Fabrication of protein-resistant blend based on PVDF-HFP and amphiphilic brush copolymer made from PMMA and PEGMA
Highlights
► The miscibility of PVDF-HFP with amphiphilic brush copolymer poly(MMA-co-PEGMA) were evaluated by DSC. ► The surface hydrophilicity of PVDF-HFP was improved by blending with polymer brush. ► Protein adsorption resistance was enhanced by both of PMMA and PEG of polymer brush.
Introduction
Amphiphilic polymer brush has attracted a great deal of interest due to its potential antifouling applications in biomedical devices, sensors, and membranes [1], [2]. Poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) and poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluoropropylene) (PVDF-HFP) copolymer, which are hydrophobic, have been widely utilized as a matrix for membrane and polymer electrolytes owing to their thermal stability, mechanical strength, and weatherability [3], [4], [5], [6]. In spite of the various advantages of PVDF and PVDF-HFP as membrane materials, their use in the food treatment, bioseparation, and biomedical applications are often hindered by significant protein fouling because of low surface energy and hydrophobicity [7], [8]. Previous work on polymeric membrane substrates suggests that incorporation of a hydrophilic polymer improves antifouling performance. To obtain this goal, various approaches including blending, surface coating, and chemical surface grafting have been proposed for the incorporation of hydrophilic moieties [6], [9], [10], [11]. Among the various approaches, blending of polymers provides the most facile and effective method when the condition of good miscibility between the components is satisfied. In addition, the blending process distributes the hydrophilic material not only on the surface but also through the bulk matrix. Thus, amphiphilic polymer brush composed of miscible hydrophobic matrix and hydrophilic brush offers one of the most appealing structures for improving the antifouling characteristics of hydrophobic polymer matrix. As poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) is known to be nontoxic, non-immunogenic, and non-antigenic as well as hydrophilic [12], [13], PEG brushes are expected to effectively resist nonspecific protein adsorption [9].
In this study, we demonstrate the fabrication and protein adsorption resistance of a blend based on PVDF-HFP and amphiphilic brush polymer, which is composed of hydrophilic brushes and hydrophobic main chains and is compatible with PVDF-HFP. We also investigated the effect of polymer brush on the blend morphology by comparing blends made from PVDF-HFP/poly(methyl methacrylate-co-poly(ethylene glycol) methacrylate) (PVDF-HFP/poly(MMA-co-PEGMA) or PVDF-HFP/polymer brush) and PVDF-HFP/poly(methyl methacrylate) (PVDF-HFP/PMMA).
Section snippets
Materials
PVDF-HFP (Kynar Flex® 2801, Arkema, Mw 822,500), PMMA (IF 870, LG MMA, Mw = 86,000) were used as received. PEGMA (Mn 526) and methyl methacrylate (MMA) were purchased from Aldrich and Junsei, respectively. α,α′-Azobis(isobutyronitrile) (AIBN, Junsei), and tetrahydrofuran (THF, Junsei) were used as an initiator and reaction media, respectively. N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) from Junsei was used as a solvent to prepare films and membrane. Bovine serum albumin (BSA, ICN Biomedicals Inc.) was used as a
Synthesis and characterization of polymer brush
Polymer brush was synthesized by free radical polymerization using MMA and PEGMA. The structure and composition of the polymer brush were investigated using 1H NMR. From the spectrum shown in Fig. 1, the peaks resulting from the methoxy hydrogen(OCH3) of the methyl methacrylate unit and the methylene hydrogens(OCH2) of the pendant PEG chain in the PEGMA monomer appeared 3.594 ppm and 3.640 ppm, respectively, confirming the successful synthesis of the polymer brush. Peaks at 4.109 and 0.845–1.839
Conclusions
PVDF-HFP properties, such as water uptake and resistance to protein adsorption, can be altered by blending these materials with polymer brush. We anticipate that this blending approach using miscible hydrophobic polymer/amphiphilic polymer brush will widen the potential applications of hydrophobic polymers, especially in the biomedical and food industries.
Acknowledgment
This research was supported by the Converging Research Program through the Korean Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology (2012K001262) and Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, Korea (2012-0007619).
References (30)
- et al.
Non-toxic antifouling strategies
Mater. Today
(2010) - et al.
Fabrication of poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluropropylene) (PVDF-HFP) asymmetric microporous hollow fiber membranes
J. Membr. Sci.
(2007) - et al.
Enhancement of the mechanical properties of PVdF membranes by non-solvent aided morphology control
J. Power Sources
(2007) - et al.
Effect of spinning conditions on the structure and performance of hydrophobic PVDF hollow fiber membranes for membrane distillation
Desalination
(2012) - et al.
Preparation of hydrophilic and fouling resistant poly(vinylidene fluoride) hollow fiber membranes
J. Membr. Sci.
(2009) - et al.
Preparation and characterization of modified nano-porous PVDF membrane with high antifouling property using UV photo-grafting
Appl. Surf. Sci.
(2009) - et al.
Plasma-induced immobilization of poly(ethylene glycol) onto poly(vinylidene fluoride) microporous membrane
J. Membr. Sci.
(2002) - et al.
Inorganic adsorbent containing polymeric membrane reservoir for the recovery of lithium from seawater
J. Membr. Sci.
(2008) - et al.
Fabrication of pore size controllable polymeric composite membrane using phase change material
Desalination
(2012) - et al.
Protein release microparticles based on the blend of poly(d,l-lactic-co-glycolic acid) and oligo-ethylene glycol grafted poly(l-lactide)
J. Control. Release
(2001)
Structure and ionic conductivity of porous polymer electrolytes based on PVDF-HFP copolymer membranes
J. Membr. Sci.
Antibacterial activities of surface modified electrospun poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluoropropylene) (PVDF-HFP) fibrous membranes
Appl. Surf. Sci.
Effect of PMMA on crystallization behavior and hydrophilicity of poly(vinylidene fluoride)/poly(methyl methacrylate) blend prepared in semi-dilute solutions
Appl. Surf. Sci.
Effects of solvent compositions on physicochemical properties and anti-fouling ability of PVDF microfiltration membranes for wastewater treatment
Desalination
Influence of ultrafiltration membrane characteristics on adsorptive fouling with dextrans
J. Membr. Sci.
Cited by (10)
Effect of MWCNTs and P[MMA-IL] on the crystallization and dielectric behavior of PVDF composites
2018, European Polymer JournalCitation Excerpt :It is well known that PVDF is usually blended with poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) to improve processability and endow the blend with the desired properties which result from micro phase separation [15–17]. The specific interaction between hydrogen atom of PVDF and oxygen atom of carbonyl groups of PMMA can lead to the completely compatibility in PVDF/PMMA blend [18,19]. PVDF/PMMA blend is a classical blend comprising of crystalline and amorphous phases and exhibit the crystallization-induced micro phase separation.
Surface modification of polypropylene nonwoven fabrics via covalent immobilization of nonionic sugar-based surfactants
2014, Applied Surface ScienceCitation Excerpt :A surface with solely hydrophobic or hydrophilic properties is often inadequate in resisting fouling upon the prolonged exposure to complex environments [39]. Based on the above considerations, amphiphilic polymer brushes have been developed to effectively suppress nonspecific protein adsorption [35,40,41]. The adherence of proteins to amphiphilic polymer-functionalized surface via either hydrophobic or hydrophilic interactions becomes energetically unfavorable, thereby weakening the interactions of the organism with the surface.