Review
Molecular basis of selective PPARγ modulation for the treatment of Type 2 diabetes

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbalip.2007.03.004Get rights and content

Abstract

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) (α, β/δ and γ) are lipid sensors capable of adapting gene expression to integrate various lipid signals. As such, PPARs are also very important pharmaceutical targets, and specific synthetic ligands exist for the different isotypes and are either currently used or hold promises in the treatment of major metabolic disorders. In particular, compounds of the class of the thiazolinediones (TZDs) are PPARγ agonists and potent insulin-sensitizers. The specific but still broad expression patterns of PPARγ, as well as its implication in numerous pathways, constitutes also a disadvantage regarding drug administration, since this potentially increases the chance to generate side-effects through the activation of the receptor in tissues or cells not affected by the disease. Actually, numerous side effects associated with the administration of TZDs have been reported. Today, a new generation of PPARγ modulators is being actively developed to activate the receptor more specifically, in a cell and time-dependent manner, in order to induce a specific subset of target genes only and modulate a restricted number of metabolic pathways. We will discuss here why and how the development of such selective PPARγ modulators is possible, and summarize the results obtained with the published molecules.

Introduction

Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor (PPAR) α (NR1C1), β/δ (NR1C2) and γ (NR1C3) are ligand-activated transcription factors belonging to the nuclear hormone receptor superfamily [1]. PPARs are lipid sensors capable of adapting gene expression to integrate various lipid signals coming from intracellular signaling pathways, from inter-organ crosstalk or even from the diet [2]. Given their partially overlapping yet specific expression patterns, the three receptors cooperate to efficiently regulate metabolic functions [3], [4] as well as other cellular processes such as proliferation, differentiation or apoptosis that are essential to the fate of the tissues and organs in which they are expressed [2], [5].

PPARs have a canonical nuclear receptor organization. The N-terminal A/B domain does not seem to be structured and harbors a weak ligand-independent transactivation function called AF-1. The C domain binds DNA via a two zinc-finger motif that is the hallmark of the nuclear receptor superfamily. Following the D domain which is a hinge region, the E domain harbors the ligand binding domain (LBD) and is endowed with a ligand-dependent transactivation function referred to as AF-2. This domains allows PPARs to function as lipid or xenobiotic sensors, since, as we will see later on, the binding pocket is large and can accommodate numerous structures. In addition, the E domain also offers the main surfaces for dimerization as well as for interaction with regulatory proteins called coregulators, a key aspect of PPAR modulation that we will also further develop in this review.

PPARs are very important pharmaceutical targets, as specific synthetic ligands exist for the different isotypes and are either currently used or hold promises in the treatment of major metabolic disorders [6]. More precisely, fibrates are PPARα agonists used as plasma lipid-lowering drugs in the treatment of hyperlipidaemia. Compounds of the class of the thiazolinediones (TZDs), such as Troglitazone, Pioglitazone and Rosiglitazone are PPARγ agonists and potent insulin-sensitizers, which have been tested and compared in a number of clinical trials for the treatment of type 2 diabetes (reviewed in [7]).

The PPARγ gene can be transcribed into three mRNA species, i.e. PPARγ1, PPARγ2, and PPARγ3 [8], [9]. Little is known about the expression pattern of PPARγ3, except that it appears to be the predominant PPARγ type in macrophages. PPARγ1 seems ubiquitously expressed, whereas PPARγ2 expression is confined to the adipose tissue, underscoring the importance of the PPARγ form for adipocyte physiology. Both the γ1 and γ2 isoforms display adipogenic potential although PPARγ2 seems slightly more potent owing to higher affinity with certain coactivators [10]. The specific genetic invalidation of PPARγ2 in the adipose tissue revealed that both isoforms are important for adipocyte physiology [11], [12]. However, it is so far not clear which specific role each isoform plays in glucose and lipid homeostasis. The specificity of action may in part rely on their different tissue expression patterns, but also in the modulation of receptor activity by the presence in PPARγ2 of an additional domain of 30 residues at the N-terminus.

Section snippets

The causes of type 2 diabetes

Type 2 diabetes is clinically defined by a hyperglycemia in fasted patients, resulting primarily from a desensitization to the hypoglycaemic actions of insulin. The etiology of type 2 diabetes is however a complex issue, since it is a heterogeneous disease with multiple and intricate causes [13], which may be of relative importance depending upon the genetic background and life-style of the subjects affected [14]. Nevertheless, obesity and dyslipidaemia constitute two overwhelming factors in

PPARγ partial activation versus modulation

These observed or potential side-effects are of great concern and raise the question of whether the modulation of PPAR activation may become safer while retaining its efficacy. Pharmaceutical developments have until recently focused on more potent and specific activators of PPARγ, the rational being to decrease the doses used during the treatment, thereby reducing the non-specific interactions of these drugs with other cellular components. However, this strategy was greatly challenged when

PPARs can bind a wide variety of ligands owing to their large ligand binding pocket

SPPARγMs are ligands whose binding induces a specific conformation change of the receptor, translating into the induction of a specific subset of target genes. A particularity of the PPAR sub-family is that the diversity of functions in which they are implicated is also reflected by the diversity of ligands that can be accommodated within their ligand binding pocket. Indeed, PPARs are activated by a wide range of naturally occurring or metabolized lipids derived from the diet or from

What is the profile of a good SPPARγM?

The SPPARγM described so far in the literature have been often only partly characterized, regarding ligand binding mode, conformational changes, coregulator recruitment, target gene activation and physiological response. To allow a better overview and the comparison of the different SPPARγMs, we summarized in a table the most important properties of each of these molecules (Table 1). It is hence very difficult to link with certitude a specific conformation change or the recruitment of a

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from the National Research Project 50, the Swiss National Science Foundation, and the Etat de Vaud.

References (126)

  • T. Fujimura et al.

    FK614, a novel peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma modulator, induces differential transactivation through a unique ligand-specific interaction with transcriptional coactivators

    J. Pharmacol. Sci.

    (2005)
  • H. Minoura et al.

    Pharmacological characteristics of a novel nonthiazolidinedione insulin sensitizer, FK614

    Eur. J. Pharmacol.

    (2004)
  • P.J. Boyle et al.

    Effects of pioglitazone and rosiglitazone on blood lipid levels and glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a retrospective review of randomly selected medical records

    Clin. Ther.

    (2002)
  • C.G. Gegick et al.

    Comparison of effects of thiazolidinediones on cardiovascular risk factors: observations from a clinical practice

    Endocr. Pract.

    (2001)
  • T. Tsukahara et al.

    Different residues mediate recognition of 1-O-oleyllysophosphatidic acid and rosiglitazone in the ligand binding domain of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2006)
  • L. Nagy et al.

    Mechanism of the nuclear receptor molecular switch

    Trends Biochem. Sci.

    (2004)
  • D. Moras et al.

    The nuclear receptor ligand-binding domain: structure and function

    Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.

    (1998)
  • M. Togashi et al.

    Conformational adaptation of nuclear receptor ligand binding domains to agonists: potential for novel approaches to ligand design

    J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol.

    (2005)
  • H.E. Xu et al.

    Molecular recognition of fatty acids by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors

    Mol. Cell

    (1999)
  • F. Molnar et al.

    Structural determinants of the agonist-independent association of human peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors with coactivators

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2005)
  • B.A. Johnson et al.

    Ligand-induced stabilization of PPARgamma monitored by NMR spectroscopy: implications for nuclear receptor activation

    J. Mol. Biol.

    (2000)
  • P. Cronet et al.

    Structure of the PPARalpha and -gamma ligand binding domain in complex with AZ 242; ligand selectivity and agonist activation in the PPAR family

    Structure

    (2001)
  • S. Rocchi et al.

    A unique PPARgamma ligand with potent insulin-sensitizing yet weak adipogenic activity

    Mol. Cell

    (2001)
  • N.J. McKenna et al.

    Combinatorial control of gene expression by nuclear receptors and coregulators

    Cell

    (2002)
  • D.M. Lonard et al.

    The expanding cosmos of nuclear receptor coactivators

    Cell

    (2006)
  • Y. Wu et al.

    Ligand and coactivator identity determines the requirement of the charge clamp for coactivation of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2003)
  • L. Nagy et al.

    Oxidized LDL regulates macrophage gene expression through ligand activation of PPARgamma

    Cell

    (1998)
  • P. Tontonoz et al.

    PPARgamma promotes monocyte/macrophage differentiation and uptake of oxidized LDL

    Cell

    (1998)
  • P. Puigserver et al.

    A cold-inducible coactivator of nuclear receptors linked to adaptive thermogenesis

    Cell

    (1998)
  • L. Gelman et al.

    Kinase signaling cascades that modulate PPARs

    Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.

    (Apr 2005)
  • C. Yu et al.

    The nuclear receptor corepressors NCoR and SMRT decrease peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma transcriptional activity and repress 3T3-L1 adipogenesis

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2005)
  • R.G. Roeder

    Transcriptional regulation and the role of diverse coactivators in animal cells

    FEBS Lett.

    (2005)
  • Y. Zhu et al.

    Isolation and characterization of PBP, a protein that interacts with peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1997)
  • M. Ito et al.

    Involvement of the TRAP220 component of the TRAP/SMCC coactivator complex in embryonic development and thyroid hormone action

    Mol. Cell

    (2000)
  • Y. Zhu et al.

    Deletion of PBP/PPARBP, the gene for nuclear receptor coactivator peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-binding protein, results in embryonic lethality

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2000)
  • S.E. Crawford et al.

    Defects of the heart, eye, and megakaryocytes in peroxisome proliferator activator receptor-binding protein (PBP) null embryos implicate GATA family of transcription factors

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2002)
  • L. Gelman et al.

    p300 interacts with the N- and C-terminal part of PPARgamma2 in a ligand-independent and -dependent manner, respectively

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1999)
  • F.A. Klein et al.

    Biochemical and NMR mapping of the interface between CREB-binding protein and ligand binding domains of nuclear receptor: beyond the LXXLL motif

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2005)
  • R. Mukherjee et al.

    Ligand and coactivator recruitment preferences of peroxisome proliferator activated receptor alpha

    J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol.

    (2002)
  • Nuclear_Receptors_Nomenclature_Committee

    A unified nomenclature system for the nuclear receptor superfamily

    Cell

    (1999)
  • B. Desvergne et al.

    Transcriptional regulation of metabolism

    Physiol. Rev.

    (2006)
  • L. Michalik et al.

    Involvement of PPAR nuclear receptors in tissue injury and wound repair

    J. Clin. Invest.

    (2006)
  • B. Staels et al.

    Therapeutic roles of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agonists

    Diabetes

    (2005)
  • D. Auboeuf et al.

    Tissue distribution and quantification of the expression of mRNAs of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors and liver X receptor-alpha in humans: no alteration in adipose tissue of obese and NIDDM patients

    Diabetes

    (1997)
  • J. Zhang et al.

    Selective disruption of PPARgamma 2 impairs the development of adipose tissue and insulin sensitivity

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (2004)
  • G. Medina-Gomez et al.

    The link between nutritional status and insulin sensitivity is dependent on the adipocyte-specific peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma2 isoform

    Diabetes

    (2005)
  • F. Blaschke et al.

    Obesity, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor, and atherosclerosis in Type 2 diabetes

    Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.

    (Jan 2006)
  • S. O'Rahilly et al.

    Genetic factors in type 2 diabetes: the end of the beginning?

    Science

    (2005)
  • P. Trayhurn et al.

    Adipokines: inflammation and the pleiotropic role of white adipose tissue

    Br. J. Nutr.

    (2004)
  • M.A. Lazar

    How obesity causes diabetes: not a tall tale

    Science

    (2005)
  • Cited by (79)

    • Enhancing insulin sensitivity by dual PPARγ partial agonist, β-catenin inhibitor: Design, synthesis of new αphthalimido-o-toluoyl2-aminothiazole hybrids

      2020, Life Sciences
      Citation Excerpt :

      nTZDpa was used as a reference partial agonist. It is worth to mention that the partial agonists do not bind to PPARγ by the net of hydrogen bonds used by full agonists which in turn decreases the transcriptional activity of PPARγ [39]. Of considerable interest, most of the currently known partial agonists interact with the LBD of PPARγ through a hydrogen bond with Ser342 in addition to several hydrophobic interactions that are similar to those that occur with full agonist binding [40].

    • Synthesis of a 1,2,3-bistriazole derivative of embelin and evaluation of its effect on high-fat diet fed-streptozotocin-induced type 2 diabetes in rats and molecular docking studies

      2020, Bioorganic Chemistry
      Citation Excerpt :

      It caused by metabolic dysregulations like decreased utilization of glucose linked with slanted insulin signaling cascade. Also, insulin resistance decreases the insulin secretion and β-cell mass in the peripheral tissues that lead to β-cell dysfunction [1,2]. PPARs, the nuclear receptor superfamily plays a specific role in glucose and energy metabolism.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    The authors contributed equally to this work.

    2

    Current address: IGBMC, Room 3013, 1 Rue Laurent Fries, BP 10142, 67404 Illkirch, France.

    View full text