The effects of model polysiloxane and fouling-release coatings on embryonic development of a sea urchin (Arbacia punctulata) and a fish (Oryzias latipes)
Highlights
► Fouling-release coatings caused developmental toxicity in sea urchins and fish. ► Fouling-release coatings, presumed nontoxic, may impact non-target organisms. ► The work warrants further study on environmental impacts of silicone coatings.
Introduction
Negative environmental impacts of biocides such as tributyltin and copper have led to regulations and bans on their use in marine biofouling control coatings (Rittschof, 2001, van Wezel and van Wlaardingen, 2004, Yebra et al., 2004). A result is research and development efforts focused on non-toxic measures such as fouling-release coatings. These coatings present a surface which reduces the adhesion strength of settling organisms (Berglin et al., 2001, Clare, 1998) enabling cleaning by pressurized water jets or in some cases by hydrodynamic forces generated as the ship moves (Berglin et al., 2003). Surface properties of the coatings including surface free energy, elastic modulus and thickness are important to the fouling-release performance (Brady and Singer, 2000, Webster and Chisholm, 2010).
The concept of fouling-release coatings has been in development for over three decades (Rittschof, 2009). A great deal of research has been conducted on fouling-release coating systems based upon silicones and fluoropolymers. Silicone polymers, based on poly-dimethyl-siloxane (PDMS), appear to out-perform fluoropolymers and be a viable fouling-release coating system (Rittschof, 2009, Stein et al., 2003). Incorporation of low molecular weight silicone oils into silicone coatings improves their fouling-release properties (Meyer et al., 2006, Milne, 1977, Rittschof et al., 2008, Stein et al., 2003, Truby et al., 2000). The composition of commercial coatings is proprietary.
Fouling-release coatings, particularly those based on silicones, have been developed and sporadically available on the market since 1990s (Finnie and Williams, 2010, Townsin and Anderson, 2009). The sales of these coatings rose significantly when manufacturers voluntarily withdrew TBT coatings from the market in 2003 and the International Maritime Organization (IMO) convention banning TBT antifouling paints was adopted in 2008 (Townsin and Anderson, 2009). Now commercial fouling-release coatings are used in the protection of many man-made structures. Since the smooth surface properties of fouling-release coatings help reduce hydrodynamic drag and improve fuel savings, their sales have increased (Dafforn et al., 2011, Finnie and Williams, 2010, Townsin and Anderson, 2009).
Fouling-release coatings are presumed environmentally friendly and are not subject to government regulations that apply to coatings containing biocides. However, their biological effects are poorly understood. Watermann et al. (1997) found none of the silicone coatings they tested caused mortality of barnacle Balanus amphitrite cyprids even though eluates contained organotin catalysts in silicone polymerization and organotin is highly toxic to marine organisms. The leachate of two silicone fouling-release coatings obtained from GE Silicones, i.e., RTV11® and RTV11® amended with polydimethyldiphenylsilicone (PDMSPS) oil, produced lethal response in mysid shrimp Mysidopsis bahia, but not in silverside fish Menidia beryllina (Truby et al., 2000). Rittschof and Holm (1997) discovered that fouling-release coatings leached compounds that killed barnacle nauplii and at least one of the silicone oil detergents described in a patent on fouling-release coatings was very toxic to barnacle larvae. Silicone oils, which are often incorporated in fouling-release coatings, trap and suffocate marine organisms (Nendza, 2007). Finally, components of silicones at the surface of silicones interact with enzymes involved in curing of biological glues (Rittschof et al., 2011).
The increasing introduction of fouling-release coatings, particularly silicone coatings, into the marine environment makes hazard assessments necessary, especially with the lack of proven non-toxic commercial alternatives and the fact that there is currently no regulation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of a series of model silicone coatings of known composition and commercial fouling-release coatings on embryo development of sea urchins and fish. Surface associated compounds from the model silicones have been partially characterized and the mixtures and individual components are known to alter the activity of enzymes (Rittschof et al., 2011). Nothing is known about compounds associated with the commercial fouling-release coatings. We confined the embryos in the presence of the non-toxic surfaces to provide a worst case exposure scenario. Our goal was to expose embryos of common species to the coatings to determine if the complex mixtures leaching from the coatings impact development. Embryos were used as test organisms since embryonic development is vital to the rest of the life-cycle and is a sensitive stage. Urchin development was chosen because it is rapid and extremely well studied (Angerer and Angerer, 2003, Giudice, 1986, Kobayashi and Okamura, 2002). Urchin embryos are small and fit in the nonslip layer of a ship at the dock or of other surfaces. Medaka development has been studied for decades (González-Doncel et al., 2003, Iwamatsu, 2004, Shi and Faustman, 1989). Medaka adults lay transparent eggs daily and rub them off their anal fin onto substrates. Thus the fish eggs could be in contact with the surface during development. Since the egg membranes are clear and the embryo muscles are transparent, one can watch development of all major organs. The larvae do not develop a calcified backbone until three days after hatching enabling easy observation of swim bladder inflation, behavior and deformities.
Section snippets
Coatings
The eleven different coatings were prepared in 24 well polystyrene (Falcon # 351147, Becton Dickinson Labware, Franklin Lakes, NJ) plates at NDSU using the methods described in Stafslien et al. (2006). Briefly, coating solution was dispensed into wells. The coating arrays were then placed in a vented enclosure at room temperature to cure. We emphasize that we are interested in the impacts of surface associated molecules and mixtures leaching from polymer coatings. Eight were model polysiloxane
Model silicones
As in the control prior to leaching, in each treatment of model silicones, most embryos developed normally to long-armed pluteus larvae by 48 h post-fertilization (Table 2). One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey HSD test revealed that the percentage of embryos in each developmental stage did not differ significantly from the control for any of the model silicones (P > 0.05).
However, after immersion in running sea water for 30 days all model silicones inhibited development. In experiment 1, 87 ± 4% embryos
Discussion
Here, we tested the effects on embryo development in water over fouling-release coatings. We chose this exposure scenario because in marine environments, space is limiting and a large number of propagules of organisms could colonize fouling-release coatings within hours or days of immersion (Roberts et al., 1991). We tested development of an invertebrate (sea urchin) A. punctulata and a vertebrate (Japanese medaka) O. latipes. Urchin embryos are tiny and could easily enter the non-slip layer on
Conclusion
Our preliminary investigation suggests the topic warrants further study. The results obtained in the present study highlight the need for caution in ecotoxicological evaluation of fouling-release coatings, where many factors such as coating type, coating formulation, test organism and application period should be taken into account. In conclusion, the results of this study demonstrate that when confined in static water over silicone-based fouling-release coatings, embryonic development of sea
Acknowledgements
We gratefully acknowledge Amy Freitag for assistance in obtaining medaka Oryzias latipes embryos and Maria L. Wise for help in obtaining sea urchin Arbacia punctulata embryos. This research was supported by the US Office of Naval Research under contract No. N00014-11-1-0180, N00014-10-1-0850, N00014-04-0597 and N00014-05-0822, and the National Natural Science Foundation of China under contract No. 40906078 and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China under contract
References (37)
- et al.
Patterning the sea urchin embryo: gene regulatory networks, signaling pathways, and cellular interactions
Current Topics in Developmental Biology
(2003) Pattern and variability in development
- et al.
Antifouling strategies: history and regulation, ecological impacts and mitigation
Marine Pollution Bulletin
(2011) - et al.
Stage sensitivity of medaka (Oryzias latipes) eggs and embryos to permethrin
Aquatic Toxicology
(2003) - et al.
Developmental, behavioral, and reproductive effects experienced by Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes) in response to short-term exposure to endosulfan
Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety
(2003) - et al.
Toxicity of 4-tert-octylphenol to early life stages of Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes)
Aquatic Toxicology
(1999) - et al.
Dechorionation as a tool to improve the fish embryo toxicity test (FET) with the zebrafish (Danio rerio)
Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology: Part C
(2011) Stages of normal development in the medaka Oryzias latipes
Mechanisms of Development
(2004)- et al.
Effects of new antifouling compounds on the development of sea urchin
Marine Environmental Research
(2002) - et al.
Age-dependent changes in toxicity of N-nitroso compounds to Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes) embryos
Aquatic Toxicology
(1990)