilized as templates for developing different materials of functional nanocone arrays (e.g., broadband anti-reflection for transparent optical polymers [21], [22], Raman signal enhancement for Au [23], hard mold for nickel [24], [25] and tungsten [26]) and as host structures for controlling the orientation of self-organized silica mesochannels [27]. To date, these reported functions are nearly performed on the basis of self-ordered TPAs with dint  100 nm, which are achieved by multi-step C2H2O4 mild anodizing and H3PO4 etching [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27]. However, this method is time-consuming (>8 h) and period-limiting (63 nm for H2SO4 at 25 V, 100 nm for C2H2O4 at 40 V, 500 nm for H3PO4 at 195 V), which seriously restrict the abilities to modulate the periods of taper-pores and optimize material's functions [5], [6], [7], [8], [9]. To solve these problems, Yanagishita et al. adopted a mold-imprinting technique to pattern Al foils with regular nanopits, exemplified by dint  200 nm, 300 nm and 500 nm, and then in situ grew taper-pores via cyclic H3PO4 anodizing and H3PO4 etching [28], [29]. Besides, Yamauchi et al. smartly utilized electron moiré fringes to solve the difficulty in characterizing the domain sizes and periodicities of self-ordered TPAs [30]. However, it is still very difficult to precisely custom-tailor different profiles of high-quality taper-pores at this stage [31]. Thus, further investigation into the modulation process of the taper-pores and the synergetic effects of anodizing and etching is essential to grasp the precise tailoring ability. Actually, there are no systematical experimental studies on the growth of ordered taper-pores varied with the cyclic times (CT), anodizing and etching time under specific electrolytes, to the best of our knowledge [21], [26], [27], [32].

Here, we in-detail investigated the effects of electrochemical reaction conditions, such as CT, anodizing and etching duration, on the growth and modulation of taper-pores during the cyclic C2H2O4 mild anodizing and H3PO4 etching of Al foils. By fixing the same anodizing and etching condition, we monitored the thickness of taper-pores (TT-TP) and the barrier layer thickness (TT-BL) varied with the CT, and current densities of anodization with respect to the time from the 1st to 13th cycles. The dependence of open sizes of pores on the CT is also monitored. It was found that the wall texture and aspect ratios of conical pores could be effectively tuned by controlling the combination of anodizing and etching time. These results clarify the roles of the discrete anodizing and etching and their cooperative effects, which can rationalize the profile evolution of taper-pores. These findings are helpful to custom-tailor different profiles of 3D taper-pores under different acidic electrolytes and develop multifunctional nanomaterials.

Section snippets

Pre-patterning of Al foils

The highly pure (99.999%) Al disks with diameters of 3.5 cm were firstly electropolished in a mixture of perchloric acid and ethanol (v/v = 1:4) for 8 min (20 V, 0 °C). The electrochemical cell is equipped with a circulating cooling system to take away the reaction heat. The circle reaction zone exposed to the electrolyte was 2.5 cm in diameter. A platinum electrode was employed as a counter electrode. The anodization was conducted in a 0.3 M oxalic acid solution (40 V, 17 °C) under magnetic stirring for

Pore profiles evolved with cyclic times

The profiles of alumina nanopores can be finely tuned by inserting different steps of etching process during the anodization of Al foils. To avoid emerging apparent corrugated textures on the surface of pore walls, we chose a suitable anodizing time (20 s) and etching time (8 min) here. Fig. 1 shows representative SEM images of taper-pore nanostructures evolved with CT. Seen from top-views (left in each panel), these as-prepared PAA membranes present similar honeycomb-like morphologies. These

Conclusions

Our experimental results indicated that controlling the combination of cyclic times, anodizing time and etching time is very crucial to modulate the profile of alumina taper-pores. To avoid breaking the walls and thinning the films, ones must choose suitable etching time and cyclic times, which product should be less than the maximal critical pore-widening time that each nanopore can sustain. Below the critical time, the inserted etching nearly has no impact on the growth rate of pores because

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (50973081, 91023003), Chinese Academy of Sciences (KJCX2-YW-M11) and Jiangsu Science and Technology Department (BE2008052).

References (36)

  • G.E. Thompson

    Thin Solid Films

    (1997)
  • I. Vrublevsky et al.

    Appl. Surf. Sci.

    (2004)
  • S. Ono et al.

    Electrochim. Acta

    (2005)
  • P. Hoyer et al.

    Thin Solid Films

    (1996)
  • T. Nagaura et al.

    Electrochem. Commun.

    (2008)
  • T. Nagaura et al.

    Electrochim. Acta

    (2008)
  • I. Vrublevsky et al.

    Appl. Surf. Sci.

    (2004)
  • S.B. Lee et al.

    Science

    (2002)
  • Y. Lei et al.

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (2005)
  • W. Chen et al.

    Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.

    (2010)
  • M. Steinhart et al.

    Science

    (2002)
  • H. Masuda et al.

    Science

    (1995)
  • A.P. Li et al.

    J. Appl. Phys.

    (1998)
  • S. Hwang et al.

    Korean J. Chem. Eng.

    (2002)
  • S. Chu et al.

    Adv. Mater.

    (2005)
  • W. Lee et al.

    Nat. Mater.

    (2006)
  • K. Lee et al.

    Nano Lett.

    (2008)
  • H. Masuda et al.

    Appl. Phys. Lett.

    (1997)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text