Elsevier

Biological Conservation

Volume 143, Issue 7, July 2010, Pages 1635-1645
Biological Conservation

Review
The emerging significance of bioacoustics in animal species conservation

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2010.03.025Get rights and content

Abstract

This review reports on the effects of human activities on animal acoustic signals published in the literature from 1970 to 2009. Almost 5% of the studies on variation in animal communication tested or hypothesised on human impacts, and showed that habitat fragmentation, direct human disturbance, introduced diseases, urbanization, hunting, chemical and noise pollution may challenge animal acoustic behaviour. Although acoustic adaptations to anthropogenic habitats have been documented, human impacts have most often generated neutral variation or potential maladaptive responses. Negative impacts have been postulated in the sexual signals of fishes, amphibians, birds, and mammals; these are concerning as any maladaptive alteration of sexual behaviour may have direct bearings on breeding success and ultimately population growth rate. Acoustic communication also facilitates other vital behaviours influenced by human-driven perturbations. Bat and cetacean echolocation, for instance, is disrupted by noise pollution, whereas bird and mammal alarming is also affected by introduced diseases and hunting. Mammal social signals are sensitive to noise pollution and hunting, and birds selecting habitats by means of acoustic cues are especially vulnerable to habitat loss. Anthropogenic intervention in these cases may have a negative impact on individual survival, recruitment and group cohesion, limiting rescue-effects and triggering Allee effects. Published evidence shows that acoustic variation may be used as an early-warning indicator of perturbations even when not directly affecting individual fitness. Acoustic signalling can be studied in a broad range of ecosystems, can be recorded, analyzed, synthesised and played back with relative ease and limited economic budget, and is sensitive to many types of impacts, thus can have great conservation significance.

Introduction

Communication, the way organisms convey information to each other, is the gel that holds animal societies together: it facilitates reproduction, provides information on individual identity, status, mood and intentions (Bradbury and Vehrencamp, 1998). As it includes a substantial proportion of the behavioural repertoire of animal species, communication behaviour can become an important driver of several aspects of species biology, affecting the evolution of life histories and genes.

Along with several other animals, humans share the use of sounds as the principal means of exchanging information. Many vertebrates (bony fishes, amphibians, reptiles, birds, mammals) and invertebrates (insects, spiders, crustaceans, nematodes) make sounds (or vibrations) for a variety of reasons, mostly for courtship and agonistic behaviours, but also for more complex social communication (Hauser, 1997, Owings et al., 1998). Many birds (oscines, some sub-oscines, trochilids and psittacines) and some mammals (cetaceans, primates, bats) may acquire important components of their acoustic repertoires by copying others, while this behaviour is thought to be innate in the other taxonomic groups (Kroodsma and Baylis, 1982, Janik and Slater, 1997). As an example, birdsong was the first ‘cultural’ trait (i.e. acquired through social learning) to be described in non-human animals, based on evidence dating back to Aristotle (Laland and Galef, 2009).

Acoustic signals are particularly well suited for studying the evolution of animal communication because of the relative ease with which sounds can be recorded and analyzed, synthesised and played back with efficiency (Gerhardt and Huber, 2002). Animal sounds have indeed served as models to address essential evolutionary questions, such as the way sexual selection operates and intervenes in speciation processes and the way natural selection shapes animal interactions (Kroodsma and Miller, 1996). In spite of being the target of many evolutionary studies, the role of animal vocalizations has been less significant in applied ecological research (Terry et al., 2005). Until the last decade, their use has been limited to acoustic surveys and censuses to detect vocal species of birds, mammals, amphibians and insects. Bioacoustics has also been used to generate basic demographic variables through the vocal identification of individuals, or estimate species occurrence and richness in those cryptic taxa characterized by species-specific acoustic signals (see also Caro, 1998, Vaughan et al., 1997, Gaunt and McCallum, 2004).

More recently, bioacousticians have begun to tackle the questions of how human activities challenge the communication systems of animal species, what are the stochastic or deterministic mechanisms involved (natural, sexual or social selection processes), and what information of conservation significance can be derived by studying animal sounds (Rabin and Greene, 2002, Slabbekoorn and Ripmeester, 2008, Laiolo et al., 2008). A similar drive determined the development of ‘Conservation Behaviour’, a discipline that combines applied and baseline research to address the behavioural mechanisms that influence the fate of populations and species (Curio, 1996, Buchholz, 2007, Caro, 2007).

The aim of this review is to collect recent literature on the impact of human activities on animal communication, and provide an overview of the potential of bioacoustics in conservation science. Based on published evidence, I discuss the type of information that could be extracted from animal sounds which may be relevant to species conservation and population ecology, and highlight a series of troublesome cases, in which acoustic variation may cause conservation problems and affects population persistence. Finally, I discuss how acoustic signals can be used in conservation studies as early-warning indicators of ongoing human-driven perturbations or to monitor population processes.

Section snippets

Bibliographic search

The overview is based on a Thompson’s ISI Web of Science search of journals within the subject categories of ‘Zoology’, ‘Ecology’, ‘Multidisciplinary Sciences’, ‘Behavioural Science’, ‘Acoustics’, ‘Biology’, ‘Marine and Freshwater Biology’, ‘Evolutionary Biology’, ‘Ornithology’, and ‘Environmental Science’ from 1970 to 2009. As a variety of human impacts has been proven to affect animal communication and no single search term could define them, I started with a broad search of the terms CALL or

Results

I found that 53 papers explicitly focused on human-driven alterations (excluding review papers). For simplicity, I refer to these studies as ‘Conservation Bioacoustics’ papers. In the remaining titles of the search, I paid special attention to those of a more descriptive nature, which dealt with intra-specific acoustic variation. I searched here for inadvertent comparisons among natural and anthropogenic habitats, populations separated by anthropogenic barriers or differently affected by human

Discussion

In the following sections (4.1–4.7) I consider each anthropogenic vector of acoustic change and discuss the consequences for individuals and populations. When the species response (or lack of response) critically affects the fate of populations living in human-transformed ecosystems, the acoustic shift has great conservation significance. When human-driven acoustic variation is not directly affecting individual fitness or population viability, it could still serve in a conservation context, as

Conclusions

A variety of human impacts can affect animal communication systems by triggering stochastic or deterministic forces of evolutionary or ecological change. The findings of this overview show that communication may become a mechanism that negatively affects population persistence in some instances, resulting in a conservation dilemma. All acoustic traits associated with (or mediating) aspects of reproductive success, survivorship and/or recruitment can indirectly affect population growth rates and

Acknowledgements

I am very grateful to F. Sergio, A.S. Pullin and two anonymous referees for providing useful comments and suggestions. While writing, I was supported by the Project CGL2008-02749 of the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation.

References (160)

  • V.M. Janik et al.

    Vocal learning in mammals

    Adv. Study Behav.

    (1997)
  • M. Katti et al.

    Tits, noise, and urban bioacoustics

    Trends Ecol. Evol.

    (2004)
  • P. Laiolo et al.

    The emergence of animal culture conservation

    Trends Ecol. Evol.

    (2007)
  • T. Lengagne

    Traffic noise affects communication behaviour in a breeding anuran, Hyla arborea

    Biol. Conserv.

    (2008)
  • R. MacNally et al.

    Forecasting the impacts of habitat fragmentation. Evaluation of species-specific predictions of the impact of habitat fragmentation on birds in the box–ironbark forests of central Victoria, Australia

    Biol. Conserv.

    (2000)
  • P.C. Mundinger

    Animal cultures and a general theory of cultural evolution

    Ethol. Sociobiol.

    (1980)
  • A.A. Myrberg

    The effects of man-made noise on the behavior of marine animals

    Environ. Int.

    (1990)
  • E. Nemeth et al.

    Blackbirds sing higher-pitched songs in cities: adaptation to habitat acoustics or side-effect of urbanization?

    Anim. Behav.

    (2009)
  • C.S. Adkisson

    Geographic variation in vocalizations and evolution of North American Pine Grosbeaks

    Condor

    (1981)
  • M.A. Ahlering et al.

    Avian habitat management meets conspecific attraction: if you built it, will they come?

    The Auk

    (2006)
  • J.J. Ahtiainen et al.

    Decreased sexual signalling reveals reduced viability in small populations of the drumming wolf spider Hygrolycosa rubrofasciata

    Proc. Roy. Soc. London Ser B: Biol. Sci.

    (2004)
  • M. Avery et al.

    Song dialects in the Bobolink (Dolichonyx oryzivorus)

    The Condor

    (1977)
  • M.C. Baker

    Cultural diversification in the flight call of the ringneck parrot in Western Australia

    The Condor

    (2000)
  • M.C. Baker et al.

    Differing effects of isolation on evolution of bird songs: examples from an island–mainland comparison of three species

    Biol. J. Linn. Soc.

    (2006)
  • E.M. Bayne et al.

    Impacts of chronic anthropogenic noise from energy-sector activity on abundance of songbirds in the boreal forest

    Conserv. Biol.

    (2008)
  • D.J. Bender et al.

    Habitat loss and population decline: a meta-analysis of the patch size effect

    Ecology

    (1998)
  • F. Bergen et al.

    Etho-ecological study of the singing activity of the blue tit (Parus caeruleus) great tit (Parus major), and chaffinch (Fringilla coelebs)

    J. Ornithol.

    (1997)
  • Bergmann, H.H., 1993. Der Buchfink: Neues über einen bekannten Sänger....
  • E. Bermúdez-Cuamatzin et al.

    Strategies of song adaptation to urban noise in the house finch: syllable pitch plasticity or differential syllable use?

    Behaviour

    (2009)
  • D.T. Blumstein

    Female preferences and effective population size

    Anim. Conserv.

    (1998)
  • J.W. Bradbury et al.

    Principles of Animal Communication

    (1998)
  • V. Bretagnolle et al.

    Using bird vocalisations as individual tags: prospects for the conservation of threatened species in counts, survival rates and population structure

    J. Ornithol.

    (2006)
  • Briefer, E., Osiejuk, T.S., Rybak, F., Aubin, T., in press. Are bird song complexity and sharing shaped by habitat...
  • H. Brumm

    The impact of environmental noise on song amplitude in a territorial bird

    J. Anim. Ecol.

    (2004)
  • K.C. Buckstaff

    Effects of watercraft noise on the acoustic behavior of bottlenose dolphins, Tursiops truncatus, in Sarasota Bay, Florida

    Mar. Mammal. Sci.

    (2004)
  • C.D. Cadena et al.

    A rare case of interspecific hybridization in the tracheophone suboscines: chestnut-naped antpitta Grallaria nuchalis × chestnut-crowned antpitta G. ruficapilla in a fragmented Andean landscape

    Ibis

    (2007)
  • T. Caro

    Behavioral ecology and conservation biology

    (1998)
  • C.K. Catchpole et al.

    Bird Song: Biological Themes and Variations

    (2008)
  • G. Chilton et al.

    Long-term changes in songs and song dialect boundaries of Puget Sound white crowned sparrows

    Condor

    (1996)
  • M.A. Cunningham et al.

    Microgeographic song variation in the Nuttall’s white-crowned sparrow

    Condor

    (1987)
  • D. Currie et al.

    Population density and the intensity of paternity assurance behaviour in a monogamous wader: the Curlew Numenius arquata

    Ibis

    (2000)
  • Dahlheim, M.E., 1987. Bio-acoustics of the Gray Whale (Eschrichtius robustus). PhD Dissertation. Department of Zoology,...
  • D.K. Dawson et al.

    Bird population density estimated from acoustic signals

    J. Appl. Ecol.

    (2009)
  • J.M. Drayton et al.

    Sounds different: inbreeding depression in sexually selected traits in the cricket Teleogryllus commodus

    J. Evol. Biol.

    (2007)
  • M.G. Efford et al.

    Population density estimated from locations of individuals on a passive detector array

    Ecology

    (2009)
  • E. Fernández-Juricic et al.

    Microhabitat selection and singing behavior patterns of male house finches (Carpodacus mexicanus) in urban parks in a heavily urbanized landscape in the Western US

    Urban Habitats

    (2005)
  • J. Fisher

    Evolution and bird sociality

  • R.J. Fletcher

    Species interactions and population density mediate the use of social cues for habitat selection

    J. Anim. Ecol.

    (2007)
  • R.J. Fletcher

    Social information and community dynamics: nontarget effects from simulating social cues for management

    Ecol. Appl.

    (2008)
  • M. Foerschler et al.

    Vocal types in crossbill populations (Loxia spp.) of Southwest Europe

    J.Ornithol.

    (2009)
  • Cited by (219)

    • The limits of acoustic indices

      2024, Nature Ecology and Evolution
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text