Elsevier

Atmospheric Research

Volume 138, 1 March 2014, Pages 1-12
Atmospheric Research

A numerical method to generate high temporal resolution precipitation time series by combining weather radar measurements with a nowcast model

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2013.10.015Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Weather radar measurements are interpolated temporally using a numerical advection-model known from radar nowcasting.

  • The interpolation is able to reconstruct fine scale temporal variations of the rainfall.

  • This improves both the peak estimation and the accuracy of hour accumulated rain depths.

  • Improvements are verified by laser-based disdrometers.

Abstract

The topic of this paper is temporal interpolation of precipitation observed by weather radars. Precipitation measurements with high spatial and temporal resolution are, in general, desired for urban drainage applications. An advection-based interpolation method is developed which uses methods for vector field estimation already known from short-term weather radar nowcasting. However, instead of forecasting the weather radar rainfall, the proposed interpolation method exploits the advection of the rainfall in the interpolation. The interpolated rainfall fields are validated by measurements at ground level from laser disdrometers. The proposed interpolation method performs better when compared to traditional interpolation of weather radar rainfall where the radar observation is considered constant in time between measurements. It is demonstrated that the advection-based interpolation method reconstructs a significant part of the temporal variations of the rainfall. Moreover, the interpolated precipitation fields estimate accumulated rain depths more accurately.

Introduction

Precipitation measurements from weather radars are used as input to a wide variety of hydrological applications including flood risk management, hydropower production and urban drainage (e.g. Krajewski and Smith, 2002, Einfalt et al., 2004, Anagnostou et al., 2010, Tapiador et al., 2011). Measuring precipitation accurately can be a challenge due to the high variability in both time and space (Krajewski et al., 2003). Although rain gauges measure the temporal variability of the precipitation, the spatial resolution is limited unless a dense network is available. The required temporal and spatial sampling of the rainfall is achievable by weather radars. Weather radars are widely used by meteorological services worldwide, providing meteorologists with observations of rainfall intensity, Doppler velocities, hydrometeor classification etc.

The scanning strategy for weather radars is typically planned to facilitate meteorological services and may not be optimal for hydrological applications. The weather radars scan most of the atmosphere by changing the elevation angle of the antenna subsequently. Instead of scanning the whole atmosphere with volume scans, it might be more beneficial, from a hydrological point of view, to exchange the volume scan for a higher temporal resolution at the lowest several elevation angles. However, as most weather radars serve multiple purposes, changing the scanning strategy for runoff applications might not be feasible in the overall perspective.

Berne et al. (2004) and Einfalt et al. (2004) investigate the required rainfall resolution for urban drainage applications and suggest that resolution of 1–3 km in space and 1–5 min in time is sufficient for accurate runoff modelling of urban areas. Most modern weather radars fulfil this spatial requirement whereas the temporal requirement is seldom fully met. Typically, the temporal resolution is 5 to 15 min (Berne and Krajewski, 2013, OFCM, 2006, Piccolo and Chirico, 2005). In Denmark, the Danish Meteorological Institute (DMI) operates five meteorological C-band radars. The radars initiate a new scanning routine every 10 min with intermediate Doppler scans (Gill et al., 2006).

The radar reflectivity measurement represents an instantaneous spatial-distributed sample of the rainfall. However, if the precipitation-producing storm is moving, the rainfall might travel several kilometres between two successive radar scans. For a smaller urban catchment, this may result in an extreme situation where the radar observations show no precipitation over the catchment when a convective storm cell has in fact passed the area between the scans. Avoiding these temporal gaps in the radar observation is the key motivation for this study.

Previously, several authors (e.g. Fabry et al., 1994, Piccolo and Chirico, 2005, Shucksmith et al., 2011) have investigated the sampling error caused by the temporal gaps in radar rainfall. All three investigations found the uncertainty by comparing original high-resolution radar data with resampled coarser resolutions in both time and space. Shucksmith et al. (2011) found that the uncertainty on 10 min accumulations could be 70% or more if the estimate is conducted from a 10 min instant value and the precipitation field is assumed stationary within the sampling time interval. However, the uncertainty was significantly reduced if the storm movement and evolution were taken into account in the accumulation method (approx. errors on 25%). Fabry et al. (1994) introduced the advection-based accumulation methods whereas Piccolo and Chirico (2005) and Shucksmith et al. (2011) applied the concept on radar data with original finer resolution. Delobbe et al., 2006, Delobbe et al., 2008 evaluated 24 h accumulations with ground observations from rain gauges. However, it was concluded that the improvements were very limited even though the method succeeded in removing ripple effect due to the sampling problem.

The presented work is inspired by the rainfall accumulation methods of Fabry et al. (1994). However, instead of computing rainfall accumulations, the storm movement and evolution are used to generate higher temporal resolution of the radar rainfall measurements, which are more suitable for urban drainage runoff applications. The interpolation method makes use of the distributed vector field of the storm movement to produce temporal interpolations between the instantaneous radar scans. Moreover, different from Delobbe et al., 2006, Delobbe et al., 2008 the improvements of the advection-based interpolation are verified by ground observations from laser-based disdrometers.

Section snippets

Methods and materials

Taylor's hypothesis states that temporal variations in points are linked to the spatial variation through the convective velocity (Zawadzki, 1973, Einfalt and Lempio, 2009). This can be used to regenerate temporal variations from spatially distributed observations with a higher temporal resolution than originally sampled if the sampled spatial resolution is high and the convective velocity is known. In weather radar rainfall measurements, the spatial resolution is often much higher than the

Results

Fig. 6, Fig. 7, Fig. 8, Fig. 9 all illustrate selected rainfall events. The four events have been selected in order to illustrate how well the advection-based interpolation is performing under different meteorological conditions. Thus, the four events represent four different types of precipitation. Fig. 6 (Event 1) shows an event from 22 May 2011 where a frontal passage passed the area. The precipitation-producing storm system had a pattern with bands of precipitation perpendicular to the

Discussion

The results of this study clearly illustrate that the agreement between radar rainfall observations and ground observations is highly dependent on how the observations are compared. If observation with a high temporal resolution is evaluated, it is important that the observations are synchronized correctly as small time differences in the data may cause misleading interpretation of the radar performance.

The CAPPI or Pseudo-CAPPI radar data product (Constant Altitude Plane Position Indicator) is

Conclusions

The results demonstrate that the interpolation of the radar data is important especially if the data is to be used in hydrological applications, which require high resolutions in time and space. It is very important that the radar rainfall measurement is treated as an instantaneous measurement of the precipitation. If the radar estimated rainfall intensity is assumed constant in-between measurements, the correlation with the ground observations decreases significantly within several minutes.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Danish Meteorological Institute (DMI). This work is part of the Storm and Wastewater Informatics project (SWI) partly financed by the Danish Agency for Science, Technology, and Innovation.

References (36)

  • L. Delobbe et al.

    Combined use of radar and gauge observations for hydrological applications in the Walloon Region of Belgium

  • L. Delobbe et al.

    Improvement of quantitative precipitation estimates in Belgium

  • T. Einfalt et al.

    Some reflections on how to compare extreme point rainfall and extreme areal radar rainfall

    Rainfall in the Urban Context: Forecasting, risk and, Climate Change, 10–13 December, 2009

    (2009)
  • R.S. Gill et al.

    The Danish Weather Radar Network

  • W.F. Krajewski et al.

    An analysis of small-scale rainfall variability in different climatic regimes

    Hydrol. Sci. J.

    (2003)
  • L. Li et al.

    Nowcasting of motion and growth of precipitation with radar over a complex orography

    J. Appl. Meteorol.

    (1995)
  • OFCM

    Federal Meteorological Handbook No. 11 — Doppler Radar Meteorological Observations, Part C WSR-88D Products and Algorithms

    (2006)
  • OTT Messtechnik

    Operating Instructions: Present Weather Sensor Parsivel

    (2009)
  • Cited by (34)

    • Three-dimensional analysis of the initial stage of convective precipitation using an operational X-band polarimetric radar network

      2019, Atmospheric Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      In the current study, we employed an algorithm for precipitation nowcasting. Different nowcasting algorithms have been proposed by many researchers; these algorithms can be roughly classified into two main categories: centroid methods (Crane, 1979; Bjerkaas and Forsyth, 1979; Browning et al., 1982; Austin and Bellon, 1982; Rosenfeld, 1987; Dixon and Wiener, 1993; Johnson et al., 1998; Handwerker, 2002; Han et al., 2009; Turso et al., 2013; Del Moral et al., 2018; Munoz et al., 2018) and cross-correlation methods (Bellon and Austin, 1978; Rinehart and Garvey, 1978; Smythe and Zrnic, 1983; Tuttle and Foote, 1990; Li et al., 1995; Lai, 1998; Mecklenburg et al., 2000; Li and Lai, 2004; Novak, 2007; Jung et al., 2011; Nielsen et al., 2014; Marra and Morin, 2018). Centroid methods identify and track the centroids of all individual storms.

    • Applicability of open rainfall data to event-scale urban rainfall-runoff modelling

      2017, Journal of Hydrology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The assumption of field stationarity between scans has been criticized as the storm field movement between scans is not accounted for (e.g. Fabry et al., 1994; Piccolo and Chirico, 2005; Shucksmith et al., 2011). To overcome this problem, creating new intermediate fields by means of advection interpolation between the precipitation fields has been proposed as a solution with encouraging results (Fabry et al., 1994; Nielsen et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2015). Accordingly, the 5 min data from Vantaa radar were advection interpolated to a temporal resolution of 1 min using an optical flow method of Farnebäck (2003).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text