Elsevier

Biomaterials

Volume 25, Issue 28, December 2004, Pages 5947-5954
Biomaterials

Surface chemistry modulates focal adhesion composition and signaling through changes in integrin binding

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.01.062Get rights and content

Abstract

Biomaterial surface properties influence protein adsorption and elicit diverse cellular responses in biomedical and biotechnological applications. However, the molecular mechanisms directing cellular activities remain poorly understood. Using a model system with well-defined chemistries (CH3, OH, COOH, NH2) and a fixed density of the single adhesive ligand fibronectin, we investigated the effects of surface chemistry on focal adhesion assembly and signaling. Surface chemistry strongly modulated integrin binding and specificity—α5β1 integrin binding affinity followed the pattern OH>NH2COOH>CH3, while integrin αVβ3 displayed the relationship COOH>NH2≫OHCH3. Immunostaining and biochemical analyses revealed that surface chemistry modulates the structure and molecular composition of cell-matrix adhesions as well as focal adhesion kinase (FAK) signaling. The neutral hydrophilic OH functionality supported the highest levels of recruitment of talin, α-actinin, paxillin, and tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins to adhesive structures. The positively charged NH2 and negatively charged COOH surfaces exhibited intermediate levels of recruitment of focal adhesion components, while the hydrophobic CH3 substrate displayed the lowest levels. These patterns in focal adhesion assembly correlated well with integrin α5β1 binding. Phosphorylation of specific tyrosine residues in FAK also showed differential sensitivity to surface chemistry. Finally, surface chemistry-dependent differences in adhesive interactions modulated osteoblastic differentiation. These differences in focal adhesion assembly and signaling provide a potential mechanism for the diverse cellular responses elicited by different material properties.

Introduction

Cell adhesion to synthetic surfaces is crucial to many biomedical and biotechnological applications [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. In addition to anchoring cells, adhesive interactions activate various intracellular signaling pathways that direct cell viability, proliferation, and differentiation [7], [8]. In many instances, cell adhesion to biomaterial surfaces is mediated by a layer of adsorbed proteins, such as immunoglobulins, vitronectin, fibrinogen and fibronectin (FN) [9], [10]. Numerous studies have shown that the type, quantity and activity of adsorbed proteins are influenced by the underlying substrate properties, including chemistry and hydrophobicity [9], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16]. These substrate-dependent differences in protein adsorption have profound effects on cellular activities, including integrin receptor binding and subsequent cell adhesive events [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23]. Several studies have demonstrated diverse cellular responses to substrates with different surface chemistries. For instance, Allen et al. showed differential gene expression for several cell types on surfaces of varying hydrophobicity [24]. Similarly, Brodbeck and colleagues demonstrated increased in vivo apoptosis and reduced foreign body giant cell formation on hydrophilic and anionic surfaces compared to hydrophobic and cationic substrates [25]. While these studies highlight the importance of biomaterial surface properties in modulating cellular behaviors, the underlying mechanisms responsible for generating dissimilar cell responses among different substrates remain poorly understood.

Using model substrates with well-controlled surface properties, we recently reported that surface chemistry alters the adsorption kinetics and structure of adsorbed FN [26]. Furthermore, we demonstrated that surface chemistry modifies the functional presentation of the major integrin binding domain of FN, alters integrin binding, and potentiates cell adhesion strength [23]. In the present work, we analyzed the effects of surface chemistry on focal adhesion assembly and signaling. Focal adhesions are specialized adhesive complexes containing structural and signaling molecules that regulate cell migration, survival, cell cycle progression, and differentiation [27], [28]. We demonstrate that surface chemistry modulates focal adhesion composition and signaling. These findings provide a potential mechanism for the diverse cellular responses to biomaterial surfaces and offer design criteria for the engineering of surfaces that elicit specific cellular responses.

Section snippets

Cells and reagents

Human plasma FN and other tissue culture reagents were obtained from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA). Fetal bovine serum was purchased from Hyclone (Logan, UT). Bovine serum albumin, anti-talin (clone 8D4) and anti-α-actinin (BM-75.2) monoclonal antibodies, alkaline phosphatase-conjugated anti-biotin antibody (BN-34), and all other chemical reagents were obtained from Sigma Chemical (St. Louis, MO). Bis(2-(sulfo-succinimidooxycarbonyloxy)ethyl) sulfone (sulfo-BSOCOES) cross-linker was purchased from

Surface chemistry modulates integrin binding and cell adhesion

Ordered and well-packed SAMs of ω-functionalized alkanethiols on gold were used to present four chemistries: (i) CH3 (hydrophobic), (ii) OH (neutral hydrophilic), (iii) COOH (negatively charged at pH 7.4), and (iv) NH2 (positively charged at pH 7.4). Prior to cell seeding, surfaces were coated with a specified FN density and blocked with non-adhesive albumin to prevent adsorption of additional proteins which may influence cell behaviors. Surface densities were characterized following coating

Discussion

Biomaterial surface properties play critical roles in controlling cellular behaviors in host responses to implanted devices, tissue engineering scaffolds and artificial organs, biosensors, and cell culture supports and bioreactors. Although it is generally accepted that diverse cellular responses to synthetic surfaces arise from differences in protein adsorption, the molecular mechanisms directing cellular activities are not well understood. Because focal adhesions function in mechanical and

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the Whitaker Foundation and the Georgia Tech/Emory NSF ERC on the Engineering of Living Tissues (EEC-9731643). B.G.K. was supported by an NSF Graduate Research Fellowship.

References (59)

  • A.J Garcı́a et al.

    Force required to break alpha5beta1 integrin–fibronectin bonds in intact adherent cells is sensitive to integrin activation state

    J Biol Chem

    (1998)
  • V.J Thannickal et al.

    Myofibroblast differentiation by transforming growth factor-beta1 is dependent on cell adhesion and integrin signaling via focal adhesion kinase

    J Biol Chem

    (2003)
  • S.N Stephansson et al.

    Enhanced expression of the osteoblastic phenotype on substrates that modulate fibronectin conformation and integrin receptor binding

    Biomaterials

    (2002)
  • H.R Reiske et al.

    Requirement of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase in focal adhesion kinase-promoted cell migration

    J Biol Chem

    (1999)
  • R Langer et al.

    Tissue engineering

    Science

    (1993)
  • J.M Anderson

    Biological responses to materials

    Annu Rev Mater Res

    (2001)
  • L.L Hench et al.

    Third-generation biomedical materials

    Science

    (2002)
  • D.R Jung et al.

    Topographical and physicochemical modification of material surface to enable patterning of living cells

    Crit Rev Biotechnol

    (2001)
  • A.J Garcı́a et al.

    Biomimetic surfaces for control of cell adhesion to facilitate bone formation

    Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr

    (2002)
  • F.G Giancotti et al.

    Integrin signaling

    Science

    (1999)
  • J.L Brash

    Protein adsorption at the solid-solution interface in relation to blood-material interactions

  • K.B McClary et al.

    Modulating fibroblast adhesion, spreading, and proliferation using self- assembled monolayer films of alkylthiolates on gold

    J Biomed Mater Res

    (2000)
  • C.A Scotchford et al.

    Protein adsorption and human osteoblast-like cell attachment and growth on alkylthiol on gold self-assembled monolayers

    J Biomed Mater Res

    (2002)
  • M Mrksich et al.

    Using self-assembled monolayers to understand the interactions of man- made surfaces with proteins and cells

    Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct

    (1996)
  • J.L Brash

    Exploiting the current paradigm of blood-material interactions for the rational design of blood-compatible materials

    J Biomater Sci Polym Ed

    (2000)
  • A.J Garcı́a et al.

    Modulation of cell proliferation and differentiation through substrate- dependent changes in fibronectin conformation

    Mol Biol Cell

    (1999)
  • T.L Bonfield et al.

    Cytokine and growth factor production by monocytes/macrophages on protein preadsorbed polymers

    J Biomed Mater Res

    (1992)
  • J.R Merwin et al.

    Transforming growth factor beta 1 modulates extracellular matrix organization and cell–cell junctional complex formation during in vitro angiogenesis

    J Cell Physiol

    (1990)
  • M Shen et al.

    The effects of surface chemistry and adsorbed proteins on monocyte/macrophage adhesion to chemically modified polystyrene surfaces

    J Biomed Mater Res

    (2001)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text