Elsevier

Biological Control

Volume 132, May 2019, Pages 89-94
Biological Control

Small-scale dispersal of a biological control agent – Implications for more effective releases

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2019.01.016Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Release of adults only and egg-laden plants only are both effective in establishing M. scutellaris populations.

  • When released, female M. scutellaris tend to lay eggs before dispersing.

  • Release of both adult M. scutellaris and egg-laden plants together increase propagule pressure.

  • Release of adult M. scutellaris at high and low densities showed similar dispersal patterns.

Abstract

Eichhornia crassipes (Martius) Solms Laubach (Liliales: Pontederiaceae) was introduced to Florida in the 1880s as an ornamental and it once infested thousands of square kilometers across the state. Megamelus scutellaris Berg (Hemiptera: Delphacidae) was developed as a classical biological control agent for this plant primarily because its free-living life stages allow it to better integrate with herbicides, which are currently used as the main control method for E. crassipes in Florida. Mass rearing and distribution programs can accelerate the benefits of biological control by augmenting natural dispersal, but an optimal release strategy must consider the entire system including the agent, the target weed, and the habitat. The effectiveness of various release strategies was evaluated using a tank experiment where single and multiple releases of either adult M. scutellaris only or E. crassipes infested with M. scutellaris eggs were compared to control treatments. The post-release dispersal capability of brachypterous M. scutellaris was evaluated using a linear transect of E. crassipes. Two density release treatments were tested and emerging nymphs were used as a proxy for female dispersal distances. All release treatments resulted in successful M. scutellaris population establishment and levels of M. scutellaris were not significantly different among them. The dispersal experiment indicated that adult females oviposit near the release point before dispersing. While the release experiment indicated that all treatments were similar, the continually fluctuating populations of E. crassipes makes establishment of populations difficult in the field. By releasing both adults and infested plants, additional propagule pressure can be attained from a single release event which can counter the tendency of adult M. scutellaris to disperse rapidly following release.

Introduction

Waterhyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) (Martius) Solms Laubach (Liliales: Pontederiaceae) is a free-floating aquatic plant that has invaded fresh water bodies across the world, altering native habitats and outgrowing native vegetation (Little, 1965, Gopal, 1987, Schmitz et al., 1993, Center, 1994). This species was introduced to Florida in the 1880s as an ornamental (Klorer, 1909) where, because of the warm climate and nutrient rich waters, it once infested thousands of square kilometers across the state (Lugo et al., 1978, Reddy and DeBusk, 1984). Since the advent of synthetic herbicides, E. crassipes can now be effectively managed, but relying solely on herbicides requires repeated applications (Schmitz et al., 1993). This has been the experience in Florida, where E. crassipes is managed continually via herbicides by federal, state, and local agencies and costs can run into the hundreds of thousands of dollars annually (Gettys et al., 2014a).

Classical biological control programs in the U.S. utilizing monophagous insect herbivores have developed and deployed four species to increase suppression of this plant (Perkins, 1973, Center and Durden, 1981, Tipping et al., 2014b). The most numerous agent in Florida is Neochetina eichhorniae Warner (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), which is known to reduce the growth and reproduction of E. crassipes, but not significantly reduce coverage (Tipping et al., 2014a). It is difficult for biological control agents to build up to damaging densities because frequent herbicide applications can cause large fluctuations in E. crassipes populations over wide areas (Center et al., 1999). Despite these challenges, herbivory by biocontrol agents increases the effectiveness of herbicide treatments by allowing for reduced dosages without any loss of efficacy, plus retarding the rate of regrowth following applications and has thereby reduced the impact of this plant in Florida (Center et al., 1999, Gettys et al., 2014b, Tipping et al., 2014a, Tipping et al., 2017). While herbicide-managed areas tend to have less E. crassipes coverage, areas where the biological control agent populations are unperturbed by the constant boom and bust cycling of E. crassipes contain smaller plants that are physiologically stressed by the insects (Center et al., 1999).

The most recently released agent, Megamelus scutellaris Berg (Hemiptera: Delphacidae), was selected primarily because its free-living juvenile and adult life stages allow it to better integrate with herbicides (Tipping et al., 2011). Eggs are laid inside the petiole and lamina of E. crassipes. Once they emerge, M. scutellaris goes through five nymphal instars (Tipping et al., 2011). Generation time is ∼25 days outdoors in southern Florida. This species is multivoltine and multiple overlapping generations are observed in the laboratory and at established sites in Florida (Tipping et al., 2014a). While M. scutellaris can be very damaging to E. crassipes (Tipping et al., 2011, Sosa et al., 2007), to date it also has not substantially reduced surface coverage of the plant, which is the primary decision metric used by land managers (Tipping et al., 2014a).

Megamelus scutellaris occurs in both macropterous (flighted) and brachypterous (non-flighted) forms (Sosa et al., 2004), with the majority of insects produced for release being brachypterous. The dimorphism is likely density-dependent (Denno, 1994), but the exact mechanism triggering this phenomenon requires further study (Fitzgerald and Tipping, 2013). Other planthopper species that are wing-dimorphic are known for their macropters’ long-distance migrations (e.g. N. lugens, Denno and Peterson, 1995), while it is generally thought that brachypterous individuals do not disperse over longer distances (Kennedy, 1961, Denno, 1976). However, such smaller-scale dispersal may play an important role in the re-colonization of herbicide treated areas, as insects move from pockets of E. crassipes that escaped treatment into the expanding mat (Center et al., 1999).

Although there can be significant initial costs considering the long process before agent deployment, benefit-cost ratios of biological control tend to be high (Harris, 1991, Hill and Greathead, 2000, Culliney, 2005). Mass rearing and distribution programs can accelerate the benefits by increasing both the number of insects available for release and the number of release events, increasing propagule pressure and augmenting natural dispersal. A poor release strategy can potentially contribute to unsuccessful establishment of biological control agents (Grevstad, 1999). Therefore, optimizing a release strategy specific to a particular agent is but one way to decrease the time to establishment while increasing the total area covered.

The spread of M. scutellaris on the landscape is important because of its potential to integrate with the widespread herbicidal management of E. crassipes. By more efficiently building M. scutellaris numbers and increasing establishment, this species can be more effective in a shorter time span. The objectives of this study were to 1.) evaluate the effectiveness of various release strategies in establishing M. scutellaris populations, and 2.) determine the dispersal capability of brachypterous adult M. scutellaris post-release.

Section snippets

Release methods

In order to determine the most effective release strategy for M. scutellaris, two general release strategies were tested: 1.) the release of adult brachypterous individuals, and 2.) the release of egg-laden (infested) E. crassipes plants. Both strategies were tested as a single release or as a series of three releases. Treatments were compared with two controls, one in which M. scutellaris was not released, but N. eichhorniae was allowed to immigrate freely and one in which insect establishment

Release methods experiment

There were significant differences (F1,50 = 27.78, p < 0.0001) in initial fresh weight between 2015 and 2016, so each year was analyzed separately.

The ANOVA of the 2015 data showed differences among treatments in average adult M. scutellaris found, average percent defoliation by N. eichhorniae, final fresh weight of E. crassipes, mean relative growth rate of E. crassipes, N. eichhorniae adults recovered, N. eichhorniae larvae recovered, mites (both species, combined) recovered, K. ema

Discussion

Many variables need to be considered when planning a release program for a biological control agent, such as the biological attributes of the agent and the target, the habitat, and the overall management system. Biological control agents are initially costly to develop but have high benefit-cost ratios over the long term (Harris, 1991, Hill and Greathead, 2000, Culliney, 2005). It is important that an effective and efficient release strategy be developed, so that the years of development were

Declaration of interest

None.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Acknowledgements

We thank Eileen Pokorny for her assistance with both experiments and John Laffey and Chris Stauffer from the Broward College Environmental Science Program for their help with the set-up and data collection on the dispersal experiment. Mention of trade names or commercial products in this publication is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA).

References (36)

  • R.F. Denno et al.

    Density-dependent dispersal and its consequences for population dynamics

  • D. Fitzgerald et al.

    Effect of insect density and host plant quality on wing-form in Megamelus scutellaris (Hemiptera: Delphacidae)

    Fla. Entomol.

    (2013)
  • L.A. Gettys et al.

    Biology and Control of Aquatic Plants: A Best Management Practices Handbook

    (2014)
  • L.A. Gettys et al.

    Can herbicide usage be reduced by practicing IPM for waterhyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) control?

    Proc. Fl. State Hortic.

    (2014)
  • B. Gopal

    Water Hyacinth

    (1987)
  • F.S. Grevstad

    Factors influencing the chance of population establishment: implications for release strategies in biocontrol

    Ecol. Appl.

    (1999)
  • D.H. Habeck et al.

    Native insect enemies of aquatic macrophytes-moths

    Aquatics

    (1986)
  • P. Harris

    Invitation paper (C. P. Alexander fund): classical biocontrol of weeds: its definition, selection of effective agents, and administrative–political problems

    Can. Entomol.

    (1991)
  • Cited by (10)

    • Integrating herbicide rates, coverage, and classical biological control insects (Megamelus scutellaris, Neochetina eichhorniae,and Neochetina bruchi) to manage Pontederia (Eichhornia) crassipes

      2022, Biological Control
      Citation Excerpt :

      In general, Neochetina spp. densities increased with a decrease in spray coverage. This is a pattern seen in other experiments that attempted to integrate herbicidal application with Neochetina spp. (Haag, 1986; Haag and Habeck, 1991; Goode et al., 2019), namely that leaving untreated plants as refuges increases their local density. Similarly, the significance of the interaction between herbicide rate and spray coverage in the presence of biological control agents after herbicide application suggests that leaving untreated plants improves the efficacy of these treatments.

    • Megamelus scutellaris (Berg) (Hemiptera: Delphacidae) biology and population dynamics in the highly variable landscape of southern Florida

      2021, Biological Control
      Citation Excerpt :

      The biocontrol agents have been shown to reduce both the biomass and reproduction in P. crassipes, while rendering the weakened plants more susceptible to herbicides (Tipping et al., 2017). While adults have been documented moving several meters a day (Goode et al., 2019), and have been observed moving 15–20 m in the weeks following an herbicide application at a site on Lake Okeechobee, nymphs are unlikely to have the ability to move long distances quickly. When plants are treated and begin to degrade, adults tend to disperse to new mats, whereas nymphs tend to migrate to viable (untreated) plants within the same mat, increasing their local density.

    • Proximity to host plant of a congener determines parasitism of a waterhyacinth biological control agent by a native parasitoid

      2021, Biological Control
      Citation Excerpt :

      These biological factors may limit any potential population level suppression of M. scutellaris by K. ema. Currently, M. scutellaris releases in Florida are conducted with adults and egg-laden plants whereby a single release in one location may contain several thousand insects and eggs and thus should overwhelm any immediate localized response by K. ema (Goode et al., 2019). Megamelus scutellaris is multivoltine in the field, causing overlapping generations throughout the year (Tipping et al., 2014).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text