Elsevier

Biomaterials

Volume 30, Issue 13, May 2009, Pages 2559-2570
Biomaterials

Review
Multiscale requirements for bioencapsulation in medicine and biotechnology

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.01.014Get rights and content

Abstract

Bioencapsulation involves the envelopment of tissues or biological active substances in semipermeable membranes. Bioencapsulation has been shown to be efficacious in mimicking the cell's natural environment and thereby improves the efficiency of production of different metabolites and therapeutic agents. The field of application is broad. It is being applied in bioindustry and biomedicine. It is clinically applied for the treatment of a wide variety of endocrine diseases. During the past decades many procedures to fabricate capsules have been described. Unfortunately, most of these procedures lack an adequate documentation of the characterization of the biocapsules. As a result many procedures show an extreme lab-to-lab variation and many results cannot be adequately reproduced. The characterization of capsules can no longer be neglected, especially since new clinical trials with bioencapsulated therapeutic cells have been initiated and the industrial application of bioencapsulation is growing. In the present review we discuss novel Approached to produce and characterize biocapsules in view of clinical and industrial application. A dominant factor in bioencapsulation is selection and characterization of suitable polymers. We present the adequacy of using high-resolution NMR for characterizing polymers. These polymers are applied for producing semipermeable membranes. We present the pitfalls of the currently applied methods and provide recommendations for standardization to avoid lab-to-lab variations. Also, we compare and present methodologies to produce biocompatible biocapsules for specific fields of applications and we demonstrate how physico-chemical technologies such as FT-IR, XPS, and TOF-SIMS contribute to reproducibility and standardization of the bioencapsulation process. During recent years it has become more and more clear that bioencapsulation requires a multidisciplinary approach in which biomedical, physical, and chemical technologies are combined. For adequate reproducibility and for understanding variations in outcome of biocapsules it is advisable if not mandatory to include the characterization processes presented in this review in future studies.

Introduction

Bioencapsulation involves the envelopment of tissues or biological active substances in a semipermeable membrane to protect the enclosed biological structures for potential hazardous processes in the direct environment. The field of application of bioencapsulation is broad. In plant cell cultures [1], [2], [3], bioencapsulation has been shown to be efficacious in mimicking the cell's natural environment. Thereby bioencapsulation improves the efficiency of production of different metabolites for industrial application. For fermentation [4], [5], [6], [7], [8] bioencapsulation is being applied for enlarging the cell density, aroma and capacity of the systems. Additionally during fermentation it avoids washout of the biological catalysts from the reactor. Bioencapsulation also has a pertinent application in medicine. It is, for example, applied to protect biological active substances or cells such as probiotica to the deleterious biological environment [9], [10], [11], [12] and for delivery in specific sites such as the colon [13], [14]. A relatively large group of researchers apply bioencapsulation for the creation of a bioartificial organ [15]. In this application, therapeutic cells are encapsulated in membranes that protect the cells against antibodies and cytotoxic cells of the host immune system. This immunoisolation by encapsulation has a number of important benefits for clinical application of transplantation. First of all, it avoids the use of systemic and permanent immunosuppression. Immunosuppression has serious side effects such as a higher chance for malignancies and frequent infections. Another benefit is that encapsulation allows for successful transplantation of cells from nonhuman origin, i.e. xenografts, which could be a mean of overcoming the obstacle of limited supply of donor tissue [16]. The principal applicability of the technology has been shown for the treatment of a wide variety of endocrine diseases, including anemia [17], dwarfism [18], hemophilia B [19], kidney [20] and liver [21] failure, pituitary [22] and central nervous system insufficiencies [23], and diabetes mellitus [24].

During the past decades many procedures to fabricate capsules have been described. Unfortunately, most of these procedures are dedicated to the technology of the production process but lack an adequate documentation of the characterization of the capsule. As a result many procedures show an extreme lab-to-lab variation and many results cannot be adequately reproduced. The characterization of capsules can no longer be neglected, especially since new clinical trials with bioencapsulated therapeutic cells have been initiated [25] and the industrial application of bioencapsulation is growing. During recent years many technologies have been described to characterize capsule properties. In the present review we discuss these technologies in view of clinical and industrial applications.

Section snippets

Polymers for encapsulation

Producing a microcapsule for envelopment and protection of biologically active substances or cells starts with selection of an adequate encapsulation material. The majority of materials used in microcapsules are polymers, either naturally occurring or synthetic. A major pitfall in the field is the absence of guidelines for documentation of the characteristics of the materials applied. It is mandatory that this documentation will be included since it is now widely accepted that the

Permeability properties

Encapsulation is applied to protect the enclosed biological materials for deleterious effects of substances or processes in the immediate vicinity of the capsules. This protection is usually accomplished by restricting the diffusion of deleterious molecules by applying semipermeable membranes. The permeability of the capsules is determined by the desired control over both the size-based exclusion and the rate of diffusion of the molecules, which either have to or must not permeate the membrane.

Mechanical resistance of microcapsules

A capsule should have a sufficient mechanical resistance to withstand the various forces during the whole duration of application. Up to now, mechanical stability did not gain too much attention by the scientific community since it is technically not too advanced to increase the mechanical resistance of microcapsules. Increasing the strength and resistance of the capsules will also increase the durability of the transplant and consequently the drug release time period. However, can this be done

Surface properties of capsules

The surface properties of capsules determine the functional performance of the capsule. It is the site that is responsible for the biocompatibility and it determines the diffusion properties. Surprisingly until a few years ago the surface of the capsule only received minor attention. This has recently changed after the introduction of new physico-chemical technologies to the field [75], [76], [77], [78], [79], [80]. To illustrate the importance of the surface analysis in the field, we will

Biocompatibility of microcapsules

The design of a standard technology for measuring biocompatibility of microcapsules is a very complex and difficult task mainly due to the complicated interactions between biological systems and microcapsules. Biocompatibility issues of microcapsules are often connected with the ability of a material to perform with an appropriate host response in a specific application [82]. For encapsulation this “specific application” is dependent on the field of application. Roughly, we can distinguish two

Storage conditions for microcapsules

Storage of encapsulated cells for transport or in the time period between manufactory and application is mandatory for almost all fields of encapsulation. Determination of suitable conditions for storage of microcapsules, however, plays an underestimated role in microencapsulation research. This is rather surprising since it is broadly accepted that microcapsule characteristics and functionality are often very sensitive to environmental parameters such as temperature, humidity, osmotic

Concluding remarks

In spite of the tremendous growth of the industrial and clinical application of encapsulation in the past decade, it is still difficult if not impossible to define the requirement capsules have to meet in order to provide long-term functionality of the enveloped cells or bioactive components. For a further development of the technology and an exchange of technologies it is mandatory to standardize and define technologies that measure specific characteristics. The present review is the direct

Acknowledgement

The financial support by COST865, grants SRDA (APVV-51-033205), and VEGA 1/4452/07 is gratefully acknowledged.

References (164)

  • P. Aebischer et al.

    Functional recovery in hemiparkinsonian primates transplanted with polymer-encapsulated PC12 cells

    Exp Neurol

    (1994)
  • H. Grasdalen et al.

    A P.M.R. study of the composition and sequence of uronate residues in alginates

    Carbohydr Res

    (1979)
  • G. Montaudo et al.

    Characterization of synthetic polymers by MALDI-MS

    Progr Polym Sci

    (2006)
  • A.H. Muhr et al.

    Diffusion in gels

    Polymer

    (1982)
  • H. Uludag et al.

    Technology of mammalian cell encapsulation

    Adv Drug Deliv Rev

    (2000)
  • B. Kulseng et al.

    Alginate polylysine microcapsules as immune barrier: permeability of cytokines and immunoglobulins over the capsule membrane

    Cell Transplant

    (1997)
  • M. Brissova et al.

    Evaluation of microcapsule permeability via inverse size exclusion chromatography

    Anal Biochem

    (1996)
  • D. Lewinska et al.

    Mass transfer coefficient in characterization of gel beads and microcapsules

    J Memb Sci

    (2002)
  • G. Chen et al.

    Preparation and characterization of NaCS-CMC/PDMDAAC capsules

    Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces

    (2005)
  • T.A. Desai et al.

    Nanoporous microsystems for islet cell replacement

    Adv Drug Deliv Rev

    (2004)
  • K.E. La Flamme et al.

    Biocompatibility of nanoporous alumina membranes for immunoisolation

    Biomaterials

    (2007)
  • S.M. Chia et al.

    Multi-layered microcapsules for cell encapsulation

    Biomaterials

    (2002)
  • M.D. Darrabie et al.

    Characteristics of poly-l-ornithine-coated alginate microcapsules

    Biomaterials

    (2005)
  • G. Orive et al.

    Development and optimisation of alginate-PMCG-alginate microcapsules for cell immobilisation

    Int J Pharm

    (2003)
  • B. Thu et al.

    Alginate polycation microcapsules. I. Interaction between alginate and polycation

    Biomaterials

    (1996)
  • O. Smidsrod et al.

    Alginate as immobilization matrix for cells

    Trends Biotechnol

    (1990)
  • F. Cellesi et al.

    Towards a fully-synthetic substitute of alginate: development of a new process using thermal gelation and chemical cross-linking

    Biomaterials

    (2004)
  • J. Dusseault et al.

    Microencapsulation of living cells in semi-permeable membranes with covalently cross-linked layers

    Biomaterials

    (2005)
  • A.M. Rokstad et al.

    Cell-compatible covalently reinforced beads obtained from a chemoenzymatically engineered alginate

    Biomaterials

    (2006)
  • C. Yin et al.

    Microcapsules with improved mechanical stability for hepatocyte culture

    Biomaterials

    (2003)
  • F.A. Leblond et al.

    Quantitative method for the evaluation of biomicrocapsule resistance to mechanical stress

    Biomaterials

    (1996)
  • R.M. Hochmuth

    Micropipette aspiration of living cells

    J Biomech

    (2000)
  • I. Dulinska et al.

    Stiffness of normal and pathological erythrocytes studied by means of atomic force microscopy

    J Biochem Biophys Methods

    (2006)
  • A.R. Bausch et al.

    Measurement of local viscoelasticity and forces in living cells by magnetic tweezers

    Biophys J

    (1999)
  • P. De Vos et al.

    Long-term biocompatibility, chemistry, and function of microencapsulated pancreatic islets

    Biomaterials

    (2003)
  • S.K. Tam et al.

    Physicochemical model of alginate-poly-l-lysine microcapsules defined at the micrometric/nanometric scale using ATR-FTIR, XPS, and ToF-SIMS

    Biomaterials

    (2005)
  • P. De Vos et al.

    Alginate-based microcapsules for immunoisolation of pancreatic islets

    Biomaterials

    (2006)
  • E.A. Fournier et al.

    Biocompatibility of implantable synthetic polymeric drug carriers: focus on brain biocompatibility

    Biomaterials

    (2003)
  • M. Ricci et al.

    Ketoprofen controlled release from composite microcapsules for cell encapsulation: effect on post-transplant acute inflammation

    J Control Release

    (2005)
  • H. Reithmeier et al.

    Lipid microparticles as a parenteral controlled release device for peptides

    J Control Release

    (2001)
  • P. Blasi et al.

    Preparation and in vitro and in vivo characterization of composite microcapsules for cell encapsulation

    Int J Pharm

    (2006)
  • M.D. Blanco et al.

    Preparation of bupivacaine-loaded poly(epsilon-caprolactone) microspheres by spray drying: drug release studies and biocompatibility

    Eur J Pharm Biopharm

    (2003)
  • M. Bucko et al.

    Immobilization of a whole-cell epoxide-hydrolyzing biocatalyst in sodium alginate-cellulose sulfate-poly(methylene-co-guanidine) capsules using a controlled encapsulation process

    Enzyme Microb Technol

    (2005)
  • G.A. Junter et al.

    Immobilized viable microbial cells: from the process to the proteome em leader or the cart before the horse

    Biotechnol Adv

    (2004)
  • M. Navratil et al.

    Use of bioluminometry for determination of active yeast biomass immobilized in ionotropic hydrogels

    Anal Biochem

    (2000)
  • T.I. Zaghloul et al.

    Enhanced stability of the cloned Bacillus subtilis alkaline protease gene in alginate-immobilized B. subtilis cells

    Enzyme Microb Technol

    (2002)
  • T. Bodeutsch et al.

    The effect of immobilization on recombinant protein production in plant cell culture

    Plant Cell Rep

    (2001)
  • R.A. Shibli et al.

    Cryopreservation of plant germplasm

    Dirasat Agric Sci

    (2004)
  • K. Anjani et al.

    Survival of co-encapsulated complementary probiotics and prebiotics in yoghurt

    Milchwissenschaft

    (2004)
  • C. Iyer et al.

    Effect of co-encapsulation of probiotics with prebiotics on increasing the viability of encapsulated bacteria under in vitro acidic and bile salt conditions and in yogurt

    J Food Sci

    (2005)
  • Cited by (199)

    • Biopolymers for the development of living materials for biomedical applications

      2023, Biopolymers: Synthesis, Properties, and Emerging Applications
    • Delivery of bioencapsulated proteins

      2022, Smart Nanomaterials for Bioencapsulation
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    All authors contributed equally to this work.

    View full text