Review
Aerosol dry deposition on vegetative canopies. Part I: Review of present knowledge

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.09.043Get rights and content

Abstract

This paper reviews the present knowledge of aerosol dry deposition, with respect to modelling and experimental aspects. In the first part, special attention is given to the existing mechanistic models, either with an analytical or a differential structure. Their predictions are compared against available measurements for grass and forest environments, obtained under controlled aerosol size and aerodynamic conditions. The observed differences are largely related to the parameterisation of the aerosol collection within the canopy. In the second part, existing experimental results are reviewed and a synthesis is provided through different inter-comparisons concerning: (1) the influence of atmospheric stability on fine particle deposition, (2) the evolution of coarse aerosol deposition with aerodynamic conditions and (3) the aerosol size dependence of deposition on grass and forest canopies. A wider compilation of measurements obtained on different canopies is finally proposed.

Introduction

Dry deposition of particles containing compounds such as sulphate, nitrate or radioactive substances has been studied worldwide over the last 30 years, and there remains a discrepancy between both measurement results and model predictions. Similar problems are encountered when considering biological hazards, for instance in connection with contamination by genetically modified organisms, spores or bacteria (such as the legionnella bacteria, among others). Despite its importance and the considerable research focused on this topic, our knowledge on aerosol dry deposition remains incomplete.

Together with wet deposition, dry deposition of aerosols is responsible for delivering to the biosphere atmospheric loads of various compounds: particles containing SO42−, NO3 and NH4+ that contribute to potential acidification and eutrophication of the ecosystems, natural or anthropogenic radioactive particles, whose impact on the biosphere has to be estimated, base cations such as Na+, K+, Ca2+ and Mg2+ that influence the nutrient cycling in soil and ecosystems and toxic heavy metals, such as Pb, Cd and Zn (Ruijgrok et al., 1995).

Many models seek to explain the deposition process to complex surfaces by taking into account variables such as particle granulometry (size distribution), surface morphology and meteorology (Legg and Powell, 1979; Davidson et al., 1982; Slinn, 1982; Wiman and Agren, 1985; Giorgi, 1986; Peters and Eiden, 1992; Zhang et al., 2001). They can be designed for a unique type of surface or for various canopy configurations. The comparison of their predictions in the modelling framework of Slinn (1982) concludes that there are large differences among them (Ruijgrok et al., 1995).

Today, there is a large database of experimental results for various vegetation surfaces, obtained under different conditions (aerosol characteristics, meteorological situations) with several techniques (see the reviews of McMahon and Denison, 1979; Sehmel, 1980; Gallagher et al., 1997b; Zhang and Vet, 2006). As information describing the experimental conditions is not always reported, a comparison of different campaign results remains difficult. However, a relevant review by Gallagher et al. (1997b) suggests an apparently consistent trend in field measurements of the deposition velocity across the size spectrum. As these measurements have been obtained with different methods and under different aerodynamic conditions, there are still uncertainties about the size dependence of the deposition and about the influence of other parameters that describe the meteorological conditions and the canopy geometry. In addition, a conclusive comparison of the available data is far from being reached, due to the lack of measurement technique inter-comparison (Wesely et al., 1985; Hicks et al., 1989), which should provide the sources of artefact and the uncertainties for each technique (Gallagher et al., 2002).

In this paper, we propose to review the existing knowledge on dry deposition by emphasising aerosol dynamics. Thus, special attention is given to the mechanical processes which control the aerosol deposition. In the first part, the most commonly used mechanistic (or process-oriented) models are described and their predictions are compared on two typical canopies, which are grass and coniferous forests. This was done preserving the specific model characters (analytical formulation or differential equation system). In the second part, a comprehensive review of the aerosol dry deposition measurements is performed, from which a detailed comparison is inferred. This synthesis emphasises the influence of atmospheric stability on fine particle deposition, the dynamics of coarse aerosol deposition (diameter around 20 μm), the size dependence of the deposition and the influence of the canopy geometry. Finally, measurements obtained under different aerosol size, aerodynamic and canopy conditions are compiled.

Section snippets

Mechanistic model review

The scope of the section hereafter is to compare some common models, which are based on a mechanistic description of the collection processes. The term of collection refers hereafter to the interaction between the vegetation and the particles, whereas the term of deposition refers to the group of processes that lead to the deposition of particles on the canopy. This includes the transport, both by turbulence and sedimentation, and the collection by the vegetation. After introducing the

Experiments review and comparisons

After having compared five process-oriented models, we will review most of the experimental results that exist in the literature. They then will be compared in order to identify the driving parameters of the aerosol deposition. Over the past decades, numerous experimental studies were performed to quantify the importance of the dry deposition on canopies and to study the influence of parameters describing the aerosol phase (size distribution and density), the aerodynamics (essentially friction

Conclusions and recommendations

In this paper we addressed the problem of the aerosol dry deposition on vegetation through a comparison of commonly used models and the analysis of availability and relevance of the experimental data required for their validation in the context of air quality and risk assessment prediction.

The model comparison highlights large differences between their predictions, which are mainly due to aerosol collection expressions. In fact, these ones have not been fully validated and obviously, model

Acknowledgements

The French Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety (IRSN) is acknowledged for the financial support provided and M.-A. Gonze for the initiative of this research project. Y. Belot is especially thanked for crucial and stimulating discussions on the experimental aspects of the research he performed at CEA over the last 30 years. Prof. R. Borghi is gratefully acknowledged for fruitful discussions on modelling aspects. Our acknowledgements go to John Liggio for his careful editing

References (133)

  • C.W. Fairall

    Interpretation of eddy correlation measurements of particulate deposition and aerosol flux

    Atmospheric Environment

    (1984)
  • F.G. Fan et al.

    A sublayer model for turbulent deposition of particles in vertical ducts with smooth and rough surfaces

    Journal of Aerosol Science

    (1993)
  • M.W. Gallagher et al.

    Measurement and modelling of cloud water to a snow-covered forest canopy

    Atmospheric Environment

    (1992)
  • M.W. Gallagher et al.

    Measurements of aerosol fluxes to Speulder Forest using a micrometeorological technique

    Atmospheric Environment

    (1997)
  • J.A. Garland et al.

    Deposition of small particles to grass

    Atmospheric Environment

    (1982)
  • D.A. Gillette et al.

    A ‘test of concept’ comparison of aerodynamic and mechanical resuspension mechanisms for particles deposited on field rye grass (Secale cercele)-Part 1. Relative particle flux rates

    Atmospheric Environment

    (2004)
  • B.B. Hicks et al.

    Some direct measurements of atmospheric sulphur fluxes over a pine plantation

    Atmospheric Environment

    (1982)
  • A.S. Kowalski

    Deliquescence induces eddy covariance and estimable dry deposition errors

    Atmospheric Environment

    (2001)
  • J.J. Landsberg et al.

    Surface exchange characteristics of leaves subject to mutual interference

    Agricultural Meteorology

    (1973)
  • B.J. Legg et al.

    Spore dispersal in barley crop: a mathematical model

    Agricultural Meteorology

    (1979)
  • P. Little et al.

    Emission and deposition of petrol engine exhaust Pb. I. Deposition of exhaust Pb to plant and soil surfaces

    Atmospheric Environment

    (1977)
  • B.Y.H. Liu et al.

    Experimental observation of aerosol deposition in turbulent flow

    Journal of Aerosol Science

    (1974)
  • H.A. McCartney et al.

    Relative contribution of sedimentation and impaction to deposition of particles in a crop canopy

    Agricultural and Forest Meteorology

    (1987)
  • T.A. McMahon et al.

    Empirical atmospheric deposition—a survey

    Atmospheric Environment

    (1979)
  • P.H. McMurry

    A review of atmospheric aerosol measurements

    Atmospheric Environment

    (2000)
  • T.L. Montgomery et al.

    Aerosol deposition in a pipe with turbulent airflow

    Journal of Aerosol Science

    (1970)
  • K.W. Nicholson

    The dry deposition of small particles. A review of experimental measurements

    Atmospheric Environment

    (1988)
  • K.W. Nicholson

    Wind tunnel experiments on the resuspension of particulate material

    Atmospheric Environment

    (1993)
  • B.I. Ogorodnikov et al.

    Radioactive aerosols near Chernobyl in 1986–1992

    Journal of Aerosol Science

    (1994)
  • Z. Ould-Dada

    Dry deposition profile of small particles within a model spruce canopy

    The Science of the Total Environment

    (2002)
  • Z. Ould-Dada et al.

    Effect of forest edges on deposition of radioactive aerosols

    Atmospheric Environment

    (2002)
  • J. Padro et al.

    An investigation af the ADOM dry deposition module using summertime O3 measurements above a deciduous forest

    Atmospheric Environment

    (1991)
  • K.T. Paw U

    The rebound of particles from natural surfaces

    Journal of Colloid Interface Science

    (1983)
  • K. Peters et al.

    Modelling the dry deposition velocity of aerosol particles to a spruce forest

    Atmospheric Environment

    (1992)
  • S. Pryor

    Size-resolved particle deposition velocities of sub-100 nm diameter particles over a forest

    Atmospheric Environment

    (2006)
  • B.D. Amiro

    Drag coefficients and turbulence spectra within three boreal forest canopies

    Boundary-Layer Meteorology

    (1990)
  • D.E. Aylor et al.

    Dispersion of spores released from a elevated line source in a wheat canopy

    Boundary-Layer Meteorology

    (1989)
  • Y. Belot et al.

    Transport of micronic particles from atmosphere to foliar surfaces

  • K.M. Beswick et al.

    Size-resolved measurements of cloud droplet deposition velocity to a canopy using an eddy correlation technique

    Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society

    (1991)
  • Bleyl, M.R., 2001. Experimentelle Bestimmung der Depositionsgeschwindigkeit Luftgetragener Partikel mit Hilfe der...
  • Y. Brunet et al.

    A wind tunnel study of air flow in waving wheat: single point velocity statistics

    Boundary-Layer Meteorology

    (1994)
  • J.A. Businger

    Estimation of the accuracy with which dry deposition can be measured with current micrometeorological techniques

    Journal of Climate and Applied Meteorology

    (1986)
  • J.A. Businger et al.

    Flux profile relationships in the atmospheric surface layer

    Journal of Atmospheric Sciences

    (1971)
  • G. Buzorius et al.

    Vertical aerosol fluxes measured by eddy covariance methods and deposition of nucleation mode particles above a Scots pine forest in southern Finland

    Journal of Geophysical Research

    (2000)
  • R.S. Cambray et al.

    Observations on radioactivity from the Chernobyl accident

    Nuclear Energy

    (1987)
  • A.C. Chamberlain

    Transport of lycopodium spores and other small particles to rough surfaces

    Proceedings of the Royal Society London

    (1967)
  • A.C. Chamberlain

    The movement of particles in plant canopies

  • A.C. Chamberlain et al.

    Deposition of airborne radio-iodine vapor

    Nucleonics

    (1953)
  • A.C. Chamberlain et al.

    Deposition of spores and other particles on vegetation and soils

    Annals of Applied Biology

    (1972)
  • R. Cionco

    A wind profile index for canopy flow

    Boundary-Layer Meteorology

    (1972)
  • Cited by (257)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text