Elsevier

Atmospheric Environment

Volume 53, June 2012, Pages 110-130
Atmospheric Environment

Influence of grid resolution and meteorological forcing on simulated European air quality: A sensitivity study with the modeling system COSMO–MUSCAT

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.02.085Get rights and content

Abstract

Model evaluation studies are essential for determining model performance as well as assessing model deficiencies, and are the focus of the Air Quality Model Evaluation International Initiative (AQMEII). The chemistry-transport model system COSMO–MUSCAT participates in this initiative. In this paper the robustness and variability of the model results against changes in the model setup are analyzed. Special focus is given to the formation of secondary particulate matter and the ability to reproduce unusually high levels of PM10 in Central Europe caused by long-range transported smoke of fires in western Russia. Seven different model configurations are investigated in this study. The COSMO–MUSCAT results are evaluated in comparison with ground-based measurements in Central Europe. The analysis is performed for two selected periods in April/May 2006 and October 2006 which are characterized by elevated concentrations of PM. Furthermore, the sensitivity of the results is studied against the used grid resolution and the meteorological forcing. Here, COSMO–MUSCAT is applied with different horizontal grid sizes and, alternatively, forced by reanalysis data with finer resolution. The use of finer grid resolutions in COSMO–MUSCAT has direct consequences on the meteorological forcing as well as on the calculated emission and deposition rates. The presented results suggest a large impact of the meteorological effects on the PM concentrations. The more accurate spatial appointment of the emissions and deposition fluxes seems to be of little consequence compared to the meteorological forcing.

Introduction

Today, regional modeling of atmospheric particulate matter (PM) is of major importance for air quality studies (Dreher and Costa, 2002) as well as climate considerations. As models are important tools for air quality management and the evaluation of emission control policies, it is necessary to assess their ability in simulating air quality. However, the modeling of PM concentrations is a difficult task because PM is a conglomerate of many particles with different physical and chemical properties. These particles are both emitted directly from a large variety of anthropogenic, biogenic and natural sources and formed in the atmosphere by chemical and physical processes from gas phase precursors. Especially sulfuric and nitric acids generated by the oxidation of the precursor species SO2 and NOx can be neutralized by available ammonia leading to ammonium sulfate and ammonium nitrate (Schaap et al., 2004; Stern et al., 2008). Therefore, the issue of policy to reduce the exposure of humans to particulate matter must be focused on reduction of primary particulate emissions and also on reduction of precursor emissions for the formation of secondary particles (e.g., Andreani-Aksoyoglu et al., 2004).

A number of studies have examined the effects of higher grid resolution on the accuracy of meteorological model simulations (Salvador et al., 1999). In most cases, increasing resolution produces more realistic structures. But a higher resolution does not necessarily imply improvements in the prediction skills (Mass et al., 2002). When chemical transformations are taken into account, the situation is much more complex. Surface emissions are characterized by heterogeneous spatial patterns. Together with the high variability of the meteorological processes this has a nonlinear impact on the chemical transformations and, hence, any increase in the resolution of meteorology and emission inventories might lead to significant changes in the modeled concentrations (Geco et al., 2005). Therefore, the uncertainty can become significant especially for secondary pollutants as ozone (Valeri and Menut, 2008) or secondary particulate matter.

Model evaluation studies are essential for determining model performance as well as assessing model deficiencies, and are the focus of AQMEII (Rao et al., 2011). The chemistry-transport model system COSMO–MUSCAT participates in this initiative. In the present study the robustness and variability of the model results against changes in the model setup are analyzed. We started by addressing the impact of the horizontal resolution of a CTM on modeled PM concentrations. Special focus is given to the formation of secondary particulate matter and the ability to capture periods with elevated PM concentrations in Central Europe caused by long-range transported smoke of widespread agricultural burning and forest fires in western Russia (Saarikoski et al., 2007). Seven different model configurations are analyzed in this study. The investigations are performed with the model system COSMO–MUSCAT (Wolke et al., 2004; Renner and Wolke, 2010). The chemistry-transport model MUSCAT (MUiltiScale Chemistry Aerosol Transport) is online-coupled with the non-hydrostatic meteorological code COSMO that is the operational regional forecast model of the German Weather Service DWD. The model system COSMO–MUSCAT runs in a regime without data assimilation. The meteorological forcing of COSMO is performed only at the boundaries by reanalysis data of the DWD. For the European scale, these data are derived from operational runs of the global meteorological model GME (Majewski et al., 2002).

The analysis presented in this paper focuses on cross-comparison (model results to model results) and evaluation (model results to observation comparison) of different model setups for the chemistry-transport model system COSMO–MUSCAT. Firstly, the COSMO–MUSCAT results are evaluated in comparison with available AQMEII measurements for two selected periods, separately for rural and suburban stations in Central Europe. Furthermore, the sensitivity of the results is studied against the used horizontal grid structure, the vertical resolution and the meteorological forcing. A regime for long-term simulations was applied for this model study. The analysis is focused on PM, particularly the secondary formed fraction and the contribution of the wildland fires. The focus will be on Central Europe, an area that features continental as well as maritime air masses. COSMO–MUSCAT is applied for different horizontal grid sizes, a one-way nesting approach and, alternatively, forced by finer meteorological reanalysis data of the DWD. The most simulations are performed using a mass-based approach for the description of aerosol processes in MUSCAT. Additionally, an extended version of the modal aerosol model M7 (Vignati et al., 2004) is utilized to study the sensitivity of the results against a more detailed aerosol modeling.

Section snippets

The chemistry transport model system COSMO–MUSCAT

The modeling department of the IfT has developed the multiscale model system COSMO–MUSCAT (Wolke et al., 2004; Wolke and Knoth, 2000). It is qualified for process studies as well as the operational forecast of pollutants in local and regional areas (Heinold et al., 2011; Hinneburg et al., 2009). The model system consists of two online-coupled codes. The operational forecast model COSMO is a non-hydrostatic and compressible meteorological model and solves the governing equations on the basis of

Scenarios and model setup

Long-term simulations were performed for a spring and an autumn period to study the contribution of secondary aerosol and wildland fires on the PM concentration in Central Europe. The influence of different meteorological conditions and model setups on the long-range transport as well as formation of secondary PM is analyzed. The periods were selected considering the season, the meteorological conditions and the availability of reliable data for verification of model results.

We choose the

Results and discussion

In the framework of AQMEII, a COSMO–MUSCAT simulation for the European domain and the whole year 2006 was performed with the N1_28km setup. The results are incorporated and analyzed in several collective papers. Vautard et al. (2012) perform an evaluation of the meteorological data, which are used for driving the chemistry-transport models. Solazzo et al., 2012a, Solazzo et al., 2012b have inter-compared and evaluated the model results regarding surface-layer ozone and particulate matter. In

Conclusions

The sensitivity of the simulation results against the grid resolution and the used meteorological forcing data was investigated. The application of COSMO–MUSCAT in an “ensemble of seven different model configurations” offers the opportunity for a detailed analysis of the model robustness and the variability of the simulated PM concentrations against changes in grid size and the running regime. One key finding of the study is the relatively high responsivity of the results concerning changes in

Acknowledgments

The LfULG of Saxony, the ZIH Dresden and the NIC Jülich supported the work. Furthermore, we thank the Federal Environment Agency of Germany for providing monitoring station data and the DWD Offenbach for good cooperation.

References (53)

  • E. Solazzo et al.

    Model evaluation and ensemble modelling of surface-level ozone in Europe and North America in the context of AQMEII

    Atmospheric Environment

    (2012)
  • R. Stern et al.

    A model intercomparison study focussing on episodes with elevated PM10 concentrations

    Atmospheric Environment

    (2008)
  • A. Stohl et al.

    A European inventory of soil nitric oxide emissions and the effect of these emissions on the photochemical formation of ozone

    Atmospheric Environment

    (1996)
  • R. Vautard et al.

    Evaluation of the meteorological forcing used for the Air Quality Model Evaluation International Initiative (AQMEII) air quality simulations

    Atmospheric Environment

    (2012)
  • C. Witham et al.

    Impacts of Russian biomass burning on UK air quality

    Atmospheric Environment

    (2007)
  • R. Wolke et al.

    Implicit-explicit Runge–Kutta methods applied to atmospheric chemistry-transport modelling

    Environmental Modelling and Software

    (2000)
  • S. Andreani-Aksoyoglu et al.

    Modeling of formation and distribution of secondary aerosols in the Milan area (Italy)

    Journal of Geophysical Research

    (2004)
  • M. Beekmann et al.

    PM measurement campaign HOVERT in the Greater Berlin area: model evaluation with chemically specified particulate matter observations for a one year period

    Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics

    (2007)
  • J. Chen et al.

    Application of the CACM and MPMPO modules using the CMAQ model for the eastern United States

    Journal of Geophysical Research

    (2006)
  • G. Doms et al.

    A Description of the Nonhydrostatic Regional COSMO-Model

    (2007)
  • K.L. Dreher et al.

    Systemic health effects of ambient air particulate matter exposure – preface

    Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health-Part

    (2002)
  • E. Geco et al.

    Examination of model predictions at different horizontal grid resolutions

    Environmental Fluid Mechanics

    (2005)
  • R. Grasselt et al.

    Validation of TERRA-ML with discharge measurements

    Meteorologische Zeitschrift

    (2008)
  • W. Guelle et al.

    Influence of the source formulation on meddling the atmospheric global distribution of sea salt aerosol

    Journal of Geophysical Research

    (2001)
  • A.B. Guenther et al.

    Isoprene and monoterpene emission rate variability: model evaluations and sensitivity analyses

    Journal of Geophysical Research

    (1993)
  • B. Heinold et al.

    Regional modelling of Saharan dust and biomass-burning smoke

    Tellus B

    (2011)
  • Cited by (69)

    • Statistical modelling of roadside and urban background ultrafine and accumulation mode particle number concentrations using generalized additive models

      2020, Science of the Total Environment
      Citation Excerpt :

      Reanalysis data were chosen over measured data because they are not influenced by local effects, i.e. the direct surrounding of the measurement station and because quantities that are usually not measured at meteorological stations, e.g. HPBL, could be implemented in the GAMs. Reanalysis data have previously been used for statistical analysis of air quality (e.g. Tai et al., 2010) and regional air quality models (Wolke et al., 2012). For further refinement of the model, the inclusion of measured meteorological quantities in order to identify site-specific characteristics could be used.

    • Impacts of improved modeling resolution on the simulation of meteorology, air quality, and human exposure to PM<inf>2.5</inf>, O<inf>3</inf> in Beijing, China

      2020, Journal of Cleaner Production
      Citation Excerpt :

      The use of finer-grid resolutions is helpful to the simulations of meteorological conditions (Queen and Zhang, 2008) as well as for the emission and deposition rates (Stroud et al., 2011). The meteorology change which resulted from higher resolution have more obvious effect on the PM, O3 (Hodnebrog et al., 2011) and their precursors than emission (Wolke et al., 2012). Furthermore, Lauwaet et al. (2013) found that finer resolution improve the O3 spatial correlations and temporal variances.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text