Wildlife laundering through breeding farms: Illegal harvest, population declines and a means of regulating the trade of green pythons (Morelia viridis) from Indonesia
Highlights
► We surveyed green python traders and breeding farms in Indonesia. Large numbers of green pythons are illegally wild-caught and exported annually. Green pythons are laundered through breeding farms as “captive-bred”. Harvesting has resulted in the decline in certain populations. Python eggshells can be used to prove provenance.
Introduction
The trade in wildlife is a major contributor to biodiversity loss and has been recognised as a major conservation concern (Grieser-Johns and Thomson, 2005, Sutherland et al., 2009). Driven mainly by economics, wildlife is traded for medicines, luxury goods, food and pets and operates on local, national and international levels (Nijman, 2010). When wildlife is traded illegally, conservation efforts and sustainable harvests are seriously undermined (Schoppe, 2009, Zhou and Jiang, 2005). Few studies have attempted, or been able, to determine the scale of illegal trade (Gavin et al., 2009), the effects of illegal harvest (Schoppe, 2009, Smith et al., 2011) or the mechanisms by which it operates (but see Wutty and Simms, 2005). As the demand for wildlife increases, additional strain is placed on wild populations, and unsustainable harvesting practices can result in extensive biodiversity loss and ecosystem degradation (Broad et al., 2003, Roe, 2008). In response, the establishment of commercial breeding farms has been promoted as a means of alleviating pressure on wild populations (Jori et al., 1995, Nogueira and Nogueira-Filho, 2011, Siswomartono, 1998).
The trade of wildlife for pets, both legal and illegal, is a multi-million dollar industry, yet it has received little attention from conservation scientists (but see Auliya, 2003, Natusch and Lyons, in press, Nijman and Shepherd, 2007, Shepherd, 2006, Yuwono, 1998). South East Asian economies, particularly Indonesia, export large numbers of species as pets that are sourced from the wild each year (Nijman and Shepherd, 2009, Pernetta, 2009, Shepherd, 2006). Reptiles in particular, are heavily exploited and Indonesia exports more than 160 live reptile species destined for the pet trade (Anon., 2010a, Anon., 2010b). Indonesia’s wildlife trade is internationally regulated by the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES). Indonesia became a Party to CITES in 1979 and trade is monitored by the CITES Management Authority, the Directorate General of Forest Protection and Nature Conservation (PHKA). For CITES Appendix II listed species, quotas are set annually with the guidance of the CITES Scientific Authority, the Indonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI) (Siswomartono, 1998). A small number of reptile species are protected under Indonesian legislation and these may be traded legally only if bred in captivity. In the early 1990s, in response to recommendations from the CITES Secretariat and high demands from consumer nations, the Indonesian government encouraged captive breeding of selected species for export (Siswomartono, 1998). This was intended to aid conservation: (1) by breeding foundation stocks for re-release into the wild, and (2) to protect species seriously threatened by commercialisation (Siswomartono, 1998).
While farming has resulted in reduced pressure on some wildlife populations (Revol, 1995), it is feared that commercial breeding may result in increased demand for wild founder stock and be used to launder illegally wild-caught animals (Bulte and Damania, 2005, Mockrin et al., 2005). For example, in Indonesia, nationally protected wildlife can be traded under permit if captive-bred, promoting the mis-declaration of animals that are in fact wild-caught (Engler and Parry-Jones, 2007). Globally, there are an increasing number of reports suggesting that for many species, this may very well be the case (Auliya, 2003, Brooks et al., 2010, Engler and Parry-Jones, 2007, Nijman and Shepherd, 2009, Vinke and Vinke, 2010).
Nijman and Shepherd (2009) found large discrepancies between the number of reptiles exported annually from Indonesia and the number of reptiles capable of being produced by Indonesian breeding farms. Their study provided strong evidence for spurious captive breeding in Indonesia (Nijman and Shepherd, 2009). The CITES-listed species exported in largest numbers from Indonesia as captive-bred is the green python (Morelia viridis) (CITES Trade Database, 2011). Green pythons are listed in Appendix II of CITES, which regulates international trade, and in 1999 became a fully protected species under national legislation in Indonesia (Dilindungi PP 7/1999). Green pythons are keenly sought after by reptile keepers, mainly due to their distinctive and unique colouration. Juveniles are born either yellow or red and change to green at approximately 65 cm in length. Restricted to tropical rainforests in Australia, Papua New Guinea (PNG) and the Indonesian provinces of Maluku, West Papua, and Papua (Natusch and Natusch, in press, O’Shea, 1996). Indonesia is the only range state that allows export of captive-bred green pythons for commercial purposes, but restricts such exports to the progeny of captive breeding. Reptile enthusiasts have recognised subtle differences in adult and juvenile colouration of green pythons and as such, have designated each colour morph as a specific locality type (Kivit and Wiseman, 2005, Maxwell, 2005). This has resulted in the search for new morphs and localities. There are numerous reports suggesting that illegal harvesting of green pythons is occurring and that some populations are in decline (Auliya et al., 2009). There is however, no direct evidence of the existence of an illegal trade in wild-caught specimens. A recent report submitted by LIPI for the CITES Asian Snake Trade Workshop (2011) stated that the illegal trade of snakes in Indonesia was non-existent. Most importantly, there is currently no easy method for differentiating between wild-caught or captive-bred reptiles destined for export (Auliya, 2003).
It is the aim of the present paper to quantify the scale of illegal trade in green pythons and evaluate the effects of current harvest levels on wild populations. The evidence for laundering of green pythons through breeding farms is examined and the role that commercial breeding plays in the conservation of wild animals is discussed. The mechanisms by which the illegal trade operates are identified and ways in which it can be reduced are suggested. Finally, a novel method for regulating the export of reptiles is proposed and it is suggested that it be trialled using green pythons.
Section snippets
Study region
Six sites were visited in the Indonesian provinces of Maluku, West Papua and Papua between August 2009 and April 2011 (Fig. 1). These sites were selected on the basis of known consumer demand for ‘locality specific’ green pythons, and therefore areas where trade of green pythons was likely to occur. Study sites were grouped into five localities based on geography (Fig. 1). In addition, markets and breeding farms that claimed to keep, breed and export green pythons were visited in the Indonesian
Trade dynamics
In total, 13 traders were located in the Indonesian provinces of Maluku, Papua and West Papua, and visited 94 times between August 2009 and April 2011 (Table 1). Several different individuals are involved in the trade of green pythons, and collectively they form the trade chain. Villagers working in, or in close proximity to, rainforest during the day opportunistically collect green pythons. Snakes are captured by hand and kept in a plastic bottle or bag for a variable period of time. Depending
Discussion
This is one of few studies to provide quantitative data relating to the illegal trade and laundering of wildlife through breeding farms. It provides evidence that there is a thriving illegal trade of wild-caught green pythons in Indonesia and documents this trade from its source to destination.
Conclusions
Despite being illegal, collection of wild green pythons is occurring. This study indicates that harvesting is threatening some populations, and, in particular, those on isolated islands. Of most concern is that green pythons from Biak, which may prove to be a distinct species, are experiencing the highest levels of population depletion. Further, the results indicate that most of the green pythons exported from Indonesia each year are actually wild-caught and laundered through breeding farms
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the many people who assisted us in the field. Despite the sensitive nature of this study, never were traders unfriendly or unwilling to help. Thanks to B. Osborne and L. McIntyre for their assistance in Indonesia. Thanks to Vladimir Odinchenko and Yury Lukin for allowing us access to python eggshells and generously providing their unpublished data on green python reproduction. M. Archer, D. Natusch, C. Shepherd and V. Nijman provided valuable comments on an earlier draft
References (57)
- et al.
Genetic effects of harvest on wild animal populations
Trends in Ecology & Evolution
(2008) - et al.
The conservation impact of commercial wildlife farming of porcupines in Vietnam
Biological Conservation
(2010) The perils of payoff: Corruption as a threat to global biodiversity
Trends in Ecology & Evolution
(2004)- et al.
Assessing the impacts of international trade on CITES-listed species: Current practices and opportunities for scientific research
Biological Conservation
(2011) - et al.
Southeast Asian biodiversity: An impending disaster
Trends in Ecology & Evolution
(2004) - Anon., 2010a. Kuota ekspor tumbuhan alam dan satwa liar yang termasuk Appendix CITES untuk periode tahun 2010....
- Anon., 2010b. Kuota ekspor tumbuhan alam dan satwa liar yang termasuk Non-Appendix CITES untuk periode tahun 2010....
Hot Trade in Cool Creatures: A Review of the Live Reptile Trade in the European Union in the 1990s with a Focus on Germany
(2003)- Auliya, M., Shine R.A., Allison, A., 2009. Morelia viridis. In: IUCN 2011. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version...
- et al.(1994)
The nature and extent of legal and illegal trade in wildlife
A ventral scale clipping system for permanently marking snakes (Reptilia, Serpentes)
Journal of Herpetology
Social Research Methods
An economic assessment of wildlife farming and conservation
Conservation Biology
Notes on the reproductive biology of Australian pythons, genera Aspidites, Liasis and Morelia
Herpetological Review
Delayed sexual maturity and demographics of Blandings turtles (Emydoidea blandingii): Implications for conservation and management of long-lived organisms
Conservation Biology
Opportunity or Threat: The Role of the European Union in Global Wildlife Trade
Ecological and evolutionary consequences of size-selective harvesting: how much do we know?
Molecular Ecology
Rattlesnake commercialization: Long-term trends, issues, and implications for conservation
Wildlife Society Bulletin
Black Python: Morelia boeleni
Measuring and monitoring illegal use of natural resources
Conservation Biology
Freshwater turtles of the TransFly region of Papua New Guinea: Notes on diversity, distribution, reproduction, harvest and trade
Wildlife Research
Going, Going, Gone: The Illegal Trade in Wildlife in East and Southeast Asia
The illegal reptile trade as a form of conservation crime: a South African criminological investigation
Cross-border trade in Saratoga fingerlings from the Bensbach River, south-west Papua New Guinea
Pacific Conservation Biology
Grasscutter (Trynonomys swinderianus) production: An example of rational exploitation of wildlife
Biodiversity and Conservation
Cited by (148)
Assessing and improving the veracity of international trade in captive-bred animals
2024, Journal of Environmental ManagementAn introduction to illegal wildlife trade and its effects on biodiversity and society
2023, Forensic Science International: Animals and EnvironmentsProfiting from cruelty: Digital content creators abuse animals worldwide to incur profit
2023, Biological ConservationDetermining the sustainability of legal wildlife trade
2023, Journal of Environmental ManagementStatus, challenges and pathways to the sustainable use of wild species
2023, Global Environmental ChangeTaking stock of wildlife farming: A global perspective
2023, Global Ecology and Conservation